User talk:Rhk111

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rhk111!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 02:42, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:MD-520MG Cockpit.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:MD-520MG Cockpit.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ww2censor (talk) 19:17, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

I don't understand why the picture I uploaded was deleted. I thought it was CLEAR enough when I uploaded the image that it was MINE and that I was uploading on my own free will for use by Wikipedia. So how come we have all these hassle now again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhk111 (talk • contribs) 03:57, 18 March 2014‎

I don't recall this exact image but from log I can see that you did not provide a copyright licence for the image when you uploaded it, so it was deleted. All images must have a copyright licence even when it is your own image because we don't know exactly what permission you are giving even though you say that you were "uploading on my own free will". The upload page walks you through the process step by step with great details given. If you chose the "It is entirely my own work" link, under Step 3 you were asked to provide a copyright licence and told to "Choose a license from the drop-down box". You must not have done that, so we did not have your permission to use or keep the image. You can upload it again under the same name and if you follow all the steps as requested there should not be a problem. Any questions just ask. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 09:18, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

BTW, you did this one correctly. File:PhAF MD-520MG Helicopter.JPG Ww2censor (talk) 13:06, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Naval Air Group - Keeping Up the Tempo Far and Beyond.pdf

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Naval Air Group - Keeping Up the Tempo Far and Beyond.pdf. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Ariadacapo (talk) 11:40, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

The source is the Philippine Navy's "Philfleet Magazine", 2016 Anniversary Edition as I had indicated when I uploaded the file. Since it is a Philippine Navy property, then that should make it eligible to be under the Public Domain. Rhk111 (talk) 12:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. Can you identify a public-domain license tag here in Commons that applies to the Philippine Navy? CC-0 cannot apply here: it is a dedication, which means it can only be applied by the author or copyright owner…~ --Ariadacapo (talk) 12:56, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

I don't understand, because Wikimedia Commons has been accepting Public licensing of PN materials for quite some time now, like these examples: BRP Tarlac Homebound,Philippine Navy Cessna -- Rhk111 (talk) 13:46, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

{{PD-PhilippinesGov}} ! You found it, this is the copyright template we need, and I just applied it to the file in question.

To clarify: the CC-0 dedication is chosen by the author/copyright owner of the work: it is applied "on top" of a given work which is copyrighted by default. To upload a CC-0 file on Commons, you need to either be the author, or show that the work has been dedicated. By contrast, the public domain status of (some) governmental works is by default: copyright does not apply to those works, whether the authors like it or not. Even if in the end, the result is practically (though not exactly) the same, indicating the proper reason why some work has no restriction attached makes this information verifiable, which is important on a wiki website. Thanks for your patience! --Ariadacapo (talk) 18:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Rhk111,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Rhk111,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Rhk111,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:58, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Jose Rizal, Aboard.jpg

Copyright status: File:Jose Rizal, Aboard.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Jose Rizal, Aboard.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Rough Deck Log Vol. No. 89, May 2020.pdf

Copyright status: File:Rough Deck Log Vol. No. 89, May 2020.pdf

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rough Deck Log Vol. No. 89, May 2020.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Spike ER Canisters Description Plate.jpg

File:Spike ER Canisters Description Plate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 12:48, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

• @Rhk111: about this file, I just realized that the main problem is the text itself. While most cases of no freedom of panorama concern artistic works, in various jurisdictions like Thailand literary works of any sort are also copyrightable. Very few countries have freedom of panorama that extends to literary works, which does not need to be flowery or poetic to be copyrighted. As long as the authors incorporate originality, the literary wotks are copyrighted from the moment of creation. Other forms of literary works include memorial texts and engraved description tablets. Copyright is usually held by the writer or author of such textual works. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:24, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

To clear some things up, I am no admin and I can't see deleted images. But the file title suggests its main motif is the literary work itself ("description plate"). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:25, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2022-04-26 SpyDer Sim 003.jpg

Copyright status: File:2022-04-26 SpyDer Sim 003.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2022-04-26 SpyDer Sim 003.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:2022-04-26 SpyDer Sim 005.jpg
• File:2022-04-26 SpyDer Sim 001.jpg
• File:2022-04-26 SpyDer Sim 004.jpg
• File:2022-04-26 SpyDer Sim 002.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:09, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

What is the problem, I used the Copyright Tag "PD-PhilippinesGov". The original Owner of these Pictures is the Philippine Air Force (PAF), I don't understand what is the problem. Rhk111 (talk) 04:28, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2022-04-26 SpyDer Sim 003.jpg

Copyright status: File:2022-04-26 SpyDer Sim 003.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2022-04-26 SpyDer Sim 003.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2022-07-16 BRP Luna 006.jpg

Yours sincerely, -M.nelson (talk) 10:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Also File:2022-07-13 BRP Luna 001.jpg and File:2022-07-13 BRP Luna 002.jpg, under the same nomination above -M.nelson (talk) 15:12, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

- Agree with the Reason, I couldn't find any Canadian Law that will allow the posting of the Picture since it was taken by a Canadian Armed Forces Personnel. Go ahead and delete. Rhk111 (talk) 04:44, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

File:2023-04-03 New EDCA Locations 1.jpg

File:2023-04-03 New EDCA Locations 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)