User talk:Tournasol7/Archive33

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old bridge over the Adour river in Dax (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Dax (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:15, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 38 rue Cazade in Dax (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:15, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St-Geours-de-Maremne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:11, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of Our Lady church in Chis (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of Our Lady church in Chis (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:44, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Haget (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:44, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Saturnin church in Haget (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:44, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Beccas (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Beccas (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Luc (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:45, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14 place Charles de Gaulle in Rodez (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortified tower in Ortholes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Cayssac (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Faith church in Trebosc (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:45, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Beccas (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Semboues (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Semboues (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Justus church in St-Justin Gers (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:29, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Auriebat (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gate at the Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Auriebat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Armentieux (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:24, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Semboues (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:08, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gate in St-Justin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:06, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Justin Gers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:52, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Justus church in St-Justin Gers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Auriebat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Armentieux (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Ladeveze-Ville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter chapel in Ladeveze-Ville (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Castex (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruined church in La Madeleine (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Armentieux (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Luc (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:19, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo Tournasol7,

Sieger 2022 – Kloster Paulinzella

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2023 findet zum dreizehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Radomianin mit einer Gesamtansicht von Kloster Paulinzella gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Waltershausen in Thüringen oder in Fulda.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr „drei Sonderpreise für Bilder von Friedhöfen“ ausgelobt. Zugelassen sind für den Sonderpreis auch Fotos von Friedhöfen, die nicht denkmalgeschützt sind.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map 

Upload your photos for the special price 

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:25, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John church in Tieste-Uragnoux (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:29, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Ladeveze-Riviere (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Labaye (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:29, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Ladeveze-Riviere (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Juillac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de la Monnaie in Figeac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:51, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Juillac (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:40, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Marciac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tourist information centre in Marciac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Augustinian church in Marciac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:40, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Tourdun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:40, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Cazaux-Villecomtal (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:25, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Germerius church in Tourdun (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Courties (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Scieurac-et-Floures (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Scieurac-et-Floures (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Mascaras (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Bars (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Monclar-sur-Losse (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Monclar-sur-Losse (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Monclar-sur-Losse (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Pouylebon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Mascaras Gers (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:13, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Mascaras (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:40, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St-Christaud Gers (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 19:27, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Bars (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:13, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Bars (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue nationale in Montesquiou (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in L'Isle-de-Noe (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escalier monumental in Auch (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Pouylebon (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 05:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gate at the St Anne church in Pouylebon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Anne church in Pouylebon (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Montesquiou Gers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Montesquiou (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:29, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Salleneuve in Auch (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:29, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Dessoles in Auch (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11 rue Brune in Auch (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:27, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Orientius church in Auch (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:27, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former intendance in Auch (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:26, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gate in Montesquiou (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO not the most beautiful composition, but good good quality --Michielverbeek 06:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Barran (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dourdou river in Trou de Bozouls (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Bozouls (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Calmont (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Fedel in Auch (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former intendance in Auch (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lasseran (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gate in Lasseran (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint James church in Lasseran (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Calmont (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:29, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Calmont Aveyron (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice view --Isiwal 07:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Julitta church in Milhac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Le Piboul (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Tayac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:29, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trou de Bozouls (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:47, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint James church in Lasseran (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former chapel in En-Martet (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel in Lacassagne (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 29 August 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:22, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Loubersan (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Idrac-Respailles (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:22, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 è iniziato: partecipa anche tu!

Buongiorno Tournasol7,

ricevi questo messaggio perché in passato hai partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia o Wiki Loves Earth Italia.

Anche quest’anno torna Wiki Loves Monuments: da oggi al 30 settembre puoi partecipare caricando le tue foto per contribuire a illustrare il patrimonio culturale italiano: vai sul sito wikilovesmonuments.it e scopri come fare!

Oltre ai 20.000 monumenti già in concorso, quest’anno si aggiungono più di 60.000 edifici religiosi, tema centrale di quest’edizione. Prendi la tua macchina fotografica, o il tuo smartphone, e individua i monumenti in concorso tramite la nuova web-app – disponibile sia da mobile che desktop – app.wikilovesmonuments.it, da cui potrai anche caricare direttamente i tuoi scatti. Sono ammesse anche foto scattate prima del concorso, purché siano inedite.

A livello nazionale verranno premiate le dieci migliori fotografie: cinque per gli edifici religiosi e cinque per le altre categorie di monumenti; queste immagini parteciperanno anche alla fase internazionale del concorso. Non sono ammesse immagini con watermark o cornici, né fotografie eccessivamente elaborate in postproduzione. Qui puoi consultare Il regolamento completo e per qualsiasi dubbio puoi scrivere a contatti@wikilovesmonuments.it.

In bocca al lupo e buon divertimento! --Ysogo(talk) 05:0, 1 September 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Blaise church in Lamazere (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:29, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helianthus annuus in Gers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:21, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Mouches (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:31, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Julien church in Mouches (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Estipouy (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lamazere (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Motte feodale de Lamazere (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Blaise church in Lamazere (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Idrac-Respailles (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James church in Idrac-Respailles (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Mirande (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de Rohan in Mirande (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:23, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St-Martin Gers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin Gers (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Lycerius church in Estipouy (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin Gers (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:39, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Berdoues (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Mercy church in Berdoues (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:37, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Ponsampere (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval tower in Bozouls (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schunkengasse 12 in Heppenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchengasse 16 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:46, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchengasse 14 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:34, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall of Heppenheim (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grosser Markt 9 in Heppenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laudenbacher Tor 4 in Heppenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 08:42, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 11:42, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schunkengasse 24 in Heppenheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Laquearius 08:43, 3 September 2023 (UTC)  Info reverted to "Nomination". User:Laquearius is not allowed o vote (insufficient edits, registered yesterday). Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:02, 3 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 12:32, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schunkengasse 18 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Laquearius 08:43, 3 September 2023 (UTC)  Info reverted to "Nomination". User:Laquearius is not allowed o vote (insufficient edits, registered yesterday). Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:17, 3 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 12:33, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schunkengasse 16 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Laquearius 08:43, 3 September 2023 (UTC)  Info reverted to "Nomination". User:Laquearius is not allowed o vote (insufficient edits, registered yesterday). Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:02, 3 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 11:39, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grosser Markt 5-6 in Heppenheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchengasse 1 in Heppenheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schunkengasse 2 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bogengasse 1 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bogengasse in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle de Valentees (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:11, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktstrasse 11 in Heppenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktstrasse 2 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 04:21, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lehrstrasse 3 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wormser Tor in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bogengasse 9 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtbrunnen in Heppenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:45, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siegfriedstrasse 5 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:35, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amtsgasse 10 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:35, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleine Bach 2 in Heppenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:45, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleine Bach 12 in Heppenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:35, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bogengasse 11 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church & Laudenbacher Tor 2 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graeffstrasse 3 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laudenbacher Tor 3 in Heppenheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:22, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsburger Strasse 4 in Eberstadt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsburg Abbey (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Lich (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:34, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charlottenburg 1 in Lich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberstadt 12 in Lich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchstrasse 6 in Eberstadt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but corner mighty be too sharp --Michielverbeek 06:45, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsburger Strasse 2 in Eberstadt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchstrasse 12 in Eberstadt (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Eberstadt (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady Queen of Poland church in Boczow (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady Queen of Poland church in Boczow (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exaltation of the Holy Cross in Torzym 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exaltation of the Holy Cross in Torzym 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:16, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Czestochowa church in Mostki (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:53, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtturm in Lich (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:57, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Wilkowo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Name of Mary church in Brojce (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Adalbert church in Trzciel (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Name of Mary church in Brojce (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Adalbert church in Trzciel (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:19, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Adalbert church in Trzciel (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Adalbert church in Trzciel (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Adalbert church in Trzciel (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:32, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Czestochowa church in Mostki (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (A little bit dark. I've added a category for the rain.) --XRay 05:17, 12 September 2023 (UTC)  Comment Above the spire I see some spots in the sky, please remove it --Michielverbeek 05:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC)  Comment This is the snow. Tournasol7 12:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael Archangel church in Brojce (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Adalbert church in Trzciel (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:12, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Miedzichowo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:14, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Stanislaus church in