User talk:Rachmat04/Archive/2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File moving request

Hello Rachmat04, I wanted to ask you if you could take a look at this file-renaming request I have opened recently? The request can be found here. Thanks in advance! Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:00, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

@Chem Sim 2001: Hello! I have processed your move request. Please take a look at the page. Thanks, ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 06:53, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
@Rachmat04: Hello! Thanks for your help! Is it okay, if I contact you again when I found some files, which should be renamed? Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:03, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
@Chem Sim 2001: Sure. Please ping me anytime if you need any help with file renaming. Thanks, ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 11:28, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
@Rachmat04: Excellent! Thanks so much for your support! I want to become a file mover, too but I am not sure if I already have the right ammount of edits you need! Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:50, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

@Chem Sim 2001: I think the rough amount of edits that are eligible to be Filemover is around 1,000–1,500 as stated in Commons:Requests for rights#Filemover. Why don't you try to request that access if you have a valid reason for that? :) ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 12:24, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

@Rachmat04: Maybe you are right! I try to apply for the right to become a file mover! Thanks, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:02, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello Rachmat04, I have found another file, which should be renamed, here! Maybe you can take a look at again! Thanks in advance, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:09, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
@Chem Sim 2001: Hello! I have move the page to a new name. Please verify. Thank you, ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:36, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks mate, I have also created a file mover right request for me! Would be great if you can take a vote for me. It's important for me that you comment with your honest opinion, however I would be very happy about a positive feedback ;) You can find the request here. Thanks so much! Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

@Chem Sim 2001: Hi! If I understand correctly, the request for rights doesn't take voting in its process. But in case it needs support, I'm happy to say that you're qualified to have a Filemover right. :) ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 07:46, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
@Rachmat04: Thanks, I know that you don't need to vote for someone to become a file mover, but I have also seen some cases in which PRO votes of random people speeded the process up. I thank you for your support. Do you mind to vote directly on the file mover right request page? Would be great. Thanks, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 10:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Nene Martelli

Hi Rachmat04. A new user, Chiara Maraghini Garrone, uploaded this image of Nene Martelli, but you put a warning template. What is needed to do more for OTRS? Thank you. --Camelia (talk) 10:55, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

@Camelia.boban: Hi Camelia! The template I added to the photo is to indicate that an email has been sent to OTRS, but it is not yet processed by the agent. The template can also be a notice for Commons admins to hold the deletion before an OTRS agent decides whether not not the license is correct based on the email sent. I hope this answer your concern. Thank you. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Ok, thank you :-). --Camelia (talk) 13:58, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Stuffed Totoro in Fukuoka; February 2015.jpg

File:Stuffed Totoro in Fukuoka; February 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:32, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Muthiah Zahra.jpg

Gbawden (talk) 12:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 10:58, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Fictional flag of State of Quintana Roo.svg

File:Fictional flag of State of Quintana Roo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

bjh21 (talk) 16:54, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

NOtice of discussion

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - blogs posted in Wikimedia Space

There are two separate blog entries for Structured Data on Commons posted to Wikimedia Space that are of interest:

  • Working with Structured Data on Commons: A Status Report, by Lucas Werkmeister, discusses some ways that editors can work with structured data. Topics include tools that have been written or modified for structured data, in addition to future plans for tools and querying services.
  • Structured Data on Commons - A Blog Series, written by me, is a five-part posting that covers the basics of the software and features that were built to make structured data happen. The series is meant to be friendly to those who may have some knowledge of Commons, but may not know much about the structured data project.
I hope these are informative and useful, comments and questions are welcome. All the blogs offer a comment feature, and you can log in with your Wikimedia account using oAuth. I look forward to seeing some posts over there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:33, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

File:MUS C.3.9. Kuitansi pembayaran BNI 64, 1980; 1.jpg

File:MUS C.3.9. Kuitansi pembayaran BNI 64, 1980; 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Wekeepwhatwekill (talk) 14:30, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Conan Edogawa mascot at Detective Conan Cafe, Taiwan; June 2019.jpg

File:Conan Edogawa mascot at Detective Conan Cafe, Taiwan; June 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:45, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 02:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Japanese train with Detective Conan figure; December 2012.jpg

File:Japanese train with Detective Conan figure; December 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:47, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 02:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Protest about Deletion Image on Wikimedia Commons

Good Evening, Mr. Rachmat04. Thank you for your message on my User talk, but I wanna tell you, if you can't be helped me to change the license, don't make it wrong, to Delete the Image who I upload to Wikimedia Commons, please remove your Deletion requests. Thanks. Ⓛⓤⓣⓗⓕⓘ 13:43, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 14:04, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 14:04, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malinau Kampung Setulang-5540.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! C-Train of Calgary, Canada; October 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:41, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 00:24, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Three wise monkeys of Nikkō Tōshō-gū.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
C-Train.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 00:24, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kagami Pond (Nagano) - South East exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marina Hotel (Sakaiminato), Japan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 00:24, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ivan Lanin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Syiah Kuala University, administration building.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kerkhof Peucut, exposure from southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 08:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stasiun kereta api Leningradsky Moskwa pada pagi hari.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Kwaliti baik. -- Ikan Kekek 11:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 08:38, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eve Antoinette Ichwan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Machimura Farm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hakodate City Tram type 9600.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ki Hajar Dewantara, statue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
ASEAN Monuments, The Spirit of ASEAN.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 08:38, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Comet tugboat, 1977.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Seiran Kobayashi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 11:13, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hotel Indonesia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Indonesia-Malaysia boundary stones in North Sebatik.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 07:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Katalog Warisan Budaya Takbenda Indonesia 2018 (Buku 2).pdf

File:Katalog Warisan Budaya Takbenda Indonesia 2018 (Buku 2).pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Abdelouahed azhari (talk) 13:31, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 07:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raiyani Muharramah-Gadis suku dani yang menggunakan sali DSC 7333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 07:40, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Point Reyes Lighthouse, after restoration.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 07:40, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memainkan gamelan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok --Poco a poco 15:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jukung Teratai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Just over the bar IMHO --Poco a poco 15:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 07:40, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20191221 JKT48 at JKT48 Joy Kick Tears HSF - Tan Zhi Hui Celine (Celine) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 10:21, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rachmat04/Archive/2019&oldid=392232681"