User talk:Mschlindwein
| Babel user information |
|---|
| Users by language |
Hi. Could you add copyright tags to the images you uploaded? For now I have tagged your image as "Unknown". If there are no tags, the image may have to be deleted. Thanks -- Chris 73 03:18, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- All copyright tags are listed at Commons:Image copyright tags. You can also see how they look like at Commons:Image copyright tags visual. I will delete the celsius image. thanks -- Chris 73 15:50, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Actually, found another source andmore info about the image (see Image:Celsius.jpg). I uploaded ahigher resolution image, and also declared it Public Domain, since the copyright expired -- Chris 73 15:56, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Oh, another tip: On Image:Neckar river watershed.png you stated Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Neckar_river_watershed.png. Do you know that you can easily create interwiki links to pages on other wikis? I added [[en:Image:Neckar river watershed.png]] to the image page, which creates a link on the left side underneath the toolbar to the Image:Neckar river watershed.png on the english wiki. Same works for almost all wikis, i.e. de: is german and sv: i swedish etc. Only with the klingon wiki do these interwiki links not work. -- Chris 73 17:00, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Actually, found another source andmore info about the image (see Image:Celsius.jpg). I uploaded ahigher resolution image, and also declared it Public Domain, since the copyright expired -- Chris 73 15:56, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Devemos ter uma página principal em português no endereço acima. Voluntários? :) --E2m 15:55, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Ok, para qualquer ajuda estou à sua disposição. --E2m 11:02, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Commons:Esplanada já está ativa Jurema Oliveira 00:45, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Austerlitz
[edit]Thanks for the notice. Deleted the wrong article. BTW, you can also simply add {{delete}} and the reason to the article, and it will show up on Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. An admin will delete it in time. -- Chris 73 01:50, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Categories in Images
[edit]Hi - is there a reason you removed the categories from Image:Aleutians-space.jpg? I think it's useful to group images by categories, especially as we now have automatic image galleries in categories. What bothers you about that? I will put the cats back in for now, but would like to hear your oppinion abou this. -- Duesentrieb 00:38, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
You wrote:
- Hallo,
- Ich kann ein Bisßen Deutsch, und wenn du Geduld hast, werde ich versuchen in deiner Sprache zu schreiben...
- Ich habe die Kategorie in Commons (Aleutians-space.jpg) weggenommen, weil ich gesehen habe, daß die Image die einzige war, die ich gefunden habe, mit Kategorie. Ich habe festgestellt, daß Kategorien vor allem in Artikel zu finden sind, und die Images können in Artikel gefunden werden. Nur deswegen habe ich die Kategorie gelöscht. Wenn ich ein Image hochlade, versuche ich immer den entsprechende Artikel zu schreiben, mit Hinweis auf das Image und Kategorie. Wenn du den Artikel commons:Aleutian Islands in Commons anschaust, findest du die Kategorie. Gruß, Marcelo Schlindwein 10:29, 13. Dez 2004 (CET)
I'll answer in english so other on the commons can follow the discussion if they like.
Please have a look at Commons:Village pump, there are some discussion about wether images should be placed in pages or if they should be grouped into galleries using categories only - especially because they now show as thumbnails there. I personally think that pages are usefull in some cases, but categories are usually sufficient.
As to the problem at hand: I, too, usually place images I upload into pages which I then put into a category. But I also try to structure the many images that are not on any page and also not well categorized (or not at all, except for the copyright-category). I do that using categories, because that is much easyer and fasterm, and helps people to find the images they are looking for. To make this more consisten, I sometimes also add images to those categories even if they are already used on some page.
I think the two approaches (using pages to form galleries, or using categories for images directly) can coexist peacefully. If the images are on a pge, what's the problem with them also being in a category? Please do not remove categories from images, as many belive this to be a more efficient and productive way of creating galleries. I belive this is true in many, but not in all cases. Please join the ongoing discussion about these topic, but do not undo categorisations (except if they are obviously wrong, naturally). Thank you. -- Duesentrieb 00:24, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Traduções
[edit]Oi Marcelo, respondi lá na Esplanada. Gbiten 17:21, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Apagar LOGOs Nasa
[edit]Oi Marcelo!
