User talk:Krol:k
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
WLM
[edit]Bonjour et désolé pour le retard dans mes réponses (j'ai beaucoup de travail avec ce concours).
Pour les deux objets à Schwarzenburg, le problème vient de la tranformation des coordonnées entre le système suisse (CH1903) et le système lat-long (WGS84) et du manque de précision. Dans les deux cas, les coordonnées en système suisse pointent bien sur le bon objet (le Speicher et la ferme).
Pour le Bundeskunstsammlung, l'annuaire de la confédération indique les bureaux (là où se trouve l'office en charge des monuments historiques) alors que le bâtiment au Monbijoustrasse 51 est un petit musée situé à côté. C'est bien le musée qui est classé dans l'inventaire et non les bureaux.
Voila, j'espère avoir répondu à tes questions. A bientôt, Manoillon (talk) 08:38, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- J'ai vérifié les deux objets à Schwarzenburg sur la carte de la Cofédération. Dans les deux cas, la transformation des coordonnées entre le système suisse et WGS84 est correcte. Ce sont les données de base qui posent problème. (Voir: http://kgs-gis.admin.ch/kgs.php) Krol:k (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK, je vais relancer les autorités à Berne. Je te tiens au courant. Manoillon (talk) 19:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 15:11, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Bern Münsterplattform DSC06058.jpg was uncategorized on 27 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:11, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Bern Staatskanzlei DSC06047.jpg was uncategorized on 28 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:30, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Bern Staatskanzlei DSC06045.jpg was uncategorized on 28 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:30, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
[edit]Dear Krol:k,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Dein Vorschlag den Kategorienamen von Schwarzenburg zu ändern halte ich in dieser Form für äusserst schwerfällig und somit unpraktisch. Kategorienamen sollten einigermassen einfach und einheitlich sein, sonst wird deren Verwendung beim Hochladen von Fotos schwierig und aufwändig. Ich halte es im konkreten Fall für die bessere Lösung einfach eine entsprechende Kategoriebeschreibung zu verfassen, damit jedem klar wird, dass die Kategorie Category:Schwarzenburg für das Dorf und die Kategorie Category:Schwarzenburg BE für die ganze Gemeinde steht. Ein über 50 Anschläge langer Kategorienamen ohne Präzedenz ist jedenfalls wenig sinnvoll. DidiWeidmann (talk) 15:20, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 17:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)