Miedzichowo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:15, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Koronowo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:16, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Koronowo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:16, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Koronowo (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Koronowo (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:16, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Byszewo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:16, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Byszewo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:17, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Byszewo (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:17, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Byszewo (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 07:04, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Byszewo (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:28, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Wawelno (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:17, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Wawelno (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:17, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Anthony church in Walcz (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immaculate Conception church in Miroslawiec (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:13, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immaculate Conception church in Miroslawiec (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:13, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady Queen of Poland church in Kalisz Pomorski 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady Queen of Poland church in Kalisz Pomorski 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Wawelno (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:55, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jezioro Zamkowe in Walcz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Walcz (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:55, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall in Walcz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:23, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Anthony church in Walcz (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:54, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsburger Strasse 20 in Eberstadt (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Quality is ok, but would benefit from boosting the shadows --Virtual-Pano 08:06, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady Queen of Poland church in Kalisz Pomorski 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:20, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady Queen of Poland church in Kalisz Pomorski 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:21, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady Queen of Poland church in Kalisz Pomorski 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:21, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguration of Jesus Christ church in Slutowo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:23, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguration of Jesus Christ church in Slutowo (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:23, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:St Thomas church in Haro (3).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Thomas church in Haro (3).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Elorriaga (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross convent in Vitoria-Gasteiz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:18, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain at Plaza de Sta Maria in Vitoria-Gasteiz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:18, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain at Plaza de Sta Maria in Vitoria-Gasteiz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:19, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle de Santa Maria in Vitoria-Gasteiz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:St Thomas church in Haro (11).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Thomas church in Haro (11).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Seminary in Vitoria-Gasteiz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:21, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C. Fray Zacarias Martinez 95 in Vitoria-Gasteiz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:21, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary cathedral in Vitoria-Gasteiz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary cathedral in Vitoria-Gasteiz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval wall in Vitoria-Gasteiz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ironbernietyrol 07:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval wall in Vitoria-Gasteiz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval wall in Vitoria-Gasteiz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Vitoria-Gasteiz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Vitoria-Gasteiz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Vitoria-Gasteiz (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Vitoria-Gasteiz (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Errementari Kalea in Vitoria-Gasteiz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hedegile Kalea in Vitoria-Gasteiz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 05:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio Fray Zacarias Martinez in Vitoria-Gasteiz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Memorial Centre Victims of Terrorism Museum in Vitoria-Gasteiz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:26, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Bendana in Vitoria-Gasteiz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John church in Miranda de Ebro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:25, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Miranda de Ebro (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:25, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teatro Apolo in Miranda de Ebro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:26, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio Fray Zacarias Martinez in Vitoria-Gasteiz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:50, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael Archangel church in Vitoria-Gasteiz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:50, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Vincent church in Vitoria-Gasteiz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:09, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a la Batalla de Vitoria (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:50, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Espainia Plaza in Vitoria-Gasteiz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:09, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fountain at Plaza de Sta Maria in Vitoria-Gasteiz (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fountain at Plaza de Sta Maria in Vitoria-Gasteiz (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teatro Apolo in Miranda de Ebro (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Miranda de Ebro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de los Urbina in Miranda de Ebro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Real Aquende 55-59 in Miranda de Ebro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle de la Fuente 8 in Miranda de Ebro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de los Gil Delgado-Ocio in Miranda de Ebro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Real Aquende Miranda de Ebro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebro river in Miranda de Ebro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge of Carlos III in Miranda de Ebro (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Miranda de Ebro (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Miranda de Ebro (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of Our Lady church in Brinas (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of Our Lady church in Brinas (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Suso in Brinas (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Las Sevillanas in Haro (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de la Paz 8 in Haro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Haro (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C. la Paz 4 in Haro (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Famberhorst 04:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de los Condes in Haro (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garizabal jauregia in Labastida (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption church in Labastida (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Thomas church in Haro (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:04, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Labastida (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption church in Labastida (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Several misidentified plant images