Um alemão resolveu marcar para apagar os logos do projeto Apollo da Nasa. Mas, segundo consta no site da nasa eles são PD. Como posso reverter ou impedir que apaguem?
Um abraço,
Campani 15:23, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Logos Nasa
[edit]Oi Marcelo!
Já minha avaliação é exatamente ao contrário. Acho que o cara NÃO tem nenhuma razão. O texto de copyright faz referência a limitações de uso do Logo da Nasa ("The" Nasa Logo), e ainda explica que este é aquele "azul e vermelho". Não limita em nada o uso dos logos da missões Apollo. Para estes vale o mesmo que para imagens. O texto é claro e eu colei ele na íntegra na discussão do cara. Mesmo assim, enviei o e-mail sugerido e espero resposta.
Um abraço,
Campani 00:53, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
FYI: the image was deleted because it was redundant with Image:WHO flag.png -- Chris 73 04:22, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
There is one brasil news agency that puts its photos in the public domain. If it is this one, I don't know. Maybe if we find someone who reads portugese and can check the link? -- Chris 73 22:45, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Sorry! My mistake! I just got up, and I guess i am still too sleepy to think straight. I'll tag the image as unknown, and add a note to the uploaders talk page. Sorry again -- Chris 73 23:32, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Sylvia Saint
[edit]Bomis released this picture under GFDL by decision of Jimmy Wales, executive officer of Bomis. He wrote the cited message saying so, and he also confirmed this to me on IRC. On the other hand, Bomis also releases a whole series of photos, including this one, under another different, non-free, license. (Remember that the same image can be released under different licenses.) Some people had uploaded the lot to commons.
To summarize:
- This is the only Bomis picture we can use under GFDL.
- The other pictures are under non-free licenses (actually, they are under a kind of "web-only-with-link" license which would enable us to use them on Wikipedia, but not on commons; this has nothing to do with fair use).
- I'll delete other Bomis pictures on sight.
- Everything has been confirmed by an executive officer of Bomis, i.e. Jimmy Wales.
By the way, you are supposed to leave messages on images' talk pages, not on the image page itself. David.Monniaux 22:20, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
See Bomis. Jimmy Wales is the majority owner of Bomis. David.Monniaux 05:27, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
Thumbnails
[edit]Hi. Please do not upload thumbnailed pictures from other wikimedia-projects, but original size pictures! Thanks. --Avatar 07:47, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Apenas esclarecendo a verdade
[edit]1. Não fui eu quem começou a campanha. 2. Eu já denunciei várias imagens sob VDA na PT.WP e no Commons também, só não vê quem não quer. 3. Não é porque eu não concordo(ava) com algo que não ia respeitar a decisão da comunidade. 4. Fatos são fatos. --FML 
hi 10:42, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- 1. Eu comecei o debate, não a campanha; aliás, o debate já estava iniciado antes mesmo de mim. 2. Na PT.WP eu denunciei antes do dia 10 de junho, porque não sei se sabia mas estava impossibilitado de contribuir fora do domínio principal desde lá. Dou um exemplo (não vou perder tempo procurando outros): A imagem pt:Imagem:Arma de fogo.jpg era VDA, não sei como capturar o histórico já que foi apagada. Ver também [1]. Ver exemplos no Commons: [2] (ainda em processo de verificação), [3] (ainda em precesso de verificação) 3. eu sempre respeitei a decisão da comunidade, discutir não mata, debater faz sempre bem. Desrespeitar é violar o que foi decidido, não discutir a respeito. 4. Continuo concordando: fatos são fatos. --FML
hi 21:38, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
Che Guevara photo
[edit]About "Image:CheGuevara and his daughter Hildita.jpg". The photographs of Che Guevara available at marxists.org are not public domain. As is clearly stated on the web site (marxists.org), the photos comes from Osvaldo and Roberto Salas book Fidel's Cuba: A Revolution in Pictures (amazon.com).
