User talk:Paladox

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Paladox!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your file upload comment "Upgrade svg to 1.1" unfortunately doesn't seem to make too much sense -- unless you were critically making use of some code which was not available in version 1.0 of the SVG standard (which does not seem to be the case)... AnonMoos (talk) 23:19, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I used the new svg 1.1 code. I copied the photo and created a new page and paste it. I then saved it and it updated the code. 86.135.248.241 11:30, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Closed-rtl.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Master Uegly (talk) 16:19, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Closed-ltr.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Master Uegly (talk) 16:19, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunflower from Mediawiki logo reworked 2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 23:41, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Toolbaricon bold

[edit]

Hey. Whatever problems there were fewer can put this ? --Дагиров Умар (talk) 13:26, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I doint understand what you mean. Paladox (talk) 14:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
that there was no problem to use this offer. --Дагиров Умар (talk) 14:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean to use that icon for bold instead of Iab icon. Paladox (talk) 15:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, if not difficult?. Icons I suggested earlier a lot of problems. --Дагиров Умар (talk) 15:54, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That version of the svg . --Дагиров Умар (talk) 16:11, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me! You can make such an effect? . --Дагиров Умар (talk) 16:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I think they should be the same. I mean the size and font. --Дагиров Умар (talk) 23:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Dioxin-2D-skeletal.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 14:38, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Apocheir (talk) 15:37, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]