User talk:Moroder/Archives 2015-2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kloster Säben Mauern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good size but dust spots. See notes, please.--Lmbuga 16:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks--Moroder 17:07, 1 April 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:38, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiligkreuzkirche Säben innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 13:05, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Manchesmal sind Entscheidungen

wahrlich unverständlich Wenn es nicht doch im System bliebe, dann wäre es jammerschade. Aber so bleibt es immerhin in der Kategorie. Ich frage mich oft, welche Schönwetter- und Optimal-Licht-Fotografen hier agieren. Bei diesem Bild muss man sich halt wirklich fragen, was man sonst mit einem Single-Shot hätte tun müssen. Man hat halt nicht immer ein Stativ dabei, geschweige denn Platz dafür. --Hubertl (talk) 10:38, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

{{@Hubertl}} Hallo, danke für deine Unterstützung, es ist mal so...--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Christus Ecce homo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trostburg Bergfried Ostseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

hello

Thank you for permission to use your ultrasound image; I will be referencing the image in my assignment.

Jacqueline Cooper

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen City Hall and Galena Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen City Hall south.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:42, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Community church south facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite a few distracting shadows, but overall acceptable for QI; moreover hard to avoid for this particular church as it is surrounded by trees.. --Slaunger 12:36, 12 April 2015 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for the review. Yes, the dilemma is winter or summer where most of the building is covered by the treees leaves --Moroder 12:44, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Community church main facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:13, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Highlands spring skiing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 03:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella group Ciampinoi from Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Shadows bottom right are a little bit disturbing. --XRay 11:04, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiligkreuzkirche Säben Geißelung Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:04, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Art Museum old building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --ArildV 12:34, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Armory Hall or Fraternal Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pitkin County Courthouse Aspen 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:16, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen building on South Galena Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:12, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Community church south facade 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:13, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Galena Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:13, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Community church portal on south facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:08, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Independence building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Need perspective corrections --Livioandronico2013 15:47, 15 April 2015 (UTC) I see nothing wrong with perspective, verticals are vertical.  Support Good quality.--C messier 17:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC) I leave some notes,anyway C messier is good education here is not to interfere when an reviewer is reviewing a photo,thanks --Livioandronico2013 19:43, 15 April 2015 (UTC) I did,we can close here --Livioandronico2013 20:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC) OK, but if one reviewer doesn't agree with one review (s)he can interfere, that's why CR exists (just for the record). --C messier 21:03, 15 April 2015 (UTC) It is not correct C messier,the CR exists if a photo is declined or promoted, and if not (as in my case) I had just suggested something (Just for Remember)--Livioandronico2013 21:21, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Cowenhaven Ute City Banque building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Cowenhaven Ute City Banque building portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen south Galena street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Famberhorst 05:53, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Elks building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:07, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen south Galena street west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 02:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen John Denver Memorial Rocky Mountain High.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 03:32, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen building on S Mill Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 02:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Block 1886 shop detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:34, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Residence Hotel 1886 detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:16, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen building S Mill street and Main st.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:02, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Wheeler Opera House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:32, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Sheely Bridge Roaring Fork river.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Contrast could be better. --XRay 04:51, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen double chair Roaring Fork river.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:40, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Mountain spring skiing 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Drop-dead gorgeous.--Johann Jaritz 02:08, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Victorian style house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Che bello!.--Johann Jaritz 14:11, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen bridge over Roaring Fork River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:11, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Saint Regis Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:37, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Säben Torturm Ringmauern 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:31, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Säben Torturm Rindmauern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Mountain spring skiing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Victorian style house Monarch St 212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:50, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Victorian style house Hallam Street 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:40, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Victorian style house Hallam Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 06:49, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Mountain spring skiing Copper run.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:49, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Mountain Ruthies and Ajax Express.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and composition.--ArildV 10:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Highlands Highland Peak Hunter Peak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 11:52, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Mountain spring skiing over Aspen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--ArildV 14:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Mountain Silver Queen Gondola over Copper gulch run.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Palauenc05 16:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Mountain Silver Queen Gondola over Silver dip run.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Mountain spring skiing east slopes .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Community church detail of south facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Detailed enough. Glad to see more photos of this historic building. --Daniel Case 23:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Highlands Highlands Pyramid Peak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 01:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Continental divide on Loveland pass 3654 m.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Stunning photographs you are presenting to the community. Smart quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC) Comment Thanks! Bin etwas verlegen...--Moroder 13:01, 22 April 2015 (UTC)No need to feel like that. You are a real master photographer. Like all the Moroders are great artists. I often think of Giorgio M. He won three Oscars for his works. --Johann Jaritz 13:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Victorian style house Hallam Street 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kloster Säben Turm der Klosterkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Säben Torturm Rindmauern aussen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 18:26, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Blumenfresko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Highlands spring skiing on Steeplechase.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 17:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Highlands Highland Peak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Detail des Seitenaltars mit Engeln.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Heilige Sebastian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very good resolution, but vertical lines are tilted: Perspective distortion. Blurry, lack of sharpness. Underexposed IMO--Lmbuga 21:12, 23 April 2015 (UTC)  Comment The object of the fotograph is the painting. The frame of it is rectangular, so within the object tilted lines are from the painter. The colours are not brisk, but that depends probably on the painting. The wall on the left is overexposed but that would not indicate that the painting itself is overexposed. Sharpness lies a little behind the picture. --ArishG 05:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)  Done Fixed vertical lines (minimal), sharpened and increased the contrast - The wall is not overexposed, look at the histogram. Thanks for the reviews --Moroder 09:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)  Support I downsampled the image to 7 and to 5 megapixels and it's a good picture and QI IMO--Lmbuga 13:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Seitenaltar Andreas Florian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good IMO, but vertical lines are not straight (see notes)--Lmbuga 21:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)  Done Fixed verticals according to the walls, the altar is not straight --Moroder 09:26, 24 April 2015 (UTC)  Support The picture was good, now it's better IMO. Good quality--Lmbuga 13:43, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Marienkapelle Kreuzigungsgruppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Maybe a very little bit over sharpened (white sharpening line visible), but very delicate object and elegant picture (light, composition, colors, sharpness). A QI, no doubt.--Jebulon 10:45, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen John Denver Memorial Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Marienkapelle Altar sechs Märtyrer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Excellent.--Jebulon 10:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Marienkapelle Altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 19:33, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Marienkapelle Altar Muttergottes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:53, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Detail des linken Seitenaltars mit Engeln.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 15:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Engel Kanzelaufsatz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:25, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Marienkapelle Altar Heilige Drei Könige.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake at Eagle River Colorado River confluence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Heiliger Andreas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia duomo Broletto e Torre del Popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia statua in piazza Duomo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Heiliger Florian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Heilige Barbara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:47, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Maria im Tempel Stephan Kessler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 20:26, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Geburt Christi Stephan Kessler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:34, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Fresken Stephan Kessler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, maybe a bit noisy. And I can hardly believe the given camera settings ISO 100, f/13 and 1/6 s?! --Uoaei1 17:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC) Comment Thanks for your review Uoaei1|Uoaei1. Light conditions were good as you see also here. I don't understand where the noise comes from --Moroder 11:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC) {{}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia duomo dettaglio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:51, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Center for Environmental Studies near the Fork river.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 22:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Detail rechter Seitenaltar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:39, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergamo Chiesa di Santo Spirito Portale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I would give the picture a bit more contrast. --Hubertl 14:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 16:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergamo Accademia Carrara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 13:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia Sette Angeli dell'Apocalisse Ottavio Amigoni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergamo portal Via Pelabrocco.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, fine detail. --Doshtsh 09:05, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Kreuzigungsgruppe Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 16:02, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia via Musei fontana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 13:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Accademia Carrara di Bergamo cancello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergamo portal in via Pignolo 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:07, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergamo portals in via Pignolo 48 and 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:55, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Accademia Carrara di Bergamo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 16:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergamo Via Pignolo 84.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia Torre dell Orologio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergamo Palazzo Provincia lato nordest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:20, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergamo portal of Carrara house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilt+perspective, look at the verticals --Christian Ferrer 12:18, 8 May 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks for the hint! --Moroder 18:33, 8 May 2015 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 19:47, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Kreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:10, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergamo fontana del delfino con tritone .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 14:56, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergamo fontana del delfino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:30, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergamo Via Pignolo 80 home Torquato Tasso plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:45, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergamo Via Pignolo 80 home Torquato Tasso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 12:12, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Kreuzigungsgruppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. Description convinced me. --Hubertl 22:13, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Foto di Grohmann

Buongiorno, vorrei usare la foto do Paul Grohmann in un libro che sto pubblicando sulla Grande Guerra nelle Tofane. Il titolo è "La terra sembrava tremare" Ci fossero delle controindicazioni, fatemi sapere.

Grazie, un saluto

• • Almeno fgammi sapere chi sei?--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Antone da pan Jakob Crepaz eila.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 03:34, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Roaring Fork River and Aspen ski area.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:11, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klausen Pfarrkirche Bur Branzoll Eisack.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 15:47, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Antone da pan ai pueresc Jakob Crepaz-Maidl detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 11:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Antone da pan ai pueresc Jakob Crepaz-Maidl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergamo Palazzo Provincia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia fountain on Broletto court.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Francësch autere de Juebia dai Andli San Antone Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:17, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Antone autere de Juebia dai Andli dlieja San Antone Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Blendenwahl

Hallo Wolfgang! Deinem Profil zufolge bist Du schon ein "alter Hase" in Sachen Fotografie in noch jungen Jahren. Ich bin sehr von Deinem Schaffen sowie Deinen umfassenden Beiträgen zu WIKIMEDIA angetan und Du hilfst mit Deinen Bewertungen sowie kritischen Kommentaren sehr viel, die eigenen Ergebnisse zu verbessern. Im konkreten Fall danke ich Dir für Deinen Edit vom 14. Mai 2015 zu meinem Foto von der Eisentür an der Pfarrkirche von Tainach in Kärnten

, wo Du mir eine andere Blendenwahl anempfiehlst. Du hast mit Deinen Argumenten natürlich Recht. Ich werde auch auf dieses wesentliche Kriterium künftig mehr Augenmerk legen. Wie Du gesehen hast, verwenden wir beide dieselbe Marke und den gleichen Kameratyp. Um das Beste aus diesem feinen Gerät herausholen zu können, ist gerade das aufgesetzte Objektiv von großer Bedeutung. In den vergangenen Monaten verwende ich aus praktischen Überlegungen vorzugsweise das Nikon 1:2,8/24-70 mm, welches in einschlägigen Kreisen als zuverlässiges "Arbeitstier" mit weitgehend zufriedenstellenden Ergebnissen gilt. Der 36 MP-Sensor erfordert allerdings bereits das Beste an vorgestecktem Glas. Und mittlerweile beginne ich, die Schärfeleistung dieses mittleren Zooms anzuzweifeln, gerade in den Randbereichen der Bilder habe ich den Eindruck, dass es nicht ganz so optimal um diese Optik bestellt ist. (Wir sprechen jetzt immer über Kritik auf sehr hohem Niveau.) Du hast Deiner Enttäuschung darüber in einem Deiner vorhergehenden Edits bereits Ausdruck verliehen (Unschärfen am oberen Bildrand bei Fresken an der Pfarrkirche in Sankt Georgen im Gailtal). Nun meine Frage an den erfahrenen Praktiker: Welches WW-/Normal-Objektiv ist Deiner Meinung nach jenes, welches dem Sensor der Nikon D800/D810 am besten gerecht wird und das Maximum an Schärfe gerade im Randbereich herausholen kann? Oder anders gefragt, auf welches Objektiv (welche Objektive) schwörst Du? Seit Monaten stelle ich mir diese Frage. Antwort erhält man nur mit Fotos, die man selbst mit dem jeweiligen Objektiv gemacht hat. LG aus dem Land, welches östlich von Deiner Heimat liegt. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:18, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Johann Jaritz, wollte dich zu einer Diskussion über den Gebrauch der Blendenweite anregen. Danke für deine nette Antwort und sehr großzügige "appreciations".

Ich bin nun überzegt, daß Blende 9 für die höchste Auflösung die beste ist. Bei niedrigen Blendenwerten kommt es eher zur chromatischen Aberration, bei höheren zu Unschärfe. Die Tiefenschärfe ist natürlich was Anderes. Ich verwende auch seit ich die D800 habe (Mai 1912) das 1:2,8/24-70 mm zu gut 95%. Hab mir auch das 70-200/1:4 und das 16-40/1:4 zugelegt aber brauche die fast nie. Mit dem 1:2,8/24-70 mm habe ich auch oft Probleme mit der Fokussierung und mache deshalb oft mehrere Bilder da man ja sonst auf dem kleinen Kameramonitor nicht viel sieht. Mit meinen alten Nikon Linsen (80-200 und micro 55, 28 etc) kann ich eigentlich nichts mehr anfangen. Vielleicht könnte man mit einem Fixobjektiv bessere Bilder haben aber da ist man hat sehr wenig flexibil. Ich sehe du hast etwa meinen gleichen Ingeressebereich und da brauchts doch einige Flexibilität ohne unnötige Gewichtsbelastung. Was sags du eigentlich zur Bearbeitung von Bildern und diesem Kommentar von Colin? Gut Licht! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:44, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia Castello fortificazioni e torre dei prigionieri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:46, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia Castello fortificazioni cinta viscontea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Johann Jaritz 04:54, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia Broletto portale est.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:44, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia Broletto portale uscita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia Castello fortificazioni ingresso 500esco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia Chiesa San Faustino e Giovita.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:27, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia from above with the Duomo and the Torre del Popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:44, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben über Klausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good composition. --Hockei 16:23, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trostburg gemeiner Efeu.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (Though I'd reduce the file size...) --Crisco 1492 00:39, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia fontana del Vescovado.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 00:42, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche Säben Baptism of American Indians.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:05, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mëisules dala biesces teut su da Ciavazes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The most beautiful part of the Dolomites for me. Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:25, 14 May 2015 (UTC) Comment Happy to send you this...postcard--Moroder 09:43, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia Castello affresco sulle fortificazioni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:43, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia Castello fortificazioni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support Some out of focus elements, but OK for me. --C messier 12:17, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kloster Säben Erzengel Michael .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:23, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingresso Palzzo del vescovado a Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontana in piazza Paolo VI Brescia armata Callegari.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia fontana di Minerva piazza Duomo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:25, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia fontana di Minerva base piazza Duomo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:25, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia fontana di Minerva Piazza Duomo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:56, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia statua di Minerva del Cignaroli in piazza Duomo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Panoramafreiheit Südtirol

Hallo Wolfgang! Kürzlich habe ich in Südtirol Urlaub gemacht und einige Fotos mitgebracht, die ich gerne auf Commons hochladen würde. Da du offenbar aus der Gegend kommst meine Frage: Welche Regelungen gelten hinsichtlich der Panoramafreiheit? Ich habe z.B. in Bozen einige der engen Gassen fotografiert oder auch den Innenraum des Doms Maria Himmelfahrt. Wenn du mir eine Email schreibst, könnte ich dir ein paar Bildbeispiele mit Bitte um deine Einschätzung schicken. Landschaftsaufnahmen sollten generell unkritisch sein, oder? --Tuxyso (talk) 05:26, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

• Hallo Tuxyso, Hier gelten diesbezüglich die italienischen Gesetze, also Panoramafreiheit zero! Mit eineigen Tricks haben wir doch versucht einige fotos zB hier in die WP einzuschmuggeln. Hier gibt es auch diese Liste de:Liste der Baudenkmäler in Bozen wo du vielleicht einige deiner (immer sehr gute) Bilder einbauen könntest! Du kannst mir gerne die Bilder auch schicken. LG --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:28, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
  • • wenn ich darf?

im REPORT_ON_THE_FREEDOM_OF_PANORAMA_in_EUROPE_by_iRights_Berlin steht zu Italien:

In Italien gibt es keine Regelung der Panoramafreiheit. Solange urheberrechtlich geschützte Werke abgebildet und ausschließlich privat oder aber nur als Beiwerk auf der Abbildung zu sehen sind, ist die Abbildung wohl erlaubt. Gesamtpunktzahl Itallien: 0/6

Kategorie 7: Hierunter fallen Länder, in welchen die Regelung der Panoramafreiheit so stark eingeschränkt ist, dass es sie praktisch nicht gibt bzw. in welchen gar keine ausdrücklichen Regelungen zur Panoramafreiheit vorhanden sind. • Praktisch keine Panoramafreiheit: Belgien, Griechenland und Luxemburg (0 – 0,5 von 6 Punkten) • Gar keine Regelung: Frankreich und Italien (0 von 6 Punkten) Dazu wurden mir schon einige "Italien Bilder" aus den Commons gelöscht. Bilder von Gassen und Strassenzügen dürften eher kein Problem sein. Innenaufnahmen und einzelne Objekte dagegen schon. --Böhringer (talk) 06:35, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

• • Hallo, danke für deinen Beitrag. Prinzipiell müsste man die jeweiligen Hausbesitzer fragen aber für Bildungszwecke (also WP) darf man gebeude fotografieren. Nicht jedoch Gebäude von noch lebenden oder nicht seit 70 Jahren verstorbenen Architekten. Ausnahme dazu dürften staatliche Gebäude sein, wobei per Gesetz der Urheber alle Rechte verliert...Grüße --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

• • • da gebe ich dir Recht. Sind Innenaufnahmen von Sakralbauten für Bildungszwecke auch erlaubt? --Böhringer (talk) 06:49, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
      • In Südtirol habe ich nie Probleme gehabt, die Kirchenmessner sind oft sehr hilfreich, hingegen in "Italien" gehts ohne Blitz und Stativ sonst muss man die Kurie um Erlaubnis fragen. Einmal hab ich beim Pfarrer vorgesprochen und der hat mich gebeten keine Aufnahmen zu machen da er Kirchenräuber befürchtete...--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
        • Hallo Wolfgang und Fred! Vielen Dank für Eure Rückmeldungen. Südtirol ist also doch Italien, auch wenn dies auf einigen Wahlplakaten der Südtiroler Freiheit anders zu lesen war :) Ich werde in den nächsten Tagen mal einige Bilder hochladen, die ersten finden sich in der User-Kategorie Images of South Tyrol by Tuxyso. Ggf. würde ich noch mal auf dich, Wolfgang, zurückkommen, wenn ich bei der Kategorisierung von bestimmten Gebäuden Probleme bekomme.Sofern du Beschreibungen noch verbessern möchtest, immer gerne. Beste Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 21:16, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

• @Tuxyso: Danke schon mal für deine ersten Bilder, die ich gleich schon zum Einsatz gebracht habe, bin auch sehr gerne behilflich bei Rückfragen. Zu deiner Frage: Wie von Wolfgang und Fred erklärt, ist Italien da so irgendwie in einer Grauzone. Landschaftsbilder sollten aber völlig unproblematisch sein und auch Gebäudefotos (innen wie außen) werden auf Commons umstandslos akzeptiert, wenn die Architekten länger als 70 Jahre tot sind. --Mai-Sachme (talk) 06:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Hallo Mai-Sachme! Vielen Dank für dein Hilfsangebot und auch für die bisherigen Verbesserungen an den Bildbeschreibungen. Ich freue mich über jegliche Hilfe bei den Beschreibungen und dem Einbau in WP-Artikel. Ich habe bereits einige weitere Bilder hochgeladen. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte del Megio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:44, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murales in Campo San Zandegola Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DKrieger 15:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia Broletto e Torre del Popolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Maybe a bit underexposed, could you brighten a little ? The pipe should be vertical, IMO. Easily fixable.--Jebulon 11:32, 16 May 2015 (UTC) Done tks --Moroder 13:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Support Thanks to you !--Jebulon 21:40, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Venice frame of a walled window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:09, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte del Megio 2 Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 10:36, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Herzjesus photo

Hi, I am using the photo you took in St Ulrich Church, Groeden, for a small group talking about who Jesus is. (Non-profit, only about 10-15 people) Thanks.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte de la Ruga Bela, at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:02, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo della Regione Veneto veduta est.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support Although not very sharp in full resolution, at 5 Mpix is sharp enough. More opinions appreciated. --C messier 11:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Labia in Venice on Cannaregio canal view from Canal Grande.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Labia and San Geremia church in Venice view from Canal Grande.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great composition. Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 02:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fondamenta del Monastero Rio dei Tolentini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 05:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte del Megio 3 Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality - a good decision to do no 100% vertical correction here. --Tuxyso 05:55, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio del Megioverso Canal Grande.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:21, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Flangini e Scuola dei Morti a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The squero San Trovaso and church in Venice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and the bird should survive... --Isiwal 07:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mascherone Palazzo Corner della Regina facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:40, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mascherone Palazzo Corner della Regina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:59, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canottieri sul Canal Grande davanti San Marcuola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Palauenc05 15:16, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte San Lorenzo a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:53, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di San Lorenzo a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:53, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Il Canal Grande con veduta verso San Geremia Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:50, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio del Megio e Fondaco del Megio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allegory Museo Correr Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia fontana delfini in Piazza della Loggia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not totally sharp at full res but OK. --King of Hearts 09:39, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vigna e Villa Bettoni Cazzago fronte sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vigna e Villa Bettoni Cazzago.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps contrast should be boosted, but QI anyways. --King of Hearts 02:26, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Pasqualigo Giovanelli a Venezia rio di Noale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 02:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ala Napoleonica Procuratie dettaglio arco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 02:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mascherone Palazzo Corner della Regina 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ala Napoleonica Procuratie dettaglio archi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:13, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ala Napoleonica Procuratie dettaglio centrale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:13, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The "Fontego del megio" in Venice, NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:50, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Flangini in Venice, Canal Grande view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Palauenc05 (talk) 23:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:52, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The San Lorenzo bridge in Venice, Southern aspect..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:54, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:46, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vigna e Villa Bettoni Cazzago ingresso muro di cinta sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 05:51, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vigna Villa Bettoni Cazzago.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 05:51, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vigna e Villa Bettoni Cazzago cancello sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo della Regione Veneto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left side of the building is leaning in, whereas the right side is perfectly straight. I would crop tighter at the top, but that is a matter of personal taste and no QI issue IMHO. --Tuxyso 05:50, 21 May 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks for the hint--Moroder 17:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 15:51, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Cavallo a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:52, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sede di partito a Cazzago San Martino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:13, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio antico a Cazzago San Martino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 07:13, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cappella di Santa Giulia Cazzago.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vigna e Villa Bettoni Cazzago muro a spina ovest .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:25, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sotoportego e calle de le Acque Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzina gotica Strada Nuova Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Rooftop losing a little bit sharpness, but still QI imo. --Cccefalon 08:20, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Diedo Cannaregio.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is the image tilted cw or is it a typical Venice problem? --Cccefalon 08:22, 28 May 2015 (UTC) Done I guess both, tried to correct it. Thanks for the hint --Moroder 10:54, 28 May 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio di San Lorenzo a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Blue cast, IMO--Jebulon 19:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks for the hint --Moroder 05:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC) Support Better, thank you, can be QI in my opinion. Maybe you could clone out the "thing" at the left border, in the sky ?--Jebulon 17:18, 28 May 2015 (UTC) Done cleaned the sky, tks again --Moroder 21:49, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Rio di San Lorenzo" canal (Venice). View of southern half from San Lorenzo bridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Procuratie Napoleonic wing, view from Piazza San Marco.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 12:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

San Leonardo

In the state it is impossible to represent: the distortion is too high. I took your version and I'll load the correction. Pieces must be sacrificed, but you will fill present a new version complies with the criteria. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:38, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Archaeodontosaurus, thanks for triing but I prefer my version because the distortion is much worse (Ihave tried it before and I have seen the results on the capitals are really unacceptable).

I would appreciate if you would kindly undo your upload also because the former version is a candidate for QI. Cheers and thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Ok  Done This image is difficult --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:35, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noè ebbro Palazzo Ducale Venezia lato sudest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Du bedienst damit exakt meinen bevorzugten Motivtyp! Danke! --Hubertl 05:32, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Cavallo a Venezia lato sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualiy.--ArildV 07:37, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loggia e allegoria della Giustizia Palazzo Ducale Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cappella di Santa Giulia a Cazzago.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right side is leaning in. Overall good quality. --Cccefalon 07:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC) Done THanks for the hint --Moroder 12:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Squero sul Rio dei Mendicanti a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualiy.--ArildV 07:34, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio de Santa Fosca Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:02, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuola Grande di San Marco e .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 12:01, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Campiello dell Anconeta Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:12, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ala Napoleonica Procuratie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:24, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noè ebbro Palazzo Ducale Venezia lato sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue antiche alle Procuratie nuove Museo Archeologico Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:24, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Bettoni Cazzago dettaglio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:06, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vigna e Villa Bettoni Cazzago muro di cinta sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very weak  Support Contrast could be better. --XRay 06:06, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di San Giorgio dei Greci a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too dark and blue cast, IMO--Jebulon 19:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks for the hint --Moroder 05:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Now, there is a halo, even visible at thumbnail. Do you think so ?--Jebulon 17:14, 28 May 2015 (UTC) Comment That happens when you brighten. But, the halos are old questions between us... Cheers and thanks for your attention!--Moroder 12:04, 30 May 2015 (UTC)Oh, yes, I remember now ! 😁 my comment was not on purpose ! Anyway, it works enough for a QI.--Jebulon 19:35, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

извинението се приема затова ме наричаха изчадие на природата копеле и т н и искаха да ме цанят за матрьошката за 2 кила ракия да има кой да е гробар а на бубе пушката да го отвезе като баровец аз им намерих поп на д попоповете да ги погребе и двамата от всичко те пазя ти си мой вече мога и да ги утупам с ток а здравчо натегалото в затворо в бобов дол ме разнесе че съм откачила а сега гледай им саиро и бирата с болерите където им свързва мъжоме и на него и на мушев и на тончев гаражо и на рамирата парапетата и на сюрме тата ина

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuola Grande di San Marco Ospedale di Venezia putti sulla facciata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 03:58, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biblioteca Marciana a Venezia facciata sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Venezia, ti amo.--Johann Jaritz 04:00, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volto Santo 2 Rio tera Maddalena Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volto Santo vera da pozzo Cannaregio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volto Santo Rio tera Maddalena Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 07:36, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volto Santo Cannaregio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 07:36, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statua di nudo maschile Museo Archeologico Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, even when I´m not fully convinced, third opinion appreciated. --Hubertl 08:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di San Leonardo a Venezia facciata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail and light --Daniel Case 05:55, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuola Grande di San Marco dettaglio facciata leone sinistro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scuola Grande di San Marco portale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natività di Maria Vergine a Cazzago portale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scuola Grande di San Marco in Venice, main facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Hmmm... the nominated candidate has a strange low-contrast milky appearance to it that I do not see in many of the other pictures of the same facad in the category. At review size, File:Venezia - Ospedale - Foto G. Dall'Orto, 2 lug 2006 - 03 retouched.jpg looks in some respects better, in some not. I would be inclined to open an MVR, unless a better edit of the nomination can be uploaded. -- Slaunger (talk) 15:00, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
• Great job with only a few changes to the RGB curves. I fixed it with pleasure. The scuola is parfatement described. And above all there is no one on the picture which is exceptional. Wolfgang has a secret weapon: he gets up early. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks a lot Archeo! Good job. I have an other secret, don't go for lunch :-)) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good job, Archaeodontosaurus. -- Slaunger (talk) 06:35, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Parliament

Hi, Just to say we're using your photo on our webpage http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/offices/bicameral/post/post-events/future-of-natural-gas/ Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.60.38.203 (talk) 14:59, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

@194.60.38.203: Please specify the author's name for correct attribution as the license requires - "Wolfgang Moroder at Wikimedia Commons". Thank you. 62.212.85.119 15:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Torre del Popolo" tower in Brescia, view from the "Piazza Duomo" square.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Scope must linked to category, not to picture. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Done Ooops, sorry --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:53, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Libreria Marciana in Venice, view from Piazzetta San Marco.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Libreria Marciana in Venice, facade on the seaside (South).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quadrifora a Cannaregio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:13, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Salvador Venezia Tommaso da Lugano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:13, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capitello Dame e Cavalieri Palazzo Ducale Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Johann Jaritz 06:02, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Appreciation

 Thank you Wolfgang, I teach ultrasound and appreciate the free use of your image.

Tina Samuel

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ladies and knights capital on the Doge's Palace (Venice), view from the seaside.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:00, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruga dei Oresi clessidra e compasso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 18:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca Vendramen a Fondamenta Vendramin ingresso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your image. IMO leaning out on both sides.--XRay 17:16, 2 June 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks! --Moroder 11:48, 3 June 2015 (UTC)  Support OK now.--XRay 06:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruga dei Oresi crociera numero 3 San Pietro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:47, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfleger Stadl Sankt Oswald, Südseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:27, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Esterno Hotel Danieli Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 09:35, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo del Selvadego in Venice, quadrifora on southern facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The distortion could be corrected --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Adoldo lapide sinistra Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statua di nudo femminile Museo Archeologico Venezia laterale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice focus where you need it most --Daniel Case 05:57, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo icone Venezia ingresso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great work ... good, gritty detail --Daniel Case 05:57, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Adoldo dettaglio facciata Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:58, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Adoldo lapide destra Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:58, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruga dei Oresi crociera numero 19 allegoria giustizia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Old, but good.--Jebulon 19:09, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Comment Tks. The photo is recent ;-) --Moroder 19:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quadrifora a San Marco Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportArchaeo was right in VIC...--Jebulon 19:23, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portale romanico a Santa Croce Venezia visto dalla corte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portale romanico a Santa Croce Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:14, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruga dei Oresi lunetta numero 23 due santi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --ArildV 09:59, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio de la Pieta Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:36, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leone di San Marco rilievo Museo Correr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:31, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte Raspi da ponte de le do Spade a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 07:46, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cruiseship invading Venice and gondolas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think the color balance is wrong, the blue cast should be corrected, IMO.--Jebulon 22:35, 5 June 2015 (UTC) Comment Peut être q'il est mieux maintenant. Merci de ton avis.--Moroder 13:26, 6 June 2015 (UTC)better, but a bit yellow, now. Could you try something between too blue and too yellow ?--Jebulon 19:06, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Done Hope it suits you --Moroder 20:12, 8 June 2015 (UTC) SupportIMO, you've got it, thanks for patience.--Jebulon 11:26, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Salvador Venezia pala altare di Tiziano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support DOF not perfect, but nice colors. --C messier 08:06, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gondole sul retro del Palazzo Ducale Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 07:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Tank you الداكري (talk) 01:25, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statua angolo Rio del Palazzo Ducale Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:32, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruga dei Oresi o Ruga Rialto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the image needs more contrast and top right is overexposed.--XRay 11:57, 13 June 2015 (UTC) Done I fixed the OE. more contrast does not make sense here imo the lights and colours are very realistic. Thanks for the comment --Moroder 12:45, 13 June 2015 (UTC)  Support OK now. --XRay 17:48, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lunetta con uccello pescatore Fontego dei Turchi Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:17, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontego dei Turchi bassorilievo animali neobizantino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:47, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fondamenta de l'Osmarin Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:45, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Agnusdio, o dei Quattro Evangelisti, a Santa Croce ingresso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sorry, yes, it was a mistake. QI promotion. --Cayambe 12:30, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Marco Venezia portale nord con Nativitá.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. IMO DoF could be better. --XRay 05:52, 14 June 2015 (UTC) Comment Yes but only with analog photography, it does not make sense to use more than f/13 on a D800. Thanks for the review --Moroder 06:51, 14 June 2015 (UTC)  Comment DoF becomes better with more distance to the object (more local length) or a tripod and f/16 or using hyperfocal distance (german: Hyperfokale Entfernung).--XRay 07:00, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzetto Barbarigo and Palazzo Zulian Priuli on Canal Grande Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:49, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Ruga dei Oresi" arcade in Venice, view West.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:27, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:49, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte dei Frari Ca Cassetti Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 17:07, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di San Simone Grande Venezia campanile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:12, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lën de Nis a Urtijëi dansciuda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:33, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lën de Nis y luech de Nis a Urtijëi dansciuda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gondole sul retro del Palazzo Ducale Venezia Ponte della Paglia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:14, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pëc de Poz Urtijëi Picea abies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:44, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edicola con Madonna e lapide votiva Antonio Visetti 1737 Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I like the choise of perspective correction. --C messier 12:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Procuratie vecie in piazza San Marco a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:25, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanile della Chiesa di Santa Fosca dalla Salizada Santa Fosca Venezia .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:20, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Santa Chiara sul Rio Nuovo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:16, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte dei Bareteri a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good colours, lively composition --ArishG 14:13, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Retro del Palazzo Ducale Venezia Rio del Palazzo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bold perspective, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 17:18, 20 June 2015 (UTC)  Comment Thanks --Moroder 18:45, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fondaco dei Turchi Ingresso laterale di Federico Berchet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support A little CA and unsharp near the top of the arch, but otherwise nice angle and detail --Daniel Case 20:30, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Marco Venezia portale nord con Nativitá 2a versione.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 08:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ca'Cassetti palace, view with Ponte dei Frari bridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:01, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:34, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio de la Pergola canal in Venice. View to the Canal Grande.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:12, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:36, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Procuratie Vecchie building in Venice, view from West.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:26, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The fish market Pescaria in Venice view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Lack geocoding. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:19, 19 June 2015 (UTC) <!-

•  Comment I added the object location geocode to the camera location code. Thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:13, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
  
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:54, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akelei in Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:33, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jars in Malia Crete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:46, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio della Pergola o Ca Pesaro verso Canal Grande Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Two dust spots in the sky :-). Otherwise good. --Cayambe 17:38, 19 June 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Moroder 20:47, 21 June 2015 (UTC)Good quality now --Hubertl 05:38, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jars in Malia Crete detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality en nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The crypt Agora with roof from West in Malia Crete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The crypt Agora in Malia Crete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:57, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Lorenzo Fondamenta del'Osmarin Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMHO, it needs more contrast, it looks a bit flat. --C messier 11:07, 19 June 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 12:47, 19 June 2015 (UTC)  Support good quality. --C messier 11:29, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo dei Camerlenghi in Venice, view with Ponte di Rialto from NW..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery of Saint George Selinari Crete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and good composition --DKrieger 21:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quartier M in Malia Crete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Llez 20:51, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jars in Malia Crete the two.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jars in Malia Crete detail2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo dei Camerlenghi e Ponte Rialto a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It might be leaning towards right a little. --Ximonic 18:47, 21 June 2015 (UTC)  Comment The Palazzo dei Camerlenghi is leaning to the left, The brown building on the right is leaning to the right. Thats Venice and I don't think it can be fixed. The truth is in the middle ;-) . Thanks for the review --Moroder 20:59, 21 June 2015 (UTC) I think its ok. We talk about venice and would destroy more than really fix. -- DerFussi 05:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salizada San Provolo edicola votiva Antonio Visetti 737.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crisp detail --Daniel Case 05:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery of Saint George Selinari Crete steeple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Palace in Malia Crete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DKrieger 06:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madonna con bambino al Ponte dei Bareteri Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 14:25, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yenitsar Agha fountain on the Venetian walls Heraklion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:35, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weinberschnecke in Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A really good image but it should be cropped (a bit).--XRay 17:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks!--Moroder 18:17, 25 June 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Jkadavoor 08:36, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agios Georgios Selinari Monastery, main facade of church..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Two Seraphs Agios Georgios Selinari Crete.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:36, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elounda and Spinalonga Crete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:39, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal road to Knossos Crete beginning stairs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, foreground could be sharper. --Tuxyso 18:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Venetian Fortress in Heraklion Crete NE side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 12:24, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bronze gold dagger of Malia Crete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:29, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carduus on Crete with insects.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:38, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yenitsar Agha fountain on the Venetian walls Heraklion detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportRemembers me very good moments in this marvellous island. And this is a QI.--Jebulon 18:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

use of image

Thank you for sharing your beautiful photo of Spain (“View from Puente Nuevo bridge in Ronda Spain” © Wolfgang Moroder.), I am using it to accompany details of a spanish language course.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knossos in Crete west court.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carduus on Crete with bugs and flies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The beetles seem Scarabaeidae. Jkadavoor 05:42, 29 June 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks @Jkadavoor--Moroder 09:15, 29 June 2015 (UTC) QI enough for me. --Jkadavoor 15:05, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Venetian Arsenal in Heraklion Crete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:46, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

"Fat finger" in VI ?

Hi Wolfgang, my best Süd-Tyroler friend (not only because alone in scope...)

Could you please explain what you did here ?

Thank you very much in advance.

(Thanks for the marvelous pics from Crete too, you just show me what I did not saw in february !)

--Jebulon (talk) 09:56, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

hi Jebulon, yes something happened while I was working with my iPad the only device I have here in Eugenie le brains ( nice food!). I really apologize. I greatly appreciate the work you did at the Heraklion Museum and I saw that I couldn't do better than you without a tripod there. Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:35, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Food by Michel Guérard ? Wow ! Enjoy, if weather not too hot ! About Heraklion museum, I did even not upload my own version of the Malia bees, neither the Disk of Phaistos, very good, but not as good as the C messier version... But what a museum !!--Jebulon (talk) 11:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

The only reasons why a South Tyrolean would be here is that he could be on the way to Lourdes or on the Saint James trail to Santiago or that this was the end of the trip ;-)) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:40, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Should I guess ? Anyway, God bless you !--Jebulon (talk) 09:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

I, luckily stopped there and you bet it was worth it. Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street vendor on pickup truck near Kokkini Hani Crete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jars South Propylaeum Knossos Crete.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportYes ! (a red link to be corrected in the categorization)--Jebulon 21:27, 30 June 2015 (UTC)