User talk:Technical 13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
General   Sand Box   Talk  




 
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

File:Microsoft Windows logo (Pre-XP).svg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Microsoft Windows logo (Pre-XP).svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Keφr (keep talk here) 16:20, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

monbook

[edit]

how do I fix it? Evrik (talk) 01:32, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello there Evrik! I'm going to need a little more information. Are you asking for help fixing User:Evrik/monobook.js? Is this in response to a message I have posted on the talk page of your custom script page (note that it would be one of 0, so I have no idea if yours is one of the pages)? If so, I'd be happy to take a look tomorrow. :) — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 03:11, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Help: yes
Message: yes

Please help. Evrik (talk) 03:12, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I hope that works! Evrik (talk) 02:50, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JavaScript update

[edit]

Hi - is [1] correct, or do I need to do more? Pek the Penguin (talk) 07:51, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a legacy when we could still use Classic Skin - it added extra links to the side bar. It's probably redundant now, but I take the view "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". Pek the Penguin (talk) 20:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • What links did it add, are they otherwise available now, and what skin are you using now? I could probably update the script for you if you desire. I just had to ask because I couldn't find any thing on any page with a "quickbar" id, which is what that script attempts to attach to. If you don't wish to use an updated script for your current skin, you may want to blank it and request deletion to prevent the broken script (which is adding error messages to your JS console) from breaking all of your code in the next year or so. Happy editing! — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 23:33, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't causing me any errors, but I've blanked it anyway. Pek the Penguin (talk) 12:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please experiment in the sandbox

[edit]
العربية ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ Frysk ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−
float 
An edit you made to MediaWiki_talk:Gadget-GoogleTranslate.js seemed to be a test, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Feel free to visit the community portal if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thank you!

The page your message is about is entirely empty. The deprecation messages left are broad and unhelpful. Please improve the script or search algorithm before you are going to continue. I say this as a Wikimedia Commons administrator who usually cared for edit protected requests on script pages and seeing the category spammed like this, doesn't make things easier. -- Rillke(q?) 15:47, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Actually, Rillke, it wasn't a test. I understand your frustration, and I'm working on clearing most of these requests out of the edit protected category as we speak. I'm replacing them with just the Category:JavaScripts using deprecated elements category which itself will be a subcat of edit protected requests to be less spamy. As for that page being empty, MediaWiki_talk:Gadget-GoogleTranslate.js#Bug fix <-- that is what triggered the message to be posted there. The goal was to tag all script talk pages where addOnloadHook was mentioned on the talk page or used in the script to this category so that they could be categorized in a way that they could be gone through and addressed by a human. I'd be happy to work with you further to clean these up. Thank you for bringing your concern to my attention on my talk page and happy editing! — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 16:18, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • What is the purpose of matching text from the talk page? -- Rillke(q?) 16:28, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • Indicative of there likely being other issues that need to be addressed still in the script. There are a lot of things listed on MW:ResourceLoader/Legacy JavaScript and chances are, some of them were missed in most scripts. It is also useful to have an idea of what scripts need jQuerification and to be brought up to coding conventions once the deprecations have been gone through. :) — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 16:33, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • To be frank, I doubt that any script needs jQueryification if it runs fine in the browsers it claims to support, otherwise. are a lot of things - I know - and that's why a generic message à la "There could be something unspecified wrong with your code", is not helpful, while "<specific issue> might cause a problem" is. -- Rillke(q?) 16:37, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

rfa

[edit]

Hi Technical 13, as you requested "temporary" admin rights, could you put an estimate about the required period/duration into your rfa? --Túrelio (talk) 08:57, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Categories in User:Technical 13/Userboxes/Browser

[edit]

Hi, Technical 13. I'm noticing that the categories assigned by this template don't match categories that are defined under Category:Users by technology. The template assigns categories with names in the form "Wikimedians who use Foo". Most of the defined categories have names in the form "Foo users". I'm wondering what the best way is to consolidate these. What do you think?

This came to my attention because a user created Category:Wikimedians who use Google Chrome without realizing that Category:Google Chrome users already existed. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:24, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

Thank you for creating the OneClickArchiver, it's amazing. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 19:07, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, OCA was originally by Equazcion and improved by T13. Just a pity neither have continued working on more scripts. Green Giant (talk) 19:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Caroline Strong.jpg

[edit]
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Caroline Strong.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Caroline Strong.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.
BevinKacon (talk) 21:25, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:JS migration

[edit]
Template:JS migration has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:42, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Technical_13&oldid=655534124"