User talk:Redy.rodriguez
Check Image:Montefurado.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for providing images to the commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
- Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
- State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly.
- If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
- Add a Copyright tag - images without a appropriate license tag will be deleted.
- Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate Categories, so it can be found by others.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki.
It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more Information, have a look at Commons:Licensing, Commons:criteria for inclusion and the Community Portal. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you. Anna 30 June 2005 00:31 (UTC)
Duda sobre las fotos de la Torre de Lamela
[edit]Hola, antes de nada me gustaría agradecer tus aportaciones al proyecto Wikipedia Commons.
Te escribo porque tras ver la serie de fotos que has subido sobre la Torre de Lamela, tras recabar más información sobre el monumento me ha surgido una duda, y es que las fotos fueron tomadas sobre esta torre, pero atendiendo a lo que se aparece aquí y aquí da la impresión de que la torre de la que se habla es esta. La verdad es que a mi me parece que la torre que tú sacaste tiene más pinta de ser algo histórico, con esas almenas y demás, en comparación con las tejas que hay en lo alto de la otra, pero la descripción que hace en la web del ayuntamiento de "una ventana con zapatas en los ángulos superiores, y en el Oeste una ventana gótica con arcos, parteluz y arco de medio punto, que están en la actualidad tapiadas" sí que parece coincidir con lo que aparece en las fotos de la "torre con tejas". Y si la torre de Lamela es dicha la torre, tus fotos habrían sido sobre un objetivo equivocado, ¿no? ¿qué opinas? Un saludo y gracias de nuevo por tu labor. --Canyq (talk) 18:36, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
- Creo que tienes razón. El monumento que yo fotografié es el Pazo de Casa Blanca, y ambos están en la parroquia de Lamela. Lo que no me queda claro es cual de los dos es bien de interés cultural, porque el catalogo de bienes de interés cultural del Ministerio de cultura http://www.mcu.es/bienes/buscarBienesInmuebles.do solo dice:
- Bien: Castillo.torre
- Comunidad Autónoma: C.A. Galicia
- Provincia: Orense / Ourense
- Municipio: Pereiro de Aguilar
- Entidad local menor: Lamela
- Categoría: Monumento
- Código: (R.I.) - 51 - 0008952 - 00000
- Registro: (R.I.) REGISTRO BIC INMUEBLES: Código definitivo
- Fecha de Declaración: 17-11-1994
- Y no pude encontrar ni el B.O.E. en que lo declararon ni ninguna referencia que efectivamente confirme que el B.I.C. es el Pazo de Torre Lamela Y no el de Casa Blanca que también está en la misma parroquia.
- Sí, yo también he investigado en http://www.boe.es con distintas cadenas de búsqueda y no logré encontrar nada. Otros B.I.C. como el Pazo de los Oca-Valladares muestran en su ficha del M.C.U. las fechas de los boletines de incoación y declaración, pero en la ficha de la Torre de Lamela no se lista ninguna fecha de boletín. Es como si la declaración de ese B.I.C. no se hubiese anunciado en el B.O.E. Tampoco pude hallar otras fuentes de información al margen de las dos ya aportadas. Por cierto, tienes la posibilidad de cambiarle el nombre a los archivos subidos si así lo deseas. Un saludo. --Canyq (talk) 02:57, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Redy.rodriguez, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
|
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Redy.rodriguez, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
|
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Redy. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Redy~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
22:43, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Ria de Vigo.jpg
[edit]
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ria de Vigo.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Ria de Vigo.jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
