User talk:MushiHoshiIshi
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- AlNo (talk: fr/en/es/pt) 15:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
categories
[edit]hi,
you have categorized all pictures of Episyrphus balteatus, and because somebody else did the same with spiders, i suspect that there is some place where you both come from, where this was decided. can you give me a hint, because i'm not so sure what you're doing a good idea. let's discuss this before you tag *all* pictures with categories. until now, it worked quite nicely this way: put all pictures from a species into a gallery page, then link this page to the family. no need to categorize every picture additionally. hope to hear from you :) --Sarefo 22:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't understand English so much. --MushiHoshiIshi 09:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Catergories
[edit]According to the image of Lycaena phlaeas there is no need to add a category when the image is already saved into an article of a species. Please accept the policy for living species in Wikipedia. Some more information can be found under Categories and articles. Thank you very much. --Dysmachus 15:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't understand English so much. --MushiHoshiIshi 16:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Categories
[edit]thank you for categorizing my mineral images on commons. those images were uploaded 2 days ago and i would very much appreciate to categorize those by myself! thank you Hannes Grobe 13:08, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
!again: could you please STOP categorizing my images! thank you Hannes Grobe 15:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Category:Agglutinate has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Rémih 17:04, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Category:Agglomerate has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Rémih 17:06, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Category:Lapillistone has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--Rémih 17:10, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Category discussion notification | Category:Unknown Anisoptera has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. |
--Cwbm (commons) (talk) 13:38, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello MushiHoshiIshi, million thanks for your watching over my work in the mineral categories :-). You're right, Category:Glaukodote was wrong named and now to find under Category:Glaucodot. Greetings -- Ra'ike T C 12:32, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Remerciements
[edit]Désolé de ne pas parler Japonais ou anglais.
Merci pour le soin que vous prenez pour mes photographies.
bon souvenir de France... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Platinum (minerals) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:57, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Clogmia albipunctatus has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Pristurus (talk) 21:47, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope
[edit]
--Motopark (talk) 16:18, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Sauroposeidon has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |