User talk:Satdeep Gill/Archives 2

Archives: 1, 2

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Burhinus indicus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black redstart at Nasirpur, Patiala 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Useful to add a CAT for the location. --Tagooty 03:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black-winged Stilt near Jalalpur, Patiala 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality though unfortunate background --Charlesjsharp 11:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black-winged Stilt near Jalalpur, Patiala 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality though unfortunate background --Charlesjsharp 11:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black-winged Stilt near Jalalpur, Patiala 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 11:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Western yellow wagtail near Jalalpur, Patiala 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Western yellow wagtail near Jalalpur, Patiala 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Green bee-eater in Patiala, India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice and sharp, but too small if cropped as it should be --Charlesjsharp 20:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC) I think it's sharp enough when zoomed in but there is then too much background noise. Can you clean the background? --Trougnouf 17:01, 16 March 2022 (UTC)  Done @Trougnouf: --Satdeep Gill 07:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 09:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Datura metel fruit near Bahadurgarh, Patiala district, India 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:28, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Datura metel fruit near Bahadurgarh, Patiala district, India 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 21:48, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black redstart at Nasirpur, Patiala 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments don't think we need this one --Charlesjsharp 11:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:35, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black redstart at Nasirpur, Patiala 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments don't think we need this one --Charlesjsharp 11:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:35, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black-winged stilt near Rohti Chhana, Patiala district 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:42, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Blumea viscosa VI nomination

Hello Saltdeep:

I am not sure how familiar you are with the scope requirements per COM:VIS of the Commons Valued Image rating system but I thought I would send you a note regarding your nomination.

If you change your VI scope for your Blumea viscosa nomination, to the following (described in COM:VIS), it will likely be supported.

Blumea viscosa, inforescence

Note that Blumea viscosa is displayed in italics.

It is your nomination and you have to make this change. No one else will do it for you.

Best,

Gordon --GRDN711 (talk) 16:52, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blumea viscosa, inforescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  CommentThe name of the species is always in italics and we only see a flower and buds, nothing else: we need to reduce the scope to Flower and buds. The argument of quality turns against you because if you look at the images of botany in VI you will see that the image is modest.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Open to your thoughts here, Archaeodontosaurus, but would not the distinguishing feature for this image be “inforescence”. I have seen this term used many times in some of your plant scopes. As this plant has no common name, would a scope of the following form be appropriate?

Blumea viscosa, inforescence

On the issue of quality, COM:VICR (3) just requires that the image illustrate the subject well at review size, which it does. It does not have to compete in quality with other VI botany images of other plants.

--GRDN711 (talk) 05:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Yes we can reduce the scope to inflorescence without problem. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment  Done @GRDN711: Thank you for your suggestion and reaching out on my talk page regarding the same. I am not sure if the new scope should be within the category template or not. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 17:02, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Useful image. Believe the plant scope format is correct now. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marsh sandpiper near Rohti Chhana, Patiala district 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 17:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red-rumped Swallow at village Kairwaan, district Dehradun 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK quality. --Charlesjsharp 20:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Gloria Gorceag in 2020.jpg

