User talk:Silltruten
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:47, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Tetraophasis szechenyii.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Elisfkc (talk) 15:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
ː@Elisfkc This is very weird, found this without copyright on FlickRː https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/22702090910/. Has that user uploaded an image with copyright, nicked it from somebody else? Silltruten (talk) 19:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Image problems
[edit]On many of your recent Flickr uploads you have changed the licence tag for that on Flickr to a different one; mostly you have put cc-by-sa-4.0 when the original licence is cc-by-sa-20. Because you simply cropped the images so you have no rights to chnage the licence under which the image is released, when uploaded here. You must retain the same licence as the original. I've fixed as many as I see but you may want to review the rest of your uploads. Please be more careful in future. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 17:36, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- I'm terribly sorry, I just mistakenly assumed that cc-by-sa-4.0 just was the current version and was to be used irrespective of which cc-by-sa the image was released under. I'll go through the uploads. It won't happen again. Silltruten (talk) 18:38, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Per Holmen's photos
[edit]Please note that Per Holmen's photos are not available under CC-by-SA as I thought. All his photos are going to be deleted. This is due to a miscommunication between him and me. I'm not sure what communications you had with him. JMK (talk) 20:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for infoǃ I've been in contact with him. On a direct question whether it was ok to make them available under CC or CC-by-SA, Per said that as long as he was credited and there was a link to his website, it was ok. But maybe he has changed his mind? I'll double check with him. Silltruten (talk) 21:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- JMK, just been in touch with Per, and as with me there was a misunderstanding concerning his images. He does not want to release them under CC-by-SA. Will you delete the one's I've uploaded as well? I do not have the authority. Thanks in advanceǃ Silltruten (talk) 23:48, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- Appreciate your info. Will file a deletion request that includes your uploads. JMK (talk) 12:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- The deletion request is here: Deletion requests/Per Holmen photos. JMK (talk) 15:07, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Appreciate your info. Will file a deletion request that includes your uploads. JMK (talk) 12:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Flickr2Commons
[edit]I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. Elisfkc (talk) 03:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, I wasn't aware of that toolǃ I'll use it in the future. All the best, Silltruten (talk) 15:25, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Flickr2Commons
[edit]I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first"). Elisfkc (talk) 15:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, the authorization doesn't work, I get this error message: "Error retrieving token: mwoauthdatastore-request-token-not-found". Some of the images have to be cropped in order to be correctly displayed in the Wikipedia App, that's why I want to download them first. Is there anything wrong with the resolution, links or the categorization? AFAIK I've done it correctly.Silltruten (talk) 15:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Woodward's Batis.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Woodward's Batis.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Woodward's Batis.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 15:43, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 - Brasil
[edit]Saudações. Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque, em outro ano, participou da competição fotográfica Wiki Loves Monuments. Escrevo em nome do grupo organizador do Wiki Loves Monuments deste ano para convidá-lo/convidá-la a participar de novo!
O Wiki Loves Monuments é o maior concurso fotográfico do mundo. Permite ampliar o conhecimento global sobre o Brasil, mostrando a riqueza cultural e histórica do país. Neste ano, ampliamos enormemente as listas de monumentos a serem registrados e isso ajuda na difusão da diversidade brasileira.
Participe do Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 - Brasil e ganhe prêmios! Serão premiadas as melhores fotografias e também aqueles e aquelas que mais contribuirem com registros fotográficos diversos do patrimônio cultural e histórico brasileiro. Leia as instruções com cuidado!
De novo, obrigado por participar do Wiki Loves Monuments e melhorar o conhecimento livre disponível na internet! Se tiver dúvidas, não hesite em entrar em contato!—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲»22:01, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Locustella fasciolata.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Locustella fasciolata.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Locustella fasciolata.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Nominated for deletion by User:A1Cafel. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 06:06, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Plain Laughingthrush.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Plain Laughingthrush.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Plain Laughingthrush.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Nominated for deletion by User:A1Cafel. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 03:12, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Myzomela annabellae - The Birds of New Guinea (cropped).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Myzomela annabellae - The Birds of New Guinea (cropped).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Myzomela annabellae - The Birds of New Guinea (cropped).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Myzomela erythrina - The Birds of New Guinea (cropped).jpg
- File:Synallaxis erythrothorax - Rufous-breasted Spinetail (cropped).jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:07, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:37, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club (1997) (20443438535) (cropped).jpg was recently deleted
[edit]File:Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club (1997) (20443438535) (cropped).jpg was recently deleted by DMacks for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: [[::Category:Internet Archive (potential copyvio)]] post-1950 copyrighted source
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 10:13, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club (1997) (20434777612) (cropped).jpg was recently deleted
[edit]File:Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club (1997) (20434777612) (cropped).jpg was recently deleted by DMacks for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: [[::Category:Internet Archive (potential copyvio)]] post-1950 copyrighted source
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 10:13, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Hög tid att ladda upp: Wiki Loves Earth 2022!
[edit]Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Sweden or other participating countries.)
Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Tävlingen började 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Även om fortsatt försiktighet är att rekommendera går det bra att ge sig ut på fotosafari och fotografera naturen i ditt närområde – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?
Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 13:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Nu startar Wiki Loves Monuments 2022!
[edit]Hej!
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Sweden or other participating countries.)
Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth!
Den 1 september inleds 2022 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, kulturmärkta fartyg och fritidsbåtar och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.
Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 10:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Äntligen maj: Wiki Loves Earth 2023!
[edit]Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Sweden or other participating countries.)
Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Nytt för i år är att vi utöver bästa foto även belönar fotograferande av tidigare ofotograferade objekt samt bästa bildserie om minst tio fotografier av samma objekt. Tävlingen börjar 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Expeditioner, fotosafari eller en helt vanlig promenad? Via en smidig karta som visar ditt närområde hittar du bra ställen att besöka – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?
Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 12:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Äntligen maj: Wiki Loves Earth 2024!
[edit]Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Sweden or other participating countries.)
Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Utöver bästa foto belönar vi även fotograferande av tidigare ofotograferade objekt samt bästa bildserie om minst tio fotografier av samma objekt. Tävlingen börjar 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Expeditioner, fotosafari eller en helt vanlig promenad? Via en smidig karta som visar ditt närområde hittar du bra ställen att besöka – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?
Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! / Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 10:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Identity?
[edit]Hi Silltruten - I saw you added a cropped version of File:Red-rumped Swallow - Gambia (32495694292).jpg as File:Cecropis domicella.jpg. How did you identify it as Cecropis domicella, rather than Cecropis daurica rufula, please? The latter breeds in Europe, but winters in the same area as C. domicella; as photo was taken in January, it cannot be identified solely by location. For the time being I have renamed the source photo (as File:West African Swallow - Gambia (32495694292).jpg) and reclassified it so it is in the same category as the derivative, but it is possible they may both need to be moved back to C. daurica if not positively identified as C. domicella. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 00:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- You're quite rightǃ I can't remember my reasoning, but must have just assumed it being domicella, not noting the date. As the photo doesn't reveal the front side, I'm not sure it's identifiable. I would not mind at all moving it back do daurica. Sorry about thisǃ Silltruten (talk) 20:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks! I'll think about it for a day or two before deciding what to do, including hunting down a West African field guide or two for further information; drop me a ping here if you have any other thoughts yourself. - MPF (talk) 22:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've been checking a bit; the two differ on the rump pattern, broader and with a pale upper part in C. daurica rufula, and narrower but solid darker orange in C. domicella. And unfortunately, this bird is as the photographer first identified, C. daurica rufula on its wintering quarters. Sadly, the search for a CC-licensed photo of C. domicella needs to continue . . . :-( MPF (talk) 21:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks! I'll think about it for a day or two before deciding what to do, including hunting down a West African field guide or two for further information; drop me a ping here if you have any other thoughts yourself. - MPF (talk) 22:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Nu startar Wiki Loves Monuments 2024!
[edit]Hej!
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in Sweden or other participating countries.)
Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth!
Den 1 september inleds 2024 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera det svenska kulturarvet. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, kulturmärkta fartyg och fritidsbåtar samt arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.
Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! / --Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 08:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)