User talk:Tournasol7/Archive30

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Joseph church in Wielun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Parzymiechy (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Wielun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Martin & Margaret church in Klobuck (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint James church in Krzepice (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:27, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de Justice in Figeac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:11, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Chelmza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Pruszcz (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stary Rynek in Sieradz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulica Dominikanska in Sieradz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dominikanska 2 in Sieradz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeglina river in Sieradz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jezioro Slesinskie (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Chelmza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szosa Chelminska 22 in Torun (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 05:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dom Narodowy in Cieszyn (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 05:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Gostycyn (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek 1 in Cieszyn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 02:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary Magdalene church in Cieszyn (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gleboka 28 in Cieszyn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gleboka 32 in Cieszyn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gleboka 49 in Cieszyn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Main post office in Cieszyn (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 06:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek 16 in Cieszyn (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 06:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek 9 in Cieszyn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek 10 in Cieszyn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Matejki in Cieszyn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gleboka 38 in Cieszyn (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 06:07, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gleboka 44 in Cieszyn (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:38, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gleboka 62 in Cieszyn (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mennicza 22 in Cieszyn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olza river in Cieszyn (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at 2 Place aux Herbes in Figeac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:01, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wyzsza Brama in Cieszyn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lutheran church in Hazlach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Chelmza (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water tower in Chelmza (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Sepolno Kraj (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Matthew church in Waldowo (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Papowo Biskupie (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Dobra (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacred Heart church in Turek (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Warta (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:42, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Cestio in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:45, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! All Saints church in Sieradz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Cieszyn (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Martin & Margaret church in Klobuck (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint James church in Krzepice (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gleboka 15 in Cieszyn (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Galy in Millau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Grazie per aver partecipato a WLM Lake Como 2022

Grazie per aver contribuito con le tue fotografie all'edizione 2022 di Wiki Loves Monuments - Lake Como. La pregiuria ha selezionato le foto finaliste tra cui saranno scelti i vincitori: link. La cerimonia di premiazione si terra' martedi 13 dicembre a Como: se sei interessato a partecipare segui gli aggiornamenti sulla pagina dell'evento.--Ysogo (talk) 14:54, 13 November 2022 (UTC) Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Thank you for having contributed with your pictures to the 2022 edition of Wiki Loves Monuments - Lake Como. The prejury has selected the finalist pictures among which the winners will be chosen: link. The awards ceremony will be hold in Como on Tuesday December 13th: if you are keen to join, follow the updates on the page of the event.--Ysogo (talk) 14:54, 13 November 2022 (UTC) This message has been delivered through Global message delivery system)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Cieszyn (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:24, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Habsburg Palace in Cieszyn (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:16, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Torun (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:56, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brama Mostowa in Torun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:56, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Grazie per aver partecipato a WLM Italia 2022

Grazie per aver contribuito con le tue fotografie all'edizione 2022 di Wiki Loves Monuments. La pregiuria ha selezionato le foto finaliste tra cui saranno scelti i vincitori: Castelli, Monumenti. La cerimonia di premiazione si terrà sabato 3 dicembre a Formigine: se sei interessato a partecipare segui gli aggiornamenti sulla pagina dell'evento.--Ysogo (talk) 17:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC) Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Thank you for having contributed with your pictures to the 2022 edition of Wiki Loves Monuments - Italy. The prejury has selected the finalist pictures among which the winners will be chosen: Fortifications, Tradional contest. The awards ceremony will be hold in Formigine on Saturday December 3rd: if you are keen to join, follow the updates on the page of the event.--Ysogo (talk) 17:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC) This message has been delivered through Global message delivery system)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Catherine church in Torun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:43, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Gostycyn (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:43, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption of Our Lady church in Torun (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:42, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Torun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:42, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery hill in Strzelno (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:42, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George Guildhall in Torun (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments right part is hanging a bit to the left --Michielverbeek 06:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 06:40, 12 November 2022 (UTC) Ok now --Michielverbeek 10:10, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Inaugurazione mostra "Wiki Loves Monuments Veneto 2022"

Buongiorno Tournasol7,

sono Matteo Zaffonato, Coordinatore Regionale OpenStreetMap per il Veneto di Wikimedia Italia.

