User talk:Seyyedalith

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Seyyedalith!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

File:امتحان ایرانسل.png

File:امتحان ایرانسل.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MohammadtheEditor 13:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammad (talk • contribs) 13:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your WP logos

Hi there! First, a note about the logo inspired by the Forsythe's one. You need to change the license as the actual original is not CC0. Please review that the others are appropriately licensed as well. Then, you'll probably want to check https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Visual_identity_guidelines and https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Trademark_policy. Please ask questions on the related talk pages if you need further help. --Elitre (talk) 11:01, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

@Elitre: Hi, Thank you for your message and help; but Wikipedia by Giulia Forsythe is Under license CC0 and it's mentioned in right of picture. Seyyedalith (talk) 21:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

The metadata says something different, so there's not much to do other than asking the author. --Elitre (talk) 13:13, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

@Elitre: Thank you for your follow up! Seyyedalith (talk) 22:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Sharif wiki2.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sharif wiki2.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

SlowManifesto (talk) 13:01, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Tums wiki.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tums wiki.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

SlowManifesto (talk) 23:13, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Sharif wiki.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sharif wiki.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

SlowManifesto (talk) 23:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Tu wiki.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tu wiki.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

SlowManifesto (talk) 20:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Dome of the rock interior vector 02.pdf

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dome of the rock interior vector 02.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

4nn1l2 (talk) 06:05, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

سلام. اثر بسیار زیبایی است. ولی چون قبلاً خارج از ویکی‌مدیا منتشر شده [1] باید از طریق COM:OTRS تأیید شود. کافی است با ایمیلی از دامین سایت قطره یک ایمیل برای ویکی‌مدیا بفرستید. با تشکر 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:08, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

@4nn1l2: سلام اجازه‌نامه‌ی تصویر در صفحه‌ی مربوط ذکر شده است. Seyyedalith (talk) 12:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

اگر منظور «انتشار بدون ذکر منبع آزاد است.» است که قابل قبول نیست چون گنگ می‌باشد. اگر سایت متعلق به خودتان است می‌توانید به یکی از پروانه‌های مجاز (COM:L) اشاره کنید و سپس برچسب {{License review}} را قرار دهید تا یک بازبین آن را بررسی کند. اگر قصد کردید از مجوزهای کریتیو کامانز (من‌جمله CC0) استفاده کنید، لطفاً دقت کنید که دادن پیوند به اصل مجوز در سایت رسمی کریتیو کامنز [2] ضروری است. 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:36, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

@4nn1l2: اعمال شد سپاس Seyyedalith (talk) 13:14, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

ممنون. لطفاً در آینده، برچسب license review را در صفحهٔ خود فایل قرار دهید، نه صفحهٔ بحثش. 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:09, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Seyyedalith,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Before and after spraying agent orange.jpg

Copyright status: File:Before and after spraying agent orange.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Before and after spraying agent orange.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Before and after spraying agent orange.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Before and after spraying agent orange.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Before and after spraying agent orange.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

JuTa 04:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC)