User talk:Vieux têtard

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Vieux têtard!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:D095- huien-huien ou dian-djin -liv2-ch11.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 09:20, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Licence {{PD-old}} oubliée, correction faite. --Marceau (talk) 19:37, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


your uploads from L’Homme et la Terre Tome 3

[edit]

Hi Vieux têtard, the date-entry in the image description is for the date (year) of creation of the original image. Please do not insert the date of upload or of the reproduction, but for the date of the original photography/painting/drawing/whatever, if available, Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Upload wizard insert this date, I supposed it was right. "L’Homme et la Terre" was published in 1905, it is all what I know, creation dates of the original images are not available. I use Commons as an images docking device for my contributions to French Wikisource, but rules seem to be more and more complicated, can you help me ? --Marceau (talk) 11:43, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:P383 - new-york, wall street - Liv4-Ch09.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 23:07, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merci de mʼavoir signalé cet oubli, je pense l’avoir réparé.
Quand j’entre ici, j’ai l’impression de n’avoir affaire qu’à des robots. Y-a-t’il dans ce site un humain capable de me répondre ?

--Marceau (talk) 08:05, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:FI-d281-fig. 79 - Expériences Rivers et Kræpelin - repos 30 mn.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre: Merci de m'avoir signalé cet oubli, je pense l’avoir réparé.
Je me suis fait piégé par votre nouveaux widget de catégorie, avec lequel mon extension "autofill forms" n'est pas compatible.
Quand j’entre ici, j’ai toujours l’impression de n’avoir affaire qu’à des robots (je le disais déjà en 2013).
À 70 ans passés et n'étant pas japonais, je préfère parler à un humain, mais comme vous parlez anglais et moi français, on ne risque pas de s'entendre. --Marceau (talk) 08:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann, Jean-Frédéric, VIGNERON: help? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:26, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Magog the Ogre, I'll take it from here ;)
Bonjour Marceau,
Il manquait la licence sur ce fichier. Cela me semble bon maintenant. Je ne connais pas l'extension autofill forms mais il faudrait peut-être demander à un technicien de se pencher sur ce problème de compatibilité (re Jean-Frédéric).
Si le format du message est certes automatique, son dépôt est bien fait par un humain. Et en tout temps, il ne faut pas hésitez à demander de l'aide.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@VIGNERON: Merci bien de t'en occuper. J'avais bien compris le messages du robot, mais mon anglais est trop mauvais pour répondre.
Je pense avoir fait les corrections nécessaires, mais c'est vrai que ce widget nouveau sur les catégories dans l'assistant d'importation m'a piégé.
J'ai l'habitude d'utiliser une extension FF qui rempli automatiquement les formulaires, je n'ai plus qu'à lui fournir les bonnes entrées et il fait le travail (bien pratique aussi pour Wikidata). Mais le widget le perturbe et il ne sais pas le traiter parce que c'est dynamique et il n'a plus les repères HTML habituels, du coup il fait n'importe quoi.
Il me suffit de ne pas l'utiliser sur cette case, et de remplir le nom de la catégorie à la main, c'est un gros progrès ! (bien sûr, je comprend l'utilité du widget, qui empêche de rentrer un nom de catégorie inexistant).--Marceau (talk) 11:07, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Je t'en prie.
Je ne comprends pas de quel message en anglais d'un robot tu parles, pourrais-tu préciser ? J'ai un doute, ton interface sur Commons est bien en français ?
Pour la correction (l'ajout de la licence), comme je le disais, cela semble bon.
Ok pour autofill forms je pensais que c'était une extension Mediawiki et non une extension Firefox ; du coup, je ne vois pas trop ce qui pourrait être fait.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 11:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai parlé trop vite, ce n'est pas le robot qui parle anglais, c'est celui qui l'a lancé, d'où mes difficultés à m'expliquer avec lui, heureusement qu'il y a encore quelques français pour me répondre. --Marceau (talk) 20:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cham : deux questions

[edit]

Bonjour. Je suis en train de catégoriser les différentes caricatures des albums de Charivari. J'ai notamment créé des catégories de type Category:Caricatures of the Salon of 1857. Pour poursuivre ces efforts, j'ai deux questions à te poser :

  1. N'y a-t-il pas une erreur de date pour File:Cham - Charivari - V1d137-a.png, File:Cham - Charivari - V1d137-b.png, File:Cham - Charivari - V1d137-c.png et File:Cham - Charivari - V1d137-d.png. Il me semble qu'ils concernent 1866 au lieu de 1863.
  1. A partir de File:Cham - Charivari - V1d235-fr.png l'intitulé des albums change et indique "Le Salon pour rire". Peux-tu me confirmer que c'est un intitulé moqueur qui concerne bien les salons artistiques comme les précédents ?
  • Il s'agit du titre des albums tel qu'il est dans le fac-simile, voir par exemple Page 235. Le premier volume semble dédié aux salons de peintures, les 6 suivants à venir sont plus variés. La liste qui concerne les deux premiers volumes est ici--Marceau (talk) 12:44, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merci d'avance. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:19, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question pour question : j'ai des albums dont la date n'est pas connue (par ex: "Ça vient de paraître") que puis-je mettre comme date dans ce cas ? J'avais pensé à {{inscription||type=no date}}, mais je ne suis pas sûr que ça rentre dans l'assistant d'upload.--Marceau (talk) 12:44, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Il me semble bien que tu peux mettre quand même des choses comme "unknown" ou "undetermined" et peut-être même "circa XXXX" ou "between XXXX and XXXX" ou "before XXXX" (ce qui permet au moins de valider le fait que c'est suffisamment ancien). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:22, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

[edit]

Dear Vieux têtard,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)