La contatto per ringraziarla di aver partecipato al concorso in oggetto e per avvisarla che la mostra "Wiki Loves Monuments Veneto 2022" verrà inaugurata il giorno 18 novembre alle ore 17 presso il complesso Santa Caterina in via Cesare Battisti 241 a Padova. Noi giurati gradiremo se potesse essere presente quel giorno.

Se volesse partecipare all'evento le chiedo gentilmente di confermare la sua presenza tramite questa pagina: Wikipedia:Raduni/Premiazione Wiki Loves Monuments Veneto 2022

Può trovare maggiori notizie riguardante l'evento qui.

Cordiali saluti
Matteo Zaffonato (talk) 17:35, 15 November 2022 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Matteo Zaffonato, I'd love to be there but I'm very sorry - it's too far away for me. I hope you will spend nice moments. Have a nice day! Tournasol7 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James church in Torun (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:38, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teutonic Knights castle in Torun (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:38, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House under the Star in Torun (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Torun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Strzelno (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:07, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Pruszcz (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:29, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dom Narodowy in Cieszyn (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:30, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gleboka 62 in Cieszyn (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:58, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lutheran church in Hazlach (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 06:42, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Our Lady of the Snow church in Iseo (7).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Our Lady of the Snow church in Iseo (7).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Chelmza (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:51, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water tower in Chelmza (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Matthew church in Waldowo (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 15 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good composition. --Sammandi 05:55, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Papowo Biskupie (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Strzelno (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Vitus church in Tuliszkow (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas & Good Shepherd church in Slesin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:23, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! All Saints church in Sieradz (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:23, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Dobra (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Joseph church in Wielun (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Warta (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a bit too dark. --XRay 05:37, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint James church in Krzepice (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Parzymiechy (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacred Heart church in Turek (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:17, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Cieszyn (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 18 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:33, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George Guildhall in Torun (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:32, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brama Mostowa in Torun (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:32, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Torun (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Catherine church in Torun (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Habsburg Palace in Cieszyn (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Cieszyn (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James church in Torun (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Gostycyn (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Torun (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:41, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum Champollion in Figeac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Laporte in Figeac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 02:45, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 47 rue Gambetta in Figeac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:46, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Pruszcz (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szosa Chelminska 28 in Torun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:15, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek Staromiejski 18 in Torun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mostowa 4 in Torun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison du Griffon in Figeac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:54, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mostowa 9 in Torun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:05, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mostowa 14 in Torun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:01, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciasna 4-6 in Torun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:01, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lazienna in Torun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:01, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lazienna 28 in Torun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:50, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Laporte in Figeac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:59, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Laporte in Figeac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-17 rue de Clermont in Figeac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:59, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel du Viguier in Figeac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison du Griffon in Figeac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hospital in Figeac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:24, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel du Viguier in Figeac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:43, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 rue Ortabadial in Figeac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:43, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kopernika in Torun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:06, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeglarska 8 in Torun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:06, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dom Narodowy in Cieszyn (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:39, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de la Monnaie in Figeac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Sisteron in Figeac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 13:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Sisteron in Figeac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 13:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Sepolno Kraj (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Matthew church in Waldowo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Papowo Biskupie (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:43, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery hill in Strzelno (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Strzelno (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:43, 23 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality.--Terragio67 05:43, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hospital in Figeac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szeroka 12 in Cieszyn (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:12, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water tower in Chelmza (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Matthias Süßen 06:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5 rue Lauriere in Figeac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Dobra (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacred Heart church in Turek (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint James church in Krzepice (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: IMO a touch too dark. May be 1/3 EV more could help. --XRay 05:32, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Parzymiechy (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: IMO a touch too dark. May be 1/3 EV more could help. --XRay 05:32, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Wielun (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Remparts of Figeac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 20:09, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corpus Christi church in Wielun (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Warta (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George Guildhall in Torun (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:04, 25 November 2022 (UTC)-

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Torun (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:02, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Remparts of Figeac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:48, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum Champollion in Figeac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:48, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Thomas church of Figeac 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Thomas church of Figeac 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:17, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Torun (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Torun (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Thomas church of Figeac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:41, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Joseph church in Wielun (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but strange green colour art the bottom of the tower --Michielverbeek 06:38, 25 November 2022 (UTC) This is a strret lights. --Tournasol7 05:07, 26 November 2022 (UTC) Ok --Michielverbeek 20:14, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Castle of Bard (3).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castle of Bard (3).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame-du-Puy church of Figeac 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 11:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame-du-Puy church of Figeac 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:09, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame-du-Puy church of Figeac 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:27, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame-du-Puy church of Figeac 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:09, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Torun (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Catherine church in Torun (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas & Good Shepherd church in Slesin (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Gostycyn (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Thomas church of Figeac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:25, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Thomas church of Figeac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support It's a bit sad, that this grid is in front of the window, but good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:25, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame-du-Puy church of Figeac 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame-du-Puy church of Figeac 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not quite symmetrical, but good quality.--Famberhorst 16:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame-du-Puy church of Figeac 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame-du-Puy church of Figeac 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 16:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas & Good Shepherd church in Slesin (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:17, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Gostycyn (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:46, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Torun (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:44, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Strzelno (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GHood quality --Michielverbeek 21:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:46, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baszta Zuraw in Torun (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 16:12, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Saviour church of Figeac 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 19:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Saviour church of Figeac 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Dobra (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Gostycyn (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Torun (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Strzelno (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George Guildhall in Torun (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Cieszyn (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:09, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Torun (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Municipal Theater of Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Building appears tilted to right. Fixable? --Tagooty 02:30, 21 November 2022 (UTC)  Done. --Tournasol7 21:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)  SupportGood quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:44, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Catherine church in Torun (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:00, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teutonic Knights castle in Torun (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:14, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Torun (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Municipal Theater of Albi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:05, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas & Good Shepherd church in Slesin (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:14, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Torun (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:12, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Catherine church in Torun (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:16, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Strzelno (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:16, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:13, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame-du-Puy church of Figeac 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 16:25, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Town hall of Cournon-d'Auvergne (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Town hall of Cournon-d'Auvergne (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Gostycyn (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Dobra (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:18, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacred Heart church in Turek (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:19, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Torun (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Thomas church of Figeac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Remparts of Figeac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 12:23, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 Slovenia

Slovenščina: Dragi Krzysztof, hvala za tvoj prispevek za četrti natečaj Wiki Loves Monuments v Sloveniji! Žirija je ocenila prispele fotografije in to soboto, 10. decembra, bomo ob 20h razglasili zmagovalce. Priključiš se lahko temu namenjenemu Zoom srečanju in si ogledaš zmagovalne fotografije ter kratko predstavitev natečaja. Vabljen!

English: Dear Krzysztof, thank you for participating in the fourth Wiki Loves Monuments competition in Slovenia! The jury has completed scoring the contributions and we will announce the winners this Saturday, 10th December, at 20h. You're invited to tune in to the dedicated Zoom meeting at this time, to see the winning photographs and a short presentation of the competition (it will be in Slovene only). Best,

— Yerpo ^Eh? 17:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Yerpo; Thank you very much for this invitation, but unfortunately I can't take part in it, I don't speak Slovene. But I will be happy to follow the results of this competition. Have a nice day! Tournasol7 (talk) 20:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Andorra photographs

Hi Krzysztof! I recently noticed you uploaded a lot of new images from Andorra. First of all, they are all really beautiful and good quality images. Nice job and keep it up! A few days ago I started creating new categories mainly for Andorra mountains but also other places (valleys, mountain passes, etc.), here in Commons and also and Wikidata. I noticed you add a lot of boxes with the names of the mountains in your photos. I love it and I apreciate it. It helped me a lot. I just wanted to ask you if you, please, could also add the categories of the mountains in your photos (now most mountains in Andorra have their own category!). And if these categories don't already exist you can leave it in red and I will create them (just tell me which ones are!).