Since your upload of the photo may be a copyright violation, I have had it deleted. Thuresson 21:15, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
Image:Schlossvaduz.jpg
[edit]Hello,
Do you have the original high resolution version of this good image? It seems you edit it near 22/8/2004 , 10:20.
It will be better to have the original image. Thanks, Tatoute 16:19, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi. Both images look like copyvios to me, unless the uploader is also the copyright holder or the copyright holder has also given permission to license it under the GPL or LGPL. -- Chris 73 07:20, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Image:Publico.png
[edit]I suppose it is. But copyright law is very unclear to me. List it at media for deletion? -- Chris 73 10:26, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
...looks very much like a professional image to me. The Link http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2004/writers/jon_wertheim/08/09/mailbag.0809/p1_agassi_all.jpg looks like a reporters subpage on CNN, although this would be cnn.com, and www.cnn.net has no page. Not 100% sure, though. -- Chris 73 05:09, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi! I have commented out this picture in User:Mschlindwein/images. I'm sorry to have intruded in your user page, but this file is a suspected copyright violation and may soon be deleted from Commons. Jastrow 15:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
image tagging
[edit]Hi Mschlindwein, sorry but currently I am very busy in my real life, and can't look up the correct tags. But feel free to tag the image yourself if you feel it is right. Best wishes, -- Chris 73 10:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Carioca machucado...
[edit]- Tinha de ser o Marcelo... Tão logo recebi a longa correspondência pró-fairusista do machocarioca, imediatamente fui olhar o que havia na vossa discussão... E dei de cara com a origem da revolta...
Não tem jeito: isso vai estar sempre acontecendo. Hoje, diante de tanto abuso, seria eu o último a defender o fair-use no Brasil... na Wikipédia (entenda-se). Não por achar que nosso direito não já o acolha - como deixei claro alhures (maxima venia o colega que vos opinou diversamente). Mas tenho um fundamentado receio de que a wiki ia virar uma verdadeira "zona"...
- Vou tentar "esfriar" os ânimos do amigo, lá - mas pelo calor, não espero ter sucesso... De qualquer forma, quero louvar-lhe o trabalho com as imagens e, pra não me esquecer, ainda continuo sem entender a razão do "pito" que me deste meses atrás...
André Koehne 23:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
No source for Image:CharlesBabbage.jpg
[edit]
This image doesn't have any source information. Could you provide a source for the image - i.e. a book or url. Thanks en:User:Megapixie
Image Tagging Image:Baby-hitler.jpg
[edit]
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Baby-hitler.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.
In particular, if you wish to claim that an image is public domain due to "70 years after creator's death" you must identify the photographer, and the date of their death! Many thanks, TheGrappler 00:21, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- The "English WP" doesn't really count as a source - what's missing is the original source information. And "70 years after author's death" really isn't obvious - I have found plenty of pre-1900 images that are still under copyright on the 70 years PMA rule. In the USA it may be Public Domain as a foreign pre-1909 image, though. Still, source information is needed to show that it is a photograph of what it purports to show! TheGrappler 11:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
E essa?
