User talk:Vsatinet/QI

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! One of Lukanlukosh Islands.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good. -- Der Wolf im Wald 13:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toungesari Island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good. -- Der Wolf im Wald 13:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Днепровские ворота (надвратная церковь). Смоленск 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Pliease, check the verticals. --LexKurochkin 12:46, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment OK, thanks. Done. Vsatinet 20:41, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK now. --LexKurochkin 07:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Позднякова башня. Смоленск.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ezarate 18:42, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Смоленск. Соборная гора, вид из Заднепровья.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:08, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Церковь Николая Чудотворца, Беляева 4а, Смоленск -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Vertical perspective distortion, fixable? --F. Riedelio 07:41, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done This shot was taken with a wide-angle lens at close range, which affects the perspective. To some extent, I tried to fix it. Too aggressiv correcting of perspective distortion will look unnatural. --Vsatinet 18:07, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 06:24, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RT-64 radiotelescope.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:05, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Орудия 199-й береговой батареи. Териберка, мыс Долгий. 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:02, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sat TV dishes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 03:45, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strelna crosses the Arctic Circle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Confluence of Strelna and its tributary Berezovaya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
the rear treetops have white edges, otherwise good --Georgfotoart 12:13, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 19:31, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset on the Strelna River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:56, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strelna river 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 22:01, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strelna river 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 21:11, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strelna river 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strelna river 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 21:10, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Изба-двойня Добровольских, Витославлицы, Новгород.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments qi --Berthold Werner 15:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Часовня Кирика и Иулиты, Витославлицы, Новгород.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality. --Phyrexian 12:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Караульный дом команды путей сообщения, Новгород.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Конюшня, Витославлицы, Новгород.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 15:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Nice --FBilula 12:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Овин, Витославлицы, Новгород.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments qi --Berthold Werner 15:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good --FBilula 12:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Звонница Софийского собора, Новгородский кремль.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Дзержинского 45, Хабаровск.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Флигель усадьбы, Витославлицы, Новгород.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Кандалакша, вокзал 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit soft and maybe a bit too tight, but QI for me. --C messier 18:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 05 Большая Варзуга.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 08 Большая Варзуга, Падун.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 07 Большая Варзуга, Падун.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strelna river 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:16, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Крестовоздвиженский собор Юрьева монастыря 01, Новгород.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good --FBilula 12:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Новгород, музей «Витославлицы» 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Красный 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Новгород, Витославлицы, Успенская церковь из Курицко.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Красный 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shore of Lake Churozero.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:33, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Надвратная колокольня Юрьева монастыря, Новгород 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Новгород, музей «Витославлицы» 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Переправа в Устье Варзуги.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CCW tilt --ArildV 12:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Done. --Vsatinet 17:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 13:35, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 09 Большая Варзуга, Падун.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:13, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Новгородский кремль, башни Покровская, Кокуй и Княжая.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Slight perspective correction needed, the left towers lean slightly to the right ReneeWrites 22:20, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank. Done. --Vsatinet 07:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!  Support Good quality. ReneeWrites 11:16, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Дом А.А. Орловой-Чесменской, Витославлицы, Новгород.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 22:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Успенская церковь из Никулино, Витославлицы, Новгород.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 15:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Изба Утенковой, Витославлицы, Новгород.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 12:35, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tersky Coast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Песчаные пляжи Терского берега.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Песчаная впадает в Стрельну.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The tall trees in centre right have CA to be corrected. Otherwise good. --Tagooty 08:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I tried to do it. --Vsatinet 12:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:52, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Княжая башня, Новгородский кремль.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK QI. --PetarM 17:45, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
QI after perspective correction --Poco a poco 18:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Slightly corrected. --Vsatinet 21:32, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:15, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lion 2 by Ji Yong-Ho.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I'm afraid that there's no Freedom of panorama for this sculpture so it can be nominated for deletion in Commons --Екатерина Борисова 00:56, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By my understanding there isn't issue with Freedom of panorama in this case (Armenia Law on Copyright and Related Rights, Article 25). --Vsatinet 20:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but what about Korea which is the country of origin for the artist? Your picture is very good, but I'm still worried about FoP --Екатерина Борисова 01:36, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"County of origin of the artist" is irrelevant. The picture was taken in Armenia; if there is no FoP in Armenia then we can't show the statue without permission of the artist. --Plozessor 07:35, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If your look slightly above in this discussion you can see that there IS FoP in Armenia. --Vsatinet 08:53, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support As a result, if we can ignore Korea as the artist's country of origin, let's take a chance and assign a QI status to this image --Екатерина Борисова 17:43, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Надвратная колокольня Юрьева монастыря, Новгород 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Riad Salih 12:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Усть-Варзуга.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:51, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]