User talk:Selbymay/1

Septembre 2011-Mars 2012

La fameuse maison

Bonjour Selbymay, j'ai effectivement constaté que la journée d'hier fut riche en nouvelles photos des MH de Nantes. Merci pour votre remarque, en consultant le plan du site joint à votre message, je crois que l'erreur vient de moi, j'ai photographié par mégarde la maison du 7 rue Sainte-Croix, juste à côté de celle de la juiverie. Cordialement, --Jibi44 (talk) 07:20, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Selbymay!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 21:30, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Chapelle Saint Goustan (1) - Le Croisic.jpg was uncategorized on 6 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 21:30, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Saint-Julien-de-Concelles - Eglise Saint-Julien (1).jpg was uncategorized on 24 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 21:11, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Jallais - Eglise.jpg was uncategorized on 1 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:45, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Cholet - Église Notre-Dame (orgues).jpg was uncategorized on 16 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 23:10, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Cholet - Église Notre-Dame (choeur).jpg was uncategorized on 16 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 23:10, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Puits (presbytère) - Questembert (2).jpg was uncategorized on 23 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Selbymay, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:56, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Géolocalisation des photos

Bonjour,

Vous avez récemment importé beaucoup de photos de bâtiments et monuments historiques. Merci pour cet apport à Commons, ces photos seront utiles pour illustrer les articles.

Je ne peux toutefois que regretter que celles-ci ne soient pas géolocalisées. Cette démarche n'est en rien obligatoire, je vous rassure, mais elle est utile.

Pour localiser une photo, vous pouvez ajouter le modèle {{location}} ou le modèle {{Location dec}}. Vous trouverez la documentation de ces éodèles sur cette page.

Pour relever les coordonnées d'un bâtiment ou monument, vous avez plusieurs possibilités:

• Vous possédez un GPS, vous pouvez relever les coordonnées lorsque vous prenez la photo;
• Vous pouvez également relever les coordonnées via Google Maps: en faisant un clic-droit sur le batiment et sélectionnant "Plus d'infos sur cet endroit", les coordonnées (latitude, longitude) apparaitront dans la case de recherche au dessus de la carte.

Si vous avez des questions ou des remarques, n'hésitez pas à me répondre ici ou sur ma page de discussion.

Pleclown (talk) 10:21, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Sallertaine - Moulin de Raire (1).jpg

Bonjour Selbymay,

J'aime beaucoup la photographie susmentionnée mais à mon avis elle devrait être améliorée avec un logiciel pour en améliorer la neteté et redresser les perspectives. Le logiciel gratuit GIMP est parfait pour effectuer ces retouches.

Cordiales salutations

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 10:33, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Sallertaine - Moulin de Raire (1).jpg

Bonjour Selbymay,

Je t'adresse mes sincères félicitations. En effet j'ai visionné ta photographie et vu qu'elle était déja en bonne voie pour être promue.

Amicalement.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 10:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Gilles-Croix-de-Vie - Cimetiere (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI in my opinion--Jebulon 16:19, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de préfecture de la Loire-Atlantique - Nantes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 12:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Cholet_-_Hôtel_de_Ville_(1).jpg

File:Cholet_-_Hôtel_de_Ville_(1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jebulon (talk) 13:07, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Croyez bien que je suis désolé.--Jebulon (talk) 13:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sallertaine - Moulin de Raire (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Gilles-Croix-de-Vie - Eglise Saint-Gilles (gargouille 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:33, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemillé - Église Notre-Dame Neuve (detail 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though the foundation is not in focus. --NorbertNagel 20:10, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galerie David d'Angers (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good work under difficult lighting conditions --Haeferl 14:33, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maindron - Geneviève désarme Attila.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI pour moi. Pourriez-vous indiquer où se trouve cette statue ? --Vassil 21:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC) L'article sur Maindron parle de l'église Notre-Dame de Cholet.--Jebulon 22:03, 26 December 2011 (UTC) Exact, elle s'y trouve actuellement après restauration. Selbymay 08:38, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Merci pour ces précisions, j'ai ajouté l'église dans la description et les catégories.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maindron - Clovis baptisé par saint Rémi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 13:04, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sainte-Leocadie - Eglise (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very nice pic, but IMO it's tilted and needs perspective distortion correction too. --Iifar 18:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)  Done Good to go. --Iifar 18:29, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prefecture of Nantes, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It is useful to attach the scope to the category and usual, adding Exterior --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:18, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Grand-Lieu - Passay (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 01:36, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lebourg - Jeanne d'Arc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Carschten 21:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Machecoul - Abbaye Notre-Dame-de-la-Chaume (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 09:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barcelona - Mammoth sculpture.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Perhaps QI, but the right edge of the mammoth is not normal (white edge)--Lmbuga 00:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC) Could you be more specific, please. I don't get what you mean. --Selbymay 20:10, 12 January 2012 (UTC) Sorry, my English is not good, see the notes. You can delete the notes when you want--Lmbuga 00:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC) There are problems, but I don't know the cause. Perhaps oversharpened--Lmbuga 00:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC) When I zoom in it appears oversharpened, I think. --NorbertNagel 21:31, 13 January 2012 (UTC) Yes indeed, I uploaded a new version less sharpened, hope you'll see an improvement. Thanks. --Selbymay 22:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC) Much better Qi to me--Lmbuga 03:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Chateaubriand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd prefer a wider crop at the bottom, but it's QI IMO. --Kadellar 19:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barcelona - Arc de Triomf (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 14:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guémené-Penfao - Chapelle St Georges (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, although could be sharper at the left edge. --Sfu 08:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blain - Château de Blain (gargouille 1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great image. But what I don't understand is the fact that the gargoyle's face is pinsharp, whereas the drainpipe bracket which is roughly on the same plane is blurred. Dodgy lens? --Fred the Oyster 16:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC) Nothing special, the focus was on the face and for once it worked. --Selbymay 21:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Bonchamps.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jallais - Manoir de la Chaperonnière.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would like to see a bit more sharpness, but it's nevertheless QI to me. --Iifar 19:38, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barcelona - Arc de Triomf (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality & very nice. --NorbertNagel 21:07, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barcelona - Farola Avenida Gaudi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tight crop but good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ur - Église Saint-Martin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 22:08, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ur - Église Saint-Martin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 22:08, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pompertuzat - Pont Deyme (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great composition, nice colors. --Yann 10:00, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pompertuzat - Pont Deyme (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 22:39, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pompertuzat - Pont Deyme (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments lovely, very nice composition --Carschten 22:39, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Rochefort-en-Terre (Vierge - détail).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 18:32, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blain - Château de Blain (gargouille 6).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:48, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Théâtre (façade) de La Roche-sur-Yon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Jebulon 16:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forges de la Jahotière (chataignier) - Abbaretz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Was it sharpened with a software? Looks slightly artifical, but still QI, I think. --NorbertNagel 21:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Louis (façade gauche) - La Roche-sur-Yon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Louis (façade droite) - La Roche-sur-Yon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Strong lens compression (perspective distortion) and tight crop. --Iifar 10:12, 26 January 2012 (UTC) In fact, it's only a problem of thumbnail, if you open the original file, you'll find the second version with perspective correction. Thanks to check. --Selbymay 17:25, 26 January 2012 (UTC) Good, but now I think it's too corrected, it looks wrong. Perspective sometimes needs correcting, but one can easily go overboard. I think a bit of perspective distortion would make it bettter. Mattbuck 22:45, 1 February 2012 (UTC)  Support Good quality now --PierreSelim 08:38, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anetz - Chateau Plessis Vair (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 13:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Crotalus durissus (1) - Nantes.jpg

Dear Selbymay,

When looking at your very nice picture File:Crotalus durissus (1) - Nantes.jpg I cannot help noticing that the snake has dust on its eye which make me believe, and also because it is taken at a museum, that it is stuffed. If this is correct the file then preferably should be categorized with Category:Zoology specimens Diorama and Category:Taxidermied reptiles. Thank you, Jopparn (talk) 12:06, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crotalus durissus (1) - Nantes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Holleday 19:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anetz - Chateau Plessis Vair (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Problème de correction de perspective (cf annotations)--Jebulon 14:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC) Difficile à corriger mais j'ai essayé. A vous de voir. Merci. --Selbymay 20:51, 9 February 2012 (UTC)très bien.--Jebulon 23:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anetz - Chateau Plessis Vair (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness borderline, but good.--Jebulon 14:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anetz - Chateau Plessis Vair (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (the picture, not the buildings !)--Jebulon 14:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agkistrodon contortrix - Nantes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Holleday 20:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croix hosannière de Soullans (Vendée).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 17:22, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croix hosannière de Soullans (Vendée) - Vue avec l'église en arrière-plan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 15:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris 9 - Printemps view (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 13:27, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Paul Landowski - Farabeuf.jpg

File:Paul Landowski - Farabeuf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jastrow (Λέγετε) 15:12, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye des Fontenelles (vue d'ensemble) - La Roche-sur-Yon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It's a bit too soft. Can you add some sharpness? --Iifar 19:38, 19 March 2012 (UTC)  Done Please tell me if it's better now. --Selbymay 21:27, 19 March 2012 (UTC).  Support I added slightly more sharpness. --Iifar 16:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye des Fontenelles (ruines 3) - La Roche-sur-Yon.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It will look better with more sharpness and without black spot (maybe bird) on the right part of the sky. --Iifar 20:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)  Done Bird is gone now :) --Selbymay 21:27, 19 March 2012 (UTC).  Support I added slightly more sharpness. --Iifar 16:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corsept - Menhir Pierre-Bonde (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 23:02, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corsept - Menhir Pierre-Bonde (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Saffron Blaze 23:02, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris 11 - Eglise Ste Marguerite (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and I like the composition very much.--Jebulon 10:07, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Procé kiosk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty.--Jebulon 23:21, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paimboeuf - Eglise Saint-Louis (int 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good. --D4m1en 16:06, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nieul-sur-l'Autise - Abbey (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 19:53, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Eglise St Clement (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments the spire is not so sharp as could be, but in general enough for QI and nice picture anyway --Taxiarchos228 13:53, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nieul-sur-l'Autise - Abbey (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 14:37, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Procé (sc 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 15:14, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Procé (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 13:24, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Procé (manor).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Small indeed, but I tried to correct it. Thanks. --Selbymay 18:10, 1 April 2012 (UTC) Support good for me now, if you crop the white strip at the top. --Moonik 18:19, 1 April 2012 (UTC) Oups, sorry.  Done --Selbymay 20:09, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontenay le Comte - Tour Rivalland (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:40, 1 April 2012 (UTC)