User talk:Pistenwolf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pistenwolf!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:49, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mass deletion

[edit]

Just for clarification: I deleted all files with the pattern "File:Drenge*" per request of you via a Facebook chat because you uploaded them from a wrong local directory. New uploads will follow. Raymond 17:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Massenlöschung von Seiten

    Seite „File:Drenge-9.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-6.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-4.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-33.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-31.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-3.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-29.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-28.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-27.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-26.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-25.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-24.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-2.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-1 Titelliste.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-19.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-17.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-16.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-14.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-13.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-12.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-1.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-1-5.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-1-4.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-1-3.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.
    Seite „File:Drenge-1-2.jpg“ wurde gelöscht.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hank Davison (3 von 8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great. --Smial 15:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaya the cat (19 von 19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:42, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herrenmagazin (8 von 17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herrenmagazin (5 von 17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for a concert shot, great timing and composition. --El Grafo 12:27, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Into Oblivion (31 von 34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not perfect, but though QI for me. --Hubertl 12:26, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graveyard Johnnys (40 von 45).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 17:29, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King Kurt (2 von 17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 17:15, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kofelgschroa (3 von 19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 17:15, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Messer (17 von 18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 17:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mad Sin (6 von 29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:38, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King Kurt (1 von 17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Rs-foto 23:11, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Die Kassierer Wiki-72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hobbs Angel of Death (5 von 16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment CAs on the guitar and the cross.--C messier 14:06, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for Review, fix the CA in the newer Version.--Pistenwolf 11:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support QI for me. --C messier 13:46, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubiosis-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit noisy, but ok --Poco a poco 20:24, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bastian Baker-95.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 07:57, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trampled by Turtles-35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 07:57, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schandmaul-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --C messier 07:57, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Patrice Babatunde Bart-Williams (1 von 16).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:4D:2C35:70A9:849E:AA00:E86:CA7 21:35, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Free & Easy Logo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Free & Easy Logo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Guanaco (talk) 02:15, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]