User talk:NoRud/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Kategorien

Hallo NoRud, vielen Dank für das fleißige Bebildern der Denkmallisten. Bitte beachte doch in Zukunft, die Fotos mit korrekten Kategorien zu versehen, damit sie unabhängig von den Wikipedia-Denkmallisten auch hier bei Commons gefunden werden können. Baudenkmäler werden grundsätzlich mit Cultural heritage monuments in ... kategorisiert, also etwa Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Rudolstadt. Die Kategorien können gleich beim Hochladen der Datei angegeben (beim UploadWizard mit einer eigenen Maske, die gleich anzeigt, ob eine Kategorie existiert oder nicht) oder im Nachhinein hinzugefügt/korrigiert werden (wie andere Benutzer und ich es jetzt schon für Deine bisherigen Werke getan haben; einfach mal in die Versionsgeschichte schauen). Wenn Du Kategorien neu anlegst, müssen diese a) sinnvoll benannt (also etwa Villas in Rudolstadt statt Villa Rudolstadt) und b) auch selbst wiederum kategorisiert (z. B. in einer Kategorie Buildings in Rudolstadt) werden. Solange eine Kategorie rot geschrieben erscheint, gibt es sie nicht! Oft hilft hier ein Blick auf bereits bebilderte Listen bzw. Kategorien, um zu sehen, wie andere es gelöst haben. Bei Fragen kannst Du Dich gern an mich wenden. Viele Grüße und weiterhin frohes Schaffen, -- Giorgio Michele (talk) 10:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Giorgio Michele,
habe gerade einige Fotos bei "Wiki Loves Earth 2014" eingestellt, dabei sind diese beiden: Dateien "https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:-006_Naturschutzgebiete_in_Th%C3%BCringen_Schwarzatal_160.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:-006_Naturschutzgebiete_in_Th%C3%BCringen_Schwarzatal_161.jpg " mit falscher Bezeichnung.Richtig ist : ......Schwarzatal 159 bei beiden Dateien.Kannst Du das Bitte ändern.VG--NoRud (talk) 15:13, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Hallo NoRud, ich kann gern die Umbenennung beantragen (selbst habe ich die Berechtigung dazu nicht). Dazu benötige ich aber die von Dir gewünschten neuen Dateinamen. Beide Dateien in 159 umzubenennen geht nicht, weil die Datainamen dann gleich wären. Also dann 159 und 160? Bitte gib mir noch einmal kurz Bescheid.
PS: Deine beiden Bilder waren (wieder) nicht kategorisiert. Ich habe die Kategorie Schwarza hinzugefügt, damit die Fotos nicht nur bei WLE auftauchen, sondern auch später noch gefunden werden können. VG --Giorgio Michele (talk) 16:01, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Danke Giorgio Michele, schlage folgende Bezeichnung vor:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:-07_Naturschutzgebiete_in_Th%C3%BCringen_Schwarzatal_159.jpg 
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:-08_Naturschutzgebiete_in_Th%C3%BCringen_Schwarzatal_159.jpg 

die letzte Zahl bezeichnet das Naturschutzgebiet. An wen muß ich mich für derartige Änderungen wenden? Dir noch ein schönes Wochenende und Dank für Deine Bemühungen VG --NoRud (talk) 07:57, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo NoRud, wie es funktioniert, steht unten rechts in der Begrüßungsbox weiter oben. Für die beiden Dateien habe ich die Umbenennungswünsche eingetragen. Auch von mir noch einmal ein großes Dankeschön für die vielen hochwertigen Fotos! Viele Grüße und ein schönes WE, --Giorgio Michele (talk) 16:35, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Unglücklicherweise wurde das erst einmal abgelehnt, weil Giorgio Michele nicht der Uploader war und nur der eine solche Umbenennung beantragen kann, aber da das hier ja klar steht hab ichs verschoben --Indeedous (talk) 11:17, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Bilder von Thüringen

Hallo NoRud, willkommen auch von mir. Bei der Bebilderung von Thüringer Orten gibt es noch einige schwarze Flecken auf der Landkarte. Hinter folgendem Link findest du z. B. alle Orte im Umkreis von 50km um Saalfeld, deren Wikipedia-Ortsartikel noch ohne Bild ist: Link. Vielleicht hast du ja Lust und Zeit ein paar schöne Fotos zu machen. Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 10:39, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Deine Bilder sind super, vielen Dank dafür! --20:43, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo NoRud, in diese Kategorie gehören Deine Bilder NICHT hinein. Es ist Dir doch schon erklärt worden! -- Ies (talk) 13:12, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Du hast grundsätzlich Recht, aber gerade bei einem neuen Benutzer, der so hervorragende Bilder hochlädt, finde ich, dass wir etwas mehr Geduld haben und ihm lieber selbst bei der Kategorisierung helfen sollten. Und NoRud hat jetzt sicherlich mitbekommen, dass eine fehlende oder falsche Kategorisierung bei vielen hier nicht sonderlich beliebt ist und wird sich sicherlich in Zukunft dabei mehr Mühe geben. --Indeedous (talk) 11:46, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Schwarzatal

Hallo, danke auch von mir für deine vielen schönen Fotos! Hab grade den Abschnitt hier obendrüber entdeckt und dadurch (wegen der Zahl 159) ein paar weitere Bilder schnell in Category:Naturschutzgebiet Schwarzatal einsortieren können.

Nur bei File:-31 Naturschutzgebiete in Thüringen Schwarzatal 159.jpg weiß ich nicht, ob der abgebildete Bereich wirklich in diesem NSG liegt. Kannst du was dazu sagen? Hat der Aussichtspunkt (Berg?) einen Namen? Ist das der Trippstein? Gruß Holger1959 (talk) 23:39, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

das ist der Aussichtspunkt "Trippstein",auch der Bereich der Wanderwege dürfte dazu gehören.Gruß--NoRud (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)--NoRud (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Danke für die Klärung. Hab auf http://www.geodienste.bfn.de/schutzgebiete nachgeguckt. Der Trippstein liegt nicht im Naturschutzgebiet Schwarzatal, aber im Landschaftsschutzgebiet Thüringer Wald (und wie fast die ganze Gegend auch im Naturpark Thüringer Wald). Das NSG fängt erst so einen km weiter nördlich an. Schöne Ecke jedenfalls! Gruß Holger1959 (talk) 20:08, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Hab grade bei gesehen dass bei de:Liste_der_Kulturdenkmale_in_Schwarzburg#WBZ_Schwarzburg_I eine „Schutzhütte auf dem Trippstein“ steht, noch ohne Bild. Ist die vielleicht auf deinem Foto oder gibts da noch ein anderes Gebäude in der Nähe? Holger1959 (talk) 20:25, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Richtig,das Foto zeigt die Schutzhütte auf dem Trippstein und gehört wohl nicht mehr zum NSG Schwarzatal.Habe das Foto in "Liste der ......, eingeordnet.--NoRud (talk) 16:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch!

Hallo NoRud,

Du hast beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2014 in Deutschland teilgenommen, wofür wir Dir herzlich danken. Ohne jeden einzelnen Teilnehmer, ohne jedes einzelne Bild wäre Wiki Loves Earth nicht so erfolgreich. Mit den vielen neuen Bildern können jetzt einerseits zahlreiche Wikipedia-Artikel bebildert werden, andererseits schaffen sie Anreize, neue Inhalte zu erstellen, die sich mit ihnen illustrieren lassen.

Von den mehr als 14.000 eingesandten Bildern hat die Jury eines oder mehrere von Dir in die deutschen Top 100 gewählt.

Das Ergebnis mit den Top 100 ist hier einzusehen: Wikipedia:Wiki_Loves_Earth_2014/Deutschland/Top100

Die ersten zehn wurden schon für den internationalen Ausscheid gemeldet: Wiki_Loves_Earth_2014_winners#Germany

Es war der erste Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth in Deutschland und wir als Jury sind vom Erfolg überwältigt. Daher würden wir uns sehr freuen, wenn Du dich nächstes Mal erneut beteiligen würdest!

Herzlichen Glückwunsch von der Jury und vielen Dank für Deine Unterstützung! --Indeedous (talk) 12:39, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Berlin Potsdamer Platz Sony Center 1.jpg ff

Hallo NoRud, danke für deine Fotos. Dateien sollten in einem Zweig (von der Wurzel bis zur letzten Unterkategorie) nur einmal vorkommen. Wenn die Datei z. B. in der Category:Sony Center ist, sollte sie nicht oberhalb und nicht unterhalb dieser Kategorie sein. Oberhalb wär z. B. die Category:Berlin-Tiergaten und Category:Berlin, egal wieviele Kategorien dazwischen sind. Das Sony-Center befindet sich im Stadtteil Berlin-Tiergarten, nicht im Stadtteil Berlin-Mitte. Category:Bezirk Mitte fällt auch weg, da sie sich oberhalb von Category:Berlin-Tiergaten befindet. Du hättest mich auch nach meiner Bearbeitung fragen können, ich hoffe jetzt ist alles klar. Gruß --Jean11 (talk) 14:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Hallo NoRud, nur mal kurz gegen weiteres In-die-Nesseln-Setzen:

  • Auf FPC sind wir sehr anspruchsvoll, was die technische Bildqualität angeht. Mindestens so anspruchsvoll wie auf QIC. Überschärfte oder sonstwie „overprocessed“ Bilder haben nur dann eine Chance, wenn sie darstellerisch/kompositorisch absolut außergewöhnlich atemberaubend sind.
  • Zwei aktive Nominationen pro User. Jede weitere fliegt gnadenlos raus, wie gut das Bild auch sei. Du kannst sie wieder einstellen, sobald eine der anderen beendet wurde. Beendet werden Nominationen durch
    • Zurückziehen seitens des Nominators (withdraw) – das beendet die Nominierung sofort
    • Herausnahme wegen Chancenlosigkeit oder Regelverstoß (Näheres steht in den Featured Picture Guidelines), aber erst, wenn die Nominierung wirklich nicht mehr erscheint, nicht schon dann, wenn die Löschung angekündigt wurde (man kann noch 24 Stunden widersprechen)
    • Ende der Stimmperiode:
      • normal 10 Tage nach Nominierung
      • oder eher, wenn die Bedingungen für vorzeitigen Abschluß gegeben sind
  • Ich rate dir, Bilder erst mal bei QIC einzustellen (Quality Images). Wenn sie da durchkommen, haben sie ordentliche technische Qualität und scheitern zumindest nicht daran. Um FPC zu überleben, müssen sie außerdem noch „Wow“ haben. Das ist bei deinen Bildern durchaus gegeben, die Figuren der niedersächsischen Vertretung haben „Wow“. Aber die technische Qualität ist leider unterirdisch.

Wenn ich mir deine Bilder so durchsehe, zum Beispiel File:Berlin_Potsdamer_Platz_DB_Tower.jpg (kompositorisch super!), dann fällt mir ein Mangel an technischer Qualität auf, der nicht auf die Dateigröße zurückzuführen ist. Knapp 9 MB müßten in der Größe ein einwandfreies Bild liefern, aber die Kompressionsartefakte springen einen geradezu an. War das Bild zwischendurch einmal in niedrigerer Qualität gespeichert? Sieht mir ganz so aus. Den Qualitätsverlust bekommst du natürlich nicht mehr raus, wenn du /das/ Bild dann wieder „besser“ abspeicherst, dann werden nur die Artefakte „besser“ abgespeichert. Irgendwas in deinem Workflow ist da noch nicht ganz sauber.

Würde mich freuen, wenn du weiter dabei bist. --Kreuzschnabel 15:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

    • Hallo Kreuzschnabel,besten Dank für Deine weitgehend konstruktive Kritik und die zusätzlichen Hinweise.

Bezugnehmend zum Foto File:Berlin_Potsdamer_Platz_DB_Tower.jpg erinnere ich mich das zum Zeitpunkt der Aufnahme sehr außergewöhnliche Lichtverhältnisse waren.(kurz nach dem Regen kam die Sonne heraus und überstrahlte die Szene ziemlich heftig) Das sah ich als Herausforderung an dazu nach etwas Gegenlicht im linken Bildbereich das erfordert sicher besondere Bearbeitungen an denen ich noch arbeiten muß!

    • Das von Dir angeführte Beispielfoto auf der Nominierungsseite (Kandidatenliste) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SonyCenterAtNight.jpg finde ich "unterirdisch",Belichtung,ausgefressene Lichter abgesoffene Schatten,stürzende Linien.Entschuldbar ist nur,daß das Foto schon von 2012 ist.Das soll aber nicht heißen das die Kritik an meinen Fotos nicht berechtigt ist.

Werde Deinen Vorschlag aufnehmen und erst mal kleinere Brötchen backen!Gruß--NoRud (talk) 13:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Kleine Korrektur

lb NoRUd, ich habe dein Bild wohl positiv bewertet, allerdings wurde ich dann per Mail freundlicherweise auf ein paar Fehler aufmerksam gemacht, die ein direktes promoten zweifelhaft gemacht hätte. es dreht sich um das Bild hier. Wenn ich mich schon wichtig mache, dann ganz, hab ich mir gesagt und diese Fehler gleich einmal ausgebessert. Wenn es ok ist, dann lass es wie es ist, denn ich habe es bereits neu hochgeladen. Wegen der perspektivischen Korrektur musste es neu beschnitten werden, was ich auch gemacht habe, aber das ist ein echter Eingriff ins Bild. Wenn es dir nicht gefällt, dann stell einfach auf deine Version zurück, ich müsste dann aber von dir die Änderungen anmahnen. Tja, so ist es, wenn man sich in den Dschungel von Qi begibt. lb. Grüße aus Wien --Hubertl (talk) 18:15, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saalfeld Schwarmgasse 24 Schlösschen Kitzerstein mit Nebengebäude und Einfriedung Bestandteil Denkmalensemble.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Others check the edge of the roof on the left, please. –Be..anyone 10:56, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saalfeld Pfortenstraße 12 Katholische Kirche 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. It looks much better now! --Hubertl 16:19, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Bonifatiuskirche

ich hab gesehen, dass du das Bild zurückgezogen hast. Ersetze dazu das Wort Nomination/Diskuss/Decline (je nachdem) mit dem Wort Withdrawn.

Ich habs mir runtergeladen und einmal genau angeschaut und gesehen, dass ich es mit vertretbarem Aufwand nicht reparieren kann (im Prinzip kann man alles machen, aber wenn es dann eine ganze Stunde dauert, da fehlt mir dann die Zeit). Weniger der Beschnitt und die perspektivische Verzerrung ist das Problem, sondern auf der rechten Seite des Kirchturms unten, im Bereich des Laternenmastes, hast du Lichtränder, welche wahrscheinlich darauf zurückzuführen sind, dass du nicht im RAW-Format, sondern nur als JPG abgespeichert hast. Beides ist bei deiner Kamera möglich. Der Licht/Schattenunterschied ist einfach zu hoch, das schafft ein internes JPG nicht. Dazu kommt noch - wie ich meine - dass du etwas zu heftig am Schärferegler gedreht hat, was das Problem noch verstärkt, wenn nicht überhaupt verursacht hat.

Mit Raw hätte ich es retten können, mit JPG geht es nicht bzw. nur teilweise.

Ich helfe dir gerne bei kritischen Bildern (du bist nicht der einzige), aber dazu müsstest du diese im RAW-Format haben. Was schon kaputt aus der Kamera rauskommt, kann man später nicht mehr reparieren. Ein bereits mehrfach als JPG gespeichertes Bild bekommt man nicht auf den Ursprung zurück. Wie obengenannten Fehler. Im besten Fall wäre ein JPG mit der absolut geringsten Kompression (sprich:JPG höchste Auflösung) noch akzeptabel, direkt und unbearbeitet aus der Kamera. Dein Ursprungsbild hat übrigens 16 MB lt. Photoshop - die compression hat es auf 3MB runtergerechnet. lg aus Wien --Hubertl (talk) 15:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Hallo, du hast einige Bilder in QI "supported" aber nicht promoviert. Meine Frage bezieht sich konkret darauf. Ist es so gemeint, dass du dafür bist aber nicht promovieren willst, oder hast du vergessen die Vorlage "grün zu färben"? Viele Grüsse, Poco2 17:56, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Berka Parkstraße 16 Bade- und Gesellschaftshaus (Coudrayhaus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sitzendorf Bahnhofstraße 7 Wohnhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niederkrossen Friedhofskapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg Untere Brücke Heilige Kunigunde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 22:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwarza b.Blankenhain Dorfkirche Fassade mit Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Leipziger Platz 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altremda evangelische Dorfkirche Nordansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality but please add an English description. --Code 17:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwarza b.Blankenhain Dorfkirche von Südost.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Question Is the tower really tilted this way? --Code 11:10, 18 January 2015 (UTC)That`s all very true,the Tower to be to the fore,nave in the background (perspective).--NoRud 09:42, 19 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Well then ... --Code 16:38, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Herzliches Dankeschön für Deine Fotos zum Jahreswechsel

Hallo NoRud,

Danke für Deinen Beitrag zum Weihnachts-Fotowettbewerb zum Thema Weinachtszeit, Winterzeit, Wendezeit''!

Mit Deiner Hilfe wurden commons um über 1500 Bilder zu Winter- & Weihnachtsthemen bereichert - mit einer großen Motivvielfalt, die von Weihnachtsmärkten und -dekorationen über Weihnachtsmänner, verschneite Landschaften und Schlössern zu typischen Speisen und Getränken reicht.

Wie Du vielleicht unserem Bericht im Kurier schon entnommen hast, haben wir die Community nun zu Abstimmungen in der Endrunde aufgerufen. Zur Wahl stehen die 14 eingereichten Artikel und 100 Bilder, die bis zum 20. Januar durch die Vorrunde und die Einbindung in Artikel ausgewählt wurden. Für die Gewinner, die bis zum 31. Jänner/Januar mit Eurer Hilfe ermittelt werden, stehen durch Unterstützung seitens von WMDE und WMAT insgesamt 12 Bild- und 4 Artikelpreise zur Verfügung. Da in jeder Kategorie – Bild oder Artikel – nur maximal ein Preis pro Teilnehmer möglich ist, sind die Preischancen groß.

Wir freuen uns, wenn Du Zeit findest, dich an der Wahl zu beteiligen. Du hast beliebig viele gereihte Stimmen, wobei erste Stimmen mehr zählen als nachfolgende (zur Reihung setzt Du einfach eine Zahl vor deine Unterschrift).

Um eine genüssliche Betrachtung der Bilder zu ermöglichen, sind die Finalisten nicht nur auf der Abstimmungsseite, sondern auch in einer Galerie zu finden.

Liebe Grüße und viel Spaß beim Bilder und Artikel bewerten!

Anna reg, Dr. Bernd Gross (talk) 08:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eingangsbereich The Ritz-Carlton Berlin 2 ShiftN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)  Oppose Overall good quality, but slightly leaning to the right. I will support this nomination as soon as this issue has been fixed. --Code 09:55, 21 January 2015 (UTC) ✓ DonePerspective distortion remote.--NoRud 10:55, 21 January 2015 (UTC)  Comment Normally this is being done by uploading a new version of the same picture. However, additionally the categorization is bad and the image needs an English description. Everything is still fixable. --Code 11:37, 21 January 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Description changed,category Hotel added.--NoRud 12:22, 21 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Ok. --Code 13:07, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saalfeld Wetzelstein 1 Villa Wetzelstein mit Ausstattung, Parkanlage und Parkarchitekturen, Brunnenbecken, Bogenbrücke (Aussichtspunkt).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:51, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saalfeld Toranlage der Villa Wetzelstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:51, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brautente Männchen (Aix sponsa).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and very good. -- Spurzem 22:03, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brautente Weibchen (Aix sponsa).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and very good. -- Spurzem 22:03, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höckerschwan (Cygnus olor) young bird.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. P.S. Remember that you should use English names of animals in English templates (en) in the description. If you want, you can use German names but in German templates (de). --Halavar 23:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! -25 Rudolstadt Schloßstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:56, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! -40 Kirche Birkigt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Image needs perspective correction. --Halavar 23:21, 22 January 2015 (UTC) ✓ DoneVertikal correction.--NoRud 10:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 22:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Village church,Memorial plaque World War I+II south facade,Dorfkirche Lengefeld b.Blankenhain Germany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great crested grebe adult female,Haubentaucher (Podiceps cristatus).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Hubertl 12:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Einordnung nur in der/den spezifischsten Kategorie/n

Hallo NoRud,

"Im Allgemeinen sollte eine Datei nur in der spezifischsten Kategorie eingeordnet sein, die zu einem bestimmten Thema existiert. Zum Beispiel sollten Dateien in Category:Paris nicht zusätzlich in Category:France eingeordnet sein." ist eine der Regeln und hier nachzulesen.

