User talk:Renamed user owrgjw35p9gh8eigh

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image no yet please

[edit]

OK.Thank you by your contributions to my little drawing.

Vicond (talk) 04:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seedfeeder SVG conversion

[edit]

Thanks! Make sure you avoid outlines between color/shade regions. --Siddharth Patil (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Renamed user owrgjw35p9gh8eigh!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

vectorization

[edit]

File:Wiki-cunnilingus.svg is a really bad and unsuable svg conversion of File:Wiki-cunnilingus.png. By the way: You created the file description page wrong. The source was wrong and the licenses were wrong. Please use for example http://toolserver.org/~luxo/derivativeFX/deri1.php to upload derivative images. Please check your other uploads for the same errors. If you need help, feel free to ask. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 00:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! Why are you uploading all those bad svg conversions of photographs? These images are blurry and no real drawings. Probably you just tested the svg conversion of inkscape. But I do not see the use of such pictures. Can you please explain what's you intention with these images? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 22:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:Caucasian_man_masturbating.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 23:56, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Breast.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- πϵρήλιο 06:31, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File:Masturbation.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kneeling sex position.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kneeling sex position.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 21:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm restoring the template because the file is missing OTRS permission and http://www.shermann.dk/ doesn't exist. -- SLV100 (talk) 05:53, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

23:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Inconsistent dates

[edit]

Accepting that this is a redraw of someone else's image, I'm noticing there's an inconsistency with Imbolc. While some articles allow wiggle room by giving Imbolc as 1-2 Feb, most mentions for the Northern Hemisphere put it at 1 Feb. The Wheel of the Year image, however, makes no mention of 1 Feb at all, and instead places Imbolc firmly at 2 Feb. It's the defining Imbolc as specifically 2 Feb without acknowledging 1 Feb that I object to. There should either there be a span of possible dates (1-2 Feb), or it is firmly 1 Feb in the Northern Hemisphere (mentioned on the image's Commons Talk page). — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR, USA (talk) 04:18, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: Dates have been corrected by SMiki55. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR, USA (talk) 18:11, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:1860 Utah $10 gold piece.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan2 (talk) 19:54, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Félicien Rops - Sainte-Thérèse.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rubýñ (Talk) 02:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]