Hi Satdeep, do you have any update on this file? The uploader has been globally blocked so I am skeptical of the validity of the ticket. Gikü (talk) 21:36, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue tiger butterfly at Kairwaan, Dehradun district.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:50, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black-winged kite near Saharanpur 01 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Useful to add a category for the location. --Tagooty 02:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bluethroat near Jalalpur, Patiala 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spotted owlet near Jalalpur, Patiala 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himalayan bulbul at Dumal Gaon, district Dehradun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Streaked laughingthrush at Kairwaan, Dehradun district.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. GPS location and category for the location would be nice. --XRay 03:56, 31 March 2022 (UTC) @XRay:  Done I have added a category and GPS location. --Satdeep Gill 05:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 09:12, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black-winged kite near Saharanpur 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit soft. Try sharpening? Useful to add a CAT for location. --Tagooty 02:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC) @Tagooty:  Done I have tried sharepening the image and also added a category for location. Thanks for the feedback. --Satdeep Gill 06:46, 31 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 11:40, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comma Iora at village Kairwaan, district Dehradun 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comma Iora at village Kairwaan, district Dehradun 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taiga Flycatcher at village Kairwaan, district Dehradun 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taiga Flycatcher at village Kairwaan, district Dehradun 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pied bush chat at Kairwaan, Dehradun district.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red-vented bulbul at Kairwaan Goan, district Dehradun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:23, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himalayan bulbul at Kairwaan Goan, district Dehradun 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:23, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cattle Egret near Rohti Chhana, Patiala district.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:38, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comma Iora at village Kairwaan, district Dehradun 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White-throated kingfisher (Halcyon smyrnensis) at Roorkee, Uttarakhand 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White-throated kingfisher (Halcyon smyrnensis) at Roorkee, Uttarakhand 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:05, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himalayan bulbul at Kairwaan Goan, district Dehradun 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yeriho 19:42, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spilopelia chinensis (Spotted doves) - Mating.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support OK, but look at the scope changes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bluethroat near Jalalpur, Patiala 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bluethroat near Jalalpur, Patiala 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spotted dove (Spilopelia chinensis) at Kairwaan goa, Uttarakhand 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spotted dove (Spilopelia chinensis) at Kairwaan goa, Uttarakhand 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 20:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grey Treepie at village Kairwaan, district Dehradun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The end of the tail is cropped. Do you have any space to the bottom of the photo? --C messier 17:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC) @C messier:  Done I have uploaded a new version of this photo. Thank you. --Satdeep Gill 11:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)  Support QI for me. --C messier 19:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yellow-footed green pigeon (Treron phoenicopterus) near Nasirpur, Patiala 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:25, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White-throated kingfisher (Halcyon smyrnensis) at Roorkee, Uttarakhand 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Scientific names are shown in italics --F. Riedelio 06:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC) @F. Riedelio:  Done Thank you! --Satdeep Gill 05:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:59, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bar-winged flycatcher-shrike at Kairwaan Gaon, Dehradun district 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The scientific name should be included in the description. --F. Riedelio 06:19, 10 April 2022 (UTC) @F. Riedelio:  Done Thank you. --Satdeep Gill 05:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Common hawk-cuckoo (Hierococcyx varius) at Kairwaan gaon, Dehradun district 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Common hawk-cuckoo (Hierococcyx varius) at Kairwaan gaon, Dehradun district 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spotted dove (Spilopelia chinensis) at Kairwaan goa, Uttarakhand 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramdei, a resident of Nadli, Kangra district, making leaf plates 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Very nice pictures. --UnpetitproleX 16:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramdei, a resident of Nadli, Kangra district, making leaf plates 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Very nice pictures. --UnpetitproleX 16:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramdei, a resident of Nadli, Kangra district, making leaf plates 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Very nice pictures. --UnpetitproleX 16:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brown rock chat (Oenanthe fusca) at Andreta, Kangra district 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:16, 16 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --UnpetitproleX 16:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brown rock chat (Oenanthe fusca) at Andreta, Kangra district 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --UnpetitproleX 16:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asian green bee-eater (Merops orientalis beludschicus) near Roorkee, district Haridwar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 12:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good Quality. --UnpetitproleX 16:28, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asian green bee-eater (Merops orientalis beludschicus) near Roorkee, district Haridwar 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportGood Quality. --UnpetitproleX 16:28, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarlet Skimmer (Crocothemis servilia) near Roorkee, Haridwar district 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khairdeen urf Pritam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:03, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Merops orientalis beludschicus dust bathing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The Latin name always in italics. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ramdei, a resident of Nadli, Kangra district, making leaf plates 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ramdei, a resident of Nadli, Kangra district, making leaf plates 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Khairdeen urf Pritam, Black and White.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Khairdeen urf Pritam, Black and White.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asian green bee-eater (Merops orientalis beludschicus) near Roorkee, district Haridwar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:52, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Image of Ayşe Hür

Hi. I took a screenshot from the kurdish site of Voice of America video. Now I want to get permission from VOA. Do you know how I can do that? Greeting Avestaboy (talk) 13:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=Ayse+H%C3%BCr&title=Special:MediaSearch&type=image

