User talk:Urban~commonswiki/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Image Tagging Image:Bernalheightsaerial.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bernalheightsaerial.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Cecil 13:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Govtctr.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Govtctr.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Cecil 13:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Digital-elevation-map-california3.GIF
Thanks for uploading Image:Digital-elevation-map-california3.GIF. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Kelly 15:54, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:LEHAVRE11JUIN06 006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 17:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:LEHAVRE11JUIN06 008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Cecil (talk) 17:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
I saw you improved the categories on some of the images I've submitted, like Image:San Francisco Ferry Building.jpg. I've never quite got the hang of figuring out categories so usually my categorization is a bit lame. Thanks for making them a lot better! --JaGa (talk) 19:27, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Balmy Alley Mission SF2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
-Daniel Case (talk) 05:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
This applies to the other four, too. Daniel Case (talk) 05:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Indianapolis_USA2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
194.32.215.11 02:44, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:LA County Museum CA1.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-Sorry about this, carol (talk) 09:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Albuquerque skyline from se.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Anonymous101 talk 10:47, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Power_plant_by_douglas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 13:39, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | File:Alaska_Yukon_Pacific_Exposition_-_Rainier_Vista.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
DrKiernan (talk) 14:09, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 06:16, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:St.Patrick's Cathedral NYC4.jpg is uncategorized since 27 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:16, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Colorado Plateaus map2.jpg is uncategorized since 8 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:20, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:EscalanteMap90MYA.jpg is uncategorized since 8 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:20, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Britton Hill Florida.jpg is uncategorized since 8 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:20, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Sitting Room at Tampa Bay Hotel.jpg is uncategorized since 19 March 2009.
- Image:Palazzo Spada cortile d'onore2.JPG was uncategorized on 29 August 2009.
- Image:Ancient Roman bust in the Musei Capitolini.JPG was uncategorized on 29 August 2009.
- Image:Palazzo Spada cortile d'onore14.JPG was uncategorized on 29 August 2009.
- Image:Palazzo Spada cortile d'onore1.JPG was uncategorized on 29 August 2009.
- Image:BigbendFla.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fontenay16.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fontenay18.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Ecluse François Ier.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fontenay32.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fontenay14.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fontenay27.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fontenay25.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fontenay31.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fontenay19.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fontenay17.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fontenay26.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fontenay24.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Seals SF 23.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Mojave desert map.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Fecamp.ogg was uncategorized on 26 October 2009.
- Image:NYH gna41074 5.jpg was uncategorized on 29 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:24, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Mississippi bassin fr.png was uncategorized on 15 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 06:19, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
File tagging Image:Eagle Lake Adirondacks New York.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Eagle Lake Adirondacks New York.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Eagle Lake Adirondacks New York.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Aside from the lack of specific source, why is there a copyright information when the license is claimed to be GFDL? Benedict (aka Redjar) is also on the project, and does not seem to have release this photo of his here under GFDL or CC. Jappalang (talk) 01:30, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Badlands_National_Park_Landscape.jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Badlands_National_Park_Landscape.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Badlands_National_Park_Landscape.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
ChristianBier (talk) 22:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Olympicparkloc.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Olympicparkloc.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Olympicparkloc.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
ChristianBier (talk) 04:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Image information
It seems you uploaded this image. Would you be able to fill in all the "Unknown" information? Thanks. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 21:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- A caption in French would be nice as well. :-) ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 21:39, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
File:WashingtonDC Capitol USA1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 10:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
File:LePenseur_Palace_of_the_legion_of_honor_San-Francisco.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoboudv (talk) 06:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
File:LEHAVRE11JUIN06 027.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Coyau (talk) 14:41, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Buildings by Auguste Perret in France has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Coyau (talk) 16:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Indianapolis USA2.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Indianapolis USA2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Indianapolis USA2.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
--Leoboudv (talk) 05:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
File:Quincy Market 11 Boston MA USA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Leoboudv (talk) 06:54, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
File:Sf_Ferry_Building.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rob (talk) 07:11, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Tes images du Satyre verseur
Coucou Urban. Ma question porte sur deux de tes images prises au British Museum et qui représentent le Satyre verseur (File:British Museum84.jpg et File:London 185.jpg). J'aimerais les retailler pour supprimer la partie unile (les rayonnages) et ajouter un peu de contraste. Est-ce que ça te convient si j'importe l'image modifiée par-dessus la tienne ou est-ce que tu préfères que je l'importe sous un nouveau nom ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 12:00, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- je préfère que tu l'importes sous un nouveau nom stp --Urban (talk) 04:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Central Park NewYork24.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Leoboudv (talk) 04:28, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Silverton1 Colorado.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--*Please read my message in this DR. I had to "pass" 8 images you uploaded on an unfree license in 2005. Imagine that. Luckily I knew the flickr owner a little or else she could have sued Wikipedia. Leoboudv (talk) 06:48, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
File:House Laurens South Carolina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Leoboudv (talk) 09:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Old courthouse Laurens South Carolina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Leoboudv (talk) 09:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
File:PresbytarianChurch Laurens South Carolina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Leoboudv (talk) 19:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Watts-Todd-Dunklin_House_Laurens_SoutCarolina_USa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
64.141.83.253 21:23, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Laurens SoutCarolina USa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Leoboudv (talk) 23:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Governor'sHouse Williamsburg Virginia USA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Leoboudv (talk) 05:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Petroglyphs Hohokam Arizona.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 06:41, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Ventura California USA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Leoboudv (talk) 10:26, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Topeka Kansas USA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Leoboudv (talk) 10:17, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Montpelier Vermont USA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Leoboudv (talk) 05:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Mount Mansfield Vermont USA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Leoboudv (talk) 05:28, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Kings Canyon California2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Leoboudv (talk) 05:27, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Kings Canyon California1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Leoboudv (talk) 06:05, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Great Salt Lake Utah USA2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 20:27, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Great Salt Lake Utah USA5.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 20:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Great Salt Lake Utah USA8.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 00:18, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- NOTE: If you pay attention to the flickr license, the image will pass flickr review. If not it is a copy vio. These are 3 images I uploaded today:
Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:55, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Hovenweep NM UTah USA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 05:18, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Institute of Art Chicago USA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 05:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Lake Tahoe California1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 05:56, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
File tagging Image:SF comté1.gif
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:SF comté1.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:SF comté1.gif]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jodo (talk) 21:19, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Paul Revere's House Boston MA USA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Sacramento Bridge California.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 05:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Fort Lauderdale Florida aerial1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 19:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Phoenix aerial Arizona USA1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 19:31, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Miami Downtown aerial Florida USA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 19:33, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Presidio SantaBarbara California.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 07:59, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Redwood City CourtHouse California USa.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 10:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
File:PointReyes California.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 05:30, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Panama City Beach Florida USA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 05:55, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
File:SheddAquarium Chicago.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 06:28, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Jordan Pond Acadia National Park Maine USA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 23:21, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
File:SaltLakeCity Utah USA1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 02:30, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Jordan Pond Acadia National Park Maine USA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
ShakataGaNai ^_^ 03:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Montgomery Capitole Alabama USA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 05:15, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Rookery Building Hall Chicago USA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Leoboudv (talk) 09:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 06:32, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Template:Copyvionote/layout --Leoboudv (talk) 00:28, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Template:Copyvionote/layout --Leoboudv (talk) 00:54, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 00:58, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 01:02, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 01:18, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 07:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 19:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 09:55, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 08:58, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 04:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 06:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 06:40, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 06:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 19:33, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Another copyright violation by Urban sadly. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 07:03, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 07:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 06:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 06:10, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 06:13, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 09:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 20:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 20:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 00:35, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 01:20, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 07:41, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 06:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Leoboudv (talk) 06:07, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Hi Urban. Instead of the files getting nominated one by one I nominated the (hopefully) last 17 images. --MGA73 (talk) 20:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate--malo (talk) 00:10, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslatemalo (talk) 22:03, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Please help replace this outdated license
Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license Template:Tl. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding Template:Tl if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
- File:Santa Barbara mission CA1.jpg
- File:PhoenixdowntownArizonaUSA.jpg
- File:Delaware river at new hope USA.jpg
- File:Climat Annaba Algerie.png
- File:Clinton House In Ithaca NY.jpg
- File:Location Of Ithaca New York.gif
- File:Nouvelleorleans1.jpg
BotMultichillT 21:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Frédéric (talk) 19:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Template:AutotranslateTeofilo (talk) 14:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate —innotata 20:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate ---Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 01:27, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate 174.109.103.21 00:14, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Wknight94 talk 12:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Kelly (talk) 23:27, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:18, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate VernoWhitney (talk) 13:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --ARTEST4ECHO talk 15:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --ARTEST4ECHO talk 15:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Nyttend (talk) 22:58, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Grcampbell (talk) 06:07, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate —Ashanda (talk) 15:53, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate – Adrignola talk 22:19, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Missvain (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Kramer Associates (talk) 04:41, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Dlarsonarts (talk) 03:31, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Denniss (talk) 09:11, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Stefan4 (talk) 19:51, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 19:59, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Using one of your pictures in a textbook
I would like to include your picture of the Fontaine des Innocents relief (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Goujon1.jpg) in a textbook. Because this is print (I can't hyperlink to the page), I wondered if you would like to add any other information to the credits, such as name/city/URL/whatever. I can be contacted at thechabon a a t hotm ail do o ot com. Thanks for uploading that picture. Iiiiaaaa (talk) 15:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Plan du Havre
Bonjour,
Merci pour votre plan du Havre.
J'en ai réalisé une version alternative, File:Plan de la ville du Havre.png, qui utilise des couleurs un peu plus sobres et une police plus lisible pour les plans, Segoe UI.
Quelle version souhaitez-vous privilégier dans les nombreux articles utilisant cette carte ? --Dereckson (talk) 09:52, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Smooth_O (talk) 12:51, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Rd232 (talk) 05:07, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Nathan Johnson (talk) 14:56, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
And also:
- File:New Mexico Landscape.jpg
- File:New Mexico Landscape2.jpg
- File:Pueblo Bonito USA.jpg
- File:Pueblo Bonito USA 2.jpg
- File:Yosemite snow 1.jpg
Yours sincerely, AFBorchert (talk) 19:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate 95.49.18.141 18:41, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Denniss (talk) 19:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
ArchiveBot
Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:35, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Urban. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Urban~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
23:17, 17 March 2015 (UTC)