Deshalb werde ich die Kategorie Saalfeld/Saale wieder aus und den anderen aus dieser Gruppe entfernen. Diese Entfernung wurde bereits schon einmal vorgenommen. Nun hast Du sie wieder rückgängig gemacht. Da Du jetzt den Hintergrund genau kennst, unterlasse bitte einen erneuten Revert. Gruß --Gomera-b (talk) 19:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Falsches Datum

Hallo NoRud, es gibt eine Handvoll Bilder von dir, die ein falsches Datum enthalten. Siehe hier (dauert etwas). In den gelisteten Fotos ist das Datum nicht in den EXIF-Daten enthalten. Ist es dir möglich das Datum anderweitig herauszufinden? --Arnd (talk) 04:29, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Danke für die Korrekturen. Wie sind überhaupt diese Dateien entstanden? Benutzt du Panoramio? Ich denke übrigens, dass man die EXIF-Daten mit einem externen Programm ändern und dann eine neue Version hochladen kann. Wie genau weiß ich nicht. --Arnd (talk) 23:13, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, ich meinte Picasa, weil genau das in den EXIF-Daten steht. --Arnd (talk) 07:43, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Hallo NoRod, wirf bitte Mal einen Blick in diese Kategorie, dann siehst du warum ich deine Bilder wieder rausgepackt hab. Für den Wettbewerb gibts viele Unterkategorien nach Ländern usw. und das da ist die zentrale "Oberkategorie" für alles zusammen. Also bitte keine weiteren Bilder mit dieser Kategorie versehen. Für deine Fotos ist eigentlich nur wichtig, daß die Vorlage {{Wiki Loves Earth 2015|de}} drin ist. Die kategorisiert dann auch automatisch in Category:Images from Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Germany. Gruß Holger1959 (talk) 09:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Dann hab ich grad gesehen, daß was ähnliches für Category:Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Germany gilt. Jener Wettbewerb hat noch gar nicht begonnen (erst wieder im Herbst). Und bei den Bildern von der Fototour Eisenach, da hast du ja {{WLM-Fototour Eisenach 2015}} drin, was schon für die automatische Kategorisierung sorgt. Beispiel: hiermit die Category:WLM-Fototour Eisenach 2015 entfernt, Bild ist hinterher trotzdem noch in der Kategorie drin. Holger1959 (talk) 09:37, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Bitte keine Überkategorisierung

Hallo NorRod, in dem Zusammenhang von Holger1959´s Aussagen möchte ich auch noch mal auf User_talk:NoRud#File:Berlin_Potsdamer_Platz_Sony_Center_1.jpg_ff hinweisen. Bei einem Bild habe ich es schonmal korrigiert. Da kannst du sehen und nachvollziehen. Die Category:Diakonissenkrankenhaus Eisenach ist schon in den von mir entfernten Kategorien drin, bis auf Category:Eisenach, der sind ja eh alle Eisenach-Kategorien untergeorndnet. Gruß --Jean11 (talk) 18:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch, Du hast gewonnen!

Hallo NoRud

Herzlichen Glückwunsch! Dein Bild ist eines der besten hundert Fotos von Wiki Loves Earth 2015 Deutschland!

Wir freuen uns, Dir mitzuteilen, dass zwei Deiner Bilder am 21. Juni 2015 auf der WLE-Jury-Sitzung in Fulda ausgewählt wurden. Wir sind begeistert über die Qualität, die Vielfalt und die Schönheit der zahlreichen eingesendeten Fotos – vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag!

Im Namen der WLE-Deutschland-Jury, Helfmann (talk) 14:24, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2015 - die Organisatoren sagen Danke

Hallo NoRud,

am 31. Mai 2015 endete der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth, an dem Du mit Deinen Bildern teilgenommen hast. Dafür möchten wir Dir herzlich danken.

Dieses Jahr haben sich 26 Länder am Wettbewerb beteiligt, insgesamt wurden dabei 108.444 Bilder hochgeladen. Aus Deutschland kamen 14.115 Fotos, was einem Anteil von 13 % entspricht. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl von 1000 Teilnehmern allein beim deutschen Wettbewerb. Einen Überblick findest du auf unserer Ergebnisseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat Ende Juni auf einer Sitzung in Fulda die Top100 und die Preisträger ausgewählt. Eine Entscheidung der internationalen Jury wird noch im Juli erwartet.

Ein anderer Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet zum fünften Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, bei dem Kultur- und Baudenkmäler bebildert werden sollen. Mit dem Fotografieren dafür kann jetzt schon begonnen werden. Vielleicht möchtest Du Dich sogar an der Organisation dieses Wettbewerbs oder von Wiki Loves Earth 2016 beteiligen?

Wir würden uns über weitere Beiträge von Dir freuen.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht das Orga-Team.

--Blech (talk) 07:30, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2015 - Urkunden

Hallo NoRud,

dieses Jahr wollen sich Organisatoren und WLE-Jury bei allen Teilnehmern, deren Bilder in die Auswahl der besten 100 gekommen sind, mit einer Urkunde bedanken.

