User talk:MJJR/archive 2012 (part 1)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search



MJJR - User talk: ARCHIVE 2012 (part 1)


Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mazagon Lighthouse R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me (I would like to see all the tree on the left) --Lmbuga 19:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanzarote Arrecife Ayuntamiento R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 16:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanzarote Arrecife Castillo de San Gabriel R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes--Jebulon 17:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanzarote Arrecife R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment It has a little tilt. --Iifar 13:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done Tilt corrected -- MJJR 16:25, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
imo looks good now. --Iifar 08:58, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanzarote Arrecife R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Iifar 17:36, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanzarote Arrecife UNED R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Iifar 17:39, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanzarote Arrecife R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Aleks G 21:20, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanzarote Arrecife R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Aleks G 19:54, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanzarote Arrecife R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit too high ISO, but nice. --Mattbuck 14:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanzarote Arrecife Castillo de San Gabriel R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Aleks G 23:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Napoleon R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me (and the extension piece on the right probably could and be removed). ;) --Aleks G 00:04, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostende Halve Maan R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, perhaps too yellow (15:51 h.?)--Lmbuga 19:38, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 Comment Thanks for the promotion. The photo was taken on an afternoon in january with a sinking sun (sunset was at 17:06 h that day!), which explains the rather yellow light. -- MJJR 22:26, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. Sorry, in Galicia is impossible a sunset at 17:06, we have the time (hour) of Spain, but we should have the time of Portugal (one hour earlier). In Galicia the sunset would be at 18:06, or perhaps at 19:00--Lmbuga 12:43, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostende Slipway R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 22:17, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostende Mortierbunker R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks ok to me. --Iifar 06:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lange Nelle R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 09:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc2017 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:08, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc2018 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:08, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MV CMA CGM Alaska R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Iifar 17:25, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Rozenhoedkaai Winter R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Question White balance? Too violet or cyan?--Lmbuga 17:20, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done I tried to fix the white balance (the lighting conditions were rather difficult that evening) -- MJJR 10:20, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Good quality now, I think. --Óðinn 19:40, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc2635 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 22:12, 16 f 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruges in Winter R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 08:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc2621 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Iifar 07:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU186 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice dynamic photo. --Ralf Roletschek 10:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MV Presto R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and very nice.--ArildV 22:16, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MV Presto R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 22:16, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lobos R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --99of9 05:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blauwe Toren Junction R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Looks pretty good, only one thing bothers me a little. Why is the high voltage A-mast (on the left) leaning to the left? --Iifar 17:20, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done Good question! I tried to make some correction... -- MJJR 22:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC).
Looks better, but A-mast is still leaning a bit to the left. --Iifar 07:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
I tried to correct again, but the other poles are then leaning to the right. Or it's an optical illusion, or the A-mast is really not completely straight? -- MJJR 21:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 Support - ok to me. These things are never quite straight. Mattbuck 23:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc2017 R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Niabot 23:37, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc2017 R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Niabot 23:37, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MV CMA CGM Nevada R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 21:54, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MV CSCL Mercury R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 21:54, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spoorlijn 51 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Vassil 01:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Polderlandschap R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, even if the crop of the tree at left could be discussed maybe. QI anyway.--Jebulon 22:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Brugge buste Vives R01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 21:33, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blankenberge Hoeve Raaswalle R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Inspite of persp. distortion left, and some acceptable noise, it is a QI overall (no overexposure of the white walls, and that is very difficult, IMO). --Jebulon 14:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Dromos R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Corniche R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 21:14, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Nile R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and very nice. --Moonik 07:29, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Nile R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice. --Moonik 07:29, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Nile R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:31, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Nile R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:31, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Nile R09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:30, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Nile R10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:31, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Aga Khan Mausoleum R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 09:13, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Aga Khan Mausoleum R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Nile R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Nile R17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 06:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Naj Suhayl Gharb R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice composition.--ArildV 20:51, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Naj Suhayl Gharb R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice composition.--ArildV 20:51, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Mövenpick R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 06:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC) its no good - its very good! --Ralf Roletschek 12:22, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Aga Khan Mausoleum R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me.--Jebulon 22:52, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Naj Suhayl Gharb R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 16:47, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Kitchener Island R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 21:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Aga Khan Mausoleum R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 21:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan First Cataract R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice. --Moonik 16:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Nile R18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 16:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Aga Khan Mausoleum R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice! May be a good FP candidate when sharpened a bit imo - A.Savin 21:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Felucca R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and QI--Lmbuga 22:14, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Elephantine Island R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:41, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Kitchener Island R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:22, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Elephantine Island R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:10, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Felucca R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 09:06, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Philae Temple R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good! DimiTalen 05:51, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Kitchener Island R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nie and QI for me. --Alchemist-hp 17:30, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Nile R22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Philae Temple R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --LC-de 16:37, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Philae Temple R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 00:23, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Philae Temple R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could have done with greater DOF, but good enough. --Mattbuck 00:23, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Nile R23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:34, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Nile R24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:35, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Philae Temple R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 18:15, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Philae Temple R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:25, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Old Dam R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. DimiTalen 07:18, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Old Dam R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine. DimiTalen 07:18, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peugeot 504 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Nile R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and good quality. --Iifar 09:24, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Kings Island R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Iifar 09:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Nile R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc2021 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 20:17, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc2021 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 20:17, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Elephantine Island R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 16:30, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Haan Strand R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Haan Strand R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hammamet-Sud beach R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hammamet-Sud beach R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MV Tanja R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 06:01, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice and interesting. --Vassil 03:38, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Souq R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good composition.--Vassil 03:42, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barge Were Di R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good photo. --Florstein 16:16, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karnak R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Frank Schulenburg 03:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Kings Island R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice composition. --NorbertNagel 21:53, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor West Bank R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:07, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor New Corniche R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:07, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor New Corniche R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:28, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graciosa R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Cayambe 20:34, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Souq R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:30, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Temple detail R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sluis Kaai R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Selbymay 20:46, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karnak R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The "tower" looks tilted!? (and the tourists... only Wikipedia photographers should be allowed at such places:-) --Berthold Werner 17:42, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done Tilt corrected. About the tourists: yes indeed! On the other hand, they give a good idea of the impressive scale of the column... -- MJJR 20:38, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:52, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abu el-Haggag R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality imho. The shadowed part on the left is a bit noisy, but still QI --Berthold Werner 17:42, 8 May 2012 (UTC) --Berthold Werner 17:42, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Luxor Souq R01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Luxor Souq R01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxor Nile R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 23:39, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Old Cataract Hotel R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Bgag 22:38, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Nile R25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Selbymay 20:50, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanzarote Castillo de las Coloradas R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Iifar 16:04, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanzarote Castillo de las Coloradas R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:21, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abu el-Haggag R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:24, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karnak R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:10, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flemish House R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -- JLPC

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damse Vaart R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me, but little dust spot (see note)--Lmbuga 21:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done Thanks. Dust spot removed. -- MJJR 09:22, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damme R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice--Lmbuga 21:25, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanzarote Montaña Roja R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:07, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flemish House R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:07, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Luxor R07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Luxor R07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanzarote Orzola R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 06:46, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Houses Potterierei R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 23:16, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Houses Potterierei R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 23:16, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damse Vaart R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice picture, but I wonder if a pespective correction is necessary for the trees on the left (could be wrong), otherwise QI, Poco a poco 20:25, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 Comment The trees are really leaning -- MJJR 08:50, 22 May 2012 (UTC) Very nice landscape, very interesting perpective, good colors and DoF, + I like it very much !!--Jebulon 15:53, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Ezelstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:00, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Kipstraat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:00, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 7861 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Cayambe 16:53, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Begraafplaats Blauwe Toren R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Clear and good image. --Cayambe 14:23, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Corniche R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. - A.Savin 21:07, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aswan Corniche R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:11, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 7861 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also good. --Cayambe 20:23, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU646 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 05:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU646 R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2810 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharpness could be better, but overall ok --Poco a poco 21:48, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU646 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also here can the sharpness be improved, but good for QI --Poco a poco 21:48, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 7714 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shame about the catenaries, but ok. --Mattbuck 23:18, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Gouvia Venetian Shipyard R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments low sharpness - why f/20? --Carschten 20:26, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 Comment the hope was to get better sharpness, but in fact it turned out differently... MJJR 21:30, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:16, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Gouvia Venetian Shipyard R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments here the same... --Carschten 20:26, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:16, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Gouvia Beach R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:16, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Town Hall R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:16, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Old Fortress R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:16, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Gouvia Venetian Shipyard R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --JLPC 08:46, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Gouvia War Monument R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Gouvia War Monument R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Faliraki R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good & nice. --Selbymay 20:24, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Faliraki R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good & nice. --Selbymay 20:24, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Theotoki R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:01, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Lighthouse R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:47, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Annunziata R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:53, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Gouvia Street R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:29, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB EMU984 R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:32, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2021 R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice -- George Chernilevsky 21:59, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2021 R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 10:02, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 7861 R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:36, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 7861 R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 15:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 1846 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 22:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Gouvia Street R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The cropped car at right is unattractive... but the nice street scenery and the good technical quality make it a QI for me. --Cayambe 10:34, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Town R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent --Steinsplitter 21:37, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Town R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good work. --Selbymay 21:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jetairfly R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:09, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brussel Legermuseum R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lot of cars but good quality. --Selbymay 11:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brussel Legermuseum R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 11:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brussels Cinquantenaire R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. DimiTalen 06:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Gouvia Bay R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition --Haneburger 14:55, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brussel Legermuseum R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perhaps a greater distance would be better but still good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:53, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brussels Cinquantenaire R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Cayambe 12:36, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Miami Beach R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 14:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Locs 7859+7733 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:06, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Locs 2609+2623 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 18:20, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Gouvia Bay R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:28, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corfu Gouvia Beach R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:28, 30 June 2012 (UTC)