User talk:Olsin.se

~== Image:Baseball.jpg ==

It has been pointed out on the English Wikipedia that your image, Image:Baseball.jpg, is actually a softball. The quality of the image is excellent, however, though of the wrong subject. I was hoping that you might have a baseball handy to take a picture of and replace the image. The image is used across the Wikipedia by the Baseball WikiProject. Thank you so much. en:User:Scm83x 16:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Humm... After reading the specifications of a softball and a baseball I have realized that the image is a softball. I'll try to find a real baseball and replace the image. // Olsin.se 16:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Must Glass

Hi,

I really like the glass that the must was in in Glass_of_Swedish_must.jpg… What brand/model is it?

Also, great work on all your photos, if you took an artsy one, I'd totally nominate it for Featured Image… How much did your camera cost?

Thanks,
Wulf 06:08, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Suck

Helvete vad patetisk du är. Att du inte ens fattar att det är {{delete}} du ska använda, om du nu tvångsmässigt måste spamma alla bilder jag laddat upp. Du har inte ens noterat på min diskussionssida att du märkt bilderna (som det står att du ska göra). Väx upp, fjant. Notwist 09:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Samma regler om hyfsat språk och att hålla sig borta från personangrepp gäller naturligtvis både på Wikipedia och Wikimedia Commons.

To any non Swedish speaking user: Notwist is calling Olsin.se "pathetic", because he can't understand that he's supposed to use a certain template. And that he should "grow up". /Grillo 10:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I might as well put the rest of my argumentation in english so everybody can understand. It is obvious to me that Olsin.se nominated the pictures i uploaded solely because I on my swedish talk page told him that I would not take any measures to contact the photographer of the pictures, since the person on the pictures (who has the pictures on his website) gave me his full permission to use the current license.

Olsen.se is trying to solve a non-existing problem, and upon me not wanting to use up time composing useless e-mails, he rather suggests the images i uploaded for deletion (speedy deletion, which is even worse). What's incredibly annoying to me here is that it's painfully obvious that he is doing this out of a personal vendetta, and I consider this an extremely unmature way of handling the entire situation. I do not regret my phrasing of him being "pathetic", which is not ad hominem (personangrepp) if you ask me.

That is however not what the argument is about, what's annoying me is that these pictures could have been deleted, for (to say the least) faulty reasons. Notwist 10:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Bild:Hoga kustenbron Sweden.jpg

Jeg lurte på om du kunne gi tilatelse til å benytte ditt foto på vår hjemmeside. I tilfelle hvilket navn skal angis på bildet? Mvh AnneHu 14:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Use of your images

You photo File:Biografen Grand Stockholm.jpg seems to be used without proper attributions in two Danish books: "Den endelige opklaring" and "Palmes morder?". —

File:Olof Palme place of death.jpg

File:Olof Palme place of death.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:06, 9 April 2016 (UTC)