User talk:Miguelrangeljr
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:41, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
File:Rio São José dos dourados meridiano sp.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
viniciusmc (talk) 14:32, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Salto do urubupunga.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
viniciusmc (talk) 14:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Antes da uhe ilha solteira.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
viniciusmc (talk) 14:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Peroba 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
viniciusmc (talk) 14:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Peroba.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Peroba.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
viniciusmc (talk) 14:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Morro do diabo 2.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Morro do diabo 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Morro do diabo 2.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
viniciusmc (talk) 14:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Cerrado morro do diabo.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Cerrado morro do diabo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cerrado morro do diabo.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
viniciusmc (talk) 14:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Morro do diabo.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Morro do diabo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Morro do diabo.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
viniciusmc (talk) 14:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Mata do rio s j dos dourados meridiano sp.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
viniciusmc (talk) 14:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello Miguelrangeljr.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
--viniciusmc (talk) 14:39, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
RE:
[edit]É preciso que a autorização seja enviada para a equipe OTRS. Pra isso basta seguir os procedimentos descritos em Commons:Email templates/Consent. --viniciusmc (talk) 15:12, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- Se você não é detentor dos direitos autorais do vídeo, então também não o é do printscreen. --viniciusmc (talk) 15:13, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- Siga os procedimentos descritos em Commons:Email templates/Consent. O Commons também não aceita imagens sob licença CC BY-ND 3.0, favor se informar melhor sobre o conteúdo aceito pelo projeto antes de carregar novos arquivos. --viniciusmc (talk) 20:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Morro do diabo florido.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
viniciusmc (talk) 20:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Jaguatirica s j d dourados meridiano sp.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
viniciusmc (talk) 21:14, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
RE:
[edit]Agora você aguarda resposta da equipe OTRS. Antes deles confirmarem a autorização você não pode carregar o mesmo arquivo novamente, já que ele foi marcado como violação de direitos autorais. --viniciusmc (talk) 21:29, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Desmatamento alto paraná.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Vera (talk) 00:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
RE:
[edit]Explicação mais clara a respeito de quê, exatamente? Esse link mesmo que você passou diz que todo o material está sob copyright e não deve ser reproduzido sem autorização. A resposta da equipe OTRS também não é instantânea, são vários casos para avaliar e você deve aguardar até que cheguem no seu. --viniciusmc (talk) 02:53, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- As fotos não são suas, já que a própria origem indica que foram tiradas de outras fontes. Como foram marcadas como violação de direitos de autor, você só deve remover a marcação se comprovado que possui autorização ou que a licença da imagem permite que ela seja reproduzida aqui. --viniciusmc (talk) 03:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Selva misionera.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Selva misionera.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Materialscientist (talk) 00:14, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello Miguel,
About this change and that change.
Did you suppress the {{Category redirect}} because you want to recognize those 2 species to follow a certain source (maybee Gregorin (2006))?
Because, we follow Mammal Species of the World (2005) which does not recognize those 2 species.
In all the cases, if you want to recognize them, you should have put the species name as sorkey: [[Category:Alouatta|discolor]] instead of [[Category:Alouatta]]
Best regards Liné1 (talk) 05:48, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Dear Liné, I really followed Gregorin (2006). The present howler monkey was photographed in Alta Foresta, Northern Mato Grosso, thus, according Gregorin (2006) is Alouatta discolor. On Wikipedia, there is a specific page to Alouatta discolor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alouatta_discolor. Is not valid to use the category "Alouatta discolor" on Wikimedia Commons, since there is a page considering this species on Wikipedia?Miguelrangeljr (talk) 18:24, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Miguelrangeljr
- Don't worry, it is valid to create a category for a species partially recognized (not by MSW...}}
- But you did not add any summary to you modification (bad boy ;-)) nor to the page
- By the way, you also forgot the sorkey: [[Category:Alouatta|discolor]] instead of [[Category:Alouatta]]
- If you want, I will provide the needed informations in the page, that you could verify
- Cheers Liné1 (talk) 05:48, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- I tried to explain all this in Category:Alouatta discolor and Category:Alouatta ululata. Could you check if the explaination suits you ?
- Cheers Liné1 (talk) 08:23, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I think we reached a consensus. I changed the category in this image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alouatta_belzebul.jpg too.Miguelrangeljr (talk) 10:45, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Miguelrangeljr
- Of course we found a consensus: we are both admirable contributors ;-)
- Just one last thing: you perhaps should:
- rename your picture to avoid contributor to move in in the future to Category:Alouatta belzebul
- change the name in the picture from "Red-handed-howler" to "Spix's red-handed howler" (don't forget the Portugues name)
- perhaps you should say why you think it is a "Spix's red-handed howler" and not a "Red-handed-howler" (the color on the back ?)
- Sorry to be so boring, but your picture is the only one we have => it must be perfect in its description.
- Cheers Liné1 (talk) 11:16, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I think we reached a consensus. I changed the category in this image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alouatta_belzebul.jpg too.Miguelrangeljr (talk) 10:45, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Miguelrangeljr
Copyright status: File:Large-headed capuchin (Sapajus macrocephalus) 3.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Large-headed capuchin (Sapajus macrocephalus) 3.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, JuTa 23:40, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
woolly monkey
[edit]i am curious why you moved my images of brown woolly monkey to silvery woolly monkey... My zoo lists the species as Lagothrix lagotricha not Lagothrix poeppigii.. I don't know why you think they are the other.. but i would think the zoo knows what species they keep.. I don't want my photos misrepresented, so can you tell me why you feel it is silvery.. --Ltshears (talk) 19:34, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]
The image File:Bothrops itapetiningaea.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bothrops itapetiningaea.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Featured Picture removal
[edit]Dear Miguelrangeljr,
as you may already know the user Commonists has been revealed recently as a sockpuppet of the blocked user Livioandronico2013. You can read more about this on the FP talk page. In the discussion on the same talk page it has been decided to remove all of his votes on Featured Picture nominations. This means that all these nominations must be re-evaluated after removing that vote. Unfortunately, this means that some pictures which were Featured Picture do not have the necessary count of ‘support’ votes anymore and therefore are no longer Featured Pictures. I am very sorry but this does also apply to this photo uploaded by you. Please do not take this personally! This is not meant as an offence. We just want to tidy up the whole Livio/Commonists’ affair and this also has some bad consequences. Please do not blame this on me (or other responsible users) but on the sockpuppet user who has made this whole mess. ;–) Of course you are invited to re-nominate your photo at any time!
Sorry again and best regards, --Aristeas (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2022 (UTC)