User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 40

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiltingen Proveltkreuz 1784.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiltingen Scharzhof 1788.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberemmel Wegekreuz 1882.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Heller Notgeld banknote (1921) of the town Steyr, Austria..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:15, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Heller Notgeld banknote (1920) of the Austrian state Styria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 22:11, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross at the L138 near Konz-Krettnach, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1788) near Wiltingen, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Welschbillig Stadtwappen Burgstrasse 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Butzweiler Friedhofskreuz 1785.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:07, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Luther.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Luther.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Luther.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Mutter Gottes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Waldemar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld Banknote (1921) of Treuenbrietzen, Germany, RV: Martin Luther..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehrang Blankenheimer Kreuz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 18:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Stadtansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:13, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Kurfürst Ludwig I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:13, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier-Biewer St-Jakobus-Brunnen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted/lacks perspective correction --Poco a poco 21:43, 2 March 2024 (UTC)  Done New version. --Palauenc05 18:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC) *Good quality -- Spurzem 19:08, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Treuenbrietzen, 1921 by Heinz Schiestl, reverse: "Mutter Gottes"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Treuenbrietzen, 1921 by Heinz Schiestl, reverse: "False Waldemar is not let into the town"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St.-Jakobus-Fountain in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope. I do think the photo needs a vertical correction.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:39, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Done New version uploaded. --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:42, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

• Hartelijk dank.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Söhne der Stadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 13:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Landkreis 1 Million 1923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 13:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote (1921) by Heinz Schiestl of Treuenbrietzen, Germany, reverse: three sons of the town..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used .--Famberhorst (talk) 16:37, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountain (1829-1898) at Viehmarktplatz in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:51, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote (1921) by Heinz Schiestl of Treuenbrietzen, Germany, reverse: view of the town..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Datum

Hallo! Ist das Bild vom Treppenaufgang Pfeiffersbrücke auch von 2022 wie das von der Petrusskulptur, oder vom 16.3.24? Kann man normalerweise davon ausgehen, dass das Aufnahmedatum dem angegebenen Datum entspricht? (Da ich der Vollständigkeit halber gerne das taken-on-Template einsetze) VG P170 (talk) 17:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Stimmt. --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

@Palauenc05: Vielleicht möchtest Du bei Gelegenheit nochmal genauer auf die Frage(n) antworten :-) --P170 (talk) 18:18, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Die in den Bildbeschreibungen angegebenen Daten sind die Aufnahmedaten. --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:22, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Alles klar, Danke --P170 (talk) 19:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Ehrang Pfeiffersbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Ehrang Petrus 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote (1921) of Treuenbrietzen by Heinz Schiestl, reverse: Prince-elector Ludwig I..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fischers Maathes reclining on his sofa..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Useful and a good nominee, but I think "before 1879" is superfluous because since that's the year he died, it's obvious. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blankenheimer Kreuz in Trier-Ehrang, Germany (after restoration)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Saint Peter in Trier-Ehrang, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former stairway to "Pfeiffersbrücke" in Trier-Ehrang, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier-Ruwer Wegekreuz 1632.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manternach Wegekreuz Syrdallstrooss (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 20:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manternach Wegekreuz Syrdallstrooss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Thi 20:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mertert wayside shrine (1882).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:53, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1632) in Trier-Ruwer, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)  Best in Scope --Трифонов Андрей (talk) 08:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mertert-Manternach Brücke über die Syr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Challenging light. If you have the RAW file: Can you further work on the highlights. Small areas of one stone are burnt, the same with areas of the sky. --Tuxyso 12:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC)  Done New version. --Palauenc05 23:36, 23 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Tuxyso 06:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Manternach, Syrdallstrooss 29, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
River Syre between Mertert and Manternach, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
River Syre between Mertert and Manternach, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Manternach, Syrdallstrooss 29, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zadar Votive column bell tower of Saint Elijah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Manternach, Syrdallstrooss 29, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Electoral building (1730) in Freudenburg, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 20:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
River Syre between Mertert and Manternach, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Manternach, Syrdallstrooss 29, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
River Syre between Mertert and Manternach, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Electoral building (1730) in Freudenburg, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 20:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heuschreckbrunnen (Koorscht o Kneisjen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heuschreckbrunnen (Wichshänsjen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 14:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heuschreckbrunnen3 (Krons Ton).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 16:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Koorscht o Kneisjen" on Heuschreckbrunnen in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Wichshänsjen" on Heuschreckbrunnen in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bielefeld 1 Mark 1921.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bielefeld 1 Mark 1921.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Mahnmal für Sinti und Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Krons Ton" on Heuschreckbrunnen in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful and used. --GRDN711 (talk) 14:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)