User talk:Leningradartist

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Leningradartist!

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Leningradartist!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:51, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"All rights reserved © Sergey Ivanov1998-2010"--–Krinkletalk 23:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Martin H. (talk) 02:42, 10 April 2010 (UTC) I now read you user page. You may have the full copyrights for the reproduction, but do you have the written permission from the painter to publish their painting under cc-by-sa allowing everyone to reuse it for every purpose? The painter died 1978 as you wrote, so the painters copyright will exist untill 2049. --Martin H. (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer. Does this contract allow you to reuse the paintings in the book? Or does it allow you to grant permission to others. Example: The company Starbucks wants to use File:Semionov-Alexase35bw.jpg for a world wide advertising campaign, can they? --Martin H. (talk) 13:41, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • User Leningradartist who downloaded the file hold an exclusive rights to use the image in any territory in any form, or by any means during the term of copyright, including the right to grant these rights in whole or partially to a third party. Reason: a written agreement with the previous holder. Permission with detailed justification provided OTRS. First published by user at:

http://www.leningradschool.com http://www.leningradartist.com Sergei V. Ivanov. Unnown Socialist Realism. The Leningrad School. - Saint - Petersburg: NP – Print Edition, 2007. – P. 450. ISBN 5901724216, ISBN 9785901724217. Also Please see file discussion page for OTRS Permission. Kind Regard, Leningradartist (talk) 15:49, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you have the right to use the painting. But are you allowed by the painters (written) permission to grant a license that allows OTHERS to reuse the image for every purpose? Granting a license requires the written form, so please forward a written permission from ALL the paintings copyright holders (the painter or their heirs) to OTRS stating, that ALL the painters agree to the license, not you. Making a reproduction or enjoying the personal, non-transferable right to reuse a painting does not give you any right to license the reproduction to others. OTRS is not interested in your book but in a written permission from those painters. Commons forbids the upload of copyrighted artwork (Template:NoUploads), I realy wounder, why this was not enforced with your uploads. --Martin H. (talk) 16:23, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
  • User Leningradartist who downloaded files listed on user page are a full and exclusive owner of all copyrights for these pictures and hold an exclusive rights to use they images in any territory in any form, or by any means during the term of copyright, including the right to grant these rights in whole or partially to a third party. Reason: a written agreement with the previous holder.

First published at:

.

.

For verify Permission Please contact OTRS.


Hi Leningradartist, what are the life dates (birth/death) of the painter of File:Belousov-Piotr-Petrovich-Portrait-of-Young-Woman-7port1bw.jpg? --Túrelio (talk) 21:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Found out by myself from the photo of Belousov Piotr Petrovich. --Túrelio (talk) 21:23, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you may have seen already, I have tentatively put a small version of the painter her/himself besides her/his name into the description of a few of the painting; see File:Alberti-Portrait-of-Man-sk21bw.jpg‎. I hope that is o.k. for you, otherwise revert. --Túrelio (talk) 21:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Категории

[edit]

Пожалуйста, не добавляйте в категории о художниках категории Painters from Russia. Категории 20th century painters from Russia достаточно. Так вы захламляете главную категорию, где персон не должно быть.Shakko (talk) 11:07, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

template painting

[edit]

Thank you for your uploads. If you plan to do more of them, you can use template:painting that was specifically designed for artworks. It eases maintenance and translation, and make long file descriptions more readable. I have included it in one of your files (File:Semionov-Alexander-In-Christmas-7win30bw.jpg) Here are the changes I have made : [1]. This template offers quite many possibilities, but it can take some time to master it in detail. If you have questions about it, you can ask them on this page. Otherwise I suppose I can add the template for you on the files you have uploaded. Regards--Zolo (talk) 19:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you, it's look nice. As I understand, I can replace this template after uploding file only ? Uploding form have't this option for direct using ? Thank you once more for advice, Leningradartist (talk) 21:21, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • You can also type your text directly if you choose "basic upload form" at the bottom of the upload screen. But if you are not very familiar with the template, I am not sure it is very convenient. (The upload options should change in the near-future, so maybe it will become simpler to do that).
    • One more trick while I am at it, for oil on canvas paintings, you can type {{oil on canvas}} in the "technique" field. It translates automatically into the user's chosen language --Zolo (talk) 21:45, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You deserve this

[edit]
The Commons Barnstar
You deserve this barnstar not only for making available many photos and pieces of art under a suitable Commons licence, but also for always answering requests which question the legitimacy of your right to upload them here, and always doing so in a friendly manner. This is what Commons is about. russavia (talk) 20:59, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The category tree is hierarchic. You can not add Category:Leningrad School to Category:Landscape paintings of Russia because 99% of the image in Category:Leningrad School do not show any landscapes. Also not the other way, you can not add Category:Landscape paintings of Russia to Category:Leningrad School because a landscape painting of russia is not necessarily related to the Leningrad School. The same for all other categories that you permanently add. Additioanlly it is not nice to overemphasize your Category:Leningrad School as something like a 'very important category' in other categories with using the * as a sort key. Category:Modern art consists of much more, the subcategories are sorted alphabetically and not according to your personal taste. I suggest you to read Commons:Categories, including Commons:Categories#Over-categorization which is also a problem of some of your category additions. --Martin H. (talk) 14:35, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, the catetgory tree is a hierarchy. If Leningrad School (subsequently: LS) is a subgroup of "xyscape paintings of Russia" it will be ok to make it a subcategory - a children category. But no, this special type of painting is not a parent category to Leningrad School.
Regards, --Martin H. (talk) 22:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Категории

[edit]

Я вас умоляю, не создавайте категории, не убедившись предварительно, не существует ли она уже. В результате мы тут имеем например, категории landscapes OF russia, landscapes FROM russia, landscapes IN Russia. Лишнее пришлось выставлять на удаление, и все перекидывать в одно. Сейчас титаническим трудом мне удалось прибраться. Теперь у нас есть:

Второе. Я, конечно, понимаю, что ленинградская школа - это ваша специализация, но вашими усилиями теперь кажется, что ничего кроме нее в русском искусстве не существовало, если судить по викикоммонс. Поэтому ваше я все-таки отсортировала и сложила в отдельные

чтобы робкие венециановы и шишкины не тонули в этом обилии. Рекомендую вам проделать то же самое со всеми остальлными вашими загрузками. И, ради бога, не плодите сущностей! --Shakko (talk) 19:56, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I saw that you switched back to a previous layout of File:Semionov-Alexase35bw.jpg description. What was wrong ? I think that the version using {{Artwork}} provided as much information -even a bit more through {{Creator}}- and in the same time avoided some translation problems and made maintenance easier.--Zolo (talk) 01:17, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and Thanks. This happened because of my inexperience. I wanted to add "The Leningrad School" (as here), to which belonged to the artist. I will try to fix it. Leningradartist (talk) 07:25, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I think adding it in the "creator" is the best solution. Actually I was planning to request a bot to move all your painting uploads to the format with {{Artwork}}, but all creator templates will have to be created beforehand.--Zolo (talk) 09:27, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
user:SchlurcherBot has edited image descriptions to use {{Artwork}}. I think it is clearer. You can also translated template:part of into Russian if you want "part of Leningrad School" to appear in Russian in creator templates.--Zolo (talk) 02:03, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Свободные фотографии художников

[edit]
  • Способы, однако, есть.
  • Если вы знакомы с изображённым на фотоснимке художником или с его наследниками, вы можете получить доступ к оригиналу фотопортрета и проверить, кто владеет правами на этот оригинал. Часто бывает, что такой портрет выполнен в домашней комнате с применением таймера и автоматического спуска затвора, то есть правами владеет сам художник (и его наследники). Возможно, что художника фотографировали его дети (наследники). Возможно, что художник сам выстроил снимок и попросил домашних нажать на кнопку спуска. В таких случаях можно сканировать портрет и в лучшем качестве.
  • Если фотостудия выполняла подряд (а не авторскую съёмку), тогда правами владеет сфотографированный человек (и его наследники). Однако неясно, чем подтвердить такое правовое состояние.
  • Пожалуйста, не ссылайтесь на «Закон об авторских и смежных правах» — он давно утратил силу.
  • PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Пожалуйста, поясните, что Вы имеете в виду, когда пишите: «не ссылайтесь на «Закон об авторских и смежных правах» — он давно утратил силу». Что касается способов, о которых Вы пишите, то в свете последней дискуссии мне они представляются нереальными. Более того, если следовать сложившейся сейчас практике, то фото художника (или любой другой персоны) на Commons вообще загрузить нереально. Только в раздел с ОДИ. Поскольку совершенно невозможно доказать, что фото действительно сделано таким-то фотографом. Даже если на обороте будет стоять его подпись, а само физическое лицо будет готово подписать любые бумаги, что это его работа. А доказательства где? - спросит некий Виртуал. И, что самое обидное, будет в известном смысле прав. Потому что без доказательств пойдёт сплошная фальш (что, например, мешает на обороте снимка 50-летней давности поставить подпись дочери художника и взять у неё разрешение на публикацию в Интернете для увековечивания памяти отца), а при необходимости представления доказательств возникает другая крайность - полный тупик. Между тем Закон, как это ни покажется странным, больших препятствий для здравого смысла не создаёт. Просто правоприменительная практика ушла не в ту сторону. И даже не практика как таковая, а словоблудие. Слишком широко трактуются нормы, описывающие возникновение авторских прав. Слишком широко трактуется понятие «произведение искусства» и «творческая деятельность». С фото получается: нажал кнопку - и ты уже совершил акт творческой деятельности и создал произведение искусства (вернее, его создадут в фотолаборатории). Никакой подписи на мутном снимке 50-летней давности нет и никогда не было. Но изволь найти автора этого произведения искусства и взять у него письменную клятву, что это, во-первых, его работа, а во-вторых, письменное разрешение на использование этого произведения искусства. Впрочем, спасибо за Ваш совет и время. В обсуждении может что-то родиться. Leningradartist (talk) 23:16, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rumiantseva-Kapitolina-Alexeevna-12bw.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rumiantseva-Kapitolina-Alexeevna-12bw.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Lymantria (talk) 11:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shteinmiller-Nadezhda-Autumn-bouquet-buk154bw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

