User talk:Kalepom

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kalepom!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:22, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 13:30, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 11:08, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 11:37, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Plaques de rue...

[edit]

Bonjour Kalepom, et bons vœux pour '24.

Merci pour tes contributions aux plaques de Nantes (et autres villes).

Par contre, te serait-il possible de ne plus les mettre dans category:Plaque de rue ? Ce n'est pas la bonne ; d'une part, elle est en français et au singulier (ce qui ne se fait pas pour des catégories aussi générales) ; d'autre part, elle est une redirection de catégorie -qui devrait être automatique, mais elle n'a pas le modèle qu'il faut, vers le bon terme : category:Street signs in France qui, elle, n'est pas assez précise, puisqu'il existe category:Street signs in Nantes, category:Street signs in Lyon, category:Street signs in Saint-Herblain, etc., ou "category:Street signs in xxx (le département)" s'il n'y a pas plus précis (Laval n'en a pas, p.e.). Si tu voulais bien les y mettre directement en les téléchargeant, ça réduirait beaucoup le temps de travail de patrouille et je serais très content. Je suppose que tu constate, dans ta liste de suivi, qu'il y en a beaucoup qui sont re-catégorisées par d'autres utilisateurs.

Perso, c'est ma liste de suivi qui est en raccourci dans mon navigateur, donc c'est la première chose que je consulte en arrivant sur Commons ; ça me permet de voir si j'ai mal rangé mes fichiers (sur ou sous-gatégorisés), de découvrir de nouvelles catégories dont j'ignorais le nom en anglais, et aussi de remercier les utilisateurs qui ont pris du temps (c'est très chronophage, une LdS de 200.000 fichiers) pour corriger mes erreurs ou méconnaissance du sujet traité.

En te remerciant par avance. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 02:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Llann Wé²
Merci pour tes explications détaillées sur le travail de patrouilleur et les catégories.
Effectivement, j'avais remarqué que les catégories étaient parfois corrigées, mais je n'avais pas conscience que la catégorie que j'indiquais était obsolète. Je suis resté calqué sur le modèle Wikidata où on déclare bien l'élément Q1969455 "plaque de rue". Je veillerai dans mes prochaines contributions à mieux utiliser les catégories "Street sign of ville/département". Kalepom (talk) 09:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pas de quoi :)
C'est peut-être parce que tu manques de curiosité, lol.
Le classement et l'indexation Wikidata sont légèrement différents de ceux de Commons, mais je ne me sers pas de Wikidata et ne m'y connais pas trop ; je découvre petit à petit, sans être attiré. Wiki et Commons me prennent déjà beaucoup de temps lorsque je m'y attèle, alors je fais une cure de désinto de temps en temps.
Ne mets-tu la catégorie qu'avec UploadWizzard ? Si oui, il vaut mieux mettre directement la catégorie la plus affinée et ne pas hésiter à mettre la catégorie définitive en plus, même si elle n'existe pas (elle apparaîtra en rouge, comme tu peux le constater sur certaines de tes plaques), comme ça, les prochains versements allant dans cette catégorie non créée y seront automatiquement lors de la création de ladite catégorie ; en principe, on créé une cat dès qu'il y a au moins 2 fichiers ou quand on sait qu'il y aura d'autres versements. P.e., "Events in Loire-Atlantique in February 2024" qui ne sera pas vide longtemps car on sait qu'il y aura des événements en 2024 en L.-A.
Tout Commonist devient patrouilleur. Dès que l'on met une catégorie en LdS et que l'on fait du ménage dans les fichiers, ça devient de la maintenance de catégorie. Il faut aimer ça, bien sûr, et ce n'est pas obligatoire ; je le fais de bon gré, malgré que je puisse râler, parfois, contre certains qui savent et ne font pas... Donc, dès qu'une photo tombe dans l'une d'elles, je vérifie qu'il n'y a pas d'autres catégories à ajouter (que je créé au besoin).
Je suis Wiki-parrain , alors, si tu as besoin, tu demandes et je réponds (si je sais) dès que mon boulot m'en laisse le temps.
Bonne continuation. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 17:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:L’Homme de bois.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Günther Frager (talk) 13:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Léda.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Sculpture by Claude Ribot (1934-2010) installed in France where there is no freedom of panorama.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Günther Frager (talk) 13:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Léda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Günther Frager (talk) 13:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Q126950969.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Günther Frager (talk) 13:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jean-Baptiste Daviais (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Günther Frager (talk) 13:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photos sur site externes...

[edit]

Bonjour.

Oui, c'est encore moi.

Merci ! Tu est certainement la personne qui verse le plus de photos de Nantes et c'est très bien. Tu l'as sans doute remarqué, je me suis lancé dans de gros rangements grâce à toutes ces photos (j'ai créé plus de 1.000 catégories). C'est cool : je me balade dans Nantes et je fais 3 constats :

  1. là où rien n'a changé, je reconnais tout ;
  2. là où ça a changé, parfois, je ne reconnais rien ;
  3. là où je ne suis jamais allé, je découvre (merci aux images sat) !

J'ai remarqué que tu verses les mêmes photos sur PSS (et peut-être ailleurs) qu'ici (au moins celle ci-dessous), alors, pour info, je me permets de te conseiller d'utiliser le modèle {{Published}} sur la page de discussion de chaque image concernée, ainsi que de préciser la provenance de l'image (url de l'image + nom auteur) sur le site PSS (par contre, je ne sais comment faire). Il n'y a bien sûr aucune obligation, tu fais à ta guise, mais ça permet de savoir si les termes de réutilisation sont respectés et peut éviter les quiproquos ; par exemple, une de mes photos est utilisée par un site gouvernemental mais la source et l'auteur ne sont pas mentionnés, donc "legal = no".

published

cite = web

legal = yes (puisque c'est toi qui as versé)

title = (titre de l'image sur le site) Caserne Mellinet - Maison de La Générale

publisher = (nom du site) PSS Archi

location = (pays du site) France

url = https://www.pss-archi.eu/photos/photo-83329.html

note = (ou formulé comme tu veux) Image publiée par son auteur (User:Kalepom) sur le site ci-dessus

accessdate = (date de versement ou de découverte) 2024-11-25

qui donne :

This file has been published. This file has been used in:

Terms of license complied with.Caserne Mellinet - Maison de La Générale. PSS Archi. Retrieved on 2024-11-25.
Image publiée par son auteur (User:Kalepom) sur le site ci-mentionné.

Je ne le mets pas sur la PdD de la photo, n'étant pas sûr que ce soit toi qui l'y ait versée...

Et, si je t'embête, n'hésite pas à me le faire savoir (gentiment, quand même, hein..., lol).

Merci encore, et bonnes promenades. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 01:28, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]