Die Erstellung hat sich krankheitsbedingt verzögert, aber jetzt sind die Urkunden fertig. Um Deine Urkunde versenden zu können, benötigt das Community-Team unseres Fördervereins WMDE eine Postadresse. Eine kurze Mail mit der Benutzerkennung und einer Adresse an mailto:community@wikimedia.de würde genügen. Per Telefon (030-219 15 826-0) oder mit einer Postkarte (Wikimedia Deutschland e. V., Team Community, Tempelhofer Ufer 23/24, 10963 Berlin) sollte es ebenso klappen.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

--Blech (talk) 21:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JCP (a.k.a. John Carlo Pagcaliwagan) 22:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Antwort auf E-Mail

Bitte E-Mails nur senden, wenn es wirklich vertraulich ist. Hier istb es nicht der Fall, ich werde nicht antworten.

Bezüglich des Reverts: Ich habe die Category:Glessen-Hohe Straße 33 Katholische Pfarrkirche St. Pankratius gelöscht, weil es bereits die (weitaus besser kategorisierte) Category:St. Pankratius (Glessen) gibt. So einfach ist die Erklärung.

MfG --A.Savin 11:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Weimar Schlosspark Belvedere Orangeriehof , Delphinbrunnen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Silvio Ludwig (talk) 13:02, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Die Vorlage: Lizenzstatus;

ist aufgrund eines Bearbeitungsfehlers in die Dateibeschreibungsseite eingefügt worden, ich habe den Bearbeitungsfehler auf der Dateibeschreibungsseite bereits wieder rückgängig gemacht. --Silvio Ludwig (talk) 13:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weimar Platz der Demokratie 1 Herzogin-Anna-Amalia-Bibliothek 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I am lenient to promote the photo, but the QIC description is not about the content of the photo but a "please promote me, I am a WLM photo" appeal. --Cccefalon 05:17, 30 October 2015 (UTC) oh sorry, is a mistake of the QInominator tool. --Atamari 23:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you. Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Danke für Deine Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2015!

belegte mit diesem Bild den

im Wettbewerb

belegte mit diesem Bild den

im Wettbewerb

belegte mit diesem Bild den

im Wettbewerb

Hallo NoRud!

Vielen Dank, dass Du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 mitgemacht und Deine Fotos von Kulturdenkmalen mit der ganzen Welt geteilt hast! Weltweit wurden im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs über 230.000 Bilder hochgeladen. 38.953 davon stammen allein aus Deutschland, wo sich 866 Teilnehmer beteiligt haben. Hier findest Du weitere statistische Informationen zu den Ergebnissen von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015.

Und so geht’s jetzt mit dem Wettbewerb weiter:

  • Die WLM-Vorjury hat alle im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs hochgeladenen Bilder gesichtet und bewertet.
  • Vom 16. bis 18. Oktober tagte die Hauptjury in Fulda und legte auf Basis der Vorjury-Bewertungen die Platzierung der besten Aufnahmen fest. In der darauf folgenden Woche wurden dann die besten Bilder des Wettbewerbs und natürlich die Preisträger veröffentlicht.
  • Für die Vergabe unserer tollen WLM-Preise wird dann Wikimedia Deutschland in den Wochen bis Weihnachten nach und nach alle Preisträger anschreiben und bitten, sich einen Preis aus unserem Sachpreispool auszusuchen. Bitte sorge daher dafür, dass Du in Deinen Account-Einstellungen Deine E-Mail-Adresse hinterlegt hast und auf ggf. dort ankommende Mails innerhalb von höchstens einer Woche antwortest.

Auch wenn der diesjährige Wettbewerb jetzt vorbei ist, möchten wir Dich einladen, auch weiterhin Fotos hochzuladen und bei der Pflege von Wikipedia-Artikeln und Listen zu helfen. Wikipedia und Wikimedia Commons leben durch Menschen wie Dich, die ehrenamtlich helfen, freie Inhalte zu erstellen und für alle zugänglich zu machen. Weitere Informationen dazu, wie genau Du an der Wikipedia mitarbeiten kannst, findest Du in unserem Tutorial, und wenn Du Dir dabei eine persönliche Unterstützung wünschst, kannst Du Dich einfach an unser Mentorenprogramm wenden.

Viel Glück für den Wettbewerb und viel Spaß bei der weiteren Mitarbeit in der Wikipedia und hier auf Commons wünscht Dir das Wiki Loves Monuments Team Deutschland 2015 (Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 20:40, 10 December 2015 (UTC))

Unerlaubte Fotos?

Hallo NoRud betreffs der Fotos zur Kulturdenkmalliste Coswig muss ich bemängeln, dass die Fotos der Baudenkmäler, zumindest so weit sie mich/uns betreffen, ohne Einverständnis der Grundstücksbesitzer und Bewohner veröffentlicht wurden, teilweise die privaten Grundstücke extra zum Zweck des Fotografierens unerlaubt betreten wurden. Ich möchte Ihnen mit dieser Auflistung keine schlechten Absichten unterstellen, empfinde es dennoch mehr als unseriös. Die Datenschutzlage sollte nach der Rechtssprechung zu ähnlichen Bildern aus dem öffentlichen Raum heraus (!) bei Google Street View in der BR Deutschland unmissverständlich sein. Bitte holen Sie unverzüglich innerhalb der nächsten 4 Wochen ab dem heutigen Datum - 15. Februar 2016 - die jeweiligen Einverständniserklärungen ein oder entfernen Sie die Aufnahmen der privaten und privat genutzen Grundstücke und Wohnbauten. Gern würde ich mit Ihnen dazu auch privat in Kontakt treten, dazu müßten Sie mir jedoch eine E-Mail Adresse mitteilen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.25.240.89 (talk) 12:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Unbekannter,

damit ich etwas unternehmen kann benötige ich die Auflistung der von Ihnen beanstandeten Fotos.

Viele Grüße--NoRud (talk) 08:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Hallo NoRud aufgefallen sind mir die vom Hof - und damit vom privaten Grund - aus aufgenommenen Fotos auf dem Ravensburger Platz 3, Kötitzer Straße 7, Brockwitzer Straße 17 und Hauptstraße 25 (sogar mit erkennbarem Kfz-Kennzeichen,) und Fährweg 2. Grenzwertig ist Brockwitzer Straße 8, (auch Kfz-Kennzeichen) - ich habe mir aber auch nicht alle Fotos angeschaut. Dennoch muss ich darauf bestehen, dass Sie, so wie Sie ja auch bei jedem Bild und einer eventuellen Weiterverwendung durch Dritte auf Datenschutz- und Lizenzbestimmungen hinweisen und diese sicher auch einfordern, den privaten Raum von sich aus respektieren oder nur für die jeweils dafür freigegebenen Zwecke benutzen. Um dies an einem Beispiel zu verdeutlichen: Ein Handwerksbetrieb mit seinem Kundenbüro ist zwar teilweise zugänglich, aber eben nur zum Zweck der Kontaktaufnahme mit dem Handwerker und nicht, um ohne Einverständnis des Handwerkers Fotos seines Büros anzufertigen und zu veröffentlichen.

Die Rechtsprechung im Zusammenhang mit Google Street View beinhaltet sinngemäß: Fotos von privaten Häusern etc. aus dem öffentlichen Raum heraus fotografiert sind einerseits zulässig zur Veröffentlichung, wenn sie nicht zum Zweck einer Detailabbildung angefertigt wurden, in ihrer Auflösung keine Detailvergrößerung möglich machen, wenn Personen und Personenbezogene Angaben (wie Kfz-Kennzeichen, Klingelnamen usw) unkenntlich gemacht werden und andererseits die Auflage, selbst diese Bilder im Nachhinein für jeden unkenntlich zu machen, wenn die Besitzer/Bewohner dies ausdrücklich wünschen und einer Veröffentlichung widersprechen. Eine Veröffentlichung von Aufnahmen aus dem nichtöffentlichen Raum heraus ist nicht zulässig ohne Einverständniserklärung. Ich bitte Sie, Ihre veröffentlichten Aufnahmen nach diesen Kriterien zu kontrollieren, auszusortieren und dafür Sorge zu tragen, falls es bereits zu einer Weitergabe oder Weiterverwendung der betroffenen Bilder kam, die jeweilige Erlaubnis dafür zurückzuziehen.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Teilbesitzer und Bewohner einer der o.g. Denkmäler

Hallo NoRud Vielen Dank für das Überarbeiten. (Stand 22.02.2016) Mit freundlichen Grüßen

File:-42 Rudolstadt Pflanzwirbach.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

87.171.145.222 18:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden E-Lok E 71 30 Lokomotivwerk Hennigsdorf von 1921 II.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 11:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Güterzug - Tenderlok Muldenthal I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 11:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Modell der Dampflok BR 01 220 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 11:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden S & H - Drehstromversuchslok I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 11:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Salonwagen 447 der K . Sächsischen Sts. E . B . von 1885 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 11:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Geschichte der Kameraindustrie in Dresden Exakta Varex IX.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 11:28, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Geschichte der Kameraindustrie in Dresden Exakta Varex VIII.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 11:28, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Geschichte der Kameraindustrie in Dresden Exakta Zubehör XII.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 11:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Geschichte der Kameraindustrie in Dresden IV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 11:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Zeitlupenkamera Pentazet, 1958 7 ; Hinweisschild.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Zeitlupenkamera Pentazet, 1958 8 ; Hinweisschild.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:09, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Spiegelreflexkamera Exakta Varex VX, 1952 ; Hinweisschild.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:11, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Exakta Varex ; Cover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:12, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Spiegelreflexkamera Sport , 1937 ; Hinweisschild.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:12, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Geschichte der Kameraindustrie Mittelständische Betriebe XI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Geschichte der Kameraindustrie in Dresden Ernemannwerke fotografische Dokumentation VI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Geschichte der Kameraindustrie in Dresden in Zahlen und Fakten I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:16, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Geschichte der Kameraindustrie in Dresden III.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:16, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:TSD Depot Unterhaltungs-, Ton-, Radio- und Fernsehtechnik , Firmengeschichte Mende.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:TSD Depot Unterhaltungs-, Ton-, Radio- und Fernsehtechnik , Rundfunkgeschichte in Deutschland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:TSD Depot Unterhaltungs-, Ton-, Radio- und Fernsehtechnik , Wurlitzer Casettenbox C110 von 1971 V.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Schmalspur-Dampflok Pèchot-Bourdon I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:20, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Schmalspur Dampflok 99 535 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:21, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Replika Motorkutsche - Daimler von 1886 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:23, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Atmosphärische Gaskraftmaschine um 1874 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:23, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Motorrad Brennabor um 1905 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:23, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Leichtmotorrad Lauri & Klement I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:23, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Mehrspurfahrrad Eureka um 1885 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Fahrrad Göricke um 1932 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Leichtmotorrad Presto 205 um 1932 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Motorrad mit Seitenwagen BMW R 62 von 1928 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Motorrad Böhmerland von 1927 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Elektromobil Baker Electric W Runabout von 1910 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Motor Horch 8 von 1932 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Motor Horch V 8 von 1933 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Luxusautomobil Röhr 8 Typ F von 1933 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Wanderer W 10-IV von 1932 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden PKW IFA F 8 von 1955 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Fahrrad Möve Modell 15 von 1956 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden IWL Motorroller Pitty von 1955 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden IFA F9 Typ 309-1 von 1955 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Motor Sachsenring P 240 um 1955 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Motorrad AWO 425 von 1955 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Motorr0ller Ceseta Typ 502 von 1960 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Motorfahrrad Simson SL 1 S von 1971 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Motorrad Jawa 350 Typ 634-7 von 1976 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Motorrad MuZ 500 R-F von 1993 I.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulae (talk) 16:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae (talk) 16:29, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

