User talk:Stefan Noack

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Stefan Noack!

-- 11:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Uwe_Puschner.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Martin H. (talk) 15:28, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ferdinand Heinrich Grautoff.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

INeverCry 19:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

4nn1l2 (talk) 12:08, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Mdachi bin Scharifu.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mdachi bin Scharifu.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hinweise zu dem Foto von bin Scharifu

[edit]

Hallo Stefan Noack,

vielen Dank, dass du das Bild von bin Scharifu hochgeladen hast! Echt klasse, dass man jetzt ein Bild zu dem Mann hat. Leider gibt es noch Probleme mit der rechtlichen Situation des Bildes, deswegen hat der Bot das Foto ja auch zur Löschung vorgeschlagen.

Das Problem liegt in der Lizenz. Du hast ja geschrieben May only be used with the permission of Stefan Noack. Wenn du dabei bleibst, kannst du das Bild gleich löschen - Wikimedia erlaubt nur Inhalte mit einer freien Lizenz. Es muss also möglich sein, dass Bild frei und ohne deine Erlaubnis zu nutzen und zu verändern, für alle Zwecke. Du kannst aber beispielsweise fordern, dass dein Name als Urheber der digitalen Kopie genannt wird. Wenn du aber grundsätzlich nicht möchtest, dass das Bild frei genutzt wird, kann das Bild auch nicht in einem Wikipedia-Artikel verwendet werden und du solltest es hier löschen.

Ich würde mich aber freuen, wenn du das Foto hier lassen würdest. In diesem Fall musst du aber angeben, warum du das Recht hast, das Bild zu veröffentlichen. Die Urheberrechte gelten in Deutschland grundsätzlich bis 70 Jahre nach dem Tod des Autors, daher ist es gut vorstellbar, dass dein Foto noch urheberrechtlich geschützt ist (wenn der Fotograf nicht vor 1950 gestorben ist). Da Du aber ein Anonymes Werk hast, ist hier für das Urheberrecht wichtig, wann es veröffentlicht wurde. Sollte es vor 1950 veröffentlicht worden sein, ist das Foto gemeinfrei, und du solltest die Vorlage Template:PD-anon-70-EU als Lizenz angeben. Wenn das Foto nie veröffentlicht wurde, wirds schwieriger, aber das können wir ja dann klären. Ich helf dir natürlich gerne dabei, das alles einzutragen, wenn du Fragen hast, melde dich einfach. Liebe Grüße --AlanyaSeeburg (talk) 15:48, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Dann muss das Bild wohl leider wieder gelöscht werden. Bedauerlich, aber wohl nicht zu ändern. Stefan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefan Noack (talk • contribs) 15:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]