User talk:Poco a poco/2017-04

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fuente en Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 227-229 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fuente en Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 227-229 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Tulcea, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Dambovita, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Herastrau, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Bruzau, Surdila Greci, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Cocos, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 82-84 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naghsh-e rostam, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:55, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario Shah Nematollah Vali, Mahan, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 08-10 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 17:01, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yanar Dag, Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reserva del Estado de Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good view of the mud volcano. -- Ikan Kekek 08:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reserva del Estado de Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:36, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de los Shirvanshah, Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-28, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Fátima bint Musa, Qom, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:20, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lámparas en la Medina de Túnez, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 84.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patio de la madrasa de Bir Lahjar, Medina de Túnez, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cementerio marino, Mahdia, Túnez, 2016-09-03, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Si esos tienen una marea viva, se les lleva el cementerio, ¿no? Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:27, 1 April 2017 (UTC) Sí, posiblemente, y si la marea acaba con la vida de alguien es muy práctico tener el cementerio ahí mismo :) Poco a poco 08:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cementerio marino, Mahdia, Túnez, 2016-09-03, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 101-106 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect now. The arm of the second crane did not match as well as the white ship and the pier next to it. --Ermell 06:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peñón de Ifach, Calpe, España, 2014-07-01, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Volcanes de lodo, Buzau, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 34.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Volcanes de lodo, Buzau, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 34.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de Triana, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 67.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de la Alameda, Valencia, España, 2014-06-29, DD 31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pozuelo de Aragón, Zaragoza, España, 2016-01-03, DD 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 08:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza San Isidro, Algeciras, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 09-11 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For a night photo sufficient qualty. --A.Savin 14:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Efectos visuales Interference en la Medina de Túnez, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Awesome. Please nominate it at FPC. BTW, I don't know if there could be any adecuate category for this effect, if so, please add. --Basotxerri 08:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC) I added it in my backlog, thanks, Poco a poco 08:35, 1 April 2017 (UTC)  Comment Cats fixed, it's called the Droste effect. --W.carter 07:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente Khajou, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. You are right. I was not sure because I have never been there. Excuse the lack of confidence in your careful work --Ermell 07:48, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Eine...

... Wikipause genehmige ich dir. Aber du gehörst doch hier auf commons zu den Vernünftigen, den Hilfsbereiten, denen mit Augenmaß. Und deshalb wirst du hier benötigt. Dringend. --Smial (talk) 16:10, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Danke dafür, dass du so eine gute Meinung von mir hast und das laut sagst, Smial. Wikipause ist auch eine Option, aber wenn sich nichts ändert, dann ist es nur eine Frage der Zeit, dass man wieder den Hals voll bekommt. Warum unternimmt die Community nichts dagegen? Ich weiß nicht, was wir für Druckmittel haben, aber diese Plattform sorgt einfach nicht für diejenigen, die viel Geld und Zeit investieren, gutes Material beizutragen. Ein Zeichen zu setzen wäre m.E. mehr als notwendig. Übrigens 9/10 ist nicht was meine Erfahrung zeigt (ich habe zum Spass ein paar Stickproben gemacht und gewissen Bilder im Netz gesucht), aber ok, für mich macht es keinen großen Unterschied. Viele Grüsse, Poco² 18:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Tut mir wirklich leid, dass es soweit gekommen ist. Fürs erste mag eine Wikipause helfen (hab gerade selbst eine 3-monatige hinter mir). Vielleicht wäre es hilfreich, über die "Problemlage" (du bist, weiß Gott, nicht der erste) und den Umgang damit in einer kleineren Runde - z.B. am Rande eines WP/WM-Meetings - zu sprechen. --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Ich finde die Idee gut und sollte man auf jeden Fall machen, Túrelio, in Montreal bin ich auch dabei. Poco² 19:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Das persönliche Gespräch ist häufig sehr hilfreich. Das mit den 9/10 war Ausdruck meines persönlichen Frusts. Btw: Wer sich als Fotoknipser in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia für die Einhaltung der Lizenzbedingungen einsetzt und dafür u.a. auch Rechtsmittel in Erwägung zieht, wird als Feind des "Geistes" der Wikipedia und Abzocker angeprangert. Verrückte Welt. --Smial (talk) 21:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Falls du es nicht schon mitbekommen hast und weil es einen gewissen Bezug zu einem der dich (und andere von uns) wurmenden Problem hat, siehe [1]. --Túrelio (talk) 22:27, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasargadae, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente Khajou, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Fátima bint Musa, Qom, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naghsh-e rostam, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 76.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embalse de Buendía, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 65-73 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:43, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plou, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 96.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente romano y torre de la muralla, Torrijo de la Cañada, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice!--Famberhorst 18:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 68.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Ayuntamiento, Tirana, Albania, 2014-04-17, DD 01.JPG

File:Ayuntamiento, Tirana, Albania, 2014-04-17, DD 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 07:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Ministerio de Asuntos Interiores, Tirana, Albania, 2014-04-17, DD 12.JPG

File:Ministerio de Asuntos Interiores, Tirana, Albania, 2014-04-17, DD 12.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 07:55, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sinfonía de las Piedras, valle de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 33.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sinfonía de las Piedras, valle de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 33.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:10, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Haghpat, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and it rewards the viewer to look inside at full size. -- Ikan Kekek 23:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Sevanavank, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 21:24, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio Khor Virap, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Geghard, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio Khor Virap, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Unas letras de Ivan

Hola Poco a poco, un saludo y un abrazo para ti, espero todo te esté bien contigo y con la familia. Te hago unas letras para comentarte un tema, sé que hace unos días te escribí para pedirte indicaciones sobre como re-nominar una imagen y me explicaste, pero luego no me decidí por miedo a no hacerlo correctamente, y tu sabes que yo desde hace tiempo trato de ser cuidadoso en lo que hago para evitar nuevos errores, y creo que hasta el momento lo he conseguido bastante bien, porque desde mi incidente en el 2014 no he tenido más problemas con mis contribuciones gracias a todas tus ayudas. Hermano, estas letras de ahora son para comentarte un tema que no entiendo muy bien, yo subí unas imágenes de unos tractores de las cuales 2 de ellas fueron catalogadas de QI, pero el usuario A.Savin discrepó y la paso a la zona de Consensual review. Sé que ya una vez te hablé algo sobre este usuario que fue quien pidió mi expulsión en el 2014 cuando mi incidente, cosa que gracias a ti no ocurrió, y cuando te pregunté por eso, me comentaste que no me lo tomara a pecho y dejara pasar el tiempo, pero esto con estas imágenes resultan un tanto curiosas por el “tono” con que A.Savin lo ha comentado, hay otro usuario que ha intentado infructuosamente defender mi imagen, y A.Savin en uno de sus comentarios dice que yo no he pedido ayuda y considera que es falta de interés mío, yo le envié un mensaje muy respetuoso disculpándome y explicándole, que me gustaría que tu leyeses, y otro al usuario que me apoya agradeciéndole su esfuerzo, pero en realidad no entiendo mucho, y quería pedirte si podías pasarte por allí y verlo todo, no es para que interfieras por favor, es solo para que me des tu opinión como muchas otras veces, quizás la imagen no sea QI, y A.Savin tenga toda la razón, y tal vez no haya perdonado mi error de aquella vez, algo que comprendería, pero igual tengo dudas, y por eso prefiero escuchar tu criterio que siempre ha sido certero. Hermano, una vez más te molesto para aprender contigo de algo, sé que mucho me has ayudado, y siempre estaré agradecido ante tus gestos para conmigo. Un abrazo grande para ti. Ivan2010