• 
  Senecio doronicum
• 
  Senecio doronicum
• 
  not Crepis aurea, some Cichorioideae plant
• 
  not Crepis aurea either
• 
  actual Crepis aurea

Hi Tournasol7/Archive33, the leftmost two images above do not show Crepis aurea. They show very typical Senecio doronicum, which was correctly noticed by User:Seysi on the respective file talk pages. Please note that these plants have both ray flowers and disk flowers, whereas Crepis cannot have any disk flowers. Also, Crepis aurea is supposed to have orange flowers, hardly any stem leaves, a single flower head per stem and blackish hairs on the involucral bracts and the upper stem. Therefore, File:Crepis aurea at Lac de Tavaneuse (1).jpg and File:Crepis aurea at Col de Tavaneuse (3).jpg (yellow flowers, no black hairs visible) are also different species, but not a Senecio species because they have ray flowers only, but no disk flowers. I changed the IDs. At least the leftmost two images above should be renamed. Best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

By the way, File:Crepis aurea at Lac de Tavaneuse (2).jpg is not Crepis aurea either (white hairs, yellow flowers!) I also changed the ID. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

In addition, File:Crepis aurea at Lac de Tavaneuse (3).jpg was misidentified. I hope I got them all now. Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Robert Flogaus-Faust; thank you for your review. I have sent the file names to be changed. Thanks again for your great job. Have a nice evening! Tournasol7 (talk) 19:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption church in Labastida (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption church in Labastida (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:52, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption church in Labastida (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:02, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santo Cristo hermitage in Labastida (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arco del Tolono in Labastida (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Vitoria-Gasteiz (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Grazie per aver partecipato a WikiLovesMonuments 2023 - Italia

_{(English version available here)}

Ciao Tournasol7, grazie per aver partecipato all’edizione italiana di Wiki Loves Monuments 2023!

È stato un anno da record, con oltre 52.000 immagini caricate su Wikimedia Commons, di cui già 2.800 utilizzate sui progetti Wikimedia (numero destinato ad aumentare). Stiamo davvero documentando il patrimonio culturale italiano insieme!

In attesa del risultato dei lavori di selezione delle fotografie da parte delle giurie, ti chiediamo di dedicarci pochi minuti del tuo tempo per rispondere a un breve questionario (anonimo), che ci aiuterà a fare ancora meglio il prossimo anno: link al sondaggio sul limesurvey di Wikimedia Italia

