User talk:Parcly Taxel
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:25, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
9-coloured triple torus
[edit]Hi Parcly Taxel,
Thanks for uploading the SVG files. I highly admire your ability to find the colourings. Hope you don't mind my redrawing File:9_mutually_adjacent_regions_on_triple_torus_2.svg to make the regions 120° apart at the holes, avoid the pseudoquadripoints, and more clearly distinguish the regions for colour-blind people.
Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 13:15, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't mind your redrawing; I included the pseudoquadripoints to stay true to the primal graph formulation and because (for the second K9 map) they preserve a reflection symmetry of the uncoloured regions.
- I have uploaded K12 embedded vertex-transitively (chiral tetrahedral symmetry) into the genus 6 orientable surface. Euler's formula shows that in this case every face must be a triangle, with no pseudoquadripoints in the dual map. Parcly Taxel 01:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, Taxel. I totally understand that these points look tidier, though am concerned that they might confuse someone less familiar with the topic who might assume regions diagonally across are considered adjacent.
- Great of you to upload these maps. I don't understand your statement that every face must be a triangle as quite a few of them in the thumbnail don't appear so.
- Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 08:45, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Topologically they are triangles – they are bounded by three edges and three vertices. Geometrically, of course they aren't. Parcly Taxel 10:34, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Got it. Thanks for explaining, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 19:35, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Topologically they are triangles – they are bounded by three edges and three vertices. Geometrically, of course they aren't. Parcly Taxel 10:34, 13 October 2024 (UTC)