68.237.136.210 16:09, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

«Улица в Тырново» Г. А. Савинова

[edit]

Здравствуйте! Я только что увидел, что File:Savinov-Gleb-Alexandrovich-Street-in-Sophia-new283bw.jpg распределен Вами в Category:Cathedrals in Bulgaria и в другие кафедральные (соборные) категории. При этом в тексте указано, что заглавие этой картины Г. А. Савинова есть «Улица в Тырново». Я сразу распознал изображенное здание - это есть мечеть Баня Баши в самом центре Софии, единственная мечеть в городе. Для меня это точно, без сомнения, но приведу доказателсьства. Рекомендую просмотреть фотографии здесь в Category:Banya Bashi Mosque, особенно указанные в скобках.

  • В центре картины ясно виден минарет. Он принадлежит зданию и, следовательно, оно и есть мечеть, а не церковь.
  • Здание находится в Софии: с его левой стороны виден трамвай, а в Болгарии трамваи есть только в Софии (см. File:Sofia tram Jan 1995 - Flickr - sludgegulper.jpg и File:Moschee Sofia Zentrum 20090404 002.JPG).
  • Расположение этого здания такое же как у Софийской мечети - косо, под углом, а не параллельно улице (см. File:Sofia um 1970 Zentrum Moschee.jpg).
  • Нельзя утверждать, что когда-то здание было церковью - предназначение не менялось (см. статью).

Прошу проверить Ваш источник, а также контрольные источники. Надо удалить соборные категории. Необходимо в тексте пояснить местоположение здания - в Софии, а не в г. Тырново (Велико-Тырново с 1965). Если сам автор так (по ошибке) назвал свою работу, то название можно оставить, но нужно пояснить, что оно ошибочно. Всего наилучшего! --Elkost (talk) 22:44, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Опять я беспокою. Я только-что заметил, что само название файла содержит фразу Street-in-Sophia - видно, что местоположение здания в Софии не вызывало сомнения при выборе названия. Это однако не отражено при цитировании названия картины. --Elkost (talk) 22:50, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Спасибо, что обратили внимание. Как я понял из пояснений владельца картины, название «Улица в Тырново» ей ошибочно дал сам автор. На то, что в действительности на картине изображена улица в Софии, уже было обращено внимание и, как вы справедливо заметили, это даже отражено в названии файла. Поэтому заранее согласен с Вашим предложением внести в описание файла соответствующее уточнение. Всего доброго! Leningradartist (talk) 23:06, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Catalog-Autumn-Exhibition-62-bw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 19:07, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catalog-Exhibition-61-bw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 19:09, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catalog-Exhibition-Russian-Museum-60-bw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 19:11, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 11:09, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Прокомментировал на странице обсуждения номинации. Leningradartist (talk) 13:27, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please remain calm and collegial

[edit]

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  עברית  +/−


It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

Sealle (talk) 18:39, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • В очередной раз предлагаю Вам сосредоточиться на обязанностях, возлагаемых в этом проекте на загружающего (Commons:Рамки проекта/Доказательство) и предупреждаю, что продолжение хамских выпадов, сопровождающихся отзеркаливанием предупреждений, приведёт к блокировке Вашей учётной записи. Sealle (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked

[edit]

Sealle (talk) 19:36, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 15:28, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catalog-Fine-Arts-of-Leningrad-76-bw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 22:11, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]