By the way, I'm very curious how do you know the name of theses mountains. Do you use a map? PeakFinder? All the names (almost) were correct! Thank you, and again, nice pictures. You are a good photographer! --Catalaalatac (talk) 20:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Catalaalatac; thanks for kind words :) Are you from Andorra? Normally I already send all photos from andorra. Well, unless I'll be back there someday. And yes, I found a nice site to search the names of peaks: [1]. All you have to do is find the location where you took the photo, click on it on the map and after select "show the panorama". Have fun :) Tournasol7 (talk) 21:09, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm originally from Sabadell, but now I live in Solsona, closer to the Pyrenees. This summer I was living in Canillo, Andorra, for a forest management internship. I had the change to visit a looot of places and I climbed a lot of mountains. And I fell in love with this part of the Pyrenees. I've been also a Wikipedian in the Catalan Wikipedia for many years and that's why I wanted to organize and categorize some of the mountain topics in Andorra. Regards the link you send me, I checked it and seems nice but if you want you can try PeakFinder (or PeakVisor too) a web and also and app to create mountain panoramas that in my opinion is way better than the one you use. For example, check here a panorama from Mirador Roc del Quer, where you took several panoramas. You can select whatever point in the world you want and the web will tell you the name of the mountains and the height. Also, try to go up or down with the arrows on the left. It will show you the same coordinates but from above. Have fun! :) --Catalaalatac (talk) 21:59, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

I was also in Solsona, probably the day before Andorra, where I took these photos. Solsona is also a nice town. Catalonia is a wonderful country in general :) And thanks for PinkFinder, indeed, it's very good site, I will surely try it. Thanks! And have a nice day! Tournasol7 (talk) 13:46, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi Krzysztof, I just checked your user talk and now I see your message. If you like mountains and toponymy, I'm sure you'll enjoy PeakFinder. Your welcome. Well, take care. And as we say in Catalan: health and legs! --Catalaalatac (talk) 01:52, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Torun (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:42, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Matthew church in Waldowo (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:13, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Papowo Biskupie (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:53, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Strzelno (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:57, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame-du-Puy church of Figeac 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:53, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Thomas church of Figeac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:51, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Matthew church in Waldowo (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:57, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Strzelno (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Cieszyn (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Dobra (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:57, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Remparts of Figeac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:57, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hospital in Figeac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I suggest a more symmetrical crop. --C messier 18:30, 2 December 2022 (UTC)  Done, ~~~~ --Tournasol7 19:48, 5 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Torun (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:34, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Catherine church in Torun (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water tower in Chelmza (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Gostycyn (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pedde du Coin des Hasards in Thiers (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pedde du Coin des Hasards in Thiers (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Gostycyn (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. IMO this is an exemplary photo, it should be kept in mind as a model for those who start photographing. --Terragio67 05:27, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Cieszyn (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Warta (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:22, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! All Saints church in Sieradz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Dobra (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame-du-Puy church of Figeac 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brama Klasztorna in Torun (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gleboka 15 in Cieszyn (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Habsburg Palace in Cieszyn (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Cieszyn (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Torun (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Artus Court in Torun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House under the Star in Torun (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Catherine church in Torun (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Gostycyn (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James church in Torun (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Pruszcz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dom Narodowy in Cieszyn (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lutheran church in Hazlach (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water tower in Chelmza (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Matthew church in Waldowo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:44, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Papowo Biskupie (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Strzelno (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:58, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Gostycyn (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! All Saints church in Sieradz (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Dobra (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Cieszyn (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint James church in Krzepice (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Warta (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Torun (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water tower in Chelmza (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Matthew church in Waldowo (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Papowo Biskupie (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Strzelno (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:10, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Saviour church of Figeac 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:30, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Procopius church in Strzelno (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking sign at Bratislava Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sky Park Bratislava from Bratislava Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and interesting contemporary architecture. -- Ikan Kekek 05:31, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stare Mesto from Bratislava Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapitulska in Bratislava.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria column at Zupne namestie in Bratislava.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:29, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calvinist church in Bratislava (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:29, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jana Holleho 9 in Trnava (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:29, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schneidra Trnavskeho 3 in Trnava (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolna brana & Synagogue in Trencin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Trencin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:23, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sturovo namestie 5 in Trencin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sladkovicova 56 in Trencin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:23, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mierove namestie 40 in Trencin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marianske namestie in Zilina (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Catherine church in Torun (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bottova 13 in Zilina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 10:34, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calvinist church in Bratislava (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:53, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miestodrzitelsky palac in Bratislava.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:53, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ganymede's fountain in Bratislava.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:53, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slovak National Museum in Bratislava (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:37, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jana Holleho 9 in Trnava (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:37, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stefaneum in Trnava (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:23, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collegium Nobilium in Trnava (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:23, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hviezdoslavova in Trnava.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:26, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Helena church in Trnava (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:19, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolna brana in Trencin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall of Zilina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:19, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolny Val 26 in Zilina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Krzysztof! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burianova veza in Zilina (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horny Val 19 in Zilina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolna brana in Trencin (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Trencin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:07, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mierove namestie 2 in Trencin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:07, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stefanika 2 in Trencin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 05:23, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity plague column in Trencin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mierove namestie 43 in Trencin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sturovo namestie 133 in Trencin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marianske namestie in Zilina (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:23, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023, Tournasol!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Tournasol7! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohe Weihnachten! Glückliches Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- Johann Jaritz talk 10:00, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays 2022/2023!

✴ Happy Holidays, Tournasol7 ✴ Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! --Aristeas (talk) 10:27, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Wesołych Świąt!

Drogi @Tournasol7: bardzo dziękuję za życzenia świąteczne, z których się bardzo cieszę. Życzę Ci również błogosławionych i spokojnych Świąt Bożego Narodzenia w gronie najbliższych oraz szczęśliwego i zdrowego Nowego Roku 2023! Wszystkiego najlepszego dla dalszej dobrej i konstruktywnej współpracy w uniwersum Wiki w nowym roku. Serdecznie pozdrawiam :) -- Radomianin (talk) 11:00, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays 2022/2023

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Tournasol7! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

Happy Holidays and best wishes for 2023. Pierre André ^(talk) 11:05, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello Tournasol

thank you for the good wishes. Happy vacations to you and your family, a blessed Christmas and a happy new year. Ermell (talk) 11:15, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

2023

Happy holidays Tournasol and a healthy 2023.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:46, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Tournasol

for your best wishes. Wishing you also happy holidays and a healthy 2023. Greetings from Friesland.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:01, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Happy holidays, Tournasol7! Hello Tournasol7, have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! It has been a pleasure to have you as a fellow Wikimedian this year. Wherever you are, enjoy the festive season and stay warm (if you're north of the Tropic of Cancer)! Your help in maintaining, improving and expanding Wikimedia Commons will always be appreciated. Greetings from Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. --SHB2000 on 12:08, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolna brana in Trencin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:27, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tolmin Castle (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tolmin Castle (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:27, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tolmin Castle (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:26, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tolmin Castle (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. WB may be a touch to warm. --XRay 05:26, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Tournasol7! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

Happy Holidays and best wishes for 2023. --Llez (talk) 09:56, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Wesołych Świąt

