User talk:Trollhead

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Trollhead!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

File tagging File:Bier_und_Burgenstraße_Verlauf.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bier_und_Burgenstraße_Verlauf.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

GeorgHH • talk 13:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Trollhead!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Brose Geschäftsentwicklung (2004-2008).jpg was uncategorized on 17 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Brose Umsatz nach Geschäftsbereichen (2009).jpg was uncategorized on 17 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Brose Mitarbeiter nach Kontinenten.jpg was uncategorized on 17 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Bullaresjöarna.jpg was uncategorized on 8 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Bydgeträsket.jpg was uncategorized on 8 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Iddefjord.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:52, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Överuman.jpg was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:58, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Burgkunstadter Martern II.jpg was uncategorized on 25 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Steinerne Hochzeit (Gasthof) Kordigast.jpg was uncategorized on 14 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:29, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Landser_Fan.jpg

File:Landser_Fan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Isderion (talk) 09:31, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Iddefjord.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Iddefjord.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Iddefjord.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 23:47, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- Mir doch egal ob das gelöscht wird oder nicht, Quelle ist angegeben und wenn euch das nicht passt und ihr wollt, dass das Bild gelöscht wird dann macht das. Ich weiß wie der Fjord aussieht, aber wenn ihr das anderen verweigern wollt nur zu - So wächst Commons und Wikipedia ! Klasse Arbeit !

File:Ajka red mud spread 08.09.2010.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:00, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Ajka red mud spread 08.09.2010.jpg

File:Ajka red mud spread 08.09.2010.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Alexrk2 (talk) 15:29, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tjängvide_image_stone.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tjängvide_image_stone.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Tjängvide_image_stone.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 17:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Jonsbok_Law_Codex.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Jonsbok_Law_Codex.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jonsbok_Law_Codex.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Polarlys (talk) 17:45, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alter, dreidimensionaler Kram :)

Hallo Trollhead! Du kannst unter PD-art keine modernen Photos alter dreidimensionaler Objekte hochladen, egal wie lange die ursprünglichen Urheber schon tot sind. Ein Photo eines aufgeklappten Buches, einer Skulptur oder gar einer Schriftrolle/eines vom Alter gezeichneten Pergamentes ist wie jedes andere moderne Photo zu händeln: Wenn keine Freigabe vom Photographen, so kann es hier nicht verwendet werden. Viele Grüße, --Polarlys (talk) 17:49, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich muss dir da leider wiedersprechen. Zuersteinmal habe ich das Foto des aufgeschlagenen Buches gar nicht gemacht, bzw. ursprünglich hochgeladen. Ich habe mich lediglich an einer Farbkorrektur des grauenhaften Ursprungsbildes versucht. Zu diesem Bild kann ich also keinerlei Aussagen in Bezug auf Quelle, UH, etc. machen. Aber um dieses soll es jetzt auch nicht gehen. Ich bin der Meinung, dass der Scan des Bildsteines rechtmäßig hier auf Commons ist, das es mit den Anforderungen von PD-ART konform ist.

Das Bild zeigt einen gotländischen Bildstein. Prinzipiell ist ist der Stein an sich dreidimensional, dieser ist jedoch nicht abgebildet. Zu sehen ist lediglich die künstlerische Arbeit auf dem Stein, in direkter Draufsicht. Es ist also ein zweidimensionales Kunstwerk (wie ein Bild auf Leinwand) und stellt als bloße (2D) Abfotografie keinen schöpferischen Mehrwert dar, der Urheberrechtlich schützbar wäre.

An dreidimensionale Kunstwerke stellt die PD-ART Vorlage folgende Anforderungen:

When a photograph demonstrates originality (typically, through the choice of framing, lighting, point of view and so on), it qualifies for copyright even if the photographed subject is itself uncopyrighted. This is typically the case for photographs of three-dimensional objects, hence the rule of thumb that "2D is OK, 3D is not".

ALLE AUFGEFÜHRTEN ASPEKTE TREFFEN NICHT AUF DAS BILD DES BILDSTEINES ZU !!!

Orginalität vorhanden? Nein

Besondere Einrahmung? Nein

Besondere Beleuchtung? Nein

Besondere Ansicht? Nein

=> Keine Schützbarkeit der Abfotografie.

Wann darf man also PD-ART verwenden?

[If] the Commons file is a copy of a photograph taken by someone other than the uploader; and [If] the photograph was a mere record copy (a faithful reproduction) of a two-dimensional work of art which is itself in the public domain.

=> Auch das trifft beides auf den Scan zu.