[edit]Deve ser um cover, mas diz ser o próprio... é incrível como o pessoal tenta aparecer usando a imagem dele: image:RaulSeixas.jpg... Dá pra ver o que pode ser feito? Abraços, André Koehne TALK ME
14:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Panama Canal PIA03368 lrg.jpg
[edit]
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Panama Canal PIA03368 lrg.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao 00:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Pierre de Fermat.jpg
[edit]
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Pierre de Fermat.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao 00:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Federer_vs_Srichaphan_Basel_2006.jpg
[edit]
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Federer_vs_Srichaphan_Basel_2006.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 21:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Diag phase eau.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
slady (o.o) 00:44, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Baby-hitler.jpg
[edit]
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Baby-hitler.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jkelly 02:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Licença
[edit]Marcelo, faltou a licença nesta foto: Image:Roger Federer Swiss-indoors 2006.jpg. Abraços! Dantadd✉ 20:34, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Baltic_sea_map.jpg
[edit]
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Baltic_sea_map.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Yonatan talk 11:34, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Quanto à imagem Image:PearlHarbor_Sm.jpg
[edit]
|
Obrigado por carregar Image:PearlHarbor_Sm.jpg. Informo que a página da imagem carregada não especifica o autor do conteúdo, logo, o direito do autor é desconhecido. Se não foi você quem criou o arquivo, então deverá especificar o autor e a licença para que tenhamos o direito de usá-lo no Wikimedia Commons (veja as tarjas de direitos do autor logo abaixo). Se você achou este arquivo em algum website, indique-o bem como os seus termos de uso do conteúdo. Se o conteúdo for derivado de um trabalho protegido por copyright, você deverá fornecer os nomes e a licença do trabalho original.
Se o arquivo não possui tarja indicativa de direitos do autor, você deverá colocar uma. Se foi você quem criou a imagem, o áudio ou o vídeo poderá usar {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} para registrá-la como Creative Commons ou usar o {{PD-self}} para registrá-la como domínio público. Veja Commons:Copyright tags para a lista completa das tarjas que você poderá usar.
Saiba que todo e qualquer arquivo sem fontes e sem tarjas serão apagados uma semana após terem sido carregados, como informam os critérios para exclusão rápida. Se você carregou outros arquivos, por favor, revise-os e veja se você especificou a autoria, a fonte e os direitos do autor. Você poderá encontrar todos os arquivos que carregou usando a ferramenta Gallery. Obrigado. howcheng {chat} 05:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hi and thanks for your message. If you can, find an administrator on de-WP (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Listusers?group=sysop) and have them look at the history. Maybe there's a source link in there. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 16:20, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:SACN icon.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 02:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Hilbert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
DaTroll 12:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Me ajuda...
[edit]Mschlindwein, desbloque meu usuário, por favor, desbloque, prometo não fazer mais aquilo, por favor, a aqui é a Ismeni da wikipédia, então desbloque meu usuário, me responda em menos de uma hora. --Ismênia Oliveira 22:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Cyprus_lrg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
85.31.76.3 12:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Baby-hitler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Kam Solusar 22:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:ThéodoreDeck_Guebwiller.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
ShakataGaNai Talk 00:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Cuzco_signing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Code·is·poetry 14:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:EzraPound 1913.jpg
[edit]
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:EzraPound 1913.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. DrKiernan (talk) 17:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
| Pay attention to copyright | Image:NSDAPChart.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Copyright claimed by a German publishing company. This image was first released 1961. (OTRS ticket# 2008090810014234) -Raymond Disc. 19:18, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
You are interested in Russian Railways, my friend
[edit]As I see, you were in Vladivostok. Did you get tehre by a train, all the way from Moscow? As of now, I am creating a site with all the information about Russian Railways for internationals. GK tramrunner229 (talk) 01:09, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, Image:Vasconúñezdebalboa.jpeg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:Image:Vasconúñezdebalboa.jpeg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
--Mangostar (talk) 17:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 21:00, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Maginot Linie Karte.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Please help replace this outdated license
[edit]Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
BotMultichillT 20:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
|
File:LewisCarrollSelfPhoto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jappalang (talk) 01:20, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Bonjour Mschlindwein,
Je viens de supprimer une de tes photos qui représent un bâtiment récent (un édicule Guimard). Il n'y a en effet pas de liberté de panorama en France, et même si c'est bien dommage, Commons se doit de respecter cette interdiction.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:35, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
|
|
File:TransSiberianRailwayAtKm9288.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bulwersator (talk) 20:35, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 08:50, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Image Permission
[edit]Hi - I would like to use your image of Lichtenstein in an educational software project, but we need an attribution only license.
Can you do that?
Thanks,
Miles Becker jmbecker46@mac.com
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Iranische Sprachen.jpg
[edit]
|
|
| This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Iranische Sprachen.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