@Avestaboy: You can find more information here on Commons:Volunteer Response Team. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 13:44, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Image of Caucher Birkar

Can I upload this image to Wikimedia Commons?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/icm_2018/28951685697 Avestaboy (talk) 14:23, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Yes, the image is in public domain. Feel free to upload it. Satdeep Gill (talk) 14:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi ! I'm not very familiar with Flickr. I hope I did everything right when uploading. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Birkar.jpg Avestaboy (talk) 16:23, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

@Avestaboy - You did almost everything right. The only issue was that you uploaded a 5 KB photo while there was a 1 MB version available on Flickr. I have updated to the newer version on Commons for now. -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 02:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Categorisation of QIs and FPs

Hey! I've just categorised all your pictures from Category:Quality images of India by User:Satdeep Gill. Mostly just added specific categories such as the particular states (eg. CAT:Quality images of Punjab, India, CAT:Quality images of Tamil Nadu etc.) and according to subject (CAT:Quality images of birds in India, CAT:Quality images of people of India etc.). I hope that is ok, and might I suggest adding such categories yourself in the future. These make it easier for people looking for particular types of quality images, and will help your very amazing pictures be used in other wikimedia projects (such as wikipedia). Thanks and regards, UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:31, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	These are beautiful images. Thanks for sharing! APatro (WMF) (talk) 04:50, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

@APatro (WMF) Thank you so much. Satdeep Gill (talk) 05:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Save the date: Commons Photographers meeting next week

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

Please save the date: on Saturday, June 19th, our next virtual Zoom meeting is going to take place. As you know, one goal of these meetings is to share knowledge about different types of photography. This time, we've lined up the following presentations:

• Photography in Nigeria
• Photographing vehicles
• I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…

If you'd like to participate in this event, please consider signing up on this page. Also, if you'd like to present at one of the next meetings, please send me a quick note. Sharing your experiences and learnings with others can make a huge difference!

I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best! Hope to see you on the 19th.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

This Sunday!

Hi, this is just a quick reminder: the next virtual meeting of our user group is scheduled for Sunday, June 19, 16:00 UTC. Topics are: “Photography in Nigeria”, “Photographing Vehicles”, “Wildlife photography and citizen science”, and “I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…”. I'm thrilled about this great agenda and I'm looking forward to connecting with you again. Stay safe and all the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praveen Das at Indic Hackathon 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Sidhu Moose Wala during the shooting of his film Moosa Jatt (cropped).jpg

File:Sidhu Moose Wala during the shooting of his film Moosa Jatt (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Sources says image is "used with permission"; it does not mention a CC license Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

C.Fred (talk) 14:10, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Quick update on behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I hope you're well and enjoy taking photos for Wikimedia Commons. Here are a couple of quick updates on behalf of our group:

• Our next virtual meeting will take place on Saturday, August 27. At this point we have two presentations lined up:

• Suitable! Unsuitable! How to choose photos for a Wikipedia for children, “Klexikon” (Ziko)
• The aperture and its (less known) effects (XRay)

You can sign up for the event on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 27, 2022. – Given that we can accommodate more speakers, I'll invite you to get in touch with me in case you'd like to present on the 27th. You can reach me any time on my talk page or by sending a quick email.

• Also, we now have a page for local events organized by members of our user group: Local events 2022. Please check it out and consider organizing an event yourself!
• And finally, we're planning on offering a Post-processing Workshop on October 8. Please save the date; an events page with more information will go up later.

Thanks for being a member of our group and for sharing your works under a free license. Have fun taking pictures!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Why the ZoomViewer mode of this file is incomplete?

