User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 2

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southern portal of Église Saint-André de Rivesaltes, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used, useful and very good -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:09, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 13:24, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church "Santa Maria d'Agullana", Agullana, Spain (view S)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:22, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:14, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pipe organ (1824) in Église Saint-André de Rivesaltes, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support The picture is a little blurry. Maybe you could make a new version on occasion. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
• I know, it was quite dark in the church, flash not allowed. It was the best I could do. --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:12, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Belfry of Rivesaltes, France (view N)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Voltmetro 17:38, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Medieval town gate in Pollestres, France (view NW)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Your valued image number 1 of this gate seems better. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:59, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
  
• It is the same gate, of course, but this is the opposite side of it, as you can see in the descriptions. The nominations can be compared to this and that --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:14, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

@Palauenc05: Entschuldigung, das hatte ich übersehen. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

@Spurzem: Kein Problem, es gibt Schlimmeres ;-) --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:45, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met... I like the example --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 10:22, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Église Saint-André de Rivesaltes, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and an interesting church. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:18, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 10:22, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
General view (northwest) of Villeneuve-de-la-Raho, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question It looks fine (I don't know if "General view" is required but let's not split hairs) but, I am curious why is there no metadata? -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:45, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
  
• I've explained about 1000 times that for whatsoever reason my system does not provide exif-data. As they are not mandatory, I don't bother to buy new equipment. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. I'm sorry if I came off inquisitive, I was only curious. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:14, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment No problem, I may have to buy new stuff, just to avoid those questions ;-). --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:47, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:03, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villeneuve-de-la-Raho Saint-Julien-et-Sainte-Basilisse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rivesaltes epitaph.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:51, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Saint-Julien-et-Sainte-Basilisse de Villeneuve-de-la-RahoFrance (view East)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Peulle (talk) 18:49, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:19, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villelongue-dels-Monts Église Saint-Étienne (sud).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is pretty noisy and with that weather conditions that should be fixed. I also think that you lift up the shadows too much --Poco a poco 13:18, 15 July 2018 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks for reviewing, new version uploaded. I've reduced the noise, however, I hadn't done anything to the shadows. --Palauenc05 13:59, 15 July 2018 (UTC)  Support Good enough now --Poco a poco 18:44, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Étienne de Villelongue-dels-Monts, France (view S)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:15, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herborn Wegekreuz 1838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:39, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Bild gestaucht?

Hallo, File:Trier Hauptmarkt 12.jpg scheint in der Höhe gestaucht zu sein. --(talk) 06:23, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
@ Berthold Werner Danke für den Hinweis. Ich schaue mir den "raw-file" nochmal an. Gruß Palauenc05

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tongeren Onze-Lieve-Vrouwebasiliek Pietà.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:24, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perpignan Castillet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, fine composition --Im Fokus 01:37, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baroque building (1767), Hauptmarkt 12, Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good image, used and useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:57, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pietà in Onze-Lieve-Vrouwebasiliek, Tongeren, Belgium..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good image, used and useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 14:46, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montesquieu Arnaud Guillaume 1374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. EXIF data would be nice. --XRay 14:55, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altar of "Our Lady, Cause of our Joy" (Tongeren), Belgium..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brouilla portal kapitell(re).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathédrale "Sainte-Eulalie-et-Sainte-Julie", Elne, France (view W)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, I think the tower on the right is tilted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Done New version uploaded. --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:48, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Used, useful and best in scope. It is the only image of this cathedral in the commons where the towers do not seem to overthrow. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Hauptmarkt 12 1767.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments the dark area in the botton is noise and seems there's aritfacts --Ezarate 22:26, 1 September 2018 (UTC)  Comment New version uploaded. --Palauenc05 21:26, 2 September 2018 (UTC)  Support better now --Ezarate 23:17, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-André-de-Sorède (east).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Hard shadow --Trougnouf 13:45, 3 September 2018 (UTC) Other opinions, please. --Palauenc05 16:58, 3 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Where should be the objectionable hard shadow? I see a well-designed image with pleasant colors and blameless sharpness. -- Spurzem 20:51, 3 September 2018 (UTC)  Comment On the right side, though it varies across monitors, one shows almost no detail and the other is just a strong shadow. I'll be  Neutral so no need to put it up for discussion. --Trougnouf 00:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lintel dated 1767, Hauptmarkt Trier No. 12..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful (but some Metadata would be helpful, where have they gone?) --Llez (talk) 13:08, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:08, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Moerenpoort" in Tongeren, Belgium (view West)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stilters eltville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --Peulle 21:25, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cockpit Ovali 1957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 21:46, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cockpit of a 1957 Volkswagen Beetle "Ovali".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roman inscription for the construction of an arsenal for the emperor's steward in the Praetorium (Cologne).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vivès Église Saint-Michel madonna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:04, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vivès Église Saint-Michel main altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy but within reasonable limits. Good quality for me, Tournasol7 07:19, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main altar of Église Saint-Michel de Vivès, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral: Single image scope --Reinhard Müller (talk) 07:26, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:23, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rettel Maison de la Dîme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The facade seems to be slightly convex. But good enough for me. Did you apply lens correction?--Famberhorst 15:23, 2 October 2018 (UTC) No, but esp. the right corner of the building is not straight. --Palauenc05 18:00, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Side altar of Saint Michael, Église Saint-Michel de Vivès, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral: Single image scope. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 07:27, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

