User talk:Llez/Archives/2019 (3)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ficus elastica - La Palma 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ficus elastica - La Palma 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ficus elastica - La Palma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Problem in VI

Problem in your appointment this morning on the date. Regards--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coast - Los Cancajos 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:50, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park - Hacienda San Jorge - Los Cancajos 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coast - Los Cancajos 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition. --Moroder 05:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Howea belmoreana 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coast - Los Cancajos 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:48, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coast - Los Cancajos 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coast - Los Cancajos 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xeroleuca degenerans 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cherry trees - Sasbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cherry trees - Sasbach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cherry trees - Sasbach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cherry trees - Sasbach 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xeroleuca degenerans, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support. Useful. Ivanhercaz (talk) 16:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 17:07, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunum amygdalum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:48, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nunnery Erlenbad - Sasbach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nunnery Erlenbad - Sasbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:22, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cherry trees - Sasbach 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:23, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cherry trees - Sasbach 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Callithrix penicillata - Maroparque 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Callithrix penicillata - Maroparque 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marginella lutea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:59, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Aubach - Lauf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:59, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Footpath - Sasbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:59, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nunnery Erlenbad - Sasbach 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:59, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nunnery Erlenbad - Sasbach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:59, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eclectus roratus(eclectus parrot) head (male).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• @Archaeodontosaurus: This is better? --BoothSift 05:36, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 06:13, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Engina alveolata, shell, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:40, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Info As it is not a fully grown shell, I changed the scope to "juvenile" --Llez (talk) 05:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 03:17, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prodotia iostoma, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 03:17, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marginella irrorata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marginella lutea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:50, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prunum amygdalum (Almond marginella), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 01:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prunum apicinum (Common Atlantic Marginella), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 18:54, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment I changed the link from page to category for better comparison and I added the vernacular name --Llez (talk) 07:18, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 01:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Volvarina philippinarum (Philippine Marginella), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and only one -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, it is not the only one, it was not linked corrcetly. I changed the link from the page to the category and I added the vernacular name --Llez (talk) 06:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
• still support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:03, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Boothsift 06:35, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marginella cleryi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:12, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment I changed the link from page to category for the compaison with all pictures --Llez (talk) 06:57, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
• still support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Boothsift 06:35, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Biomphalaria peregrina, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful and used — Rhododendrites ^talk |  12:45, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Babelomurex gemmatus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nebularia acuminata (Acuminate Mitre), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard - Sasbach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:36, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard - Sasbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 05:59, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyard - Lauf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:21, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nunnery Erlenbad - Sasbach 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:21, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dupotetia alabastra 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:38, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nunnery Erlenbad - Sasbach 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:41, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nunnery Erlenbad - Sasbach 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:42, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nunnery Erlenbad - Sasbach 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:39, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nunnery Erlenbad - Sasbach 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:06, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schloss Aubach, Lauf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used. Ivanhercaz (talk) 14:44, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 18:48, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dupotetia alabastra, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 18:24, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunus avium duracina - flowers - Sasbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:47, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nunnery Erlenbad - Sasbach 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:48, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nunnery Erlenbad - Sasbach 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:48, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dupotetia alabastra zonata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:06, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protea cynaroides - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:06, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leucospermum lineare × cordifolium - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:08, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calathea warscewiczii - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vanda tricolor var. suavis - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:07, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dioon spinulosum - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:14, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echinopsis mamillosa var. kermesina - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Engina zonalis (Banded Engina), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:57, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:46, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Imbricaria astyagis shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
  

 Info The correct name is not Ziba asyagis but Imbricaria astyagis (see also file name and description). Ziba astyagis is a synonym, see here and also the correspondant Wikipedia article. Therefore I changed the scope from Ziba astyagis to Imbricaria astyagis. --Llez (talk) 07:24, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemophos tinctus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:10, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crocodylus porosus - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:17, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dupotetia alabastra ssp. zonata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 06:18, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gemophos tinctus (Tinted Cantharus), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pergola - Plaza de España - Tazacorte 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pergola - Plaza de España - Tazacorte 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poicephalus senegalus - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Motacilla cinerea - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petrosaurus thalassinus - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intellagama lesueurii - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:28, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Engina trifasciata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Fluffy89502 ~ talk 16:59, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spixia martensii 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spixia martensii, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gemophos auritulus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:11, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemophos auritulus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:46, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marginella pseudosebastiani, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marginella pseudosebastiani 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:07, 16 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 18:16, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ara militaris - Maroparque 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ara militaris - Maroparque 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Japeuthria ferrea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Supportbr/>Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:00, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Japeuthria ferrea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope and used. --Andreas Stiasny (talk) 10:02, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stairway - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:14, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantern - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:20, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please check the image. It looks like tilted CW. Please have a look to the background too. --XRay 05:11, 19 July 2019 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Llez 05:42, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xerosecta arnaizi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:25, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunum cinctum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 11:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vase - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:36, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyäne mit einem geraubten Lamm - Albert Güldenstein - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prunum cinctum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunum marginatum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:11, 21 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 13:02, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metal sculptures - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:05, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leucanthemum vulgare - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:48, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cantharus leucotaeniatus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:51, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bull - Isidore-Jules Bonheur - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:51, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bull - Isidore-Jules Bonheur - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:52, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stoneware columns - Wolfgang Trust - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prunum marginatum (Thick Marginella), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:03, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone lantern - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Did you go to Japan? Coool, I'm excited about seeing your Japanese photo set :)Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:39, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone lantern - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:39, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torii - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit soft but good enough --Podzemnik 06:39, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cantharus leucotaeniatus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 06:25, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xerocrassa cretica, "coastal form", shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Meets all criteria -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:35, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhinocoryne humboldti 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone bridge - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:57, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:57, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone lantern - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Did you go to Japan? Coool, I'm excited about seeing your Japanese photo set :)Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:39, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone lantern - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:39, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torii - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit soft but good enough --Podzemnik 06:39, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quasimitra puncticulata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:43, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrobates tinctorius - Wilhelma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:44, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pithecia pithecia - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:43, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flora - Georg Schreyögg - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:43, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Quasimitra puncticulata (Punctured Mitre), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Boothsift 06:20, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quasimitra variabilis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tringa totanus - Aachener Tierpark Euregiozoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The bird's legs are not very sharp. But the head and body are nicely sharp.--Famberhorst 15:12, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strigatella aurantia ssp. aurantia (Orange Mitre), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:03, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:39, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quasimitra variabilis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:09, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erblehenhaus - Stühlingen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 27 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Sky a little bit grainy, minor halos at the roof. --XRay 05:11, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erblehenhaus - Stühlingen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:13, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lophochroa leadbeateri - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --大诺史 07:39, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nebularia ferruginea 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 10:56, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Townhall - Ewattingen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:33, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Townhall - Ewattingen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:33, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cumbre Nueva - Cloudfall 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cumbre Nueva - Cloudfall 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Janthina pallida 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eurypyga helias - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:10, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrrhura perlata - Karlsruhe Zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:25, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Murex ternispina 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Murex ternispina 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Janthina