User talk:Pichard
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 19:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
User:Pichard/Pichard
[edit]Your "contributions" page has been moved into your userspace and can be found User:Pichard/Pichard here. Deadstar 13:06, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you!
[edit]Hello Mr. Pichard, and thank you very much for your fine and precise pictures of plants! Kind regards, --Sten Porse (talk) 07:47, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Please use the correct date format
[edit]Hi Pichard,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you mentioned a date on File:Acer_pseudoplatanus_sabliere-morriere-plailly_60_01072008_01.jpg. Please know that in order for dates to be automatically detected and translated into other languages it needs to be in the YYYY-MM-DD
format (ie. 2024-01 for January 2024 or 2024-12-23 for 23 December 2024). Also, for other (less specific) dates use {{Other date}} for centuries, ranges, 'circa' etc. like this: {{other date|between|1899|1903}}
for "between 1899 and 1903
". This way the dates will be translated internally into the user's language preference. I've fixed it for you here. See for example the result in French: here. Thanks again.–Krinkletalk 16:34, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
ID of some of your plant photographs
[edit]Cher Pichard,
Mon Francais est mauvais, mais si vous ne comprenez pas mes mots anglais, dites-moi et je vais essayer de traduire mon texte:
I changed the ID of a few of your photographs. Your images of Cephalanthera damasonium from Lurais (File:Cephalanthera damasonium lurais 36 11052008 3.jpg, File:Cephalanthera damasonium lurais 36 11052008 1.jpg and File:Cephalanthera damasonium lurais 36 11052008 2.jpg) show Cephalanthera longifolia in fact. The flowers are white (not cream), the bracts of the lower flowers are shorter than the flowers (they should resemble normal leaves and be longer than the flowers in Cephalanthera damasonium) and the flowers are wide open. I cannot completely exclude a hybrid of the two species, as the lower leaves are not as long and narrow as I usually see them on images of Cephalanthera longifolia, but I tentatively changed the ID to Cephalanthera longifolia. Please note that your images of Cephalanthera damasonium from Catena de Rangeval are correctly named.
Your images of Veronica agrestis (especially File:Veronica agrestis saint-fuscien 80 19052007 4.jpg because of the long pedicels and the mostly blue, big flowers, but very probably also File:Veronica agrestis saint-fuscien 80 19052007 6.jpg) show Veronica persica. Veronica agrestis images on the web are usually misidentified photographs of other species. The only photograph of Veronica agrestis on the Commons, which might well be correctly identified, is this one: [:File:Veronica agrestis eF.jpg]. The other photographs in this category are very probably misidentified other species from Veronica genus. You can find some images of (probably) correctly identified Veronica agrestis here: [1], [2], [3], [4]. Veronica agrestis has usually almost white flowers on pedicels shorter than their bracts.
Finally, I am convinced that some of your images of Gymnadenia conopsea from Chézy-sur-Marne and from Festieux (File:Gymnadenia conopsea chezy-sur-marne 02 12052007 3.jpg, File:Gymnadenia conopsea chezy-sur-marne 02 12052007 2.jpg, File:Gymnadenia conopsea chezy-sur-marne 02 12052007 4.jpg, File:Gymnadenia conopsea festieux 02 25052008 2.jpg and File:Gymnadenia conopsea festieux 02 25052008 1.jpg) actually show specimens of Anacamptis pyramidalis. I corrected these as well.
Please note that I did not change the ID of any of your photographs on your private user page and that I made no attempt to rename the photographs.
Best regards -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 18:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC).
Thank you so much, I've all updated. Regards. Pichard (talk) 21:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC).
I use one of your sound registers
[edit]Hi Olivier!
I have use one register of Phylloscopus sibilatrix in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)
You can see directy in the follow links and click over "Siguiente" (=Next):
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/sonido.php?id=91
If you wish, you can send me some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor card" in Animalandia: http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Olivier%20Pichard
This is my "contributor card", for example: http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn
In the future, I use more of your resources, I sure!
Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid work!! Regards! Fernando Lisón
--Fernando.lison (talk)
Use of your picture for a book
[edit]Hi,
We’d like to use one of your pictures for a book that will be publish next fall. On wikimedia, it says that the picture is copyright free.
The title of the book is Secrets de plantes 2 and the name of the author is Fabien Girard. The initial print run will be 1000 copies.
We’d like to have your autorisation by e-mail to use this picture. If you accept, what is the exact name of the source that we must write beside the picture?
Here are the link of the picture.
Stéphane Aubut Editor assistant for Les Éditions JCL
stephane@jcl.qc.ca
Yes, you can use this picture with the cc-by-sa 3.0 licence.
Regards
O Pichard