User talk:Un naturaliste du Midi

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Un naturaliste du Midi!

-- 21:01, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Camargue8806DiaMeyerChistianA.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kersti (talk) 16:15, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lusitano010604NimesFrMeyerChristianD.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Kersti (talk) 16:16, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, J'ai enlevé le bandeau correspondant. Cordialement Un naturaliste du Midi (talk) 18:12, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Pinto0310Grau30MeyerChristianB.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kersti (talk) 16:18, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, J'ai enlevé le bandeau correspondant. Cordialement Un naturaliste du Midi (talk) 18:10, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use

[edit]

You cannot prohibit commercial use for images at Wikimedia Commons. See the outcome of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pinto0310Grau30MeyerChristianB.JPG. Therefore the files with contradictory language have been removed. – Adrignola talk 18:36, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:VerbascumThapsus070527LesVansMeyerChristianD.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Acather96 (talk) 16:22, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]

Helix lucorum

[edit]

Désolé du retard de la réponse. Nous confirmons la détermination: l'image est bien celle d'un Helix lucorum. Le sens des stries, contrairement à ce que vous aviez lu, ne fait pas référence. Bonne Journée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:52, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merci d'être plus explicite. Quelles différences morphologiques y-a-t-il entre les coquilles de l’escargot turc (Helix lucorum) et de l’escargot de Bourgogne (Helix pomatia) ? Un naturaliste du Midi (talk) 19:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Rapportez vous aux deux articles référents sur wikipédia France qui sont bien documentés. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Vous dites "Le sens des stries, contrairement à ce que vous aviez lu, ne fait pas référence." mais j'ai lu dans l'article sur l’escargot turc auquel vous me renvoyez : "on peut la différencier grâce à ses rayures dans le sens longitudinal de la coquille. L'escargot de Bourgogne a lui des rayures perpendiculaires à la coquille." Merci d'être plus explicite. Un naturaliste du Midi (talk) 05:35, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
L'article est corrigé. Si vous étés professionnel vous pouvez contacter notre conservateur en Zoologie au MHNT qui est prévenu de votre demande. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merci j’ai retrouvé un livre sur les escargots et corrigé la fiche "escargot turc" sur le Wiktionnaire.

Bird identification

[edit]

Hi. Discussion of the identification of a bird in a photo you changed the description of is ongoing here.   — Jeff G. ツ 17:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:62Berck-HopMar130426MeyerCh.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MKFI (talk) 12:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]