User talk:Palauenc05/Archive 13

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Mark Notgeld banknote Lunden (1921), RV: tombstone of Peter Swyn..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 12:22, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lintel (1490) at historical building Glockenstraße 2, Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 20:12, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caricature of "Beckumer Pütt" on a banknote of 1918.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:15, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building Trier (Germany), Simeonstr. 2.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:46, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Mark "Notgeld" banknote (1921) of Wildeshausen, obverse: "Kapitelhaus"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 09:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:54, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bronze bust of Mahatma Gandhi in Trier, Flanderstraße.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, the only in scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 09:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:30, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Domkurie Eich in Trier (northeast view)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 15:31, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier bronze bust Gandhi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckum 50 Pfennig 1918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 16:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Eisenach, RV: Luther's arrival at the Wartburg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:53, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lunden 1 Mark 1921 Grabstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:09, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zerbst 25 Pfg 1921 RS Brauerei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Beckum 2 Mark Beckumer Pütt.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beckum 2 Mark Beckumer Pütt.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisenach 50 Pfg 1921 Luthers Ankunft.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Architectural fragments, Romanesque cornice and Gothic gate, in Trier, Rindertanzstraße..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Stockplatz 2 Portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:45, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Saarstrasse 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Mark "Notgeld" banknote of Zerbst, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 12:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier bronze bust Gandhi (front).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:55, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Wappen Stockplatz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:08, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Dom Kreuzgang 3 Engel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zerbst 1 Mark 1921 RS Markt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice. -- Ikan Kekek 12:41, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical building Saarstraße 32 in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 17:22, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Relief of arms of alliance (c. 1720) at Stockplatz 2, Trier (Germany).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 19:11, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

File:Osterfeld 150 Pfennig 1921.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
150 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Osterfeld, Germany (1921)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Andrei (talk) 22:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Rinteln, RV: Baron Munchausen riding on a cannonball.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Andrei (talk) 22:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wildeshausen 50 Pfennig 1921 Alexanderkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Wildeshausen, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 10:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Beckum, RV: The story of a sundial..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and a good FPC candidate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

• I doubt it. People will complain that the reverse is actually vertical, while the obverse is horizontal. --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

• True, I guess they might. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:16, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Bad Oeynhausen, RV: Fürstenhof..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 21:53, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Perpignan Théâtre de l'Archipel.jpg

File:Perpignan Théâtre de l'Archipel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

VIGNERON (talk) 09:23, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

OK VIGNERON, bien que je sois simple, j'essaie de comprendre: Les projets Wikimédia sont commerciaux bien qu'ils soient non-commerciaux!? --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

C'est compliqué mais les projets Wikimédia sont plutôt commerciaux et n'accepte pas les licences non-commerciales, voir Commons:Licensing. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 10:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckum 25 Pfennig 1920 (Sonnenuhr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:02, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Oeynhausen 50 Pfennig Fürstenhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really good as usual. -- Ikan Kekek 23:05, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Osterfeld 150 Pfennig 1921.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osterfeld 150 Pfennig 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rinteln 50 Pfennig 1920 Münchhausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:47, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern 1 Mark 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, I like the annotation on the bottom :D --PantheraLeo1359531 18:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstadt 50 Pfennig 1921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Mark Notgeldschein (1918) of Beckum, RV: so-called "Beckumer Pütt".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 14:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Mark "Notgeld" banknote of Haltern am See, RV: Siebenteufelsturm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 08:55, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:47, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Konstadt (1921).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 10:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckum 2 Mark Kuh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:35, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Itzehoe, RV: Historical "Wallenstein-Eiche".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and best in scope -- Spurzem (talk) 16:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:57, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monschau 50 Pfennig Jagdschloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caricature of Beckum (Germany) on a banknote of 1918: "Citizens pull up a cow"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:42, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of the district "Kreis Monschau", RV: Jagdschloss.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 12:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monschau 50 Pfennig townscape.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:19, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Northeast view of Trier, wood engraving by Hubert Clerget (1885).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and a good FP candidate. I can't help feeling that Google Maps and search engines, generally, plus the greater ease in taking and printing photographs, are why it's no longer standard for books like the one this came from to be printed. On the other hand, this site enables the wider, easier and certainly cheaper dissemination of this image, even if it helps make future similar engravings less likely. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:32, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment @ Ikan Kekek: It's amazing that you call it "a good FP candidate", while it's obviously not worth the QI label. Strange, isn't it? --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:51, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Question Wait, did I say it wasn't worth being a QI? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I hadn't noticed the nomination in QIC. I just voted to promote it. Let's see whether anyone contradicts that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:13, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

• I think what happens is that there are so many nominations at QIC, it's a lot easier for people to miss some than either here or at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:15, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

• Right, it's a phenomenon that I observe quite often. Nominations of serious motifs are ignored, while for example an entire series of a sleeping cat is promoted. I guess, we'll have to accept that the importance of a motif doesn't play any role in QI. --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:42, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

• That sleeping black cat is really beautiful, though. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:11, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

• So cute a pussy! --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:41, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monschau 50 Pfennig map.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 21:17, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of the district "Kreis Monschau", RV: townscape.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 10:26, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:33, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zerbst 10 Pfg 1921 RS Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:38, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier Stadtansicht Nordost Hubert Clerget.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:12, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of the district "Kreis Monschau", RV: map of the district..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful und used -- Spurzem (talk) 16:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckum 1 Mark 1918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

User box

Hello Palauenc05

I'm not proficient with Wikipedia and Commons script language nor the many special features. I'm a monkey see, monkey do user. That is, I look for something that does what I want and copy it, making any necessarily modifications. I tried to use your user box entries for QI and VI but it only worked partially. It says I contributed but not the number. If you go to my user page you will see what I mean. Do you mind explaining how I get it to fill in the counts?

Thank you -- Jim Evans (talk) 22:36, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

@ Jim Evans: You have added:

This user has uploaded valued images to Wikimedia Commons.

This user has uploaded quality images to Wikimedia Commons.

that is correct. However "Valued images by Jim Evans" is less complicated than "... by User:Jim Evans" (I've made this mistake years ago). Then, to each image that is promoted you add the category:"Quality images by Jim Evans" and/or "valued images by Jim Evans" (these are hidden categories. Then the number of promoted images should appear in the user box. Go ahead and try it. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

I've just created the Category "Quality images by Jim Evans" and added it to . The first count for QI should appear in your user box soon. Try the same procedure for VI accordingly. Regards --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

If you don't succeed, let me know, I'll do it for you. --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your reply. It works, but I guess it means one must add this line to every image page one-at-a-time. I'm not sure it's worth that much effort to me. But, thanks again. -- Jim Evans (talk) 15:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

That's what I do each time after an image has been promoted. It only takes a few seconds. If it's not important for you, forget it. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

If I had been doing as I went like you, I would do it. But to go back through previous ones is a lot of work. I wonder why the BOT that marks the file page doesn't add this? -- Jim Evans (talk) 17:03, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Zerbst (1921), RV: museum..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 20:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Wittenburg 1922 299 Pfennig.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittenburg 1922 299 Pfennig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Oeynhausen 25 Pfennig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Mark Notgeld banknote (1918) of Beckum, RV: so-called "Beckumer Pütt".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 16:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal (c. 1720) of historical building Stockplatz 2 in Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support More than the portal, but that's probably the easiest way to describe the scope. A useful and well-lit depiction of a beautiful architectural element. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:32, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 December 2020 (UTC)