User talk:Tournasol7/Archive25

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Chateauneuf-la-Foret (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Pardulphus and Martin church in Sussac 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Medard church in St-Meard 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 16:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Ligoure 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 16:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la Cathedrale 5 in Lausanne 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former hospital in Lausanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lausanne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place Saint-Francois 15 in Lausanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! District Court in Lausanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Francis reformed church in Lausanne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Cite-Devant in Lausanne (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:17, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Charles-Vuillermet in Lausanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:17, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Cite-Derriere in Lausanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la Cathedrale 5 in Lausanne 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Anthony church in Chamboret 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 17:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St-Junien-les-Combes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in La Croix-sur-Gartempe 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Gervasius and Protasius church in Mailhac-sur-Benaize 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de Rumine in Lausanne (roof).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:57, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Bret 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former town hall of Aigle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avenue du Cloitre 35 in Aigle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 05:51, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Troistorrents 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 05:50, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Logis seigneurial in St-Martin-le-Mault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:19, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Tersannes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in St-Sornin-la-Marche 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:19, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Barbant (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 18:10, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Taurion (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Junien church in St-Junien-les-Combes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:55, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Roussac 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Gaudentius church in St-Jouvent 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water well in La Jonchere-Saint-Maurice (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la Cathedrale 5 in Lausanne 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Haldimand 14 in Lausanne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Lausanne from Place du Chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Troistorrents 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Troistorrents 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Bellac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Ligoure 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rodhullandemu 13:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Chateauneuf-la-Foret (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 21:52, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Leodegar church in Peyrilhac (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lanhoso Castle 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour d'Echizadour (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in La Croisille-sur-Briance 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary and St Leobon church in Surdoux 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James church in Magnac-Bourg 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James church in Magnac-Bourg 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Morgins 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Morgins 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 14:45, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Pardulphus and Martin church in Sussac 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:57, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11 rue Firmin Tarrade in Chateauneuf-la-Foret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:57, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Saturnin church in St-Sornin-la-Marche 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 21:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in La Croix-sur-Gartempe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 21:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Aigle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Theodulos church in La-Tour-de-Peilz 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haldentor in Aarau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Broye river in Payerne (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Grand-Chene 8 in Lausanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FR-CH boundary stone at Pas de Morgins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of La Tour-de-Peilz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auberge de la Bourgeoisie in Troistorrents.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin-le-Mault (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 15:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Bellac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 15:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baseltor in Solothurn (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Council of the Canton of Vaud in Lausanne 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Francis reformed church in Lausanne 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la Cathedrale 5 in Lausanne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Troistorrents 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Ligoure 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Maurice church in La Jonchere-St-Maurice 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Junien church in St-Junien-les-Combes 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of Vieze river 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Morgins 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedholzplatz 24 in Solothurn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prefecture of the district of Lausanne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former court in Payerne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Jourgnac (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Medard church in St-Meard 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St-Gilles-les-Forets (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 18:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Chateauneuf-la-Foret (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Aigle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Roussac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Sauviat-sur-Vige 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Maurice church in La Jonchere-St-Maurice 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Bellac 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Logis seigneurial in St-Martin-le-Mault 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Salvaterra de Mino 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de la Oliva Salvaterra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Salvatierra de Mino 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de la Oliva Salvaterra 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:54, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Junien church in St-Junien-les-Combes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:58, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Sauviat-sur-Vige 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Ligoure 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Giles church in St-Gilles-les-Forets (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:53, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Salvatierra de Mino 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Broye river in Payerne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Morgins 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halden in Aarau (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Troistorrents 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Domps (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Meard (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Junien church in St-Junien-les-Combes 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 21:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Salvatierra de Mino 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit soft but QI given the resolution --Poco a poco 11:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Medard church in St-Meard 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:21, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courthouse in Zagan (3) V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courthouse in Zagan (4) V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Zagan (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Zagan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek 34 in Zary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 19:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Salvatierra de Mino 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:04, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old international bridge Valenca Tui.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Salvaterra de Mino 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Pardulphus and Martin church in Sussac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Chateauneuf-la-Foret (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 08:55, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Pardulphus and Martin church in Sussac 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Meard (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:25, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Zagan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:25, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:27, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support It's a weak promotion. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 05:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fire station in Chateauneuf-la-Foret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:57, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Ligoure 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:58, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Chateauneuf-la-Foret (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Medard church in St-Meard 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:00, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Zagan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Zagan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 07:58, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Anthony church in Chamboret 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of La Jonchere-St-Maurice (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Achillea millefolium at Lac de Morgins (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The flower on the left is sharp with good bokeh. The blurred flower + bee on the right is distracting, I suggest cropping it out. --Tagooty 14:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 19:02, 11 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality, thanks. --Tagooty 02:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek 9 in Zary (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Heart of Jesus church in Zary (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek 17 in Zary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:30, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Logis seigneurial in St-Martin-le-Mault 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:05, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:05, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Junien church in St-Junien-les-Combes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Ligoure 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Giles church in St-Gilles-les-Forets (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower gate in Zary (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:25, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exaltation of the Holy Cross church in Zary (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrobrego 4 in Zary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Domps 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:52, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Chateauneuf-la-Foret (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:52, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Medard church in St-Meard 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:52, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Bellac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:49, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrobrego 6 in Zary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Zagan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek 6-7 in Zary (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bohaterow Getta 1 in Zary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek 32-33 in Zary (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Jourgnac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 14:43, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Domps (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ADARSHluck 15:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Pardulphus and Martin church in Sussac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ADARSHluck 15:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Chateauneuf-la-Foret (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 14:43, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Sharpness could be better.) --XRay 05:06, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Bellac 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (A little bit soft. Contrast could be better.) --XRay 03:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (A little bit soft. Contrast could be better.). --XRay 03:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:33, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:33, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:33, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Ligoure 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:49, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, nice mood. --Aristeas 07:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Troistorrents 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:16, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Logis seigneurial in St-Martin-le-Mault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael church in La Meyze 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Medard church in St-Meard 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Giles church in St-Gilles-les-Forets (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted a little bit CCW (to the left). --Halavar 15:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC) Sorry, but the perspective is good IMO. Tournasol7 06:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)  Support I findd no tilt. Could be a little bit sharper, but good enough for QI. --Steindy 12:05, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Bellac 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add more sharpness. --Halavar 15:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 06:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:15, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:43, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 06:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Heart of Jesus church in Zary (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek 35-36 in Zary (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Chateauneuf-la-Foret (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:13, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ligoure River in St-Priest-Ligoure (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Burgnac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lavignac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:12, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Pageas 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:12, 19 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James church in Magnac-Bourg 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:46, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek 6-7 in Zary (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Medard church in St-Meard 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Pardulphus and Martin church in Sussac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:15, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower gate in Zary (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 08:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dominican church in Colmar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dominican church in Colmar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:28, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval enclosures of Colmar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:42, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval enclosures of Colmar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:38, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medieval enclosures of Colmar (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:38, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 rue des Artisans in Colmar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:38, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 rue des Artisans in Colmar (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 20:15, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 18 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 21 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:43, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrobrego 5 in Zary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:43, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrobrego 11 in Zary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:43, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Chateauneuf-la-Foret (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 rue des Artisans in Colmar (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:33, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Sandherr in Colmar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poele des Laboureurs in Colmar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:21, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poele des Laboureurs in Colmar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 31 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint James church in Creussen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hersbrucker Tor in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Roussac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question What is that spot on the right above the roof? --F. Riedelio 06:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)  Done, it was a bird, I think. Tournasol7 05:25, 22 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 09:16, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall of Pegnitz (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lauf an der Pegnitz (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hersbrucker Strasse 1 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I will support.  Support Good quality. --Andrey Korzun 18:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall of Pegnitz (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I will support.  Support Good quality. --Andrey Korzun 18:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laghetto and Tempio di Esculapio in Villa Borghese 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corso Vittorio Emanuele II 208 in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Via della Gatta in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice view and mood. Maybe a bit too bright to my taste. -- Alvesgaspar 14:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Prati in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Sisto in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Sisto in Rome (4) V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Cestio in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Pulsnitz (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:43, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 53 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:42, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Lauf an der Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Goodquality --Llez 06:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Leonard church in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Wildenfels (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:41, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand

เรียน สมาชิกวิกิมีเดีย เนื่องจากเราเห็นว่าท่านเคยเข้าร่วมการประกวดรูปถ่ายที่จัดขึ้นโดยวิกิมีเดียประเทศไทย เราจึงอยากเชิญชวนท่านเข้าร่วมการประกวดรูปถ่าย Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand ซึ่งจะจัดขึ้นระหว่างวันที่ 15 พฤศจิกายน – 15 ธันวาคม 2564 นี้ มีรูปแบบในการประกวด 7 หัวข้อ คือ บุคคลในวิทยาศาสตร์ รูปจากกล้องจุลทรรศน์ สื่อที่ไม่ใช่รูปถ่าย รูปชุด สัตว์ป่ากับธรรมชาติ ดาราศาสตร์ และหมวดหมู่ทั่วไป หากท่านมีความสนใจในการเข้าร่วมการประกวด ท่านสามารถไปยังหน้าเว็บเพจ Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand เพื่ออ่านข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมและอัปโหลดไฟล์ของท่านภายในช่วงของการประกวดที่ได้กล่าวไว้ ขอแสดงความนับถือ ทีมผู้จัด Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand วิกิมีเดียประเทศไทย

Dear Fellow Wikimedians, Seeing that you have participated in one or more photo contests organized by Wikimedia Thailand, we would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand which will be held between 15 November – 15 December 2021. There are 7 categories in which you can submit: People in Science, Microscopy images, Non-photographic media, Image sets, Wildlife & nature, Astronomy, and General category. If you are interested in participating, you can visit the web page Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand/en for more information and to upload your files within the period of the contest. Kind Regards, The organizing team of Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand Wikimedia Thailand

--Karto1 (talk) 11:06, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahnfried house in Bayreuth (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 14:22, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 24 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 14:33, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lauf an der Pegnitz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 14:33, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall of Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 14:51, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhone River near La Balme 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 16:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poele des Laboureurs in Colmar (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be touch too dark. --XRay 08:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poele des Laboureurs in Colmar (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Kamenz (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Ossling (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Wildenfels (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlossstrasse 3 in Wildenfels (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Pulsnitz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:23, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Kirchberg an der Jagst (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:47, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtturm in Kirchberg an der Jagst (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:35, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Ossling (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Pulsnitz (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:47, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Kamenz (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:33, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 rue des Artisans in Colmar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Can you give it just a little more space on the left? I don't like that the lamp is cut off (even though it is just a tiny bit). Otherwise it is good quality for me. --Domob 16:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC) Sorry, but it was taken that you see... --Tournasol7 18:08, 3 November 2021 (UTC)  Support That's fine, just wanted to check. It is good quality for me even with this crop. --Domob 14:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 19:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Kirchberg an der Jagst (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Kamenz (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Wildenfels (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:20, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlossstrasse 3 in Wildenfels (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:20, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Ossling (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of the Nativity church in La Machine 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 22:16, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Sant'Angelo in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 23:19, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Vittorio Emanuele II in Rome (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 21:13, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlossstrasse 26 in Neuenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Storchsnestturm in Oehringen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:28, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Daun (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochturmkapelle am Zwinger in Rottweil (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Kirchberg an der Jagst (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hersbrucker Strasse 1 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA left at the rain pipe on the right side. --Ermell 08:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)  New version uploaded, it's better? Tournasol7 10:38, 25 October 2021 (UTC) Did not solve the problem. See antotation. --Ermell 21:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC) And now it's better? --Tournasol7 18:09, 3 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at QIC talk page

A discussion is being held here, over the reviewing process at QIC and the possibility of improving our Image Guidelines. As a regular contributor to the project, your opinion would be most welcome and valued. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:37, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vorstadt 2 in Neuenstein (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:07, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lauf an der Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Kaysersberg (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 15:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Kaysersberg (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:30, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Kaysersberg (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--V.Boldychev 10:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Kaysersberg (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:40, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Kirchberg an der Jagst (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:34, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of Constantinus in Kaysersberg (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of Constantinus in Kaysersberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of Constantinus in Kaysersberg (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of Constantinus in Kaysersberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 7 in Rottweil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Wildenfels (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlossstrasse 3 in Wildenfels (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 32 in Pegnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:29, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hofgarten in Oehringen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Schloss in Bayreuth (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 24 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Kaysersberg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Synagogue of Colmar (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:07, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Kaysersberg (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and interesting. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:49, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oejendorfer Park in Hamburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Autumn photo, good quality --Michielverbeek 06:20, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Ossling (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:28, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Wildenfels (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 11 in Creussen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Kaysersberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thyssenkrupp Testturm in Rottweil 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:36, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Ossling (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Kirchberg an der Jagst (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Kamenz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Wildenfels (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:36, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolder in Riquewihr (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 21:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolder in Riquewihr (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 21:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine de la Sinne in Riquewihr (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 22:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Riquewihr (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Riquewihr (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 21:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of Constantinus in Kaysersberg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Kaysersberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poststrasse 18 in Kirchberg an der Jagst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Visitor centre in Ribeauville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:24, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Visitor centre and Grand'Rue in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 Avenue de Gaulle in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 Route de Bergheim in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johann-Sebastian-Bach-Platz 7 in Ansbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:00, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Promenade 26 in Ansbach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustadt 35 in Ansbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Lawrence chapel in Rottweil 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 24 in Rottweil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5 Grand'Rue in Ribeauville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:28, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Sant'Angelo in Rome (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 07:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 place de la Premiere-Armee in Ribeauville (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:59, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 place de la Premiere-Armee in Ribeauville (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 Rue des Juifs in Ribeauville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Daun (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JS-Bach-Platz 22 in Ansbach (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 6 in Ansbach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:22, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ev.-lutheran parish church in Bayreuth (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanzleistrasse 7 in Bayreuth (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue des Juifs in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 21 rue Klobb in Ribeauville (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 07:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17 rue Klobb in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:11, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlossstrasse 24 in Neuenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Daun (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Rottweil (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Kirchberg an der Jagst (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 28 Grand’Rue in Ribeauville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Kaysersberg (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (and with a slight crop to the right it will become symmetric). --C messier 22:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Synagogue of Colmar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a ghost left bottom corner and a light dust spot in the sky. --Steindy 17:57, 7 November 2021 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 15:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC) Only in part of the spots. The not at all small ghost can still be seen. --Steindy 14:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:16, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Synagogue of Colmar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a large dust spot in the sky, --Steindy 17:57, 7 November 2021 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 15:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC) No, not done. --Steindy 14:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:16, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 21 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 39 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:12, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 44 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:41, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de l'Hotel-de-Ville in Ribeauville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de l'Hotel-de-Ville in Ribeauville (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de l'Hotel-de-Ville in Ribeauville (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 10 Rue des Freres Mertian in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 place de l'Ancien-Hopital in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:41, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:55, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 90 Grand'Rue in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 Rue de la Fraternite in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Schloss in Bayreuth (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Schloss in Bayreuth (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahnfried house in Bayreuth (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hulged 05:29, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanzleistrasse 7 in Bayreuth (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 38 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 rue Klobb in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand'Rue in Ribeauville (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:42, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 Place de la Sinne in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:41, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buettenstrasse 4 in Ansbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buettenstrasse 23 in Ansbach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:13, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz in Ansbach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 12 in Ansbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buettenstrasse 2 in Ansbach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:56, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Kaysersberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cut off that huge white space on the top edge --Jakubhal 16:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 06:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Thanks. Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:47, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Neuenstein (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unfavorable image composition (disturbing flagpole) and cropping (IMO too much foreground). --F. Riedelio 17:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 06:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 08:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 14 in Creussen (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 Place de la Republique in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 134 Grand'Rue in Ribeauville (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 134 Grand'Rue in Ribeauville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11 Rue du Vieux Lavoir in Ribeauville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11 Rue du Vieux Lavoir in Ribeauville (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchstrasse 18 in Kamenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchstrasse in Kamenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchstrasse 1 in Kamenz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwingerstrasse 4 in Kamenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 09:12, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwingerstrasse 6 in Kamenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:08, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 Place du Bouc in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:56, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Riquewihr (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:31, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Ansbach (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geschwister-Scholl-Haus in Leipzig (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grimmaische Strasse 2-4 in Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Historical town hall of Muenster (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ducal Museum in Gotha 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lauf an der Pegnitz (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:11, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 rue Salzmann in Ribeauville 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 rue Salzmann in Ribeauville 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptmarkt 9 in Gotha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainzer Gasse in Alsfeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomaskirchhof 20 in Leipzig (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptmarkt 39 in Gotha (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klosterstrasse 3 in Blankenheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Gregory church in Ribeauville 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain at Place de la Republique in Ribeauville 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain at Place de la Republique in Ribeauville 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannesstrasse 6 in Blankenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la 1e Armee in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Visitor centre in Ribeauville (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 rue Salzmann in Ribeauville 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte des bouchers in Ribeauville 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:21, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte des bouchers in Ribeauville 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:21, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salvator basilica in Pruem 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Paul cathedral in Muenster 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Sharpness just acceptable.) --XRay 05:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Thomas church in Leipzig (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Augustinian church in Gotha (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 84 in Bensheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine du cerf in Ribeauville (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AStiasny 07:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)