Insofern bitte ich dich den Schnelllöschantrag zu entfernen, da die Datei in ALLEN Punkten Commons-konform ist. Wenn das Bild des Buches gelöscht werden würde wäre das zwar schade, aber es betrifft mich nicht. Lg, --Trollhead (talk) 18:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Der Stein ist nicht platt, alle Randpartien der Abbildung sind bereits die Seiten des Steines, eine „direkte Draufsicht“ wie beim Scan einer Buchseite ist nicht gegeben. Wenn du dir andere Abbildungen anguckt, bspw http://courses.cit.cornell.edu/hist320/Images/Gotland_stone743%5B1%5D.jpg oder http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/74/Tj%C3%A4ngvide.jpg fällt dir auf, dass eine rein technische Reproduktion mit identischen Ergebnissen offnbar nicht erfolgte und die Reproduktion von Standpunkt der Photographen und Ausleuchtung abhängig ist. --Polarlys (talk) 18:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Falls du den Betonsockel unten meinst, der wurde vermutlich angegossen, um den Stein besser ausstellen zu können. Wenn es dir um die Beleuchtung geht, dann sollte das auch kein Problem sein, da das Aufstellen eines Scheinwerfers vor einen Stein nicht wirklich Orginalität darstellt. ([...] demonstrates originality [...] through the choice of [...] lighting [...] ) Der Stein ist einfach heller angestrahlt, als auf den anderen Bildern, was dem Fotografen aber noch lange keine Urheberrechtschaft zuweißt. Der Standpunkt des Fotografen, ist übrigens genau das, was meine Rechtfertigungen ermöglicht. Der Stein ist absolut zweidimensional dargestellt.

Wenn du übrigens so argumentieren möchtest, dann sollten wir z.B. dieses Bild: [1] auch gleich löschen, da es noch weit weniger zweidimensional ist als mein Scan und nur von einer Website stammt. Wir könnten auf dieser Basis wohl noch hunderte weitere Bilder löschen, die alle klitzekleine dreidimensionale Stellen/Bereiche aufweißen, im Allgemeinen jedoch zweidimensional sind. Lass und das Thema abschließen, du kannst dich in der gewonnenen Zeit mit der Verbesserung der WP beschäftigen, ich kann das, das Bild kann es auch, indem es einfach online steht, und jeder ist dann glücklich. Es gäbe da wirklich weit wichtigere und gravierenderere Datein mit möglicher UHV zu besprechen. Aber dieses ist OK! --Trollhead (talk) 18:52, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte reagiere doch nicht so aufgebracht. Bspw. werden hier nahezu täglich Bilder von Vasenausschnitten u.ä. gelöscht, die auf deine Weise hochgeladen worden sind, aber letztlich trotz des visuellen Eindrucks keine Reproduktionen zweidimensionaler Objekte sind. User:Bibi Saint-Pol zeichnet sich dafür verantwortlich und seine Löschanträge werden ohne Murren und in Einklang mit den Projekt-Guidelines ausgeführt. Ich frage ihn mal um seine Meinung, er hat da hinreichend Erfahrung. Grüße, --Polarlys (talk) 19:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC) PS: User_talk:Bibi_Saint-Pol#File:Tj.C3.A4ngvide_image_stone.jpg[reply]