Grazie ancora. --Ysogo(talk) 21:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary of the Kings church in Laguarda (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samaniego kalea in Laguardia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaztelu kalea in Laguardia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza Berria 1 in Laguarda (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santo Cristo hermitage in Labastida (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Famberhorst 05:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arco del Tolono in Labastida (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City walls of Laguardia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cathedral of Verona (7).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathedral of Verona (7).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John church in Laguardia (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Famberhorst 04:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sala Amos Salvador in Logrono (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Famberhorst 04:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Library of La Rioja in Logrono (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Famberhorst 04:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Juan Plaza 1 in Laguardia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:18, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio del Espartero in Logrono (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parliament of La Rioja (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria del Palacio church in Logrono (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Juan Plaza 1 in Laguardia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortification of Revelin in Logrono (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Town hall of Leuven (7).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Town hall of Leuven (7).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria del Palacio church in Logrono (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Logrono (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Historical Archives of La Rioja in Logrono (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality,--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Library of La Rioja in Logrono (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:33, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James the Greater church in Logrono (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Decent quality, good perspective --Plozessor 17:06, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Barriocepo in Logrono (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Logrono (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Logrono (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:40, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Viana (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gate at Calle Algarrada in Viana (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:40, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old chimney of the tobacco factory in Logrono (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:54, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza del Coso 2 in Viana (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Anoa y Busto in Viana (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:18, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Viana (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of the St Peter church in Viana (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:18, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of the St Peter church in Viana (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebro river in Brinas (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of the St Peter church in Viana (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of the St Peter church in Viana (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Plozessor 04:24, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of the St Peter church in Viana (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Plozessor 04:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Sepulchre church in Torres del Rio (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Torres del Rio (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebro river in Logrono (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:03, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de Piedra in Logrono (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 22:15, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Torres del Rio (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal de Castilla in Los Arcos (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de Santa Maria 3 in Los Arcos (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Los Arcos (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Los Arcos (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Tolono Mountains (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality but it looks like there are dust spots , pls see notes --Virtual-Pano 19:25, 3 October 2023 (UTC)  Done, dust spots removed.--Tournasol7 18:17, 9 October 2023 (UTC)  Support ok now --Virtual-Pano 12:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal de Castilla in Los Arcos (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de Santa Maria 3 in Los Arcos (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zalatambor Castle in Estella-Lizarra (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de los Reyes de Navarra in Estella-Lizarra (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:28, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Sepulchre church in Estella-Lizarra (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Sepulchre church in Estella-Lizarra (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:28, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria Jus del Castillo church in Estella-Lizarra (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:36, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Pedro de la Rua church in Estella-Lizarra (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:36, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael Archangel church in Estella-Lizarra (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dominican convent in Estella-Lizarra (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Estella-Lizarra (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ega river in Estella-Lizarra (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de la Carcel in Estella-Lizarra (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Clare convent in Estella-Lizarra (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estella Bus Station (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Pedro de la Rua church in Estella-Lizarra (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:59, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dominican convent in Estella-Lizarra (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:59, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Viguier d'Auglanat in Figeac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:46, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estella Bus Station (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Estella-Lizarra (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de San Pedro in Pamplona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City walls of Pamplona (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza del Castillo in Pamplona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James the Greater church in Logrono (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Estella-Lizarra (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de la Magdalena in Pamplona (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza del Castillo in Pamplona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio Credito Navarro in Pamplona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sant'Andrea della Valle in Rome (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sant'Andrea della Valle in Rome (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza del Castillo 1 in Pamplona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Augustinian convent in Pamplona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:36, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Pamplona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Pamplona (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal Nuevo in Pamplona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:34, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal Nuevo in Pamplona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum of Navarre in Pamplona (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of the Kings of Navarre in Pamplona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Augustinus church in Pamplona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente de Recoletas in Pamplona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Wawelno (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I want to support, but there are some CAs on the branches and on the building. --Sebring12Hrs 08:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC)  CommentSorry, but I don't ot, where you see some CAs? Tournasol7 21:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)  CommentSome discreet green CA in tree branches--ArildV 07:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Sorry, but I still don't see the CAs. Could you add a notake where they are? Tournasol7 15:45, 9 October 2023 (UTC) Done.--ArildV 07:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC) These are the remains after removal of magenta CAs. I can't do this better and IMO it's so insignificant as to be almost invisible. .--Tournasol7 04:25, 16 October 2023 (UTC) Thank you, its a very big image and sharpness and quality are very high otherwise.