User talk:Ulaisaeva

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ulaisaeva!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Ulaisaeva,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Ulaisaeva,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:21, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Russia is open!

Здравствуйте! с 1 по 30 июня проходит российская часть международного фотоконкурса "Вики любит Землю". Приглашаем вас принять участие в конкурсе, чтобы помочь нам лучше проиллюстрировать вики-статьи, пополнить крупнейшую в стране коллекцию изображений российских природных объектов и побороться за призы.

С правилами конкурса и списком охраняемых природных территорий России можно ознакомиться здесь. Мы также будем рады ответить на ваши вопросы.

С уважением,
организаторы конкурса. 14:56, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

(Вы получили это сообщение, поскольку участвовали в предыдущих конкурсах "Вики любит Землю")

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Коломенское 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Воронцово 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 14:34, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Царь пушка 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 09:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Подсолнечник 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hwwo 16:41, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Звонница Софийского собора Великий Новгород 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:11, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Парк Сокольники 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hwwo 16:41, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Дворец Кусково.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Mind adding a category to describe the plaque (perhaps "Plaques in Moscow"?) Otherwise good quality and happy to promote. --S.Hinakawa 18:08, 24 June 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --S.Hinakawa 18:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Пион обыкновенный Махровый 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:14, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Пион обыкновенный Махровый 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:43, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Клумба в парке Сокольники 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:14, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Сад-сиренгарий на Щелковском шоссе 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good but a close-up of the flower requires it to be identified --Poco a poco 20:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)  Support Is identified in category. Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 19:23, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Крокусы под снегом.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you add a category for the plant? --Blood Red Sandman 00:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)  Support Looks like they did. Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 19:23, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Сад-сиренгарий на Щелковском шоссе 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little noisy, but quality for me high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:16, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Сад-сиренгарий на Щелковском шоссе 116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (a bit soft but still fine for me) --Domob 07:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Сад-сиренгарий на Щелковском шоссе 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Сад-сиренгарий на Щелковском шоссе 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Сад-сиренгарий на Щелковском шоссе 130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Сад-сиренгарий на Щелковском шоссе 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Сад-сиренгарий на Щелковском шоссе 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful image and good quality -- Spurzem 18:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Клумба в парке Сокольники 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really pretty, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Клумба в парке Сокольники.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 03:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Коломенское 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. could be taken in a little better angle. but its a quality one --Augustgeyler 07:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Распускаются почки сирени 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Третьяковская галерея Люстра.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Ulaisaeva,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

«Вікі любіць фальклёр-2021»

Запрашэньне да ўдзелу ў «Вікі любіць фальклёр-2021» Паважаны вікімэдыец! Ад імя ўдзельніц і ўдзельнікаў спаборніцтва «Вікі любіць фальклёр-2021» маем гонар запрасіць Вас да супрацы.

--User:W 10:30, 4 лютага 2021 (UTC+3) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 93.84.188.66 (talk) 07:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Сушильня и каретный сарай 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I would recommend to crop the scaffold out. --Ermell 20:51, 26 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:11, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Клумба в парке Сокольники 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Главный ботанический сад 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 23:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Дворец царя Алексея Михайловича Люстры 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 09:40, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Государственный музей А.С. Пушкина 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:57, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Дом, где жил архитектор-реставратор Спегальский Ю.П. табличка.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:24, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Крутицкий казенный приказ 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:24, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ансамбль Ярославова Дворища и древнего Торга 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:24, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

как номинировать качественное изображение на избранное изображение? Ulaisaeva (talk) 15:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Сирень 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Description in English would be great. --Tournasol7 09:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Главный ботанический сад 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Дверь 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Усадьба Царицыно Люстра в Екатерининском зале.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Сирень 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 17:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Салтыковский лесопарк 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Салтыковский лесопарк 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)  Oppose for now. IMO a good photo, but misidentified. C. vulgare has got spiny, winged stems up to the flower heads and different involucral bracts. This might be Cirsium arvense instead. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)  Support Alright, the category was corrected and I reverse my vote. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Главный вход фрагмент 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Центральный павильон (главный) фрагмент 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:31, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Прохоровы ограда фрагмент.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Сушильня и каретный сарай фрагмент.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:23, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Голландский домик 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:21, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Ulaisaeva,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Щербаков.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Щербаков.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Щербаков.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Krd 05:46, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 21:53, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SkоrP²⁴ 07:55, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Филимонова 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Памятник Габдулле Тукаю Казань.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 04:47, 8 August 2024 (UTC)