• If there's only one photo in scope, the only questions are: (a) is the scope per se reasonable? (b) does the photo clearly represent the scope? (c) is the photo per se acceptable (e.g., not tiny and not a horrible photo). If it fulfills the requirements and the scope is reasonable, it should be supported. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:18, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

• I am not sure how a side altar in a church qualifies for what the rules define as a suitable scope. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 14:23, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

• If you look at the description, you can read that this altar is classified by the French Ministry of Culture in the "Base Palissy". What else do you want? --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:36, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Maison de la Dîme", Rettel, France (view W)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:47, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Epitaph of Simone de Berzé († 1327), Abbaye Saint-Philibert de Tournus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:48, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Cyprien - Bel Ange.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:16, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argelès Chapelle Saint-Laurent-du-Mont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:42, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical barque "Le Bel Ange" (1898) in the Port of Saint-Cyprien.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support, well described and categorized, useful. Skimel (talk) 18:35, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argelès Chapelle Saint-Laurent-du-Mont apse embrasure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:24, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Saint-Laurent-du-Mont d'Argelès-sur-Mer, France (view SW)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good image, best in scope -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Apse of Chapelle Saint-Laurent-du-Mont d'Argelès-sur-Mer, France (view E)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:46, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Fassbenders Central Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 18:39, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gary Brooker (2018).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reims Jacquart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:28, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Brimont, house of Champagne Jacquart, Reims (view SW)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:32, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal of Welschnonnenkirche (Trier), Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 22:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clemens Wenzeslaus 1794.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:49, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clemens Wenzeslaus von Sachsen, Kontributionstaler 1794..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose The scope must indicate it is a coin. Charles (talk) 17:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

•  Support apologies. Charles (talk) 11:26, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment "Kontributionstaler" is a coin. If it was a Ford Mustang, would I have to indicate it is a car? --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:50, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Useful. If you don't know a Taler is a coin, why would you look for the scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Matt Pegg, 2018..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westhofen Epitaph 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westhofen Epitaph 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 19:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Porta-Nigra-Platz 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
King George of Saxony, 2 Mark coin (1903).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1870) near Messerich, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1781) near Messerich, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainz 50 Pfg 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bettel wegekreuz2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image and good quality (obwohl ich es ein ganz klein bisschen dunkler gehalten hätte) -- Spurzem 20:44, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainz 25 Pfg 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:33, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Mainz 25 Pfg 1921 (helmet).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainz 25 Pfg 1921 (helmet).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Another really good one. -- Ikan Kekek 00:06, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Mainz 10 Pfg 1921.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainz 10 Pfg 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:00, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koerperich Schlossstrasse 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:25, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote, Mainz, 1921.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, apparently unique in scope. I think this could be a good FP nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:13, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross near Bettel, Luxembourg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:47, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building Schlossstr. 8 in Körperich, Germany (view SW)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:48, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehrenbreitstein 25 pfg Born.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:01, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pellingen wayside cross.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:11, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Mainz 10 Pfg 1921.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote, Mainz, 1921.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Mainz 50 Pfg 1921 (eagle).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainz 50 Pfg 1921 (eagle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:53, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehrenbreitstein 25 pfg Brentano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:53, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote (1921) of Ehrenbreitstein (Germany), RV: C. Brentano..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:22, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Malente (Germany) (1920)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)