User talk:LHcheM

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, LHcheM!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:18, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a picture of SbCl5

[edit]

--98.212.194.19 14:49, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Why? I bought it from Merck, with the original label as shown LHcheM (talk) 04:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Structure of Chloro(pyridine)cobaloxime formal charges removed.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 03:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Structure of 15-crown-5.png is disputed

[edit]
Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Structure of 15-crown-5.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Ed (Edgar181) 18:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Ah you're right. Terribly sorry for the stupid mistake, now corrected the structure. Thanks! LHcheM (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick fix. Ed (Edgar181) 11:43, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Top right cloud of the excellent diagram, the bottom of that cloud should refer to less- and more-branched "glycogen". Instead it refers to "gylcogen".

Oops sorry for the mistake, and thank you for your kind reminder! LHcheM (talk) 13:48, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong structures

[edit]

There's some errors in

: You didn't show the phosphate group of 6-phosphogluconic acid, and ribulose-5-phosphate is just totally wrong. besides that, keep up the good work. --131.243.46.164 01:46, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I'm sorry for the mistakes I've made. Thank you very much for your comment and spotting the error! LHcheM (talk) 11:04, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


File:Addition of O atom on C60 scheme.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aloneinthewild (talk) 19:04, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sample of succinic acid.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Michał Sobkowski (talk) 21:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well,it seems that there is a mistake in this picture : the position of GSSG and GSH are reversed. The GSH rather than GSSG should be oxidized by hydroperoxides. --Sunnyden

Thank you very much for noticing that! I am terribly sorry for the mistakes and have corrected it accordingly. LHcheM

File:Sample of Cyanocobalaminn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 11:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for the diagram, I find it helpful!

However I would like to suggest some improvements:

  • Would it be possible for you to export a SVG version of the diagram?
  • I find it confusing that the arrows of glycolysis are not "in one line" (The "Type A aldolase" arrow does not terminate at G3P, the arrows down of G3P are shifted to the right relative to those up from G3P). Could make all the arrows of glycolysis in one straight line?
  • Do you have information on Galactose synthesis in humans? As far as I know mucus is made up mainly from Galactose, somehow this must be synthesized? Or am I missing something here?

Thanks! Tony Mach (talk) 15:42, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, sorry for the late reply as I was hooked up with loads of stuffs outside of the web.

  • I used ChemSketch, which I was unable export SVG from, if you have any advice on that I would gladly do so!
  • for the tight space I just have to shift the arrows ectopically, but nonetheless I do think such arrangement gives a more integrative view of cellular metabolism, which is not pathway-specific but easily flow from one to another
  • Galactose cannot be synthesized in humans to my knowledge and must be acquired from diet.

Hope that helps! Thanks for the discussion! Thanks! LHcheM (talk) 11:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that your figure had the forward lactate dehydrogenase reaction (Pyruvate -> Lactate) producing NADH and Lactate instead of NAD+ and Lactate (since fermentation is used to regenerate NAD+ for stalled glycolysis). The mistake isn't there for ethanol fermentation so I think it was just an oversight for this reaction. Bryant.schultz (talk) 18:10, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Under glycolysis page, check the direction of the arrows in the diagram for the anerobic oxidation of NADH to NAD during the reduction of pyruvate to lactate. Teru.hayashi (talk) 01:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Pathophysiology of metabolic disorders of phenylalanine and tyrosine.png is disputed

[edit]
Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Pathophysiology of metabolic disorders of phenylalanine and tyrosine.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 19:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Source for sulfur/palladium/iodine compound?

[edit]

I was marveling at the image File:Solid state structure of the (I11)3- ion in (((16)aneS4)PdIPd((16)aneS4))(I11).png as seen in en:polyiodide. Where did you dig this up? I couldn't find a reference. -- Phyzome (talk) 01:53, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]