Ich meine das ja nicht persönlich gegen dich. Mich nervt nur allgemein immer diese Bürokratiek*cke. Ich weiß, dass man keine UHVs machen soll, ich lade auch keine Bilder hoch, die offensichtliche UHVs sind. Alle Löschinfos hier auf meiner Disk waren allesamt Streifälle, bzw. Willkür von Einzelnen (keine Lösch-Disk, etc.) Ich halte mich schon an die Regeln, ich find Wikipedia auch wirklich klasse, und beteilige mich viel. Aber wenn manches hier so mitbekomme, dann weis ich auch, warum z.B. beim 10 Jahre WP Artikel in der Zeit so etwas drin stand wie <sum up>[...]aber neue Mitglieder kommen immer seltender dazu, bleiben meist auch nur kurz, und steigen dann wieder aus, weil die Wikipedia einfach zu kompliziert ist und Neulingen gegenüber zu unfreundlich und kompliziert ist.</sum up> --Trollhead (talk) 19:14, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ziel ist es, freie Dateien zur Verfügung zu stellen. Dafür bedarfs es a) einiger Regeln und b) jedermenge Pflege. Wir haben jeden Tag hunderte neue Urheberrechtsverletzungen, viele aus Unwissenheit, genug aus Vorsatz. Wir präsentieren unseren Nutzern Dateien, die „frei“ sein sollen. Das geht mit Verantwortung einher, denn wenn man unseren Angaben nicht glauben kann, ist das Projektziel gescheitert. Uns erreichen regelmäßig Aufforderungen, Dateien zu entfernen, weil die irgendwo gegen den Willen des Rechteinhabers entnommen und teils unter falschen Angaben hochgeladen worden sind. Das Problem ist also von praktischem Interesse. Die Quintessenz vieler Berichterstattung in den Tagen war ein wenig folgende: Das Projekt ist immer komplizierte geworden und man kommt kaum noch rein. Die Anforderungen sind definitiv gewachsen, aber woran liegt das? Nun, unsere Inhalte sind höherwertiger als vor 7 Jahren als ich anfing, viele Lemmata sind besetzt und es bedarf ausgeprägten Fachwissens, um manche Artikel zu ergänzen. Über die Jahre wurde jede Menge Navigationselemente, Software-Features, etc. eingeführt, weil Nutzer das wollten und es ja letztlich auch dem Leser i.d.R. dienen mag. Genauso war es mit den Regeln: Ein paar Unbedarfte fingen an, dann kam juristische Expertise zu. Dann wollten Nutzer Inhalte einstellen, die weder selbstgemacht noch uralt sind. Dann wurde nach rechtlichen Grundlagen für Ausnahmen gesucht und diese wurden in Regeln verankert. Wenn du heute ein einfaches Amon-Amarth-Cover hochladen kannst, ist das Ergebnis dieses Prozesses. Die Auffassungen gehen jedoch teils berechtigt auseinander und so gibt es immer wieder Auseinandersetzungen in Grenzfällen. Das erachte ich nicht als sonderlich schlimm, es ist einfach die Evolution dieses Projektes (und ja, es kann einen furchtbar nerven). Wie schon gesagt bist du bspw. mit dem Cover ein Nutznießer der komplizierten Regelungen. Kommt nun ein Neuling und lädt ein x-beliebiges Cover hoch, so wird dieses aus gutem Grund gelöscht werden. Ihn frustriert das, weil er anderswo ja auch „ein Cover“ gesehen hat und er die Regeln nicht kennt und nicht versteht. Folglich spricht er von „Bürokratie“ und macht sie im schlimmstem Fall dem Projekt zum Vorwurf und hängt sie an die große Glocke, wo es oft so dargestellt wird, als wären all die Regeln nur aus Selbstzweck einem „inneren Kreis“ entsprungen, um irgendwelche Leute zu frustrieren und elitären Dünkel beibehalten zu können. In meinen Augen ist genau das Gegenteil der Fall: Die Regeln sind Ausdruck einer komplexen Wirklichkeit, die von zahlreichen Einzelpersonen über die Jahre an das Projekt herangetragen wurde, worauf dieses im Rahmen des Projektziels Möglichkeiten schuf, die Wünsche zu integrieren. Grüße, --Polarlys (talk) 19:43, 20 January 2011 (UTC) PS: Lass uns jetzt mal die Aussage von Bibi Saint Pol abwarten. Dann kann man immer noch den Antrag entfernen oder einen regulären LA draus machen. --Polarlys (talk) 19:43, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, das stimmt, was du da sagst, überwiegend muss ich dir auch zustimmen. Wie du vll. gemerkt hast, kenn ich mich doch relativ vernünftig hier im ganzen WP-Universum aus, so dass es mich nicht mehr wirklich schockiert und/oder überrascht, wenn jemand mit einem (S)LA kommt. Du bist von deiner Arbeit und deiner Entscheidung überzeugt, ich bin es von meiner; die Wahrheit liegt wohl irgendwo dazwischen. Ja, warten wir mal ab, was Bibi dazu sagt. Wie schon gesagt, ich bin dir jetzt auch nicht böse oder so, und ich mein das alles auch nicht persönlich, aber wie du es auch gesagt hast, manchmal nervt es einfach nur. In diesem Fall habe ich z.B. 7,50€ (für einen Schüler/Studenten doch schon etwas Geld) für eine Zeitung gezahlt, die mich zwar schon ziemlich interresiert; der Kaufentschluss fiel aber erst, als ich gesehen habe, wie viele tolle alte Bilder da drin sind, mit denen sich in der WP einige Artikel hervorragend bebildern lassen. Dazu kam dann nocheinmal rund 20-25 Minuten das Bild zu scannen, beschneiden, digital zu verbesern (Farbe, Helligkeit, Kontrast optimiert) und hochzuladen. Das hört sich zwar alles vielleicht trivial an, aber irgendwie freut man sich dann eben, wenn das Endergebniss dann da ist, und es jeder sehen kann. Um so mehr nervt es dann eben, wenn jemand das wieder löschen will. Ich denke du weißt, was ich meine ;) Lg, --Trollhead (talk) 20:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

??? Was ist dass den für ein Mist? Die Datei wurde ja schon gelöscht. Ich dachte, wir wollten abwarten... --Trollhead (talk) 20:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, hab ich auch gerade gesehen und mit der Bitte um mehrtägiges Abwarten zum Einholen weiterer Meinungen wiederherstellt. --Polarlys (talk) 20:09, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, das kann ich verstehen, mir ging es bei einigen Artikel so. Eine weitere Perspektive ist wohl aber auch die des Verlages, der Geld für die Nutzung eines Photos bezahlt hat und er nicht zu einer sehr freizügigen Auslegung des Rechtes neigt, wenn es um einen eher grenzwertigen Fall geht, oder die eines Photographen, der damit Geld verdient. Grüße, --Polarlys (talk) 20:13, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mh, also neben mir waren jetzt zwei weitere Nutzer der dargestellten Meinung, sowohl der löschende Admin als auch unser Plastik- und Vasen-Experte. --Polarlys (talk) 23:02, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Du meinst FÜR Löschen? Warum gibt es hier eigentlich keine richtigen LDs wie in der de-WP? --Trollhead (talk) 06:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Es gibt durchaus "LDs", aber nur wenn die Angelegenheit nicht Schnelllöschungs-Material ist. Die Vorlage {{Delete}} führt zu einer LD. --Túrelio (talk) 17:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anders_Behring_Breivik_in_diving_suit_with_gun_(self_portrait).jpg

File:Anders_Behring_Breivik_in_diving_suit_with_gun_(self_portrait).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hemshaw (talk) 23:42, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anders_Behring_Breivik_in_black_suit_(self_portrait).jpg

File:Anders_Behring_Breivik_in_black_suit_(self_portrait).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wutsje (talk) 11:34, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anders Behring Breivik in military uniform (self portrait).jpg

File:Anders Behring Breivik in military uniform (self portrait).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wiki13 talk 16:31, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prisoner map of KZ Flossenbürg.JPG

File:Prisoner map of KZ Flossenbürg.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 19:04, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ed Hardy Beer.jpg

File:Ed Hardy Beer.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 19:46, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Glenfiddich bottle.JPG

And also:

File:Glenlivet bottle.JPG

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teilansichten von Hainweiher (1920).jpg

File:Teilansichten von Hainweiher (1920).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Berthold Werner (talk) 06:43, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danegeld.jpg

File:Danegeld.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 01:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:4lyn Mach1 Festival 2008.jpg

File:4lyn Mach1 Festival 2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2003:C5:5F34:9900:9483:4879:56C0:2506 10:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Richard Wettstein (1927).jpg

File:Richard Wettstein (1927).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Matr1x-101^{Pinging me doesn't hurt!} {user - talk? - useless contributions} 11:08, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Emanuel Zaufal.jpg

Yours sincerely, Notrealname1234 (talk) 01:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Trollhead

Contents

File tagging File:Bier_und_Burgenstraße_Verlauf.jpg

Tip: Categorizing images

File:Landser_Fan.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Iddefjord.jpg

File:Ajka red mud spread 08.09.2010.jpg

File:Ajka red mud spread 08.09.2010.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tjängvide_image_stone.jpg

File tagging File:Jonsbok_Law_Codex.jpg

Alter, dreidimensionaler Kram :)

File:Anders_Behring_Breivik_in_diving_suit_with_gun_(self_portrait).jpg

File:Anders_Behring_Breivik_in_black_suit_(self_portrait).jpg

File:Anders Behring Breivik in military uniform (self portrait).jpg

File:Prisoner map of KZ Flossenbürg.JPG

File:Ed Hardy Beer.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

File:Teilansichten von Hainweiher (1920).jpg

File:Danegeld.jpg

File:4lyn Mach1 Festival 2008.jpg

File:Richard Wettstein (1927).jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Navigation menu

User talk:Trollhead

File tagging File:Bier_und_Burgenstraße_Verlauf.jpg

Tip: Categorizing images

File source is not properly indicated: File:Iddefjord.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tjängvide_image_stone.jpg

File tagging File:Jonsbok_Law_Codex.jpg

Alter, dreidimensionaler Kram :)

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Navigation menu

Search