exigua (Dwarf Janthina), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 07:46, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Addisonia excentrica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:22, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euomphalia strigella 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guaruba guarouba - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Psilaxis oxytropis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:06, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrobates tinctorius - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:06, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trichopodus microlepis - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Psilaxis oxytropis, shell, brown form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:23, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Architectonica modesta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:19, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrobates tinctorius var. azureus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:38, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrrhura perlata - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:06, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euomphalia strigella, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Architectonica modesta (Modest Sundial), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pseudonebularia cucumerina 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:57, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrrhura perlata - Karlsruhe Zoo 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:26, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Baar - View from Fürstenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyrrhura perlata (Crimson-bellied parakeet), dorsal side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:12, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Not actually dorsal side is it?. Lateral/side view or, as I say, 'showing back feathers' (I use 'showing chest feathers' and not 'ventral' if I feel a bird deserves two scopes (like here). We don't seem to have an agreement about this on VI Llez, Archaeodontosaurus . BTW I've commented before for butterflies that ventral is incorrect for butterflies with wings closed. Charles (talk) 10:04, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support We bring everything back to Man. Your anthropocentric habit is not good, but it is universally understood. We are not in the context of scientific publication but we want to reach a wide audience. That is why it is acceptable to take some liberties. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:33, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyrrhura perlata (Crimson-bellied parakeet), ventral side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:14, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudonebularia cucumerina (Kettle Mitre), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:15, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Imbricaria flammea 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Foudia madagascariensis - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:21, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrobates tinctorius - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:30, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrobates tinctorius var. azureus - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:19, 5 August 2019 (UTC)  Strong support When the image is enlarged to full size the high level of moisture in the depicted environment and on the frog's skin is almost palpable to the viewer. Especially the frog's legs display an intensively blue, nigh unearthly sheen. Even if kept in captivity, this is an impressive image of a rare amphibian! -- Franz van Duns 10:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Imbricaria flammea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalidos antsepokensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:04, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kalidos antsepokensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria --Ercé (talk) 07:35, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pseudonebularia fraga 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:52, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roseomitra incarnata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:41, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Balcones de la Avenida Maritima - Santa Cruz de La Palma 14.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Balcones de la Avenida Maritima - Santa Cruz de La Palma 14.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudonebularia fraga (Strawberry Mitre), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Liotinaria peronii (Péron's Liotia), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chondrula bergeri, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Andreas - Neudingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:25, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasthaus zum Hirschen - Sumpfohren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:25, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bathyliotina nakayasui, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria --Ercé (talk) 07:30, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Boothsift 18:12, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Imbricaria conularis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:20, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Andreas - Neudingen -Organ gallery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:19, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Andreas - Neudingen -Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pyrrhura perlata - Karlsruhe Zoo 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pyrrhura perlata - Karlsruhe Zoo 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Imbricaria conularis 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Andreas - Neudingen - Baptismal font.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:08, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Andreas - Neudingen - Lectern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Camera shake visible in the lower part --Uoaei1 08:12, 15 August 2019 (UTC)  Info It was not a camera shake but a stacking error in the HDR. It is corrected now. Please discuss --Llez 09:03, 15 August 2019 (UTC)  Support Good now --Uoaei1 15:04, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Andreas - Neudingen - Chancel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Imbricaria conularis, shell, form with conspicuous lines.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:05, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Imbricaria insculpta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:52, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Andreas - Neudingen - Statue of the Sacred Heart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit noisy but OK --Podzemnik 05:52, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Andreas - Neudingen - Pulpit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:52, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Imbricaria conularis, shell, form with conspicuous dots.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:03, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Andreas, Neudingen, view from southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:40, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Andreas, Neudingen, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:40, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Andreas, Neudingen, organ gallery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Imbricaria astyagis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:22, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Andreas - Neudingen - Right side altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:20, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Andreas - Neudingen - Left side altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xeromunda vulgarissima, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Andreas, Neudingen, chancel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Andreas, Neudingen, lectern.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Andreas, Neudingen, baptismal font.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domiporta praestantissima 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:14, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Imbricaria insculpta, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Nice, useful and used--Boothsift 18:22, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Andreas, Neudingen, pulpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:07, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Andreas, Neudingen, Statue of the Sacred Heart.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:57, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Judging Wiki Loves Monuments India 2019

Hi Llez, Hope you are doing well. Like last year, we would love to have you as one of our honoured judges for the upcoming Wiki Loves Monuments, India 2019. We really hope you would accept this and help us with your expertise. Please do let us know if you have any particular ideas or anything else you think we should know. --Sumit Surai (talk) 15:36, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

• Thank you so much Llez for accepting our offer. Our jury rounds will open sometime during the first week of October. So it would not coincide with your holidays. Thanks again --Sumit Surai (talk) 12:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liegende Acht - Anja Oschwald 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:13, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liegende Acht - Anja Oschwald 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:13, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Andreas, Neudingen, left side altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Andreas, Neudingen, right side altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strigatella paupercula 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:01, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georg - Mundelfingen - Organ gallery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:01, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georg - Mundelfingen - Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:01, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fields - Blumegg - Ewattingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:13, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Domiporta praestantissima, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:48, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strigatella coronata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:28, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georg - Mundelfingen - Pulpit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:13, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georg - Mundelfingen - Chancel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:12, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyrenaearia cantabrica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:06, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pilgrimage and monastery church "Maria Loreto", Stühlingen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strigatella paupercula (Poor Mitre), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Meets the criteria --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:54, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Georg, Mundelfingen, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Meets all criteria --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:53, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Georg, Mundelfingen, organ gallery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Request geocode needed -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:50, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Done Sorry, careless mistake --Llez (talk) 21:44, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support. Meets all criteria -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:12, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Prunus avium duracina - flowers - Sasbach.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prunus avium duracina - flowers - Sasbach.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cancilla rehderi 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:47, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georg - Mundelfingen - Left side altar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:46, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georg - Mundelfingen - Left side altar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georg - Mundelfingen - Left side altar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:44, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georg - Mundelfingen - Right side altar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georg - Mundelfingen - Right side altar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:11, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georg - Mundelfingen - Right side altar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:11, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery church Maria Loreto - Stühlingen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check your image. CAs at the church tower, (dust) spots, posterized sky. --XRay 07:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)  Done New version from RAW --Llez 10:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Sorry being so late. --XRay 05:18, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strigatella coronata (Coronate Mitre), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Georg, Mundelfingen, chancel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:07, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Georg, Mundelfingen, pulpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quasimitra punctostriata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georg - Mundelfingen - Main altar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georg - Mundelfingen - Main altar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Georg, Mundelfingen, left side altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Georg, Mundelfingen, Statue of Saint George.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Georg, Mundelfingen, John of Nepomuk, flanked by two Apostles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cancilla rehderi (Rehder's Mitre), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helicella iberica, shell, white form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Georg, Mundelfingen, right side altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Georg, Mundelfingen, Statue of John the Baptist.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Georg, Mundelfingen, Mary with Jesus, flanked by St. Catherine and St. Barbara.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Imbricaria baisei 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georg - Mundelfingen - Main altar 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Georg - Mundelfingen - Main altar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Imbricariopsis punctata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vollmers Mühle Seebach - Grinder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vollmers Mühle Seebach - Mill wheel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Georg, Mundelfingen, central altarpiece "The Crucifixion".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Georg, Mundelfingen, upper altarpiece "St. George".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Quasimitra punctostriata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charpentieria itala nigra 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vollmers Mühle Seebach - Kleiekotzer - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:13, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vollmers Mühle Seebach - Kleiekotzer - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Georg, Mundelfingen, statue of St. Peter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:24, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Georg, Mundelfingen, statue of Mary Magdalene.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:24, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Imbricaria baisei, shell, pale form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Imbricariopsis punctata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:54, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domiporta filaris 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferguson TO-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! McCormick X4.50 T4i.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charpentieria itala ssp. nigra, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 08:55, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kleiekotzer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scabricola olivaeformis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deutz F1 L 514 (1950).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Primus PD2 (1953).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strigatella vexillum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MAN 2L3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:46, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kramer 414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:46, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
McCormick X4.50 T4i.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Meets all criteria -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:08, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Domiporta filaris (File Mitre), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Used and useful.--Peulle (talk) 08:59, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scabricola olivaeformis (Olive-shaped Mitre), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:01, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aff Siciliaria lamellata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! I.A.M.E. Pampa T 01 (1955).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deutz D 6005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neocancilla papilio 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allgaier R22 (1950).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hakotrac T6 (1963).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:54, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strigatella vexillum (Vexillate Mitre), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:48, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nunnery Erlenbad - Sasbach 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nunnery Erlenbad - Sasbach 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neocancilla clathrus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vollmers Mühle Seebach - Fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vollmers Mühle Seebach - Stove.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vollmers Mühle Seebach - Historical telephone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strigatella scutulata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:05, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Extatosoma tiaratum - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:05, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trachyaretaon carmelae - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:05, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theloderma corticale - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:05, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neocancilla papilio (Butterfly Mitre), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Albinaria grisea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not as sharp as usual? --Ermell 06:23, 4 September 2019 (UTC)  Info It depends on the size, this shell has only 1,5 cm in length! --Llez 06:31, 4 September 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:36, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kindergruppe mit Ziegenbock - Wilhelm Sauer - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:11, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jüngling - Christoph Voll - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 4 September 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theloderma corticale - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:25, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neocancilla clathrus (Clathrus Mitre), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:06, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Crocodylus porosus - Wilhelma.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crocodylus porosus - Wilhelma.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natica tedbayeri 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dichotomyctere fluviatilis - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Symphysodon aequifasciatus - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Symphysodon aequifasciatus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:18, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indomodulus tectum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:08, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osteolaemus tetraspis - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:05, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cebuella pygmaea - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cebuella pygmaea - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:03, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strigatella scutulata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Albinaria grisea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Jüngling" by Christoph Voll, Karlsruhe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Llez/Archives/2019 (3),

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Indomodulus tectum (Glowing Modulus), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dichotomyctere fluviatilis (Green pufferfish).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. But a bit dark. (and too green possibly?) Charles (talk) 08:55, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Done Colour correction --Llez (talk) 10:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Natica tedbayeri (Florida Moon Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Osteolaemus tetraspis - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Osteolaemus tetraspis - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Llez/Archives/2019 (3),

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pithecia pithecia - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:57, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Excidobates mysteriosus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrobates tinctorius var. azureus - Karlsruhe Zoo 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:57, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natica arachnoidea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vieja melanura - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerithideopsis pliculosa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 06:34, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IHC 353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:36, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cebuella pygmaea - Karlsruhe Zoo 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 06:34, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osteolaemus tetraspis - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 06:34, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trichoglossus haematodus deplanchii - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 06:34, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Natica arachnoidea (Spider Moon Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Albinaria maculosa, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Excidobates mysteriosus (Marañón poison frog) dorsal view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerithideopsis californica albonodosa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:04, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eva - Christoph Voll - Stadtgarten Karlsruhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:03, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vanellus coronatus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:02, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bubo scandiacus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:01, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Calathea warscewiczii - Wilhelma.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Calathea warscewiczii - Wilhelma.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goura cristata - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrobates auratus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astronotus ocellatus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 04:49, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuora flavomarginata - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olivella volutella 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrobates tinctorius var. azureus - Karlsruhe Zoo 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:29, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altolamprologus compressiceps - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:29, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vanellus coronatus - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:50, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trichoglossus haematodus deplanchii (Deplanche's lorikeet).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:41, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Question Can you be sure about the subspecies Llez for a zoo animal? It seems to only come from New Caledonia (HBW alive) Charles (talk) 17:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cerithideopsis californica ssp. albonodosa, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:01, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Eva" by Christoph Voll, Karlsruhe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Meets all criteria -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:03, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altolamprologus compressiceps (Compressed cichlid).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Demoulia abbreviata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hanooz 05:13, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trichoglossus ornatus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:20, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cebuella pygmaea - Karlsruhe Zoo 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:22, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altolamprologus compressiceps - Karlsruhe Zoo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:23, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)