User talk:Spiridon Ion Cepleanu

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

SUM UT OMNIA : UMBRA ET PULVIS - ΕΙΜΙ ΩΣ ΑΠΑΝΤΑ : ΣΚΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΚΟΝΙΑ...

No FoP !
No derivative works : it's forbidden to...
...modify with Photoshop even my own works !!! see [1] and lower.

Dear administrators of Commons, OK with your deletions if you refuse to admit that my DERIVATIVE works can be according to my sources but different, and also according to my own pictures but modified, or to older ones, coming from my archives, silver/paper pictures, scholar works realised before the digital age, before the severe decline of the public domain and of the freedom of panorama for the benefit of copyright. I'm too old, you're too young, I have known a freer world, your children will have to pay a fee to enter a city containing public monuments or sculptures. That's life : we live in a brave new world where all images, even collectively and anonymously worked by a team or by myself some times ago (before the numeric era), even showed in a public free domain or place, must today 03:15 Monday 23 December 2024 belonging to someone, and must fall into the merchandised artworks domain, with a copyright. I'm an oldtimer, too old for this brave new very private world. It is for this reason that I am...

This user is, of their own volition, no longer active on Wikimedia Commons.
This is not indicative of breaking any Wikimedia policies.


...but I'm happy to have participated in the beginning of Wikipedia to the establishment of a living, free and shared encyclopaedia. Delete all you think to must be deleted, please, do for the best, because I have uploaded some images improperly (by example without OTRS). Wikipedia must be legally irreproachable. On the other hand, even if I'm not agree with the actual laws concerning FoP, PD or Copyright, it is not necessary to accusing me of bad faith. Here we are all volunteers. Thank you, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 17:34, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yann!

[edit]

Hi @Yann: , have a good day. I am retired from Wikipedia but I still sometimes want to restore the historical facts on certain maps, when other contributors introduce errors like here [2]. But I take good note that this represents a serious offense which can cause a blockage, which will delight those who, for political, religious or ideological reasons, prefer to hide some historical facts but, not succeeding so far in excluding me of Wikipedia, use my technical and methodological clumsiness to pass me off as a troll or a vandal. I take good note that a digital map created «for and on» Commons, is as sacred as a historical work of art and therefore intangible, an I ask to the community «since this is so, why did you keep the "upload new version" function? It's nonsense.» You Yann, «do what must, come what may». Wishes, Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 08:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiridon Ion Cepleanu: Yes, this could be controversial. I suggest to discuss any change first on the talk page, and to get a consensus before. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:21, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Treaty of Andrinople 1829.png

[edit]

Good day. There is a clear mistake on the map you have drawn - the "Azerbaijan" region is located SOUTH of the Araks River, but not in Transcaucasia. Examples: 1, 2, 3, 4. And Armenia is clearly to the north and a little to the east.1, 2, 3, 4. I would be grateful if you fix it quickly. Well-read MountainMan (talk) 16:10, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What's interesting though, is how many wikis use that image, and which ones. I guess they don't see much of a problem ? — Jerome Potts (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A lot. They don't see it, because, apparently, they don't notice it, but READERS see it, but this is a historical mistake, the area is MUCH further south, please, please correct the inaccuracy--Well-read MountainMan (talk) 17:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
One more, and more--Well-read MountainMan (talk) 12:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Would you, you all colleagues please, verify on the historical sources and old maps that «Azebaïdjan» is a name, used not only by a modern state, but also by a large territory of former Persia, on the both sides of Arax river? Thank you very much! --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 13:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RomaniaHistRegions.jpg

[edit]
File:RomaniaHistRegions.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

OrionNimrod (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This map is not political and show not irrendentist claims but only historic european lands where Romanians (with others) lived. --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 13:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Regiuni Româneşti.png

[edit]
File:Regiuni Româneşti.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Viuser (talk) 12:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On my opinion this file must be renamed because Regiuni Româneşti means "Romanian regions". Renamed as Regiuni istorice în România și vecinătate meaning "Historic regions in Romania and neighborough". --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 13:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]

{{Autotranslate|1=|2=Files in Category:Fictional flags of Wallachia|3=plural|base=Idw} Yours sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Affected:[reply]

Changes to German Settlement Zone

[edit]

Two days ago you edited the image of Occupied France during WWII reducing down the Zone of German Settlement. Do you have sources that claim it is smaller or? Sandjaar (talk) 07:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, here: Jean-Luc Leleu, Françoise Passera, Jean Quellien, Michel Daeffler: La France pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, Ministère de la Défense & Fayard 2010 (ISBN 978-2-213-65461-4) and Peter Schöttler, Du Rhin à la Manche : frontières et relations franco-allemandes au XXe siècle, Presses universitaires François Rabelais, Tours 2017. --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 11:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Spiridon_Ion_Cepleanu&oldid=971850135"