--ArildV 12:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of the Kings of Navarre in Pamplona (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Augustinus church in Pamplona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente de Recoletas in Pamplona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Fermin chapel in Pamplona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Pamplona (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of Goyeneche in Pamplona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Pamplona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Fermin de Aldapa church in Pamplona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banco de Espana in Pamplona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Estella-Lizarra (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Navarra in Pamplona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 04:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banco de Espana in Pamplona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a los Fueros in Pamplona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parliament of Navarre in Pamplona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 04:41, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Navarra in Pamplona (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 18:49, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parliament of Navarre in Pamplona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit dark. --XRay 04:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle del Dos de Mayo 4 in Pamplona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Taconera 8-12 in Pamplona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:34, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the carmelite convent in Pamplona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:33, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio del Conde de Espoz y Mina in Pamplona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Slightly tilted but minimal. --Plozessor 04:22, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Luzaide-Valcarlos (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igartza Jauregia in Beasain (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igartza palace & chapel in Beasain (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit dark, but seems to fit the weather. --Plozessor 04:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igartza Ermita in Beasain (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igartzako Zubia in Beasain (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igartza Errota in Beasain (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruavieja in Logrono (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems a bit underexposed to me --FlocciNivis 09:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC) It's normal, because it was a cloudy day.--Tournasol7 14:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Yes, a bit dark, but that seems to match the rainy day and thus depict reality. --Plozessor 10:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:View of Lecco (4).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View of Lecco (4).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igartza Errota in Beasain (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Errenteria (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Augustine convent in Hernani (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gentiles dorretxea in Hernani (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Hernani (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igartza Jauregia in Beasain (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:38, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Fermin chapel in Pamplona (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but perspective looks unnatural (as a result of fixing the verticals). --Plozessor 05:39, 21 October 2023 (UTC) sorry, I don't understand, it looks ok in my eyes...--Tournasol7 18:43, 21 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality imo. --ArildV 07:57, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Hernani (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de Casadevante in Hondaribbia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Carlos V in Hondarribia (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sta Maria del Manzano church in Hondaribbia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City walls of Hondaribbia (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Pamplona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sta Maria del Manzano church in Hondaribbia (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:40, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City walls of Hondaribbia (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:40, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Clare convent in Tolosa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:40, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tolosa International Puppet Center (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:40, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ptuj Castle (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:15, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint George church in Ptuj (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:57, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Ptuj Castle (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:15, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ptuj Castle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:57, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of Mary church in Ptuj (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:15, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Slovenska Bistrica (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Slovenska Bistrica (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of Mary church in Ptuj (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Zalec (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Zalec (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio del Conde de Espoz y Mina in Pamplona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, not very good composition with disturbing elements. But ok imo. --ArildV 13:41, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Redin in Pamplona (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Dormitaleria in Pamplona (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Santa Maria dell'Orto in Rome (5).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Maria dell'Orto in Rome (5).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tonovcov Grad (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gregorciceva 10 in Kobarid (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of Mary church in Kobarid (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:17, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Defense tower in Zalec (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:16, 31 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:17, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Zalec (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:16, 31 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:17, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:09, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immaculate Conception church in Kamnik (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:16, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little Castle in Kamnik (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:16, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Eligius chapel in Kamnik (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:16, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James church in Kamnik (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tonovcov Grad (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:27, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Bled (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:00, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Bled (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:00, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Bled Island (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:00, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Immaculate Conception church in Kamnik (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly dark? --ArildV 21:21, 2 November 2023 (UTC) I have brightened it a bit and corrected the perspective. For me good quality now. -- Spurzem 20:32, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 19:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 20:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter cathedral in Treviso (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter cathedral in Treviso (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist cathedral in Oderzo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist cathedral in Oderzo (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Latisana (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Latisana (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Vitalis church in Muzzana del T (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Gorizia (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Gorizia (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Gorizia (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:23, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:31, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:14, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:31, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:07, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene cathedral in Desenzano (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Lecco (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Lecco (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --XRay 04:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Ivrea (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Ivrea (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Ivrea (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Ivrea (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Ivrea (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Verona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Thomas Becket church in Verona (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Giovanni in Valle (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Verona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 06:42, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in S Bonifacio (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre Coxina in Vicenza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter cathedral in Treviso (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 06:36, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duomo vecchio in Brescia (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Faustinus & Jovita church Brescia (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Sorrows church in S Giorgio di Nogaro (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Como (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Cervignano d F (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tempio Voltiano in Como (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Como (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Desenzano del Garda (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 19:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene cathedral in Desenzano (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Fontaine in Montlucon (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Charles of Catinari church in Rome (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St-Martinien (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:48, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martinian church in St-Martinien (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Luke and Martina church in Rome (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Luke and Martina church in Rome (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Charles of Catinari church in Rome (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Charles of Catinari church in Rome (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Lamaids (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:03, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 November 2023 (UTC)