User talk:VízPart

PANONIAN Sockpuppet Investigation

Status: open • view • edit • history • watch
Filed: 02:54, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

• PANONIAN (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Suspected sockpuppets of PANONIAN

• PANONIAN (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• SlovenskoSlovákom (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Evidence for sockpuppeting of PANONIAN

The obvious sockpuppet of PANONIAN was created exactly at a time when sockpupeteer PANONIAN was blocked for 1 day on march 10. See the block log of PANONIAN 14:18, 10 March 2010, blocked PANONIAN with an expiry time of 1 day (account creation disabled) ‎(Disruptive editing: Edit warring) , the block on march 10. And now see the creation of the sockpuppet SlovenskoSlovákom 20:08, 10 March 2010 SlovenskoSlovákom New user account. Less than six hours after PANONIAN's block, the sockpuppet is created and reverts exactly the same edits as PANONIAN was blocked for. Including on the Atlas of World War II [1]. Reverting to the same version PANONIAN did. Please block the sockpuppet indefinitely and the sockpuppet master as well, PANONIAN. Thank you for your assistance regarding this CheckUser request. The sockpuppet even mentions PANONIAN in this edit "page edited by panonian is more balanced" Also there is clear block evasion is going on with regards to PANONIAN. It seems that altough attempting to misrepresent a Slovak before the sockpuppeting was revealed it is in fact proved that SlovenskoSlovakom edits from Serbia and is in fact the sock and or meatpuppet of user PANONAIN. Therefore this request is for dual purposes, the investigation thus far was conducted by Martin H., but he shows no further interest in the case, so the case should be finished and closed and the sockpuppet and the sockmaster still needs to be blocked. And it does not matter if it is a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet really what is clear that the account is opened during the block of PANONAIAN immidiately reverting the same edits he were blocked for therefore the express purpose of the sockpuppeting is to evade the block. If someone is interested in investigating further and handling the sock, any help is welcome. Another proof is that PANONIAN says his block is not a problem. OF COURSE it is not when there is a sockpuppet immidiately appearing to do the reverts, and dirty work. OF COURSE the block is not a problem for him as he can create an unlimited supply of sockpuppets. VízPart (talk) 03:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Talk page usage

The PANONIAN discussion above is not appropriate for a talk page. Please see COM:TALK for guidance. Please place it in User talk:VízPart/PANONIAN or someplace similar and link to it from your talk page. Also, the guideline suggests that you "archive rather than delete" when your page gets full. You deleted the notice from PeterSymonds.[2] This is permitted, but is not encouraged. Your edit history contains summaries like "undoing sock/meatpuppet (admitted) of PANONIAN".[3] Please desist. If you can't work on a topic without commenting on your fellow editors, take a break and work on other subjects. Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Note: Please know that requests for checkusers must be filed at COM:RFCU. Tiptoety ^talk 00:03, 13 April 2010 (UTC)