Hello,

Please check why the ZoomViewer mode of this file is incomplete? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%DB%8C%D8%A7_%D8%AB%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87_%D8%B9%D9%84%DB%8C%D9%87_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85.jpg

Please review and correct.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by کورش عروج (talk • contribs) 15:44, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Koorosh Orooj

Best regards کورش عروج (talk) 14:56, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

@کورش عروج With 467 MB, the file is too big to open up in the Zoom Viewer within a reasonable time, I believe. -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 15:59, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

So please look at these two files with a size of more than 400 MB and see that they are fully loaded and visible. I think the problem is something else. Please get help from experts in this matter:

The most complete and accurate reconstruction of Girl with a Pearl Earring-21 Gigapixel-Digital Profoundism-Demo.jpg

Lambda20210907 003 ABCD.png

Thank you

Koorosh Orooj کورش عروج (talk) 18:19, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Remembering the Border Camps, 1980.webm

Copyright status: File:Remembering the Border Camps, 1980.webm

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Remembering the Border Camps, 1980.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Remembering the Border Camps, 1980.webm

Copyright status: File:Remembering the Border Camps, 1980.webm

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Remembering the Border Camps, 1980.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hindu grave in Bali.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddy field in Bali.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:02, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Welcome to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 India

Hello Satdeep Gill/Archives 2!

We are excited again to let you know that, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the 13th time this year. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year from September 1 to September 30, 2022. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record and digitally document our monuments for future generations and get a chance to win exciting prizes!!!

You can find more details about the Indian edition of the competition in this event page. See you in action in few hours!!

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A Balinese girl posing in a flower field.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampuan hand-made scarf at L'eun Kraen village in Ratanakiri 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:30, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Owl in Bali 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:58, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Owl in Bali 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:05, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indigenous youth at Banlung, Ratanakiri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments 'indigenous youth' is condescending personality rights? --Charlesjsharp 17:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC) @Charlesjsharp: I have added the template to the image. Also, this was photographed during a Wikimedia training. --Satdeep Gill 11:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC) Support Given that the term Indigenous peoples is used by both governments and organizations (like the UN, the ILO, the World Bank and Amnesty) without prejudice, I don't think we can argue that the term is derogatory or insulting in itself. It may not be very accurate, though; having the name of the ethnic group in question might have been a more fitting description. Please feel free to open this up to further discussion in CR if you wish.--Peulle 11:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

You're invited to provide input…

Dear fellow member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

At our last meeting end of August, we talked about getting in touch with the Wikimedia Foundation and offering our help for improving Wikimedia Commons. Today, I invite you to provide your input on a draft open letter to the Foundation. Over the course of the next ten days, we'll further improve the text together, before inviting people to sign it. If you're interested in providing input, please engage in the discussion on the talk page of the draft.

In the meanwhile, I hope you're well and have a great time taking photos! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 08:42, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little pied cormorant at Bali 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:09, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little pied cormorant at Bali 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 15:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little pied cormorant at Bali 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:01, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balinese woman carrying offerings fruits on her head 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little pied cormorant at Bali 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 21:36, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little pied cormorant at Bali 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, really nice image --PantheraLeo1359531 15:04, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Las cascadas de cochecorral 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:41, 23 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:34, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A paddy field in Gunung Kawi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goddess of Rice, Dewi Sri, made from rice in a paddy field in Gunung Kawi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goddess of Rice, Dewi Sri, made from rice in a paddy field in Gunung Kawi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little pied cormorant at Bali 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 09:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little pied cormorant at Bali 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 09:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Image of Alessandra Martines

Hallo Satdeep ! I found a photo of Alessandra Martines on Flickr. Can I upload it or does it violate copyright? https://www.flickr.com/photos/savethechildrenusa/5187385873 Avestaboy (talk) 18:05, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

@Avestaboy Hi, this is under CC Non Commercial license. Unfortunately, we don't accept NC or ND licenses on Commons. Satdeep Gill (talk) 05:35, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:A Balinese girl posing in a flower field.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A Balinese girl posing in a flower field.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dvarpala statue near Sanur Beach, Bali 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please improve the categorization. No red links please. --XRay 03:04, 27 September 2022 (UTC) @XRay: Done for all! --Satdeep Gill 03:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)  Support I added some categories for you. --XRay 06:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garuda statue near Sanur Beach, Bali.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please improve the categorization. Please add a category for the location. --XRay 03:05, 27 September 2022 (UTC)  Done Done with this as well. --Satdeep Gill 03:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)  Support I added some categories for you. --XRay 06:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dvarpala statue near Sanur Beach, Bali 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bali Musicant Drummer statue near Sanur Beach, Bali.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:55, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 September 2022 (UTC)