User talk:Orser67
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:21, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Senate 2024 map
[edit]Thank you. for fixing my mistake with the Mississippi seat. —GoldRingChip (please reply on wp) 01:24, 17 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoldRingChip (talk • contribs) 01:24, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Utah Turned back to red
[edit]I’ve seen several sources including the bill itself state it is an independent commission so why did you change it back? It legit calls it a independent commission in the bill https://elections.utah.gov/Media/Default/2018%20Election/Issues%20on%20the%20Ballot/Proposition%204%20-%20Full%20Text.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bleach143 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Despite the name of the proposal, Utah created an advisory commission, because redistricting power still ultimately rests with the state legislature. Somewhat like in Iowa, the Utah legislature can reject the map proposed by the commission and draw its own map. Compare that to a state like Michigan, where an independent commission is fully in charge of drawing and submitting the maps. These distinctions between types of commissions are made by this source and this source. The Brennan Center also describes the commission as an advisory commission here. Orser67 (talk) 20:00, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Turnout in US midterm elections.png
[edit]File:Turnout in US midterm elections.png
Hello. Thanks for the chart. It needs to be updated. 2018 turnout was 50.3%:
--Timeshifter (talk) 16:01, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Adlai E. Stevenson (cropped 3x4).jpg was recently deleted
[edit]File:Adlai E. Stevenson (cropped 3x4).jpg was recently deleted by Fitindia for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Lauren at the Council
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 06:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
File:ThomasDewey (cropped 3x4).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 20:29, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
File:George C Wallace (crop2).jpg was recently deleted
[edit]File:George C Wallace (crop2).jpg was recently deleted by Materialscientist for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Hillary Clinton (cropx2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |