User talk:Olybrius/档案/2010年

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Église_des_jacobins_à_Toulouse_-_dessin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 09:34, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Rivers of Toulouse

[edit]

Bonjour Olybrius. Dans la Category:Rivers of Toulouse, il n'y a que "Garonne (Toulouse)". Supprime-t-on cette catégorie, ou bien y aura-t-il "Canal du midi (Toulouse)" ? Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 06:24, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne pensais pas mettre les canaux dans rivers, je crois qu'il y a un truc waterways plutôt, mais il y a d'autres rivières à Toulouse (le Touch, l'Hers-Mort et d'autres petits machins), c'est pour ça que j'ai créé la catégorie. - Olybrius (talk) 10:10, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Bon, ben tiens, je vais mettre le Touch dedans tout de suite. - Olybrius (talk) 10:12, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
J'ai mis que le photo où il est à Toulouse en fait, ça me paraît suffisant ... - Olybrius (talk) 10:19, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oui, c'est très bien. Jack ma (talk) 14:26, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Commons user,

We noticed you adopted {{Mérimée}}. Thanks for your work in the field of Monuments Historiques français !

In case you did not know about it, we invite you to take a look at the Projet Monuments Historiques français.

We hope to see you soon ! — Jean-Fred (talk) 23:04, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the correction and clarification, no possible confusion now. Cheers --Santosga (talk) 16:09, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Defaultsort

[edit]

Bonjour, et bravo pour ton travail sur les catégories. J'ai cependant une question. Pourquoi retires-tu les « defaultsort » ? (exemple). Merci pour ta réponse. guillom 21:17, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Euh, ben, je les ai mis dans la catégorie (cf. Category:Martin Malvy), ça me paraissait suffisant. La page Martin Malvy peut-elle être ds autre chose que sa catégorie homonyme ? Si c'est le cas, oui certes évidemment il faudra les remettre... - Olybrius (talk) 21:28, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use "Exact duplicate" template for images from different sources.

[edit]

Do not use "Exact duplicate" deletion template for images from different sources. The images are different scans from different sources in different countries. The ones you have nominated for deletion are rare photographs, scanned from original negatives hold in Golestan palace museum. Please remove exact duplicate template and open a normal deletion request if you feel they should be deleted. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 19:53, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Création d'une catégorie

[edit]

Bonjour. J'ai constaté que tu ajoutes parfois des catégories, dont certaines apparaissent en rouge. Pour qu'elles deviennent bleues, tu dois attribuer une catégorie à la catégorie. P.ex. à Category:April 2008 in France dans le champ d'édition ajouter Category:April 2008 by country. - Je viens de le faire pour cet exemple. Cordialement Traumrune (talk) 21:55, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah oui merci, mais j'en crée tellement que des fois (souvent même) j'ai la flemme de compléter toute la hiérarchie ; bah c'est joli le rouge, non ? - Olybrius (talk) 21:59, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Euh, non. Ce n'est pas joli dans le sens que la catégorie est considéré comme inexistante tant qu'elle n'est pas intégrée dans la hiérarchie du "categorytree". Si on est à la recherche d'une catégorie pour une image et passe en revue des sous-catégories, on ne la voit pas, et donc ne peut pas y ranger l'image. Un peu dommage, car si toi tu aime créer des catégories, moi je préfère chercher d'abords dans l'existant. En fait, comme toi j'ai la flemme d'ajouter les liens, surtout pour des sujets techniques ou des villes inconnus dans un pays inconnu ou pire un nom de ville qui existe dans plusieurs pays d'Amérique du Sud. Heureusement c'est pas ton cas, la France n'est pas exotique (du moins pour moi :-)). Mais si tu ranges déjà tu pourras le faire jusqu'au bout. Il faut dire qu'il y a des jours où j'ai envie de changer les liens rouges en bleu et d'autres où je préfère enlever la catégorie de l'image. Je ne sais pas si je me suis bien expliqué. Comme je suis bibliothécaire de formation, le classement "correct" est devenu une déformation professionnelle. Cordialement Traumrune (talk) 21:02, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:18, 15 November 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)