User talk:Sergio09200

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sergio09200!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:09, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Col de Portech (Ariège - France) - Panneau d'information.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 20:08, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Logo de Cougnaud Construction, entreprise industrielle de Vendée (France).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo de Cougnaud Construction, entreprise industrielle de Vendée (France).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ahmadtalk 00:04, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Gare de la Bastide-de-Sérou.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gare de la Bastide-de-Sérou.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo de Cougnaud Construction, entreprise industrielle de Vendée (France).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viaduc de Vernajoul (Ariège).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 13:15, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viaduc ferroviaire de Vernajoul vers Foix (Ariège).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 13:18, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viaduc de Glénic (Creuse).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 13:19, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gare de la Bastide-de-Sérou.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 13:20, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Porte de fer recto avec profil Jules Lax (1842-1925), créateur du Train jaune.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Culex (talk) 13:10, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Message ?

[edit]

Bonjour Sergio092000. Je suis sincèrement désolé de voir que vous aviez été bloqué par une décision d'administrateurs. Mais sur le message que vous m'avez envoyé, c'est la seule chose que j'ai pu lire car la suite du message ne s'est pas affiché (trois points ...) et le logo était différent de d'habitude, ressemblant à une boite aux lettres. Pouvez-vous y répondre sans votre pseudo ? Cordialement.--Anthospace (talk) 10:51, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nouvel essai envoyé il y a une minute, Merci et bien à vous Sergio09200 (talk) 14:48, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Désolé encore mais tout ce que j'ai pu lire c'est "nouvel essai". Quant à votre page de discussion principale, seuls les administrateurs peuvent la modifier. On ne peut même pas lancer un nouveau sujet. Cordialement. Anthospace (talk) 18:00, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
C'est assez scandaleux de bloquer ainsi le courrier privé des gens ; honte à cette junte, il y avait :
Bonjour,
Nous avons eu l'occasion de collaborer sur Wikipedia notamment sur le cyclisme : je viens donc vous informer que j'ai été bloqué indéfiniment hier notamment en raison de mon vote contre le candidat administrateur Limfjord, coopté par le clan au pouvoir, venant certes après des blocages antérieurs largement excessifs au moins pour partie.
Vote contre #1 : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Administrateur/Limfjord69#Opposition
Seul endroit où je pouvais m'exprimer ou me défendre (bien caché) : https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sujet:Xu2qn9i4at1zfpbs&topic_showPostId=xudih4k3msoa8hp5&fromnotif=1#flow-post-xudih4k3msoa8hp5
Cette condamnation vient certes après des blocages antérieurs largement abusifs au moins pour partie. Ma liberté de ton et mes critiques ne plaisaient forcément pas mais je pensais, à tord, qu'il aurait été pertinent de laisser vivre quelque opposition au clanisme, à la perte de neutralité au profit d'une dérive wokiste non seulement tolérée mais encouragée.
Bien à vous Sergio09200 (talk) 18:09, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonsoir. Sur Wikipédia, je n'ai presque jamais contribué à des pages politiques et on ne m'a jamais imposé de façon de penser. Même si je sais que certains contributeurs revertent un peu trop facilement ou utilisent les règles selon le sens à eux (ce que Wikipédia n'est pas ou autres prétextes...). Quant aux votes pour les administrateurs, je n'y ai pas participé. Cependant sur la dérive wokiste, hors Wikipédia, je vois en effet bien cela dans les médias, la politique, l'école... Sur ce, je n'en développerai pas plus ici. Sincèrement désolé pour vous, vous n'êtes pas le premier à être banni de Wikipédia. Pour ma part, sur les quelques articles de l'Ariège ou sur les cols où vous avez pu contribuer, je n'ai rien à vous reprocher. Cordialement.--Anthospace (talk) 19:00, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonsoir. Sur le message à propos du col de Crouzette, seul le début où vous me remerciez est affiché. Pour le reste, on ne voit que trois petits points. C'est à cause du blocage. Cordialement. Anthospace (talk) 21:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]