Thank you, Krzysztof, I also wish you and your family merry Christmas and lots of health in 2023! Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku! --Poco a poco (talk) 12:16, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tolmin Castle (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tolmin Castle (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tolmin Castle (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tolmin Castle (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tolmin Castle (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tolmin Castle (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:52, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tolmin Castle (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:52, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tolmin Castle (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tolmin Castle (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:52, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tolmin Castle (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:22, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pyrenees in Andorra (10).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pyrenees in Andorra (10).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Massis del Casamanya (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Massis del Casamanya (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Rocinj (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Rocinj (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Rocinj (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Catherine church in Lendava (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Catherine church in Lendava (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horny Val in Zilina (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:37, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Como (38).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:55, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Brescia (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Catherine church in Lendava (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Catherine church in Lendava (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Catherine church in Lendava (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:56, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schneidra Trnavskeho 3 in Trnava (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:52, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Varazdin (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:38, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Varazdin County palace (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:38, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Varazdin (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:38, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Varazdin (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Varazdin (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Varazdin (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Varazdin (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Varazdin (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Varazdin (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Varazdin (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Varazdin (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Varazdin (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Varazdin (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Varazdin (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Varazdin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Varazdin (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Varazdin (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Varazdin (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Varazdin (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grosse Strasse 41 in Wittenburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Ansalonga (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riu de Rialb in Sorteny (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 02:25, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in La Cortinada (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Ordino (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pic de l'Albeille (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 05:20, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Canolic (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pic de Coma Pedrosa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrenees in Andorra (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 05:19, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Cornelius & Cyprian church in Ordino (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pic de Carroi from Ordino (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Ordino (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrenees in Andorra (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, interesting and informative. --Milseburg 07:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Valira del Nord (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking sign at Coll d'Ordino (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pic de Coma Pedrosa from Coll d'Ordino (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:40, 3 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Have to second this. The snow-capped mountains and the trees just blend in neatly. --SHB2000 09:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coll d'Ordino (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road CS-240 at Coll d'Ordino (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bony de la Pica (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Musee du Piano in Limoux (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Musee du Piano in Limoux (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking sign in Vall de Mereig (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrenees in Andorra (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Valira d'Orient (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Canillo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Massis del Casamanya (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Massis del Casamanya (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:27, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roc del Quer lookout (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrenees in Andorra (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking sign at Roc del Quer (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Canillo (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Canillo (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John church in Caselles (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Sanctuary in Meritxell (3).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanctuary in Meritxell (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Meritxell (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Pas de la Casa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Port d'Envalira (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrenees in Andorra (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pic de l'Albeille (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Canolic (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrenees in Andorra (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in La Cortinada (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Tournasol7/Archive30,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking sign in Canillo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Canillo (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Ansalonga (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Cornelius & Cyprian church in Ordino (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Sanctuary in Meritxell (2).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanctuary in Meritxell (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Meritxell (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John church in Caselles (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Port d'Envalira (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Port d'Envalira (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Canillo (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:57, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John church in Caselles (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 12:16, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrenees in Andorra (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 12:16, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Canolic (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 07:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in La Cortinada (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 07:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Port d'Envalira (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 12:16, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Valira del Nord (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 09:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Cornelius & Cyprian church in Ordino (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:40, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrenees in Andorra (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:40, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coll d'Ordino (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Valira d'Orient (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in La Cortinada (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Canillo (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John church in Caselles (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Port d'Envalira (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Meritxell (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Canolic (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrenees in Andorra (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:00, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in La Cortinada (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Ansalonga (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:06, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Port d'Envalira (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in La Cortinada (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrenees in Andorra (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:41, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Ansalonga (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Cornelius & Cyprian church in Ordino (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Meritxell (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John church in Caselles (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in La Cortinada (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in La Cortinada (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Cornelius & Cyprian church in Ordino (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Canillo (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:35, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City walls of Bascara (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Figueres (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Port d'Envalira (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in La Cortinada (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Meritxell (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Figueres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:56, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Figueres (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:56, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Acisclus & Victoria church in Bascara (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carrer de Parets in Bascara (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:56, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Felix church in Girona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:56, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Pia Almoina in Girona (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Girona (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Girona (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Felix church in Girona (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Girona (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in Canillo (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Onyar river in Girona (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convent of Sisters Vetlladores in Girona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Dominic convent in Girona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Girona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacred Heart church in Girona (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carrer del Bisbe Torras i Bages 6 in Vic (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edifici de la Llotja in Vic (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Teresa church in Vic (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roman temple in Vic (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 14:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Pieta in Vic (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Mount Carmel church in Vic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Vila in Vic (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Moixo in Vic (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Besalu in Vic (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Costa in Vic (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antoni Maria Claret church in Vic (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 12:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rambla de Sant Domenec 5 in Vic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 11:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Post office in Vic (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Dominic church in Vic (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:35, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Castle of Varazdin (17).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castle of Varazdin (17).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Vic (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:51, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episcopal Palace in Vic (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:34, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Sorrows church in Vic (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Colomer in Vic (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:20, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carrer de l'Escola in Vic (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:35, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Llobregat river from Montserrat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montserrat Abbey (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centre de Coordinació Pastoral in Montserrat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:25, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edifici Nostra Senyora in Montserrat abbey (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:25, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Saint John church in Caselles (8).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint John church in Caselles (8).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of the Montserrat abbey (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Vell in Manresa (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa d'Exercicis Espirituals in Manresa (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mark chapel in Manresa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antic Palau del Consell in Manresa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary basilica in Manresa (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:54, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Montserrat church in Manresa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carmel church in Manresa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 18:27, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Manresa (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:55, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Suria (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Vell in Avinyo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John church in Avinyo (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de l'Abadal in Avinyo (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cal Verdaguer in Avinyo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:10, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of the Rosary church in Suria (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 08:42, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Suria (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:30, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte de Cardona in Suria (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:31, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Christopher church in Suria (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Placa Major in Suria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)