User talk:Pudelek/Archive9

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biebrza National Park, Wroceń 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biebrza National Park - Wroceń.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Váh a Revúca v Ružomberku.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:33, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tatra 97 Kopřivnice

[edit]

Greetings Per your instructions to use your image, I am notifying you that I used your image at the link provided below. Thank you

http://www.jigidi.com/created.php?id=9O0XL6TO

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Augustów - Jezioro Białe (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:59, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Augustów - Jezioro Białe (by Pudelek) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:59, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biebrza National Park, Wroceń 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--ArildV 08:56, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of John of Nepomuk near Saint Matthew church in Wrocław (Breslau).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uniwersytet Śląski - Wydział teologiczny i katedra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:53, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biebrza NP in Dolistowo (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:01, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biebrza NP in Dolistowo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:54, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biebrza NP from the raft.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:54, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biebrza National Park in the evening.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. An English description would be appreciated --Moroder 12:01, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Białe Augustowskie (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:53, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osowiec-Twierdza - Fort II (Zarzeczny) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carska Droga - Goniądz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biebrza National Park (in the evening).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice mood; love the virga --Daniel Case 05:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osowiec-Twierdza - Fort II (Zarzeczny).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:11, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osowiec-Twierdza - Fort II (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:12, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biebrza in Wroceń.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hockei 19:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rainbow in Podlasie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:12, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smogorówka Dolistowska - rainbow.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:45, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wroceń - wooden house.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 05:53, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osowiec-Twierdza - Fort II (03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:58, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Degucie - house.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:58, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sejny (Seinai) - White Syngagogue.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sejny (Seinai) - town hall.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:04, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sejny (Seinai) - old post office.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:01, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Žerotín (Scherotein) - zámek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:01, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zámek Rájec nad Svitavou (Schloss Raitz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 14:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lysice (Lissitz) Castle park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:28, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouzov (Busau) castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Laitche 10:54, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rozhledna Žernovník.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:03, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lysice (Lissitz) Castle - entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:28, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Turaida Castle

[edit]

Dear Pudelek, is it possible for me to use your photo of the Turaida Castle in a book about 'Castles at War', that is soon comming out. I really like to use it on a previev page (Din A4). Of course will i mention your name. Many thanks in advance, Katrin.

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Smogorówka Dolistowska - rainbow.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Smogorówka Dolistowska - rainbow.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Using your image, thanks!

[edit]

Many thanks for posting this image of Sedlec ossuary! I am going to use it in a powerpoint presentation to my history class. Thank you,

Danielle Kinsey

I have not time left to look at your pictures.

[edit]

in the last four month, you nominated 75 own pictures, but never assess images from others. Do you think, we are your servants? --Hubertl (talk) 13:18, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Kolory

[edit]

Chodzi o to, że to zdjęcie nie ma określonej przestrzeni barw. Zdjęcia do publikacji w necie powinny mieć przestrzeń sRGB. Jeżeli jest inna, lub tak jak w tym przypadku nie ma jaj wcale, zdjęcia mogą być wyświetlane nienaturalnie. Już kiedyś zwracano Ci uwagę na QI, że niektóre Twoje zdjęcia są za jasne i to może być tego przyczyna. Jeżeli chcesz mogę dodać przestrzeń barw do tego zdjęcia. W ten sposób będzie pewność, że każdy komputer z każdą przeglądarką będzie wyświetlał zdjęcie tak samo. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Na tym zdjęciu nie ma zapisanej przestrzeni barw, sprawdź sobie w danych exif. A Photoshop automatycznie przydziela ją w czasie zapisywania pliku. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:37, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boskovice synagogue, interior (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I have no time all for assessing YOUR pictures.--Hubertl 13:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC) Support Nice. A translation in the file page should be valuable, IMO.--Jebulon 13:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately , I do not know Hebrew ;) --Pudelek 14:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC) *  Comment it´s absolutely uncooperatively from the nominator, just nominating his own pictures without doing the same with others. Actually it is 75:0 in the last four month. --Hubertl 14:11, 13 July 2015 (UTC) Maybe one of our Israëli fellow commoners could help for translation ? --Jebulon 17:25, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norra Kvill National Park, Sweden (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 21:42, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norra Kvill National Park, Sweden (by Pudelek) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:50, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swedish landscape near Björnlunda (by Pudelek) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:06, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swedish landscape - farm in Nässja.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swedish landscape near Mjölby (by Pudelek) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. And very nice --A.Savin 23:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Norra Kvill National Park, Sweden (by Pudelek).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Norra Kvill National Park, Sweden (by Pudelek).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholm City Hall (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 15:29, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholm - Solna centrum Metro station (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 15:29, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vreta Monastery Church - old entrance.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Famberhorst 15:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vreta Monastery Church and gardens.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:31, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Swedish landscape near Björnlunda (by Pudelek) 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Swedish landscape near Björnlunda (by Pudelek) 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prośba

[edit]

Cześć. Zagłosujesz mi na to zdjęcie? W FP byłeś za. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaroměřice (Jaromierzitz) castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:03, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boskovice (Boskowitz) - Kostel svatého Jakuba Staršího.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:56, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Litovel (Littau) - Svatojánský most.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:58, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Litovel (Littau) - Svatojánský most - pano.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:03, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boat in Skillinge, Sweden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes! --Ralf Roletschek 22:27, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferry in Karlskrona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:44, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jevíčko (Gewitsch) - Highway bridge of unfinished extraterritorial highway Vienna-Breslau.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:52, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 02:04, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jevíčko (Gewitsch) - zámek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 12:59, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velké Opatovice (Groß Opatowitz) - Moravské kartografické centrum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 12:59, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Swedish landscape near Mjölby (by Pudelek) 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Swedish landscape near Mjölby (by Pudelek) 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Moravian Cartographic Center in Velké Opatovice (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

"last" vs. "latest"

[edit]

You are using the word "last" for your images on your user page. This is not correct, as I imagine, you will still go on uploading photos to WIKI COMMONS. The appropriate attribute in that context is the word "latest", or you might as well use the adjective "recent". "Last" you only apply when there won´t be any further ("His last photos were ... before he died"); and I imagine you are going to continue your photographic works, won´t you?. Hopefully you are not mad at me, but I had to tell you that, so your user page is brought one more step towards perfection. ;=) Kind regards. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:46, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vážany (Waschan) - kostel Zvěstování Panny Marie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Left side leaning out (lewa strona przechyla się na zewnątrz) --Jacek Halicki 15:08, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Trochę to skorygowałem, ale ogólnie ten kościół był cały jakiś taki nieforemny --Pudelek 15:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velké Opatovice (Groß Opatowitz) - zámek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velké Opatovice (Groß Opatowitz) - zámek pano.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:58, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boskovice (Boskowitz) - Hradní ulice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boskovice (Boskowitz) - židovské město (01).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zámek Boskovice (Boskowitz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:00, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boskovice (Boskowitz) - zámecký skleník.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrad Boskovice (Boskowitz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boskovice (Boskowitz) - Hradní ulice (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 15:26, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boskovice (Boskowitz) - radnice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:42, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) - old city and city wall.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ezarate 22:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pivovar Černá Hora (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boskovice (Boskowitz) - Residenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:43, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zámek Rájec nad Svitavou (Schloss Raitz) - panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:43, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lomnice (Lomnitz), Moravia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:00, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lomnice (Lomnitz) - sýpka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lomnice (Lomnitz) - židovská škola.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta Coeli Monastery (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boskovice (Boskowitz) - town hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments strong vignetting,can you fix? --Livioandronico2013 07:57, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong? For me is OK --Pudelek 09:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Now is ok ,This is Vignetting. Now I can't vote because editor,saluti affettuosi --Livioandronico2013 10:43, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Now the colors looks a bit unnatural - the sky was a strong blue --Pudelek 12:25, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
light blue is good too --Livioandronico2013 15:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
But now the facade is too bright... --Tsungam 15:07, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I revert --Livioandronico2013 15:33, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK for me. --C messier 08:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta Coeli - portal.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrad Pernštejn (Pernstein) - by Pudelek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great composition. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrad Pernštejn (Pernstein) - brána (5. nádvoří).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrad Pernštejn (Pernstein) - by Pudelek 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:31, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrad Pernštejn (Pernstein) - erby.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I would prefer a tighter crop, but QI to me --DKrieger 21:59, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrad Pernštejn (Pernstein) - by Pudelek 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality! --Isiwal 20:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrad Pernštejn (Pernstein) - by Pudelek 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:09, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Budatín hrad - by Pudelek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use of "Hill of Crosses"

[edit]

I have used this picture at Facebook.com/venitemusic on Sep 14th. Thank you. Jason Hayes

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uppsala domkyrka - by Pudelek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:39, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrad Pernštejn (Pernstein) by Pudelek 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:58, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Mounds of Gamla Uppsala (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boskovice (Boskowitz) - Kostel svatého Jakuba Staršího v noci.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boskovice (Boskowitz) - radnice 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lysice (Lissitz) - zámek (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:17, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lysice (Lissitz) - zámek (by Pudelek) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:17, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lysice (Lissitz) - zámek (by Pudelek) 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:17, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lysice (Lissitz) - zámek (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:54, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hrad Pernštejn (Pernstein) - brána (5. nádvoří).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hrad Pernštejn (Pernstein) - brána (5. nádvoří).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svojanov (Fürstenstein) - by Pudelek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Letovice (Lettowitz) - zámek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lysice (Lissitz) - zámek (by Pudelek) 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Litomyšl chateau, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Litomyšl (Leitomischl) chateau - by Pudelek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:15, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Litomyšl (Leitomischl) - jízdárna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stumholmen, Karlskrona - hangars.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vodní nádrž Letovice (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amiralitetsklockstapeln i Karlskrona.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:49, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stumholmen, Karlskrona (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:01, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borgholm castle (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:25, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalmar castle (by Pudelek) 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:23, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalmar castle (by Pudelek) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:24, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borgholm castle (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting combination of forms, perspective and light --Daniel Case 05:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalmar castle (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 07:21, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bastion Kungshall, Karlskrona.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:31, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image of Svaty Kriz wooden church

[edit]

Hello,

I would like to know if I can use your picture of Svaty Kriz church (in slovakia) in my blog about slovakia at the tourism site lametayel.

Thank you in advance. בנימין (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stumholmen, Karlskrona - hangars 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Litomyšl (Leitomischl) chateau - by Pudelek.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Litomyšl (Leitomischl) chateau - by Pudelek.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borgholm castle (by Pudelek) 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality Ficilbotoe95 13:43, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gripsholm castle (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality Ficilbotoe95 11:27, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholm Palace (by Pudelek) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:42, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riddarholmen (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:42, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gripsholm castle (by Pudelek) 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:35, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholm Palace (by Pudelek) 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholm Palace (by Pudelek) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholm Palace (by Pudelek) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Copper Mine Museum in Falun.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--Borvan53 (talk) 07:16, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Castle in Stockholm (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:45, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skansen, Stockholm (by Pudelek) 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:49, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armémuseum i Stockholm (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:49, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skansen, Stockholm (by Pudelek) 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gripsholm castle (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition, good quality Ficilbotoe95 11:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skokloster castle (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:39, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Olofs kyrkoruin, Sigtuna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:32, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uppsala slott (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:31, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skokloster castle (by Pudelek) 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:31, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alnö gamla kyrka (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uppsala domkyrka (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Mounds of Gamla Uppsala (by Pudelek) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skansen, Stockholm (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alnö gamla kyrka (by Pudelek) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:26, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alnö hembygdsgård (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:08, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kristine kyrka, Falun (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:14, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Falu gruva (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:58, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Falu gruva (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Drottningholm Palace (by Pudelek) 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Drottningholm Palace (by Pudelek) 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lund cathedral - main altar (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lund domkyrka - crypt (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 19:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dukelský pamätník (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Älvros old church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 13:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nižný Komárnik (Alsókomárnok) - kostol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dukelský pamätník - aleja (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vyšný Komárnik - kostol (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ales stenar (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:29, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Östra Södermanlands Järnväg - station in Mariefred.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dobroslava (Доброслава, Dobroszló) - Chrám svätej Paraskievy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:35, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Údolie smrti - expozícia bojovej techniky (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:09, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument of tank battle of the Battle of the Dukla Pass - 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapišová (Капішова, Kapisó) - expozícia bojovej techniky 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svidník - Vojnový pamätník a cintorín sovietskej armády (by Pudelek) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svidník - Vojnový pamätník a cintorín sovietskej armády (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svidník - Vojnový pamätník a cintorín sovietskej armády (by Pudelek) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request of use of the photo "File:Kryžių kalnas (Góra Krzyży).JPG"

[edit]

Hello,

I am a student and also a small, minor political leader from a small party from Hong Kong, the former colony of GB (and now an de facto colony of PRC).Recently, I saw your photo of the Hill of Crosses in the Chinese Wikipedia page.
I would like to use it as my Facebook banner with some words that will ask HongKongers that "Will you defend your land, friends and family, like they did?" in Traditional Chinese.
As I read your words here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kryžių_kalnas_(Góra_Krzyży).JPG , in respect with your rights, therefore I am writing to ask for your permission to use. I will make sure to mention your name and attaching the link of Wikimedia Common of the photo.

Thank you for your consideration.

ZumarX

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svidník - Vojnový pamätník a cintorín sovietskej armády (by Pudelek) 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 13:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gamla Uppsala museum (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell tower of Gamla Uppsala church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --ArildV 13:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Skokloster castle (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skokloster castle (by Pudelek) 2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sundsvallsbron (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Order of the Sword - Royal Castle in Stockholm.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Order of the Vasa - Royal Castle in Stockholm.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:56, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! High Coast (Höga kusten) - by Pudelek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:13, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! High Coast (Höga kusten) - by Pudelek 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:13, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapišová (Капішова, Kapisó) - expozícia bojovej techniky.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice detail and color; interesting way to frame that pays off --Daniel Case 05:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! High Coast (Höga kusten) - by Pudelek 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sweden - road nr 87 near Bispgarden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. It looks a bit soft. --XRay 16:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! High Coast (Höga kusten) - by Pudelek 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Härnösand, Sweden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frösö Church, Sweden - detail.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK imo. --ArildV 14:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volvo Amazon in Örebro, Sweden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality even the car --Ermell 13:25, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volvo Amazon in Örebro (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:26, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Göta kanal near road E20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sweden - road E4 (near Docksta).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 15:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gamla Uppsala museum, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sweden - E20 road near Göta kanal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 21:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domkyrkoforum, Lund.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. simple, but interesting. --Hubertl 14:21, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kronborg castle, Helsingør, Denmark.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 11:53, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kronborg castle, Helsingør, Denmark (military buildings).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beach in Helsingør, Denmark.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Falu gruva (by Pudelek).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Falu gruva (by Pudelek).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Údolí Bílé Opavy (Weiße Oppa) - by Pudelek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:42, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyboder, Copenhagen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 12:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kastellet, Copenhagen (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 12:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kastellet, Copenhagen (by Pudelek) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buick Skylark in Sweden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyboder, Copengagen 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 23:09, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Royal Life Guards (Den Kongelige Livgarde), Copenhagen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 23:09, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Royal Life Guards (Den Kongelige Livgarde), Copenhagen 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 01:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Samodzielnie wklejone QI

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Black Diamond (Royal Library), Copenhagen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kongens Have - Statue of Queen Caroline Amalie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Royal Life Guards (Den Kongelige Livgarde), Copenhagen 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Royal Life Guards (Den Kongelige Livgarde), Copenhagen 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark in Copenhagen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Copenhagen - Christianshavn from Langebro.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:52, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Navel Base Holmen in Copenhagen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 16:43, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vestvolden - fortification of Copenhagen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:08, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Copenhagen - view from Christiansborg castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:08, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Copenhagen - view from Christiansborg castle (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:25, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morris J-type Van Carlsberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:44, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roskilde cathedral - Christian VI tomb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:52, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roskilde Cathedral - Christian IX's Chapel.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roskilde Cathedral - Christian IX's Chapel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 20:58, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roskilde - Arch of Absalon (interior).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:06, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Drottningholm Palace (by Pudelek) 4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Drottningholm Palace (by Pudelek) 4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vestvolden - fortification of Copenhagen (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 22:03, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christiansborg Palace, Copenhagen (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Very nice work! --Michael Barera 02:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chevrolet Carlsberg truck in Copenhagen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volvo Amazon in Copenhagen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:33, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmorkirken, Copenhagen (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Copper Mine Museum in Falun.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Copper Mine Museum in Falun.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulation, I like this pic really. It´s a kind of reduced. --Hubertl 09:00, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roskilde, Skolegade.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --SKas 19:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ford tractor in Roskilde, Denmark.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 23:14, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viking festival in Trelleborg, Denmark 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:29, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hunkovce (Felsőhunkóc, Гунківці) - German war cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 13:10, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vyšný Komárnik (Felsőkomárnok) - T-34-85 tank.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 15:13, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vyšný Komárnik (Felsőkomárnok) - Lisunov Li-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 15:13, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silesian - Moravian Beskids in autumn 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karlov pod Pradědem (Karlsdorf) - old house.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zborov (Zboró) - German military cemetery.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svidník (Oberswidnik, Felsővízköz, Свідник) - military park (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:27, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karlova Studánka (Bad Karlsbrunn ) - hotel Libuše.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svidník (Oberswidnik, Felsővízköz, Свідник) - military park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:31, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Skansen, Stockholm (by Pudelek) 3.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skansen, Stockholm (by Pudelek) 3.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viking festival in Trelleborg 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 13:54, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vřesová studánka (Heidebrünnel), Hrubý Jeseník (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vřesová studánka (Heidebrünnel), Hrubý Jeseník.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vřesová studánka (Heidebrünnel), Hrubý Jeseník - kostel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Česká Ves ( Böhmischdorf ) - česko-německá tabule.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branná (Goldenstein) - hrad a Škoda 105.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 00:55, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kristine kyrka, Falun (by Pudelek).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kristine kyrka, Falun (by Pudelek).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoczew (Гічва) - church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 13:51, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schronisko w Łupkowie (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 13:51, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Using Your Photo

[edit]

Hi there,

Per your request, I'm letting you know that I will be using the following photo (with attribution, and according to the license terms you set forth) for an upcoming article on mentalfloss.com: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:St._Vitus_Cathedral_-_Stained_glass.jpg

Thanks so much for sharing your work!

Cheers,

Janet Burns janet@mentalfloss.com — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 174.44.77.250 (talk) 18:22, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful holidays

[edit]

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! --Tremonist (talk) 15:52, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

[edit]
* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 19:12, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Łupków (Лупків) - old greek catholic cemetery (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Łupków (Лупків) - old greek catholic cemetery.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KWK Kleofas - pozostałości 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bieszczady - sunrise from Chatka Puchatka (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support nice. --Rjcastillo 13:19, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bieszczady - sunrise from Chatka Puchatka (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:21, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bieszczady - view from Połonina Caryńska.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:35, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chatka Puchatka (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:17, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bieszczady - sunrise from Chatka Puchatka (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:26, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bieszczady - sunrise from Chatka Puchatka (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:09, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! T-Centralen Metro station in Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chatka Puchatka (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Połonina Wetlińska (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:45, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Usage of phoro

[edit]

Dear Mr.Marcin Szala, I am going to use your photo of the dome in orthodox church in Mediash, as an illustration in my book concerning mandalas and perception of space. Sincerely Sergey Morgachev, Moscow psychologist baikal.s@mail.ru — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 94.29.15.41 (talk) 18:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Military cemetery in Česká Skalice (Böhmisch Skalitz) 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:52, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Military cemetery in Česká Skalice (Böhmisch Skalitz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:52, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Military cemetery in Česká Skalice (Böhmisch Skalitz) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Połonina Wetlińska - Smerek (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:47, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Połonina Wetlińska - Smerek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great landscape! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

QI Tunisia training

[edit]

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 19:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hospital Kuks (Kukus).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Česká Skalice (Böhmisch Skalitz) - castle.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Silesian - Moravian Beskids in winter 2014.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Silesian - Moravian Beskids in winter 2014.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bieszczady - sunrise from Chatka Puchatka (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:16, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuks (Kukus) - view.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:06, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hospital Kuks (Kukus) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:55, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hospital Kuks (Kukus) 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:06, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rozběřice (Rosberschitz) - pomníky bitvy 1866 u Šrámova kříže.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuks (Kukus) - wooden house.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bieszczady - sunrise from Chatka Puchatka (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bieszczady - sunrise from Chatka Puchatka (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chlum - Orlice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chlum - Baterie mrtvých.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Połonina Wetlińska - Smerek.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Połonina Wetlińska - Smerek.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wykorzystanie zdjęcia w serwisie TRAIL.PL

[edit]

Dzień dobry,

zgodnie z informacją pod zdjęciem chciałabym poinformować o wykorzystaniu zdjęcia wnętrza schroniska Andrzejówka w opisie schroniska w serwisie TRAIL.PL - ogólnopolskiej, darmowej internetowej bazie znakowanych szlaków i atrakcji turystycznych.

W razie pytań proszę o kontakt: kasia@trail.pl

Pozdrawiam serdecznie i zapraszam do udziału w rozwoju naszej społeczności :)

Katarzyna Kwolek

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rajcza - train station altitude sign.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presidential Palace in Warsaw (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presidential Palace in Warsaw (by Pudelek) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Żywiecki - January 2016.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hradec Králové (Königgrätz) - Labe (Elbe).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hradec Králové (Königgrätz) - hlavní nádraží (detail).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hradec Králové (Königgrätz) - hlavní nádraží.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to the main object, diffence between sun side and shadow side is well done, a Q1one--Michielverbeek 11:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hradec Králové (Königgrätz) - Salon republiky.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hradec Králové (Königgrätz) - ulice Československé armády.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hradec Králové (Königgrätz) - pivovar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hradec Králové (Königgrätz) - Velké náměstí.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hradec Králové (Königgrätz) - radnice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hradec Králové (Königgrätz) - Velké náměstí 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:03, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tiberius Iulius Abdes Pantera tombstone in Römerhalle, Bad Kreuznach, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hradec Králové (Königgrätz) - Labe (Elbe) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:35, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hradec Králové (Königgrätz) - Muzeum východních Čech v noci.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK for me, although an HDR would result in better handling of the shadows. --C messier 09:56, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Using your picture "Beskid Śląsko-Morawski - panorama 2"

[edit]

Hello Pudelek,

my name is Aleksandr Schamberger and i would like to use your picture "Beskid Śląsko-Morawski - panorama 2" for my website: paperlegends.de

I was looking for a photo, whose athmosphere could represent my Pen & Paper Project and your picture was what i am looking for.

I wanted to send you this message and give you the information, that i will use your picture under the conditions of the CreativeCommons Attribution-ShareAlike license 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0).

Your picture will be shown on the following page on my website without any changes: http://www.paperlegends.de/welten/neu-russland/

Furthermore, your name as the author and creator will be shown on the imprint of my site: http://www.paperlegends.de/about/

Thank you very much for sharing your work! You've done a greate picture! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 60.148.85.155 (talk) 04:11, 01 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With kind regards Aleksandr Schamberger — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 60.148.85.155 (talk) 04:10, 01 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hradec Králové (Königgrätz) - T. Masaryk statue.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:49, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hradec Králové (Königgrätz) - hlavní nádraží (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:11, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zawieszenie dzwonu Zygmunta (fragment obrazu).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christmas lights in Warsaw.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments a bit dark, but ok --Martin Falbisoner 13:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krakowskie Przedmieście, styczniowy wieczór 2016.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warszawa - synagoga z Gwoźdźca.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warszawa - synagoga z Gwoźdźca 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warszawa - synagoga z Gwoźdźca 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument to the Ghetto Heroes, Warsaw.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warszawa - synagoga z Gwoźdźca 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krasiński Palace in Warsaw (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Wyspowy - zima kontra wiosna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Special recording. Twig right of the middle above what disturbing.--Famberhorst 15:53, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Wyspowy - Ćwilin i Śnieżnica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Wyspowy - Lubogoszcz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:20, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Wyspowy in March 2016.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Konjevići (Коњевићи), Republika Srpska - church.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surtsicna (talk) 10:42, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Wyspowy in the evening.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Wyspowy - Kudłacze o zachodzie słońca.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pretty good, concerning the light conditions. --Tsungam 13:33, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for a permission to publish one of your photos

[edit]

Dear Pudelek,

I really like the photo of Novi Sad's Petrovaradin Fortress you made in August 2012. Since I'm working on a doctoral thesis dealing with Exit Festival, I would appreciate very much if you allow me to use it as an illustration within the monograph. Needless to say, I will cite your name below the picture.

If you need any additional information on my work, please don't hesitate to ask.

Eternally grateful in advance, Jelena

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EN57AL-1730 in Opole (Oppeln).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 08:11, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bmnopux - Opole Główne.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SU42 i Bmnopux - Opole Główne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SU42 i Bmnopux - Opole Główne (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bieszczady - Halicz (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Przełęcz Goprowska (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:09, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terka (Терка) - centrum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Wyspowy in the evening (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Perhaps this should be categorized under 'sunsets'? --Peulle 21:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Ram-Man 16:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC) Support The mountains could have been brought forward a bit more in the image, but now that it's a picture of the scene rather than just "the mountains", I think it's good enough for QI. It's a bit grainy, but that's because of the low light. If anybody disagree they can take it to CR. --Peulle 08:07, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP?

[edit]

I love this photo. I'd be happy to nominate it for a feature. But I thought I'd ask you first whether you'd consider it featurable.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bieszczady - Krzemień, Bukowe Berdo, Halicz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bieszczady - od Halicza do Krzemienia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Szlak -bazowy- do bazy namiotowej Rabe.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

use of picture

[edit]

Hello Pudelek,

I would like to use your picture on my website www.odovolenke.sk

Its this picture: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Liptovsk%C3%A1_Mara_-_church_tower_and_water_reservoir.jpg

I hope you will agree :)

I really like your picture, good job. Thanks a lot

best regards

Rado

Use of a picture

[edit]

Hello,

I would like to use a picture you uploaded for my dissertation.

It us for non-commercial, scientific use.

At some point, the dissertation should get published, in which case you would be contacted again for licensing agreement if the picture is used in the published version.

Is this agreeable for you?

Best wishes

The picture is: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kostnice_Sedlec.JPG — Preceding unsigned comment added by XPLBx (talk • contribs) 12:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Pudelek,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Przełęcz pod Tarnicą, Bieszczady.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:14, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bieszczady - Krzemień (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:40, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Przełęcz Goprowska, Bieszczady.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough to be a Q1photo. F-value 8 is a good idea in this case --Michielverbeek 15:13, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Warszawa - synagoga z Gwoźdźca 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Warszawa - synagoga z Gwoźdźca 2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarnica, Bieszczady (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful and good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:17, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crusher in Bieszczady mountains.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)*  Comment I do not see any crusher on the picture? --Christof46 19:57, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chata Huczwice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Tarnica, Bieszczady (by Pudelek).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tarnica, Bieszczady (by Pudelek).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krywe (Криве) - ruins of the church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems sharpened a bit too much, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 15:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hulskie (Гільське) - cerkwisko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 10:43, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veporské vrchy - Klenovský Vepor a Lom nad Rimavicou (Forgácsfalva).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 10:44, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Αυτοκινητόδρομος 1 Κόσοβο.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

C messier (talk) 15:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, mistake, it's just a redirect with misleading name to one file you have uploaded. You can remove it if you like. --C messier (talk) 15:24, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PKP class EU07 and Serbian ŽS 711.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:28, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EN57AL-3009rb - PR Lubelskie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:37, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lom nad Rimavicou (Forgácsfalva), Slovakia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:28, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terespol - Monument to the construction of the Brest Highway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:38, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunrise near Krzna river, Poland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The dark areas are a bit disturbing, but otherwise OK. --Peulle 11:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evening near the Krzna river, Poland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:56, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evening near the Krzna river, Poland (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Surprisingly not grainy for such a dark pic and I understand that you blanked the person's face for privacy. Please add a location tag (geo tag) though. Good quality. --W.carter 14:25, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Subliminal suggestion and conspiracy tactics. Intelligence sponsored.

[edit]

Visit my Twitter website @freddythefreel1 (Nine photographs typed information on homepage to counter twitters character limit. Regards Mr Earl D Edwards Jr. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.197.242.142 (talk) 01:43, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunrise near Krzna river, Poland (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:47, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orthodox church of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross in Dobratycze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good Quality--Lmbuga 10:45, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neo-Uniate Saint Nicephorus church in Kostomłoty (Костомолоти).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 10:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Onuphrius church in Jabłeczna (Яблочина).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Spirit chapel in Jabłeczna (Яблочина).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polish boundary stones near Burg river.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shrine in Kostomłoty (Костомолоти), Poland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--ArildV 07:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Svidník - Vojnový pamätník a cintorín sovietskej armády (by Pudelek).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Svidník - Vojnový pamätník a cintorín sovietskej armády (by Pudelek).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sunrise near Krzna river, Poland (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunrise near Krzna river, Poland (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wooden house in Dołhobrody, Poland (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:07, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wooden house in Dołhobrody, Poland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 12:59, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel in Hanna (Ханна), Poland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:59, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Peter and Paul church in Hanna (Ханна).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:10, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohnstein, Saxony.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:28, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elbe in Saxon Switzerland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:17, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathen and Lilienstein in Saxony.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 20:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poleski Park Narodowy, Staw Głęboki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:28, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]