Hola Iván, por aquí todo bien, como siempre, espero que también por aquella isla tan bonita. A ver, te comento por partes. Lo primero es que, efectivamente, hay que identificar con la mayor exactitud posible lo que se está fotografiando. No has cometido ningún error al tomar esas fotografías o al subirlas a Commons, pero uno de los requisitos a imagen de calidad es que la imagen tenga una descripción y categorías certeras. En tu caso particular hubiera sido oportuno tomar nota de los modelos de tractor y maquinaria. Aún así, he conseguido incluir categorías más o menos exactas de los mismos por lo que, acto seguido, he votado a favor. Otro error es la sobrecategorización. Si utilizas por ejemplo la categoría tractores no deberías utilizar la categoría maquinaria agrícula, porque la segunda es madre de la primera. Basta con la categoría inferior, y cuanto más inferior sea, mejor. Un abrazo! Poco² 19:38, 9 April 2017 (UTC) PD:Deberías firmar siempre con las cuatro tildes (~~~~) para que aparezca de forma automática tanto tu nombre de usuario como la fecha del comentario.

Gracias Poco de todo corazón por tu intervención y por tus consejos, sabré corresponderlo manteniendo siempre una actitud adecuada en cada una de mis colaboraciones, para continuar mejorando acorde a como se debe, un abrazo grande hermano desde esta Isla del Caribe. Ivan2010 02:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Por cierto he firmado haciendo click en las tildes, y como verás sí muestra la fecha pero no me convierte en link mi nombre, no sé porque, pero esa es la razón por la que no suelo firmar así, ¿Tienes idea de que puede estar ocuriendo? Un abrazo

Esto es firmando con las 4 tildesIvan2010 14:54, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Y esto copiando y pegando mi firma -- Ivan2010 14:56, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Ping

Moin Poco, in der DE-Wikipedia funktioniert eine Erwähnung nur, wenn man gleichzeitig im gleichen Abschnitt neu unterschreibt. Und man bekommt auch sofort oben in der Glocke einen Hinweis, das der Ping gesendet wurde. Wenn das in commons gleich abläuft, ist deine Erwähnung hier nicht gesendet worden. Nur zur Info. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 20:48, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Interessant, das wußte ich nicht, danke für die Info Nightflyer! Da bin ich mit Sicherheit häufig reingelaufen, vor ein paar Minuten wieder... --Poco² 21:06, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Ping mich einfach mal an, dann sollte deine Glocke rot werden. Nur zum Testen. Und ich bekomm sofort einen Hinweis. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:12, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Verstehe ich nicht, ich pinge dich and und meine Glocke wird rot? Ich mache den Test nochmals wie vorhin mit Ralf. Poco² 21:28, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Du hast nicht neu unterschrieben. Ping und Signatur-Datum im gleichen Abschnitt müssen identisch sein. Der Ping kam nicht an. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:40, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

@Poco a poco: und @Nightflyer: müßte eigentlich funktionieren. --Ralf Roleček 21:52, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Hat funktioniert. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:56, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Faro del cabo Espartel, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 02.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Faro del cabo Espartel, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 02.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Fátima bint Musa, Qom, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 07:33, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario Shah Nematollah Vali, Mahan, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasargadae, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:06, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Si-o-se Pol, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 91.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition. Would be very, very nice under other lighting conditions and without people of course. Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:06, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Haghpat, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment beautiful scene, but the brightened shadows of the church is too noisy IMHO. Also CA (see annotation). --Carschten 20:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 19:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC) weak  Support: better --Carschten 23:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lori Berd, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment a) Please fix the perspective, b) please remove the dust spots, c) Can you do sth. about the noise in the sky? --A.Savin 05:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 19:59, 7 April 2017 (UTC) Good quality --A.Savin 23:38, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Mónaco, 2016-06-23, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Nevsha, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 58-62 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Pudelek 08:19, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Nuévalos, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista desde Julio Andrade, Provincia de Carchi, Ecuador, 2015-07-21, DD 41.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Shkodra, Albania, 2014-04-18, DD 13-15 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Hnevank, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 86.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a hint of CA on the roof of the tower, and I think it would look better with the two top-most free-hanging twigs on the right side gone. --W.carter 21:24, 5 April 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 19:59, 7 April 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --W.carter 20:37, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Configuring UW for WLUS India

Firstly thanks for accepting to serve as a jury member of Wiki Loves Uniformed Services (India). I am very happy to you inform you that the project's grant request has been approved by WMF. So I would like to configure the upload wizard for the campaign. I request you to introduce me to the basics, what to be modified, the base script etc. (I have already been assigned the user right) --Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 11:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello Diego, any update on this? --Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 15:34, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, bad timing, I've been very busy in real life and I'm leaving now for holidays with my family. I wasn't either expecting this request and for this topic now. You can get an overview about campaigns here. I don't know what you meatn with basics, are you campaign editor? I think that it would be easier if you tell me which campaign is close to your needs and we try to modify it to what you actually need. Poco² 17:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roques de García, Parque Nacional del Teide, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España, 2012-12-16, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 71.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Remolinos, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-30, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escatrón, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-23, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:40, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Azat, valle de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 40-42 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are overexposed areas, I'm not sure if you could get that better. Could you try, please? --Basotxerri 07:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 19:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC) Weak  Support now. --Basotxerri 15:45, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruta de las Caras, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra del Moncayo, Ágreda, España, 2012-08-28, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sobradiel, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-30, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Vinalopó a su paso por Elche, España, 2014-07-05, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quiosco, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 54.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, good enough. Daniel Case 22:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Camels aren't architecture

Hi Poco a poco,

I read about what happened lately but camels can be architecture ;). See here. (Though it looks more like a Dromedary too me.) Hopefully this cheers you up a bit. Natuur12 (talk) 23:27, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Cool pic, Natuur12, thank you! Indeed, only one hump... Poco² 19:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC) PD:Btw, I know that place.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruta de las Caras, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 75-77 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 10:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santed, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 10:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salinas de Peralta de la Sal, Huesca, España, 2015-12-23, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:41, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Segura de los Baños, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 81.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 10:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sauquillo del Campo, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:00, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 61.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The horizon is tilted --A.Savin 11:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 16:56, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --A.Savin 18:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rafesmar 20:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Fátima bint Musa, Qom, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 21:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shirpala, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-18, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Si-o-se Pol, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 92.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:47, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Iglesia de La Compañía, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 149-151 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de La Compañía, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 149-151 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Fátima bint Musa, Qom, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:39, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shirpala, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-18, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:58, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tepe Sialk, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario Shah Nematollah Vali, Mahan, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:20, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embalse de Entrepeñas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Zafra, Campillo de Dueñas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-04, DD 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments An excellent composition, only the light fall is unfortunately not really good --Michielverbeek 20:40, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa de La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:19, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shish Badgiri, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There is a dust spot on top in the middle --A.Savin 12:27, 13 April 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 17:58, 13 April 2017 (UTC) Good quality --A.Savin 10:49, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peirón, Campillo de Aragón, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-07, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 22:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje en el Parque de Doñana, España, 2015-12-07, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:31, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de la Virgen de los Olmos, Tornos, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:57, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel, Belmonte de Gracián, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-05, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:58, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

New account using your /credit on a copyvio upload

Hi Diego. I noticed this while doing deletions: [2]. This looks to be a vandalism only account. It seems strange that they would upload a copyvio video with your /credit template on it. Perhaps you have a sockpuppeteer following you? Daphne Lantier 16:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Daphne for letting me know. As that user is now blocked indefinite it doesn't make sense to contact him/her. No, I wasn't aware of any sockpuppets, but will be alert. Best! Poco² 20:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Creator template

Sorry for the watchlist spam (they are marked minor) but that maintenance category needed some serious work. - Revent^talk 19:48, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello Revent, thanks for the help. Yes, I'm aware of that issue. I only included the template in my pictures from 2013 onwards (not finished) and still have pending to do so for the pictures taken in previous years and some in 2013. Best, Poco² 20:32, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

