User talk:MJJR/archive 2010

MJJR - User talk: ARCHIVE 2010

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest Palace of Arts R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 22:01, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest National Theatre R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 21:29, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest Szent Istvan Bazilika R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment One small dustspot found ;-) --Berthold Werner 09:28, 25 January 2010 (UTC)  Done Dust spot removed. -- MJJR 19:34, 25 January 2010 (UTC) Good. --Berthold Werner 16:16, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agios Georgios Selinari R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 07:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agios Georgios Selinari R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me.--Jebulon 22:32, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kramer Allrad R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good... except for the vehicle at the letf which is a bit distracting. --Cayambe 07:00, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vai R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 23:14, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vai R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 23:15, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Toplou R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Berthold Werner 11:56, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Toplou R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and otherwise also very good. --Cayambe 08:27, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Toplou R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Berthold Werner 11:56, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Itanos R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Jovianeye 04:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Itanos R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Jovianeye 04:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Itanos R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments okay --Carschten 19:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agios Nikolaos R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. ZooFari 02:07, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agios Nikolaos R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. ZooFari 02:07, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sitia R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very sharp and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 08:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sitia R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also very good. --Cayambe 08:34, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palekastro R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments If you look at the water and the clouds on the left side, the picture looks distorted --Mbdortmund 23:35, 11 June 2010 (UTC) --  Done Justified remark, thanks! Actually the picture was not distorted, but more than two degrees tilted to the right. I uploaded a new version. -- MJJR 19:49, 12 June 2010 (UTC) looks better now --Mbdortmund 22:27, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palekastro R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Jovianeye 21:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palekastro R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Jovianeye 21:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palekastro R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Jovianeye 21:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sitia sloop R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. Lycaon 13:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palekastro R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good.--Mbz1 00:24, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ierapetra R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interresting view. Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:58, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goudouras R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lack of sand, but QI to me --Jebulon 23:50, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Kapsa R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Jovianeye 21:26, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goudouras R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Trace 21:02, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palekastro R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The little tower with the bell seems not to be straight, is that real? --Mbdortmund 23:42, 11 June 2010 (UTC) --  Comment The bell tower seems a little bit lopsided indeed, but it's more an impression than reality. The picture is not distorted or tilted. -- MJJR 19:49, 12 June 2010 (UTC) No tilt, I think. To me, it's a QI. --Jebulon 21:57, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ierapetra R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 07:01, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ierapetra R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 10:29, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Kapsa R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice place, good and sharp image. --Cayambe 13:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Kapsa R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and good. --Cayambe 16:17, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Kapsa R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 16:17, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ierapetra R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Smial 22:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roofs of Bruges R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice view, did you try to expose the lighter parts a bit darker? --Mbdortmund 22:11, 27 June 2010 (UTC)  Done -- MJJR 08:33, 28 June 2010 (UTC) nice --Mbdortmund 10:34, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amiras Memorial R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:26, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loutra R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 09:07, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amiras village R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --George Chernilevsky 09:05, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Amiras Memorial R02.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amiras Memorial R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 09:11, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ano Viannos R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but it would be better to reduce sharpness level in your camera because there are visible sharpness artifacts on the picture (dark contours around light objects and vice versa). --Kae 08:25, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Amiras_Memorial_R01.jpg

File:Amiras_Memorial_R01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Walter Siegmund (talk) 10:27, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lentas R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 05:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Markt Noordzijde R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. I love this city, really.--Jebulon 23:50, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Gruuthuse R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Archaeodontosaurus 08:17, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Arentshuis R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need a crop on the left side IMO, because of the notice board. --Jebulon 23:48, 12 July 2010 (UTC)  Done -- MJJR 07:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Good now, thank you. Did you agree with my wish ? --Jebulon 08:34, 13 July 2010 (UTC) Yes, the notice board was a little bit disturbing indeed. -- MJJR 18:55, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lentas Marina R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 05:17, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge OLV Westportaal R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good. --Cayambe 08:25, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Dijver R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice urban shot. --Elekhh 00:56, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loutra R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 18:23, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Arentshuis R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. (the gate at the right may also be interesting) --Berthold Werner 06:09, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lentas Marina R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me.--Jebulon 21:48, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gortys R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Might benefit from a little bit of perspective correction. Rama 01:22, 17 July 2010 (UTC)  Done Perspective corrected -- MJJR 15:21, 17 July 2010 (UTC) I think it's good now --Ayacop 15:04, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crete Landscape R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Cayambe 14:54, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SNCB Class20 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 13:41, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spoorlijn 51A R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lacks some DOF, but QI, though -- Smial 15:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damme Kerk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI IMHO. —Jagro 22:58, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horst kasteel R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice view --Mbdortmund 23:38, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SNCB Class20 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks definitely QI to me. Petritap 12:29, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damme Schellemolen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aarschot Sint-Elisabethkapel R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Mattbuck 09:18, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horst kasteel R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Composition is really good but picture tilted a bit CW --Mbdortmund 07:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)  Done Tilt corrected -- MJJR 08:50, 10 August 2010 (UTC) good --Mbdortmund 16:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horst kasteel R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice view --Mbdortmund 07:04, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horst kasteel R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 15:05, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest Vajdahunyad Castle R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Lmbuga 20:52, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damme Kerk R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 14:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

FP-nomination

Hi Marc! Congratulations for your very illustrative and well-lit locomotive picture. I dared to nominate it as FP. Good luck --Ikiwaner (talk) 18:51, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Jeruzalemkerk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments perhaps cropping of the half red traffic sign would look better? --Mbdortmund 21:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)  Done cropped -- MJJR 09:38, 16 August 2010 (UTC) good --Mbdortmund 10:20, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Kruis kerk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments sharp, good colours and details --Mbdortmund 21:07, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Godshuizen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:31, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Jeruzalemkerk R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok -- Smial 00:58, 17 August 2010 (UTC)  Support Good -- George Chernilevsky 07:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SNCB Class20 R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iotatau 21:20, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loc7798 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 06:58, 17 August 2010 (UTC) no: excellent ->FP-nom! --Ikiwaner 18:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eupatorium maculatum R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good... please, give name of location and geotag in the file description. --Cayambe 07:14, 17 August 2010 (UTC)  Comment Location is Bruges, Belgium. As the picture is taken in a private garden, no geotagging is added for privacy reasons. -- MJJR 16:09, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damme Kerk R12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me--Jebulon 07:53, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snellegem Molenvijver R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments great view but house and building look a little bit tilted/distorted CW --Mbdortmund 21:14, 15 August 2010 (UTC)  Done Tilt corrected, image restitched -- MJJR 13:31, 16 August 2010 (UTC) Great view. Not entirely sure it's level, but no real way to tell. Mattbuck 14:08, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisseweegs Vaartje R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:25, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bratislava Stary Most R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, very good technically (I wonder I don't see any CA...)--Jebulon 22:17, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Devin Donau Panorama R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Areas of overexposure, but otherwise good. Mattbuck 21:30, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nieuwpoort Jachthaven Panorama3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good work --George Chernilevsky 08:01, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breskens Vuurtoren R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- Smial 00:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IJzendijke Molen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Jebulon 22:09, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breskens Vuurtoren R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments That's Holland. Hup Holland!--Jebulon 22:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoofdplaat Scheldedijk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:59, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IJzendijke Molen R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 22:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenduine beach R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments "Avec la mer du Nord pour dernier terrain vague"... Good--Jebulon 22:43, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breskens Port Scaldis Panorama R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good -- Felix Koenig 12:31, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biervliet NHKerk R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine. Mattbuck 18:57, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bratislava tram R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO nice, but it is not Tatra T3, but Tatra T3SUCS (in fact T3Mod) — Jagro 16:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for the useful explanation about the tram types! -- MJJR 22:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)  Comment No problem to add closer description in Slovak. :) — Jagro 22:59, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bratislava Tram R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Ankara 23:54, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bratislava Tram R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Lmbuga 23:13, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bratislava Danube R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:22, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bratislava Danube R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good--Jebulon 11:02, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Caleta R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please help poor reviewers by giving different names to your pictures (only one different print -one numeral- in three images). I will not review because risk of mistake. --Jebulon 23:10, 20 November 2010 (UTC) Sorry!  Done Caption completed -- MJJR 22:49, 21 November 2010 (UTC) * Good--Mbz1 03:25, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Caleta R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please help poor reviewers by giving different names to your pictures (only one different print -one numeral- in three images). I will not review because risk of mistake.--Jebulon 23:10, 20 November 2010 (UTC) Sorry!  Done Caption completed -- MJJR 22:49, 21 November 2010 (UTC) Good--Ankara 22:58, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Caleta R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, with a description good enough ;).--Jebulon 00:32, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa Adeje R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good IMO. Nice composition. --Avenue 11:49, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Punta de las Gaviotas R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 11:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gran Canaria International Airport R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and useful--Jebulon 10:14, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garachico R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ja.--Jebulon 01:04, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge old houses R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Correct picture and good enough quality despite the weird exposure choice (automatic mode?). With a smaller aperture the image would probably be sharper. -- Alvesgaspar 19:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tenerife Playa El Duque R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 07:11, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Punta de las Gaviotas R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 07:10, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tenerife Fishing Boat R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imho --Berthold Werner 15:03, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Punta de las Gaviotas R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 18:20, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tenerife Landscape R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:56, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Caleta R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 10:56, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de Fañabé R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good composition --Mbdortmund 15:50, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tenerife Playa El Duque R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments like to be there --Mbdortmund 15:49, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tenerife Playa El Duque R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good composition, even if the details aren't very high... --Carschten 18:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Caleta R09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 07:39, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Caleta R10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A nice scene. The cropped rocks at lower right are perhaps not ideal, but the composition is better than many panoramas. QI IMO. --Avenue 03:43, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Punta de las Gaviotas R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me QI and more. --Alchemist-hp 23:35, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Punta de las Gaviotas R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok to me now. --Cayambe 20:00, 22 December 2010 (UTC)