#invoke:Autotranslate Paulae (talk) 16:29, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae (talk) 16:29, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:30, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:31, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:31, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:31, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:31, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:31, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:31, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:32, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:32, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:32, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:33, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:33, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:33, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:34, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:34, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:34, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:36, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:36, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:36, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:36, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:37, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:37, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Paulae ([[User talk:Paulae|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:42, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Derbrauni ([[User talk:Derbrauni|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:04, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2016

Hallo [[:#titleparts:PAGENAME]],

Du erhältst diese Nachricht als Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Earth 2014 oder 2015. Dieses Jahr wird sich Deutschland wieder am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth beteiligen. Wir würden uns über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Der Zeitraum für das Hochladen der Naturbilder ist vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2016.

Für die Weitergabe an den internationalen Wettbewerb ist ab diesem Jahr eine Mindestauflösung von 2 Megapixeln erforderlich. Bitte gib an, in welchem Schutzgebiet oder an welchem Schutzobjekt (z.B. Naturdenkmal, Geotop) die Fotos gemacht wurden. Wenn Bilder gar nicht zugeordnet werden können, gelangen sie nicht in die Wertung. In die Bilder eingefügte Zusätze wie der Name des Fotografen, Datum, Beschreibung oder ein Rahmen sind unerwünscht.

Seit der letzten Runde sind unter anderem Listen aller FFH-Gebiete und EU-Vogelschutzgebiete in Deutschland erstellt worden, die nun ebenfalls auf Bilder warten.

Dieses Jahr wird eine Vorjury die Vorauswahl der Bilder nach den Wettbewerbsregeln übernehmen. Als Teilnehmer aus den Vorjahren kannst Du Dich daran beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, ein Zugangscode kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech ([[User talk:Blech|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Ein Herzliches Dankeschön für Deinen WLE-Beitrag 2016

Hallo NoRud,

der diesjährige Fotowettbewerb „Wiki Loves Earth“ liegt hinter uns. Für Deutschland haben mehr als 1100 Teilnehmer über 18.000 Fotos hochgeladen. Damit sind wir ein gutes Stück vorangekommen bei der Dokumentation der Schutzgebiete und zu schützenden Objekte unserer Natur.

Vorjury und Hauptjury haben eine Auslese nach qualitativen Kriterien vorgenommen und im Ergebnis wurden 100 Preisträger ermittelt. Die TOP-100-Fotos von 64 Fotografen findet Ihr auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Doch der gesamte Fotoschatz lässt sich mit nur 100 Fotos kaum erfassen. Daher habe ich nach Themenfeldern eine persönliche Auswahl vorgenommen und diese in Form von Kalenderpostern zusammengestellt. Über ein offizielles Poster mit den TOP-100 hinaus gibt es auch Poster zu Flora, Fauna, Landschaften und zur Geologie. Für jeden Geschmack dürfte bei dieser Kollektion etwas dabei sind. Wer Lust hat kann sich eine preisgünstige Druckerei suchen und ein solches Poster für ca. 15 € im Format A1 ausdrucken lassen. Alle fünf Poster zusammen zeigen mehr als 400 Fotos von über 160 Teilnehmern.

Wenn alles klappt, dann wird das TOP-100-Poster in Kürze auch in höherer Auflage gedruckt und auf der bevorstehenden WikiCon in der Region Stuttgart (Kornwestheim) für die Teilnehmer zum Mitnehmen und Weiterverteilen vorliegen. Auf dieser vom 16.-18. September stattfindenden Konferenz wollen wir auch nächste Schritte und mögliche Projekte mit Blick auf WLE-2017 diskutieren. Vorschläge für eine WLE-Preisverleihung und einen WLE-Workshop im Rahmen der WikiCon liegen auf dem Tisch. Es wäre schön, wenn auch Du dabei wärst.

Der Kalender reicht übrigens bis Juni 2017 und soll dazu einladen, schon in den kommenden Wochen und Monaten erneut auf Fototour rund um den Naturschutz zu gehen. Möge Euch ein Poster bis zum 4. WLE-Fotowettbewerb im Mai 2017 begleiten. Von mir allen Teilnehmern ein ganz persönliches Dankeschön und den Preisträgern einen herzlichen Glückwunsch. ( Bernd Gross, 20:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC))