User talk:Moroder/Archives 2014-2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piz Boe cresta strenta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 18:09, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gherdëina da Secëda ju.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piz Boe 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Florstein 16:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col Turond Sella.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 16:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vallon del Foss .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 16:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vallon del Foss bottom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 16:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iron grate in Venice San Marco.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piz Boe and Catores guide Manfred Stuffer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 06:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arabba from Sella group.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zabriskie Point foto

[edit]

I send you a link to your photo of Zabriskie Point, I used it in my genealogical blog: http://lakewierzycki21.bloog.pl/id,340670907,title,Zaborowski,index.html Thank You! Lucja Wierzycka By the way, there is a Wierzycki Lake in Canada, in memory of my uncle Wierzycki, a prospector.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peter Runggaldier Alpine skier.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piz Boè Lec Dlace Pas dl Lech Dlace.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:08, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lech Dlace.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:08, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use image for BMJ article

[edit]

Dear Dr Moroder

I'm Sky a 4th year medical student from University of Edinburgh, and am currently writing an article on Obstetrics Ultrasound for the student BMJ (British Medical Journal). I have come across your image (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6b/Nuchal_translucency_Dr._Wolfgang_Moroder.jpg) and am wanting to incorporate this into my article, how do I go about requesting for permission? I will not be profiting from this article and the author (you) will be accredited in the article as well.

Hope to hear from you soon. Thanks!

You are very wellcome to use all my images on wikimedia as long as you cite my name. Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:02, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! West view from Piz Boe.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:16, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col Alton eastern face.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good!--Llorenzi 21:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canale Col d Alton.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Colonna and Punta delle Fontane.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:42, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Val Lerghia Plan de Roces.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and amazing pic! --P e z i 18:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verena Stuffer downhill racer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. (Please add the template for personality rights.) --XRay 10:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)✓ Done, thanks --Moroder 16:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welche Berge?

[edit]

Hi Moroder, Hast du eine Idee --> File:Temp 564236.jpg und File:Temp 514564.JPG ? LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done LG--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:21, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Danke! --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piz Boe South West view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:49, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piz Boe South view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 15:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Summit of Piz Boè.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:32, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wayside shrine Col dala Pelda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wayside crucifix in Selva.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 14:06, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peter Rungggaldier Alpine Skier 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verena Stuffer alpine downhill racer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 18:33, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wöhrerkapelle in Feldthurns.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 19:40, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Virgin Mary in the parish church of Feldthurns.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woodcarved statue of Jesus in the parish church Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well done, nice camera --The Photographer 18:26, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I used your photo

[edit]

Hi-

Just to let you know that I used one of your photos on my blog. Much appreciated. :)

http://carolbalawyder.com/2014/04/18/what-do-these-writers-have-in-common-2/

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wöhrerkapelle Heilige Katharina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good --A.Savin 15:58, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wöhrerkapelle Altar Detail Arme Seelen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wöhrerkapelle Fenster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:55, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wöhrerkapelle Altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, however, the verticals are leaning in yet. --Cccefalon 17:53, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Köster Klausen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skiing on Sass Pordoi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Few haloes, but ok. --Mattbuck 21:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wayside shrine Col dala Pelda fresco right side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:05, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ultrasound Image

[edit]

I used your image in a Powerpoint about ultrasound scans, and I mentioned you. Thank you very much, Dr. Moroder.


Joana Bertran, Catalonia, 14 years old.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kreuzwegstation N 12 Pfarrkirche Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 15:51, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

art history project

[edit]

Dear Sir, Per your request, I am notifying you that I am using your picture. I am using it in a slide show for an art history presentation and will make sure to cite you as the owner. Thank you for making it available. Yours Truly, An Undergraduate Student

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wayside shrine Col dala Pelda fresco with Madonna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piz Seteur Sellatürme.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality., great shoot --J. Lunau 10:06, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle Uçhisar in Cappadocia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support some blur at the right, nevertheless OK for QI, nice view otherwise --A.Savin 14:25, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fairy chimney dwelling in Ukisar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soganli Valley Cappadocia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:22, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fairy chimneys in Cappadocia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 14:22, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Claraia" photo

[edit]

Hello, My name is Kumi Kasai. I am an editor for the magazine "The 4.6 Billion Year Journey of Earth" which is published by Asahi Shinbun, Japanese reading newspaper company.

Now, we picked "Claraia" up for our topic. In our magazine, I would like to use your image of "Claraia" . We Will mention you as the author.

Thank you.

Yours sincerely,

Kumi Kasai PublicationsDivision, Asahi Sinbun 5-3-2 Tsukiji Chuo-ku, Tokyo JAPAN 104-8011 e-mail:hyakka@asahi.com

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Uchisar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support FP for me --Christian Ferrer 17:35, 26 April 2014 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the encouragement --Moroder 09:09, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Köster detail of main building Klausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hot air balloon ride at sunrise in Cappadocia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:09, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
lens distortion --The Photographer 00:53, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:View of Uchisar.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View of Uchisar.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hot air balloon ride at sunrise in Cappadocia 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hot air balloon ride at sunrise in Cappadocia 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Arctic Kangaroo 22:29, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument to the Turkisch women rear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain on a square in Kaisery.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dantercepies y Col Bustac 15 january 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Had not seen that Poco had already reviewed the image. :-) Ok now. --Cayambe 16:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New Mosque Yeni Camii Istanbul.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciragan Palace 2014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wooden building on the Bosphorus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:44, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mariahimmelfahrt des Sephan Kessler.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good for QI --Cccefalon 07:05, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woodcarved statue of Jesus in Feldthurns .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:30, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Köster Dependence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:27, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dolmabahçe Palace, view from the Bosphorus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain of Ahmed III Topkapi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:05, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosque in Istanbul internal view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sorry but need description and categories (according to the coordinates the New Mosque--ArildV 07:34, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Comment You are a son of a b... You knew exactly which Mosque it is, (I saw your picture). I needed a lot of research because I forgot the location... Thanks for the review --Moroder 20:27, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Of course not Moroder!! It's a year since I was in Istanbul and it is not very easy to recognize a single mosque, and I've never been inside the New Mosque. I had of course told you if I knew that it was different mosque, I always try to help if I can (I've btw added both categories and descriptions for some of your other Istanbul photos. Please assume good faith.--ArildV 21:03, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Comment I was just kidding... but I gladly accept some tricks in our WP community--Moroder 21:12, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Ok!--ArildV 21:15, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old wooden housings on the Bosphorus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A great photo. Yet it is tilted ccw and two blurry birds need to be cloned out. --Cccefalon 19:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks!--Moroder 21:43, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:49, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wooden building on the Bosphorus 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 06:48, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domed church in the Soğanlı Valley.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Although I feel it can and should be slightly sharper. --Arctic Kangaroo 06:49, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Three churches domed hidden church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:18, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain at Sahabiye madrasah Kayseri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:27, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dolmabahçe Palace and Sultans gate april 19 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:27, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument to the Turkish women in Kaisery.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:38, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulip garden in Istanbul.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 08:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nicht ärgern über File:Fairy_chimney_in_Cappadocia.JPG bei QIC

[edit]
Weit entfernt von QI, aber > 30 mal im Wikiversum und hundertfach im Web auch kommerziell verwendet

Im Vergleich zu der Zeit, als mich der leider verstorbene Mbdortmund für QIC begeisterte, haben sich da einige Dinge entwickelt, die kontraproduktiv sind. Insbesondere haben sich einige Leute da die Stammtischhoheit erobert, die anscheinend nicht so wirklich das Konzept verstanden haben und besser bei FP untergebracht wären. Ich mische mich inzwischen nur noch selten ein, insbesondere dann, wenn ich glaube, daß Ablehnungen blödsinnig begründet werden. Ich hoffe, ich habe richtig verstanden, daß du über meine Begründung nicht sauer bist. In dem Bild steckt sicher einige Arbeit, um es halt zu retten. Ich selbst habe Tonnen von Fotos, die ich nicht zur Wahl stellen würde, die aber imho trotzdem nützlich sind für die Wikipedia.
Um in QIC wieder mehr Vielfalt hineinzubringen, damit nicht immer nur das 100ste Baudenkmal oder die 1000ste englische Vorortbahn vorgestellt wird und der Stammtisch aufgebrochen wird, habe ich mir überlegt, ob man die Teilnahmebedingungen nicht dahingehend ändern sollte, daß für je fünf (oder eine diskutierbare andere Anzahl) Eigenvorstellungen mindestens ein Fremdvorschlag, z.B. aus den neuen Uploads der letzten Woche, gemacht werden muß. Wäre das eine Sache? -- Smial (talk) 11:39, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, hab mich nicht mit deinem Kommentar sondern mit denen von Jebulon und wie sehr oft von Mattbuck geärgert. Dein Kommentar war sicher richtig: keine Brillianz, das Licht war in dem Moment einfach schlecht, deshalb ahbe ich das Bild auch zurüchgezogen. Inzwischen habe ich aber bemerkt dass der Begriff Underexposed für dark missbraucht wird. Wenn aber sämtliche Pixel im Histogramm erhalten sind is es doch nicht underexposed. Oder?

Deinen Vorschlag finde ich sehr gut wenn auch etwas arbeitsam, man hat ja sonst schon die Hände voll zu tun;-) LG --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Peter in Schrambach Feldthurns 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:20, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Castle Uçhisar in Cappadocia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castle Uçhisar in Cappadocia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hot air balloon start in Cappadocia 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me. --Halavar 21:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pieta Sankt Laurentius Felthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit soft, but good for QI --Poco a poco 12:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Peter in Schrambach Feldthurns 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CA on the roof and left wall. Heuschrecke 19:58, 9 May 2014 (UTC)  Comment There is no relevant CA anywere in the picture --Moroder 22:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)...ok, I think I'm wrong. Good quality then (but note a small dustspot near the roof which I marked.) --Heuschrecke 08:45, 10 May 2014 (UTC)✓ Done Cleaned 3 DSs. Thanks for the hint and the review[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Köster Dependence detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 11:11, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Satish kumar

[edit]

Satish kumar

Das Staubkorn ...

[edit]

... ist weg, aber jetzt ist das Bild plötzlich zu dunkel? --Sitacuisses (talk) 22:38, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, fogendes passiert. Ich verdunkle das Bild um dust spots besser zu sehen und habe dann vergessen das Bild aufzuhellen. Grüße --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:31, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Étienne Bassac Groin vault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI IMO --Malchen53 12:15, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holzer couloir input.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments One dust spot to be removed. --Cccefalon 07:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks! --Moroder 08:59, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Oswald in Kastelruth am Herz Jesu Sonntag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Slightly tilted ccw. Also the tree at the right side is very blurry and covers a considerably big space. Could you consider to apply a new crop to get rid of a big portion of the blurred leaves? --Cccefalon 10:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)✓ Done I cropped off the leaves but I don#t really see how I could change the vertical lines. Thanks for the review --Moroder 06:33, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
On a second look: The church tower is tapering; so it is not a photographic issue. Thank you for cropping the right side. No issues left and QI. --Cccefalon 07:16, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Peter in Schrambach Feldthurns 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 09:57, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baroque tombstones in Istanbul.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Vallongia Selva.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There's a dust spot in the sky top left.--Sitacuisses 15:18, 14 May 2014 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks --Moroder 17:30, 14 May 2014 (UTC) ✓ Done Reverted darkening --Moroder 18:27, 15 May 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Sitacuisses 23:07, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The output cone of Holzer couloir in the Val Lasties, NNW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
waterfront house of Afif Pasha at Yeniköy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Langkofel group in spring.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:34, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sa la crëeusc sun Resciesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:49, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Sebastian chapel in Feldthurns 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 13:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farmhouse Puntleider North face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 12:42, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puntleider farmhouse in Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 12:42, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puntleider farmhouse in Feldthurns entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 11:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Resciesa in spring.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter und Sullmannhof in Schrambach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:21, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frühmesser Feldthurns.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:21, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woodcarved polychromed statue of Jesus in the parish church Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:14, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sullmann Hof und St Peter in Schrambach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good.--ArildV 09:06, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ansitz Raffenberg Feldthurns Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:11, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ansitz Raffenberg Feldthurns Portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ansitz Raffenberg Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:59, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wohnhaus Wöhrmann Feldthurns Fresko Hauptfassade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:13, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Feldthurns.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, nice composition and very pitoresque --Slaunger 18:31, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use your photo SR 98 Arizona

[edit]

I'm a teacher at the University of San Diego who has just finished a semester class on Museum Studies with my anthropology students. They have designed a student-exhibit about the Horse in American Indian Culture. We would like to use your photo as a mural on a wall to help the room and the things in the exhibit feel like they are out of doors in the natural landscape of Arizona. We will give you credit for the use of this photo. Please respond in order for me to show the Dean that we have approval for this beautiful piece. We are NOT doing anything commercial and this is a small, 450 sq ' gallery with no admission fee. It is free for viewing the exhibit for anyone who is either on campus or from San Diego to see. The exhibit will open on October 2. Thank you! Susan Enowitz susanevan@sbcglobal.net

Very happy to help you with your exhibition --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:22, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farmhouse Rainer Feldthurns windows with iron grates.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:19, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martyrdom of Saint Andrew in Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:36, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farmhouse Rainer Feldthurns.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use of photo

[edit]

Indianz.Com has used your photo of the Navajo Generating Station to accompany a story about coal-fired power plants in Indian Country.

http://www.indianz.com/News/2014/013910.asp

Please contact indianz at indianz dot com if you object or have concerns. Thank you.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziernfeld Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziernfeld Feldthurns Westansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mullngütl Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 17:08, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marienkapelle am Wohnhaus Fürholzer Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 17:08, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farmhouse Nagele Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 17:08, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mary

[edit]

beautiful photo! May be using it on www.setonmagazine.com God bless you!

Hallo Wolfgang! Vielen Dank für dein Kommentar auf QIC. Die Beschreibung war in der Tat etwas knapp, ich habe diese mal etwas ergänzt und Wiki-Links hinzugefügt. Vielleicht schaust du noch mal drüber. Deinen Kommentar bzgl. der Kategorisierung verstehe ich allerdings nicht. Ich habe unter Category:Munsterkerk, Roermond kategorisiert - genauer geht es nicht. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mair in Guln Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schrott in Schrambach Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 16:23, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kier in Garn Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Iifar 06:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please apply perspective correction... Just kidding! QI imo. --Lewis Hulbert 17:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farmhouse Rainer NW face detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 16:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farmhouse Rainer Feldthurns Western face.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 16:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farmhouse Rainer Feldthurns South face.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 16:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farmhouse Rainer Feldthurns SW face detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 16:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Servus Moroder,
das Bild erscheint mir etwas dunkel. Habe einen [Versuch] gemacht, falls es dir gefällt verwende es einfach. LG --P e z i (talk) 21:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Servus, genre, Danke. LG vom Gardasee Wolfgang.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt George in Schnauders Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt George in Schnauders Feldthurns fresco remnants.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Georg in Schnauders Feldthurns Portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:03, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pflersch Tribulaun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:21, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Die Hölle in Pflersch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:21, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lajen aus Tagusens.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:21, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stlupëc sun Resciesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stlupëc y ciuc sun Resciesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Florian in der Klamm Feldthurns Westseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House N 5 Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 03:50, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Saint Andrew church in Feldthurns.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Andrew church in Feldthurns.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ploner Obergarn S.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tribulaun Pflersch SW detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Usage of Zabriskie Point panorama

[edit]

Hello!

I would like to inform you I have just used your photo of Zabriskie Point at my Facebook fanpage 'Places in Zabrze (Poland) you haven't got any idea about'. Link: www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=511042925695977&set=a.385695194897418.1073741829.383897218410549 :) Thanks! Best wishes!

Kamil Żbikowski

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosaico traslazione San Marco Venezia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments High quality and EV. --ArildV 18:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wöhrerkapelle Feldthurns Kreuzwegstationen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pflerschert Tal Richtung Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nice composition, huge resolution. The house in the middle and the mountain tops in the right are overexposed, but these are minor problems. --Siipikarja 08:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tribulaun Pflersch SW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 19:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Lovely scenic shot. Nice composition. --Siipikarja 08:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mair in Guln Feldthurns 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments What is that in the bottom right corner of the image? -- KTC 11:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Fixed, thanks for the hint --Moroder 13:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC) Support I think it's ok --Christian Ferrer 04:50, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campo San Barnaba a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panni stesi a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice picture. --Kadellar 12:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca marciana Venezia dettaglio facciata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 15:41, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bauernhaus Troger Gulln Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --P e z i 15:52, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bachmann in Schrambach Feldthurns Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --P e z i 22:34, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Virgin Mary in ermine dress in the parish church of Feldthurns.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --P e z i 22:34, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swastika Stein in Pflersch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --P e z i 14:34, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ca Pesaro dettaglio facciata 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:17, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca marciana Venezia facciata est.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good quality. But please remove dust spot (notice). --P e z i 20:05, 14 June 2014 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks!--Moroder 20:46, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca marciana Venezia dettaglio facciata 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca marciana Venezia dettaglio fregio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 17:06, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca marciana Venezia arco della facciata figure maschili con cornucopia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ploner Obergarn Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:23, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedhofskapelle Feldthurns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. But I would suggest to crop half of the sky. --P e z i 22:34, 13 June 2014 (UTC)✓ Done Didn't crop too much. Die Wolken geben mehr Stimmung imo. Thanks for the review--Moroder 22:08, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

[edit]

Wolfgang Moroder,

Using your image of Margaret Mary Alocoque and Jesus for videos that I produce for religious non-profit. Providing you credit. Thank you so much for the beautiful image.


Joseph J. Rutchik (jjrutchik@yahoo.com)

It's my pleasure --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:54, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte San Stin Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a dust spot to be removed (see annotation). I also saw 3 tiny bird spots; just consider if you want to remove them. --Cccefalon 15:31, 15 June 2014 (UTC) ✓ Done Killed the DS but missed the (poor) birdies ;-). Thanks --Moroder 16:56, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finestra al ponte San Stin Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 17:03, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca marciana Venezia arco con angeli femminili.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, still symmetry could be improved croppin the right a bit --Poco a poco 11:33, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca Marciana a Venezia facciata est 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Giustinian Lolin Canal Grande.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:17, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca marciana Venezia statua di nudo femminile e gabbiano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Johann mit Friedhof in Tschötsch Pfeffersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florian Fuchs 08:19, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca marciana Venezia balaustra nudo maschile Ercole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 20:49, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rilievo scena mitologica Biblioteca Marciana Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca Marciana a Venezia facciata telamone ingresso sinistra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:54, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca Marciana a Venezia facciata telamone ingresso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:54, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allegorical figure on the campanile Chiesa Santa Margherita Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca marciana Venezia statue di nudi maschili.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Just ok, still some remaining areas. I think that the reason for the fil size is the noise in the sky --Poco a poco 18:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wohnhaus Wöhrmann Feldthurns hauptfassade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Peter und Sullmannhof in Schrambach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:59, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrwidum Feldthurns 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:24, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mosaico traslazione San Marco Venezia.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mosaico traslazione San Marco Venezia.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rainy day in Venice Biblioteca Marciana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:29, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Feldthurns Saint.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:41, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Feldthurns Saint 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:41, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Feldthurns Pietá.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:04, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Archivio di Stato di Venezia 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Stae on the Grand Canal sunny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hof Boden in Pflersch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:11, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca marciana Venezia altro dettaglio fregio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Cccefalon 17:07, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca marciana Venezia balaustra nudo maschile Ercole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:13, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca marciana Venezia nudo maschile balaustra2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality now. --Cayambe 15:16, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Foto Dantercepies

[edit]

Sehr geehrter Herr Moroder, wir möchten Ihr Bild der Bergstation des Dantercepies verwenden. Bitte nennen Sie uns Ihre E-Mail-Adresse damit wir Ihnen zeigen können wie wir es verwenden möchten. Vielen Dank. Holger Homberg. info@noe.de

--HolgerHw (talk) 13:56, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Angel left Urtijei.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Angel left Urtijei.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 02:02, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Angel right Urtijei.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Angel right Urtijei.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 02:44, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt in Feldthurns innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Procuratie nuove a Venezia dettaglio facciata Caffè Florian.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. One dustspot yet to be removed, I made an annotation. --Cccefalon 08:52, 21 June 2014 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks! --Moroder 09:19, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:58, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holzstatue der Jungfrau Maria in der St. Magdalena Kirche Tagusens Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:47, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence church in Feldthurns side altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:37, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statua della Fortuna scultore Bernardo Falconi Punta della Dogana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Two dustspots in a photo of good quality. --Cccefalon 09:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)✓ Done You won't believe it but those bastards regrow after I kill them... Thanks!--Moroder 11:31, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. Sure, I believe you ... sometimes I wonder how a dustsport can suddenly appear in a camera-lense-system which hasn't been opened for lense change since weeks. --Cccefalon 12:25, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frauenschuh Cypripedium calceolus Bula Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. But it is really " This image is a panorama consisting of multiple frames that were merged in software" or did you just accidently copy-paste the template? --Cccefalon 12:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)✓ Done It's a wrong c/p. Thanks --Moroder 13:03, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca Marciana Venezia mascherone ingresso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa delle Zittelle e tre oci Giudecca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, but several dust spots to be removed yet. See my notes. --Cccefalon 07:41, 22 June 2014 (UTC)✓ Done Thans a lot. --Moroder 21:53, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. Apologies for late review, it slipped through my eyes. --Cccefalon 10:19, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Procuratie nuove a Venezia dettaglio con allegorie femminili.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Rifesser Brixen Bressanone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --P e z i 20:42, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Rifesser Brixen Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --P e z i 20:42, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca marciana Venezia facciata dettaglio nudo maschile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 19:50, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belltour of San Pantalon Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some dust to remove --Cccefalon 12:59, 25 June 2014 (UTC)✓ Done There must be a worm in the saving process of PS which makes them grow ;-) --Moroder 16:13, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Giudecca e magazzini del sale Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok, nice view but the left part are not very sharp.--ArildV 09:55, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Albions Lajen Südansicht.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:59, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Urtijëi ududa da Bula ju.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 14:39, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water transport in Venice at Rialto bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gothic relief Virgin Mary Jesus saints Corte nuova Castello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca marciana Venezia dettaglio facciata centrale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, though I don't like the crop at the bottom. --Smial 09:30, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PalazzoFlangini sul Canal Grande a Venezia dettaglio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --P e z i 15:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unsere Liebe Frau Lajen Fassade.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments One little bastard --Cccefalon 05:54, 27 June 2014 (UTC)✓ Done Killed the beast --Moroder 21:32, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:00, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]