User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 15

Quality Image Promotion

File:Bielefeld 25 Pfennig 1919.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bielefeld 25 Pfennig 1919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:55, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Wittenburg 1922 99 Pfennig.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittenburg 1922 99 Pfennig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1650) near Kyllburgweiler.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Atmospheric image, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Bielefeld 25 Pfennig 1919.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote (1919) of Bielefeld.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 14:05, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dortmund-Hörde 25 Pfennig 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanzem Wegekreuz Cantzheim (Detail).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig Notgeld banknote Dortmund-Hörde.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I don't think that only images of fresh printed banknotes are useful. -- Spurzem (talk) 13:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserliesch Wegekreuz 1800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserliesch Wegekreuz 1823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserliesch Wegekreuz 1661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But still no way found to save the meta-data-information? --Milseburg 14:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Bremen 75 Pfennig 1921.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bremen 75 Pfennig 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserliesch Wegekreuz 1776 (Detail1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Bad Lippspringe 25 Pfg 1921.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Lippspringe 25 Pfg 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1823) in Wasserliesch, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 18:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1661) in Wasserliesch, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used, good image -- Spurzem (talk) 17:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1800) in Wasserliesch, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Bremen 75 Pfennig 1921.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
75 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote (1921) of Bremen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 15:55, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saarburg Bildstock 1741 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gernrode 75 Pfennig 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

File:Bad Lippspringe 25 Pfg 1921.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Bad Lippspringe, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 09:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Detail of wayside shrine (1776) in Wasserliesch (Germany).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 09:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:47, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eutin 50 Pfennig 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good one --PantheraLeo1359531 14:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanzem Wegekreuz 1695.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building (1726) in Saarburg (Germany), Staden 15..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 11:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
75 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote (1921) of Gernrode, Thuringia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 17:04, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Eutin, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 11:15, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1695) near Kanzem, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 11:12, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building (1676) in Saarburg (Germany), Pferdemarkt 4..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier-Euren Zingenkreuz 1809.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Euren Wappenstein 1680.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building (18^th century) in Saarburg (Germany), Am Markt 6..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building (c. 1700) in Saarburg (Germany), Staden 45..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier-Euren Wegekreuz St-Helena-Straße 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weimar 75 Pfennig 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saarburg Pferdemarkt 4 1676.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is the narrowing at the bottom for real? --Poco a poco 16:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC) Yes, nothing is straight there, look at the windows on the 2nd floor. --Palauenc05 16:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)  Support Funny, ok, QI then to me --Poco a poco 08:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1809) in Trier-Euren, so-called "Zingenkreuz".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:40, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Relief stone (1680) in Trier-Euren, Eisenbahnstraße 1..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:40, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier-Euren Bildstock Im Spilles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good. -- Liberaler Humanist 19:06, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neusalz (Oder) 1-50 Mark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saarburg lintel 1676 Pferdemarkt 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

File:Bad Lippspringe 25 Pfg 1921.jpg

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bad Lippspringe 25 Pfg 1921.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bad Lippspringe 25 Pfg 1921.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
75 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote (1921) of Weimar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, and another great cultural/historical document. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (19^th century) in Trier-Euren, St.-Helena-Straße 73..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 18:59, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1,50 Mark Notgeld banknote of Neusalz (Oder) (now: Nowa Sól in Poland).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 20:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine with relief of Pietà (18^th century) in Trier-Euren.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 20:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Speyerkreuz Eurenerstraße 1820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit too dark, but good enough IMO. --Tournasol7 09:41, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier-Euren Bildstock Im Spilles (Detail).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1820), so-called "Speyerkreuz" in Trier, Eurener Straße..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine (1741) in Saarburg, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Ok for this--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Scores:

1. Saarburg Bildstock 1741 (2).jpg: +1
2. Saarburg Bildstock 1741.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--

=>
File:Saarburg Bildstock 1741 (2).jpg: Promoted.
File:Saarburg Bildstock 1741.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--

--Palauenc05 (talk) 08:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eutin 25 Pfennig 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Commonists 21:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Euren Wegekreuz vor Plein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Retzgrubenweg 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig notgeld banknote (1922) of Cologne, soldier is knitting and watching a bird in its cage..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 22:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside shrine (1790) and fountain (1763) in Trier-Olewig.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 21:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ruin of a "protected" historical building in Trier-Olewig.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used (Der Anblick schmerzt.) -- Spurzem (talk) 21:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Sankt Matthias Höhe ü M.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:48, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Brunnen und Bildstock Unter Kleeburg 3-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meiningen Notgeld 50 Pfg 1920 Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erzbischöfe Trier und Köln.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saarburg Schlussstein 1761.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of former locomotive repair shop in Trier..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote (1920) of Eutin, RV: Voss-Haus..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and beautiful, another potential FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment @ Ikan Kekek: Thanks, I agree, the quality is certainly good enough for FP. However, I'm afraid, people get tired of those bills if there are too many nominations. But if you like, feel free ... --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I think the solution is to wait a while between nominations of Notgeld pictures, similar to what Llez does with his shell photos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Yep, that's what I've done so far. --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Bildstock Medardstraße-Schammat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Lokrichthalle Graffiti Donald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 16:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Wegekreuz Sickingenstraße 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 19:13, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prize cup for Tour du Léman in 1975.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:43, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside chapel (c. 1900) in Trier-Süd, Maternusstraße / Albanastraße (view south)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 17:50, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Signature of Ferran Adrià.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (18^th century) in Trier-Süd, Maternusstraße / Albanastraße (view north)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 17:48, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)