I ran VFC across the entire maintenance category (which I had already cut in half by fixing books and the like) so they should all have it now, unless there was some variation of the whitespace that I missed. - Revent^talk 20:42, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruta de las Caras, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:50, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Velilla de la Sierra, Soria, España, 2016-01-03, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 09:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Velilla de Jiloca, Zaragoza, España, 2014-01-08, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:19, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Atienza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 147.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:50, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narros, Soria, España, 2016-01-03, DD 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:49, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Fuendetodos, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Moros, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-05, DD 01-03 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Munébrega, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:34, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Madrid desde la catedral de la Almudena, España, 2014-12-27, DD 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:27, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 53.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 53.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 15:09, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruta de las Caras, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sotodosos, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 38.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:17, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salinas de Peralta de la Sal, Huesca, España, 2015-12-23, DD 09-13 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:15, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villar de los Navarros, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Monasterio de Cocos, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 52-54 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monasterio de Cocos, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 52-54 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerros Pintados, Pampa del Tamarugal, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:07, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:59, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valle Arcoiris, Río Grande, Chile, 2016-02-05, DD 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:38, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcán Aucanquilcha, Chile, 2016-02-10, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:58, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcán Poruñita, Chile, 2016-02-10, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:58, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Un saludo y gracias

Gracias Poco, como ves así tengo que ser yo por las características de mi conexión, que es aún muy lenta vía modem telefónico, y entonces voy colaborando exactamente como tu nombre de usuario; “Poco a poco”, pero siempre buscando hacerlo bien y cada día ser mejor. Un abrazo hermano desde esta isla del Caribe, las mejores cosas para ti -- Ivan2010 14:47, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Hola Ivan, efectivamente, hay si hay que hacer gala de una cosa eso es paciencia! un abrazo Poco² 16:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:01, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerros Pintados, Pampa del Tamarugal, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:49, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 90.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KTC 18:11, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:59, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Observatorio espacial ALMA, Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-06, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:15, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transporte por cable de minerales, Devnya, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caballero de Madara, reserva histórico-arqueológica Nacional de Madara, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:55, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Aladzha, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:49, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesias rupestres de Basarbovo, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 99.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de San Bartolomé, Bardallur, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-06, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (although I would have gone for a warmer WB). --C messier 20:33, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Svetitskhoveli, Miskheta, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I guess perspective shots like these are OK, but I do think there should be a mention in the description, possibly also adding a category like this when the perspective warp is so extreme and intentional.--Peulle 15:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC) After 10,000 QIs never heard of having to add that category, but  Done, Poco a poco 15:32, 23 April 2017 (UTC) Yeah, I just think that this perspective is so extreme that saying it's a photo of the monastery would be inaccurate; it's a perspective shot of the monastery.--Peulle 19:20, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Svetitskhoveli, Miskheta, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 15:20, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caballero de Madara, reserva histórico-arqueológica Nacional de Madara, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio en Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:13, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 16-18 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tilted little bit (see the note about the horizon) --Halavar 19:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 19:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 20:33, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Árbol de Piedra, Desierto de Siloli, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tren de la FCA en el trayecto Ollagüe-Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 96.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcán Licancabur, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:33, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 22-24 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:58, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Sigüenza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 145.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mausoleo de Shah Cheragh, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 32.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mausoleo de Shah Cheragh, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 32.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio Khor Virap, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:45, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio Khor Virap, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:45, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Geghard, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 46-51 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lori Berd, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:15, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Jorge, Varenna, Italia, 2016-06-25, DD 12-14 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The tower is tilted. The perspective at the left should be corrected too --A.Savin 11:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 19:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --A.Savin 11:54, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 19:05, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Retrato de Diego Delso, Calatayud, España, 2015-01-09, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.You do good portraits, you should do that more often. ;) --W.carter 19:03, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roca del elefante, Heimaey, Islas Vestman, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 043.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 19:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Risan, Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:46, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Haghpat, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 11:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tejado, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Pink CAs in two places (see the notes) --Halavar 18:43, 19 April 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 19:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:42, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 19:41, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Herastrau, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puca Pucara, Cuzco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 82.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:09, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peperomia obtusifolia, Conservatorio botánico, Fort Wayne, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-11-12, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sign and unsharp part at the top are a bit distracting, it would be better to crop them out, see note/suggestion. --W.carter 19:03, 26 April 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 19:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC) Thanks, that's better. Good quality. --W.carter 20:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)