User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 4

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schleswig 25 Pfennig 1920.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schleswig 25 Pfennig 1920.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Itzehoe (1918).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Itzehoe (1920).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:01, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riol Franziskus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:55, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainz Bahnhof 1919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:55, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Buxtehude (1921).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and nice. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:59, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:08, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Mark "Notgeld" banknote of Hamburg (1921)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:16, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:31, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prien Notgeld 10 Pfennig 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prien Notgeld 25 Pfennig 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiel 50 Pfennig 1918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 11:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Hamburg Notgeld 50 Pfennig 1921 (2).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Notgeld 50 Pfennig 1921 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Pretty stuff --Podzemnik 10:40, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grevesmühlen 50 Pfennig 1923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:50, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Longuich Wegekreuz 19tes Jh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame about the branch left. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 16:49, 14 February 2019 (UTC)  Comment I can easily get rid of the branch, but that silly car in the background annoys me more. --Palauenc05 17:07, 14 February 2019 (UTC) You can not drive that car from the photo. (just kidding)--Famberhorst 17:54, 14 February 2019 (UTC)  Info Just for the fun of it, please look again. (As if I had nothing else to do.) ;-) --Palauenc05 22:07, 14 February 2019 (UTC) Good job! Cap off.--Famberhorst 06:10, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Apenrade (1920).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and thank you again for taking on this great project! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:29, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Apenrade (1920).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Lovely, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:29, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bahnhofplatz Mainz, pre 1914..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:08, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross 17th century in Riol, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:11, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prien Notgeld 50 Pfennig 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:19, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prien Notgeld 1 Mark 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:19, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Hamburg Notgeld 50 Pfennig 1921 (2).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Hamburg (1921), "Landungsbrücke" and "Michel"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Grevesmühlen (1923).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Prien am Chiemsee (1920)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Prien am Chiemsee (1920)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothenburg 50 Pfennig 1918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 15:06, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Prien am Chiemsee (1920)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:10, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Mark "Notgeld" banknote of Prien am Chiemsee (1920)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:11, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Longuich (Germany), Kirchenweg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:11, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hamburg Notgeld 1 Mark 1921.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hamburg Notgeld 1 Mark 1921.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Neumünster (1920).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:20, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Kiel (1919).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:20, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin Notgeld 50 Pfennig 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Kiel (1919).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:20, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross, so-called "Schneiderskreuz" (1668) in Trier, after restoration in 2018..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:06, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Nürnberg (1920)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prizna, Croatia, view W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:47, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment More useful if cropped though. Charles (talk) 14:03, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Prien Notgeld 1 Mark 1920.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prien Notgeld 1 Mark 1920.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Façade portal of Saint-Martin, Colmar, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:33, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Support better framing. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Not only that, the color looks real and not washed out. I think this is flat-out better, at least at the sizes shown on the file pages. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:27, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Colmar saint martin portail.jpg: 2 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Portail de la collégiale Saint-Martin (Colmar).jpg: -1 
=>
File:Colmar saint martin portail.jpg: Remains as a VI. <--
File:Portail de la collégiale Saint-Martin (Colmar).jpg: Declined.

---- DeFacto (talk). 18:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosenheim St Nikolaus Kirche Reliquiar St Nikolaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:56, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reliquary bust of St. Nikolaus in St. Nikolaus Church Rosenheim, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tingleff 1 Mark 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 08:14, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Pfarrkirche Mülln.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:37, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustadt Samoa 1922.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:36, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Mark "notgeld" banknote of Tingleff (Nordschleswig), 1920..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:05, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburger Dom Putto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 19:09, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Neustadt in Mecklenburg (1922), German colonies on the Mariana Islands and the Caroline Islands..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful (I was going to post "Good quality", which is also true). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pfarrkirche Mülln, Salzburg (Austria), view East..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:35, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marble putto in the Salzburg Cathedral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bronze bust of Anton Chekhov in Opatija, Croatia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of Senj, Croatia (from South).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:32, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apenrade 25 Pfennig 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:36, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Palauenc05,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apenrade 50 Pfennig 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosenheim 5 Pfennig 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Rosenheim (1921).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Rosenheim (1921).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosenheim 10 Pfennig 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:36, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opatija Anton Tschechow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please reduce the contrast, the shadows are too strong --Michielverbeek 08:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)  Done @ Michielverbeek: Contrast reduced as far as possible. The right side of the face shows more details now. --Palauenc05 17:59, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosenheim 25 Pfennig 1921 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Rosenheim 25 Pfennig 1921 (2).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosenheim 25 Pfennig 1921 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flensburg 50 Pfg 1920 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:16, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 Mark Georg 1903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Rosenheim 50 Pfennig 1921 (1).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosenheim 50 Pfennig 1921 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:15, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosenheim 50 Pfennig 1921 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:19, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin 50 Pfennig 1921 Stralauer Fischzug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:46, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin 50 Pfennig 1921 Köpenick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:46, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin 50 Pfennig 1921 Tiergarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin 50 Pfennig 1921 Spandau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 11:55, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin 50 Pfennig 1921 Treptow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 22:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote (emergency money) of Berlin (1921), district Friedrichshain..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:48, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. BoothSift 23:08, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote (emergency money) of Berlin (1921), district Köpenick..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. BoothSift 23:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote (emergency money) of Berlin (1921), district Tiergarten..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. BoothSift 23:00, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote (emergency money) of Berlin (1921), district Spandau..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. BoothSift 23:00, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote (emergency money) of Berlin (1921), district Treptow..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Berlin 50 Pfennig 1921 Tiergarten.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin 50 Pfennig 1921 Tiergarten.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:De Fer Trier 1692.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:De Fer Trier 1692.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin-Straßenbahn Hallesches Tor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sefferweich Wegekreuz 17tes Jh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:10, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1727) in Sefferweich, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 20:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel (18th century) in Sefferweich, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:25, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 20:04, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hanover 25 Pfennig 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:49, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (17^th century) in Sefferweich, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Mark "Notgeld" banknote (emergency money) of Berlin (1922), Hallesches Tor..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote (emergency money) of Hanover (1921), Marktkirche, Hanover..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:18, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 16:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)