User talk:Pulcherus
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Hans Steger.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Général Michel du Faing d'Aigremont.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Général Michel du Faing d'Aigremont.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Unlike some of my other pictures, this file is not a derivative work as I photographied it in a book published in the 1920's. Pulcherus (talk) 13:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Insigne du CAB.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Túrelio (talk) 08:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- OK, noted Pulcherus (talk) 13:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Général Biebuyck.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Général Biebuyck.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- This file is not a derivative work as I took the picture of it in a book published in the 1920's. I would appreciate to receive a warning (with the motive of it) before my file is deleted. Pulcherus (talk) 13:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Emile Tumelaire.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Emile Tumelaire.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- This is not a derivative work as I took the picture of it in a newspaper in the 1920's. I would appreciate anyway to receive a warning (with a possibility for me to answer) before my picture being deleted. Pulcherus (talk) 13:32, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Jean Teughels.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jean Teughels.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- This is not a derivative work as I have taken a picture of it in a newspaper of the 1940's. Please warn me before and explain the source of the concern in case of problem! Pulcherus (talk) 13:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
File:De-fraiteur-amsterdam.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Emile-Joseph Galet.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Emile-Joseph Galet.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- This is not a derivative work, rather taken in picture in a newspaper of the 1930's. If there is a concern please warn me and explain before deleting it! Thanks! Pulcherus (talk) 13:36, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
File copyright status
[edit]Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their source is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 09:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
File:René Magritte - La fée ignorante.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
H2O(talk) 11:13, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Paulus Jules Destrée.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
H2O(talk) 11:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Paulus Esquisse de la maternité 1912.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
H2O(talk) 11:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Paulus usines.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
H2O(talk) 11:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
File:René Magritte - L'empire de la réflexion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
H2O(talk) 11:32, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Grand Hôpital de Charleroi - Les Viviers
[edit]Bonjour Pulcherius,
Où as-tu trouvé cette image File:Grand Hôpital de Charleroi - Les Viviers.jpg ? Est-elle libre de droits ?
Bien à toi. JmH2O(talk) 08:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Bonjour JMH2O,
- J'ai trouvé cette image dans le Charleroi MAG. Je pense que pour cette raison, elle est libre de droit.
- Cordialement Pulcherus (talk) 11:51, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- J'ai vu, c'est dans le numéro de décembre du magasine. Mais, si l'image n'a pas de copyright mentionné, l'ensemble du cite de la ville est bien sous copyright. Je laisse en place, mais d'autres seront peut-être plus rigoureux.
- Bonne continuation.
- --JmH2O(talk) 12:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oui, je suppose que ce serait en effet à la ville de réagir dans ce cas. Reste l'aspect didactique du plan pour les (nouveaux) patients de l'hôpital.
- A voir donc.
- Bonne journée! Pulcherus (talk) 12:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)